From: owner-aml-list-digest@lists.xmission.com (aml-list-digest) To: aml-list-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: aml-list-digest V2 #244 Reply-To: aml-list Sender: owner-aml-list-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-aml-list-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk aml-list-digest Monday, January 19 2004 Volume 02 : Number 244 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:10:25 -0800 From: "Kathy Tyner" Subject: Re: [AML] (DesNews) Profile on _Home Teachers_ How 'bout shooting for a funny, well-written story that just happens to be clean? Oh, and maybe tells some truth about how the program could work in showing caring and compassion? Nah, just a thought. Seems to me they have it bass-ackwards. Kathy Tyner Orange County, CA - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:24:28 -0700 From: Melissa Proffitt Subject: [AML] Call for AML Award Nominations During the Saturday session of the AML Annual Meeting, on Saturday, March 6th, we will be presenting the 2003 AML Awards. These are awarded to outstanding literature published during the calendar year 2003 in a = variety of categories. We are again calling for nominations for possible award winners. Qualifications for eligibility are: 1. The nominated work must be by or about Mormons. If the author is not= a member of the LDS Church, the nominated work should have significant = Mormon content. 2. The nominated work should have been published between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2003. It must be readily available for review by the = award committee. The nominated work should, if possible, be nominated within one of the following award categories: Novel Short Fiction Poetry Personal Essay Young Adult Fiction Criticism Film and Theater Biography (should have intrinsic worth as literature as well as historic value) Children's Literature If the award committee believes there are not enough qualified works = within a category, it will not make an award for that category. Conversely, = there may be one or two award categories not listed that will receive awards. = If you know of an outstanding literary work that does not fit any category, = you may nominate it with an explanation of why it should be recognized by the AML. When you are nominating short fiction, poetry, essays or criticism, = please include the publication in which they can be found. The AML does not make awards in the following categories, either because they are outside our purview or are being recognized by other = organizations: History Folklore Non-literary scholarly texts by LDS writers (mathematics, social = sciences, etc.) Cultural studies Anyone who would like to see a list of past award winners can go to: http://www.aml-online.org/awards/index.html which is organized by category, recipient, title and year. Please post your nominations directly to the AML-list or privately to me = at Melissa@Proffitt.com. The deadline for nominations is January 31, 2004. Thank you, Melissa Proffitt - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:29:00 -0700 From: Steve Perry Subject: [AML] Boyd K. Packer Artwork Display Begin forwarded message: > LATTER-DAY SAINT ART EXHIBITED > See http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Jan/01092004/friday/127360.asp > href="http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Jan/01092004/friday/ > 127360.asp">Link > > The Museum of Church History and Art in Salt Lake City is currently > featuring the exhibit "Boyd K. Packer: The Lifework of an Amateur > Artist," > which displays many works from his lifetime of artistic interest and > ability. Also on display is "Landscape and Life: The Rural Setting of > the > Latter-day Saints," with art by LeConte Stewart and J. George Midgley. > Selected portions of the exhibit can be viewed online at > www.lds.org/churchhistory. - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:09:04 -0500 From: "Richard Johnson" Subject: RE: [AML] Personal Websites: Advice? I must be living in a strange world, but my site, www.PuppenRich.com is hosted by dixiesyss for about fifty bucks a year and I am racking my brain for the guys who registered my domain but it was dirt cheap too, by standards of what you guys are talking about. I also use the site for email (referring to my doll and puppet business) as do my wife, some kids etc. My only problem is that my son, who was helping me set up the web page keeps getting mobilized and sent over seas(Army reserve) and I am too inept to successfully run the page myself. I keep FTP ing material that doesn't make it into my Page (the son is supposed to get home from the gulf in April, and maybe then. . . Richard B. Johnson, Husband, Father, Grandfather, Actor, Director, Puppeteer, Playwright, Writer, Thingmaker, Mormon, Person, Fool. I sometimes think that the last persona is the most important- and most valuable. Http://www.PuppenRich.com - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:57:56 -0700 From: Christopher Bigelow Subject: [AML] re: _Pride & Prejudice_ (Movie) Okay, I went to see this movie, largely based on comments I've read hereon. My favorite thing about it was the soundtrack. If I remember correctly, someone on this list said _P&P_ is the best Mormon romantic comedy so far. I didn't see _Charly_ or _Out of Step_ (not sure if either of those is even classed as a romantic comedy), but I've seen both Halestorm joints, and I would agree _P&P_ is better than them. However, not by as much as I'd hoped after reading your comments. Personally, I found _Best Two Years_ (coming to theaters in Feb?) more satisfying than _P&P_, though not by a huge margin. I can make that statement despite Kirby Heyborne's hamminess having almost ruined _Best_ for me (the film definitely needed his character, but I didn't buy his acting). I'm very grateful that Kirby Heyborne wasn't in _P&P_. If I remember correctly, someone also said that _P&P_ achieved the same level of competency as an adequate Hollywood film. No way, Jose! Perhaps my perspective is clouded by the fact that, just last night, I rewatched the sublime _High Fidelity_. I'm sorry, but even compared to lesser movies than _High Fidelity_, _P&P_ was way too hammy and silly and forced and implausible. It did have more successful moments than either Halestorm film--the soundtrack really helped it vault over some bars--and the acting was overall better than Halestorm acting, but so many of the supporting characters were botched, and so much of the plot felt forced. I didn't mind the lead actresses who played Elizabeth and Jane, though I agree with whoever said the main couple was not believable. However, the other female actresses were pretty much all a real mess (well, the Mary one was OK too). The men were better, I thought, but nowhere near the level of John Cusack and Jack Black. Actually, that's comparing apples to oranges, because _High Fidelity_ was a male POV film, and _P&P_ was a female POV. The supporting women in _HF_ were definitely way more satisfying than the supporting men in _P&P_. (I have to admit, though, that I really enjoyed the returned missionary doofus, even though he was way too exaggerated.) The goofiness and eccentricity in _High Fidelity_ worked because the film managed to not try TOO hard and to stay within the realm of plausibility, whereas those elements in _P&P_ pretty much went over the top. Why do so many Mormon films have to try too hard? I felt I was watching a somewhat-improved Halestorm flick, not a Hollywood-level flick. _P&P_'s wedding chapel scene was even almost as stupid and annoying as _R.M._'s courtroom scene. _P&P_ was sold out in Orem when I saw it on Friday, Jan. 9th, and to my surprise the theater was probably half full or more of middle-aged and retired people, from whom most of the loud laughs ensued. Not sure why that was. Maybe the tie-in to Jane Austen appeals to the older crowd, for whom the Halestorm flicks lack any redeeming cultural anchor? The film is apparently getting great word-of-mouth among the graying populace. By the way, the trailer for _Home Teacher_ struck me as almost as foreboding as the one for _Cat in the Hat_. It looks like the film will be a real mess, probably the worst Halestorm film yet. I hope we're pleasantly surprised. Chris Bigelow - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:14:32 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Hansen Subject: [AML] Mormon Folklore Is there a site on the net that has reports on LDS folklore, a la snopes.com? Is anyone aware of such a site? MRKH ===== Mark Hansen +++++ Inspirational Rock Music http://markhansenmusic.com Listen to me and others at http://kzion.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:16:13 EST From: Vholladay5254@aol.com Subject: [AML] PS on Cedar Fort Me again. I finally came to your email and realize that you've already published your nonfiction book. That's what I get for starting with the most recent emails. Historical fiction in the LDS market is an interesting case. A few authors have made it work bigtime, but for several years, historical fiction has just not been as popular as contemporary. I think part of it is just that as a people, we've had so much history it feels like "been there done that." Yes, people like it and read it but the numbers aren't as significant and publishers look at that. If they have a choice between putting time and energy into producing a book that will sell 1200 copies and one that will sell 4500 in six months, they take the one that will sell more. CFI doesn't make this offer on all manuscripts it receives - just the "second tier," the ones that other publishers think are good but won't be big money makers. Most publishers (in my, granted, limited experience) want blockbusters. They'd like everything to sell like Gerald Lund or Chis Heimerdinger or Anita Stansfield. Anything less, and they really don't want to commit their resources to it, because then they're tied up when the next blockbuster does appear. Okay, that's all. Just that CFI is getting stronger and I expect they'll be a serious contender in the LDS publishing world. Cheers, Valerie - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:32:41 -0700 From: "D. Michael Martindale" Subject: Re: [AML] BLACK, _Pride and Prejudice_ (Movie Review) I don't get this whole death wish scene thing for _Pride and Prejudice_. To me that whole melodramatic reaction to rejection is par for the course for moody BYU coeds and doesn't constitute going off the deep end of anything. - -- D. Michael Martindale dmichael@wwno.com ================================== Check out Worldsmiths, the new online LDS writers group, at http://www.wwno.com/worldsmiths Sponsored by Worlds Without Number http://www.wwno.com ================================== - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:35:32 -0700 From: "Eric Samuelsen" Subject: RE: [AML] BLACK, _Pride and Prejudice_ (Movie Review) Kim Madsen wrote: >So, I disagree with Eric, I didn't find it a death-wish scene. And I've >just decided it feels scary to disagree with Eric because he's smart and >well-versed in film techniques, a college professor for crying out loud, >and I am just a lowly audience member. So here Kim writes this terrific post, reading a scene differently from how I read it, but basing her reading on life experience I pretty much obviously have never had. I mean, I'm not, and never have been, a young woman. So, it's an interesting point Kim raised, and I was really taken with her argument. I still don't necessarily agree, but I see where she's coming from. And then she throws this above bit in at the end. No, see, that's not how it works. I'm just a guy. To put it another way, I'm a guy. I do not have, and never will have, a woman's perspective on any work of art. =20 The fact that I'm a college professor means, in this context, exactly nothing. I love the exchange of views we have on this list. But please, I have no authority here. We're both just audience members, readers and watchers and viewers. In the case of this particular film, though, what I find interesting is the fact that there was this scene that, for me, not only didn't work, but which seriously detracted from my (purely subjective) enjoyment of the picture. So a film I wanted to REALLY like, I sort of kind of liked. Kim obviously had a very different experience with the film. But were both our experiences completely valid? Of course they were.=20 There's another factor as well. I tried to talk Andrew out of what I saw as a death wish scene. He didn't agree with me, and I still think he was wrong. Does that fact have anything to do with the fact that I don't like that scene? Sure. =20 Kim, please, keep posting. And the next time I do something, a play or a movie or something, and something about it bugs you, say so. I promise I will listen. Will I be persuaded that I'm wrong? Quite possibly. =20 Eric Samuelsen - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:45:52 -0700 From: "Eric Samuelsen" Subject: RE: [AML] David FARLAND, _Lair of Bones_ (Review) Ivan Wolfe wrote: > I'll list five other fantasy writers that need to be >checked out: >1. Robin Hobb - her series about FiyzChivalry, the Liveships and the White >Prophet are my third favorite fantasy books ever. >2. Orson Scott Card finally released the Crystal City, the latest Alvin >Maker >book, and it was as good as any of the others. =20 >3. Robert Jordan needs to wrap up the series soon, but his wheel of time >series >is still the most richly detailed and inticately designed fantasy series on >the market. =20 >4. Stephen King's Gunslinger series is his best work period, and one of >the ten >best fantasy series ever IMHO. Great fantasy. Amazing, wonderful, etc.=20 >5. Alan Moore's "League of Extraordinary Gentlmen" (yes the movie was >awful, >but it has no resemblance whatsoever to the masterpiece his graphic novel >of the >same name was) and Neil Gaiman's Sandman series are comic books that are >better >than 95% of the prose fantasy out there. >FWIW. See, and here we go. I've read Robin Hobb. Think she's great. Haven't read Robert Jordan, but my wife and daughter have, and think he's great. And I'll defend Stephen King anywhere, in any context. I saw League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, the movie, and had a feeling that there was a pretty nifty source book I was watching get butchered up there. (Okay, Seabiscuit was sold out that night, and my wife I had a babysitter, and LOEG had tickets available, and the viewing time was right. Plus it had Sean Connery; how bad could it be? Ha. I don't know if that's the worst movie ever made, but it's surely one of the worst really expensive movies ever.) (Then it turned out Seabiscuit wasn't all that good either, I didn't think. And that's a GREAT book, which got turned into an okay, but too obviously 'inspirational' movie.) (Sort of like Radio. Well acted, but thematically, uh, unsubtle.) Eric Samuelsen - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:28:30 -0800 (PST) From: "R.W. Rasband" Subject: [AML] Deseret News: The Double Edge of Sundance (The following was the lead editorial in this morning's Deseret News. It gives good advice, though the ominous tone of warning against wickedness at Sundance is funny to those of us who have been familiar with the festival for a while. Back before Tarantino's "Resevoir Dogs" and Soderbergh's "sex, lies and videotape" changed Sundance's image, the average Sundance movie usually reflected Robert Redford's piously earnest social and political views--that is, granola-ish, preachy leftism, about as "dangerous" as an issue of "The Nation" or a PBS documentary. Those films would win the prizes at the festival and then be promptly forgotten. The evolution of Sundance into hipness is amusingly recounted in Joe Bob Briggs' "Profoundly Disturbing", a highly moral book about dangerous films that I heartily recommend.) Deseret Morning News, Saturday, January 10, 2004 The double edge of Sundance Deseret Morning News editorial For several weeks now, the Sundance Film Festival has been running a promo in local movie theaters. In the spot, a pair of herky-jerky hands arrange and=20 re-arrange letters to form the titles of films that have premiered at the Park City event over the years. The roll call is long and impressive. A lot of A-list films have been shown. In short, the annual Park City festival, the brainchild of Robert Redford, has a life of its own now. It attracts artists, investors, retailers, paparazzi, glitterati and has given Utah =97 once considered a maze of cow trails =97 some cosmopolitan flair. As for Redford, a man who made his bones on his matinee idol looks, Sundance has been a way to sharpen and polish the gift for serious cinema he displayed directing "Ordinary People." Redford has prospered. Cinema has prospered. And Park City has prospered. But as with every ski town, there is also a downslope to deal with. Woody Allen once said if he could live his life over again, he'd do everything the same, except he'd skip "The Last Remake of Beau Geste." Many moviegoers=20 would likely choose to skip many of the films that have premiered at Sundance. In fact, it's been suggested that Charles Dickens wrote the line, "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" about the festival. Directors, actors and writers have used Sundance to give the world wonders. They have also used it to give the world a great deal of landfill. Yes, it takes a kind of "guts" to sit through a bloody, distressing Quentin Tarantino film, take the body blows and not walk out. But it also takes courage to see such for what it is: Stylish, rhythmic violence that uses "art" to mask an unhealthy fixation with atrocities. Because of Sundance, much ugly cinema can never be put back in the can. It's here to stay. Yet, to wax philosophical, so it is with the world in general. Depravity is a part of daily life. And society can no longer be counted on to screen it or=20 provide a buffer. People must pick and choose wisely as they examine their options for entertainment and enlightenment. The Sundance film festival has been known to offer unforgettable moments. It has also provided moments that people can never forget, no matter how much they try. Do some homework. Listen to the buzz. Choose well. As with any product, let the buyer beware. Copyright 2004 Deseret News Publishing Company=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D R.W. Rasband Heber City, UT rrasband@yahoo.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:31:44 -0700 From: Christopher Bigelow Subject: [AML] (DesNews & SL Trib) _Home Teachers_ reviews Home Teachers, The HOME TEACHERS, THE: Michael Birkeland, Jeff Birk, Elizabeth Sands, Jimmy Chunga. Rated PG (violence, vulgarity) By Jeff Vice Deseret Morning News [one and a half stars] That "The Home Teachers" looks and sounds more like an actual film than HaleStorm Entertainment's two other movies is a real accomplishment. Both "The Singles Ward" and "The R.M." were pretty much amateur hour - low- to no-budget films filled with out-of-focus shots and fuzzy sound, as well as little plot (truth be told, they resembled filmed "roadshows" more than anything else). For all its technical achievements, the company's latest - and least-funny - comedy makes you yearn for the quaint incompetence of the other two films. It's as if in trying to tell an actual story the filmmakers have taken a big step backward. And its "homages" to such beloved comedies as "Tommy Boy" and "Planes, Trains and Automobiles" are too obvious, verging on comedic plagiarism. The title characters are Greg Blazer (HaleStorm regular Michael Birkeland) and Nelson Parker (Jeff Birk), two LDS Church members who begin butting heads when they're assigned to be home-teaching companions. That's because they couldn't be more different. Greg would just as soon spend his Sundays in front of the television, watching professional football and eating chicken wings. The gung-ho Nelson - who's new to the ward - wants to start their visits immediately. And to Greg's surprise, his wife (Elizabeth Sands) agrees with Nelson and practically kicks him out the door. (She's basically hoping the experience will do him good.) But with the first visit, things go horribly awry. As Greg sneaks away to take in some gridiron action, he sets in motion several small disasters that destroy the unfortunate family's home. And things only get worse from there. The bits cribbed from other movies only make you wish you were watching those instead. And the tonal shift in the film's final third, from slapstick to more saccharine drama, is much too jarring. The two leads try to make the material better - even if their efforts are in vain. Birk, whose character looks sort of like Jerry Seinfeld in a Pee-Wee Herman Halloween costume, doesn't overdo it as much as you'd expect. And Birkeland does have a likable, everyman quality that certainly helps. "The Home Teachers" is rated PG for scenes of comic violence (hunting, vehicular and slapstick), crude humor and sight gags (relating to bodily functions) and scattered use of mild (and creative) profanity. Running time: 81 minutes. Movie review: The Home Teachers By Sean P. Means The Salt Lake Tribune [two stars] Rated PG for thematic elements and brief mild language; 81 minutes; opening today across Utah. The latest comedy from "The Singles Ward" director Kurt Hale is an uneven buddy movie, showing the wacky misadventures of Mormon home-teaching partners -- one anal-retentive and overzealous (Jeff Birk), the other a football-obsessed slob (Michael Birkeland) -- ministering to reluctant ward families. The gags (involving an overflowing toilet, a disrupted funeral service and a destroyed car) are juvenile and plod on too long. The leads are engaging, particularly Birkeland, who has a goofy, Chris Farley-esque appeal. Hale is showing signs of improvement: backing off the local-celebrity cameos (with the woeful exception of radio personality Jimmy Chunga), taking pains to explain LDS culture to outsiders, and going beyond the green Jell-O jokes to talk about the Mormon faith. - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:16:58 -0800 (PST) From: Veda Hale Subject: Re: [AML] Cedar Fort Offer on My Manuscript Well, maybe run from Cedar Fork... I'm one who has a book done by them. Someone on the staff knew I had the manuscript and "talked me into it". Yes, it cost me. But it also got me off my dime and thrust me into publication. Worth it? There are ways of judging that don't always add up to money. They took care of the details--Copyright, listed on Amazon.com, put out there in a few places, enough to where a few people who knew me saw it and bought and commented. I'm not sorry I did it. Of course, it didn't take money I needed for anyone else in the family. If it had, I'd probably do like most of us do, back down for family needs. I was led to believe that the book had merit, that they didn't just publish anything. Hummmm. Doug Alder, a friend in St. George and a man with a wide influence, also published his first novel with Cedar Fork at the same time as mine was done--December 1902. His is titled "Sons of Bear Lake". He did most everything they suggest to help promote. I think he is satisfied and his book has sold well. I did nothing, at least not yet. I was busy on the Whipple biography and trveling with my husband. He sent letters to his wide list of acquaintances, got himself asked to speak to many different groups, perhaps hinted to certain people to review book, etc. After thinking about the situation, I'm afraid it takes that in today's world. There is just too much out there for something to be discovered on its own. Has anyone run across my book, "Ragged Circle"? I doubt it. We all have too much to read just keeping up with what we've heard mentioned by someone who we think is more knowledgable than we are. So, what am I saying? Well, I like the Cedar Fork "folks". I like what they are trying to accomplish in a difficult publishing world. How could AML help them and those like them? We shouldn't all be like little puppies sniffing around the Deseret Book doors, hoping for a chance to slip in to where we think the only warm hearth is. Veda Hale - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:57:22 -0600 From: LDS Film Festival (by way of Jonathan Langford ) Subject: [AML] This Friday: Filmmaking Marathon LDSBOX NEWSLETTER 01/04 http://www.ldsbox.com feedback@ldsbox.com GET READY FOR THE 24-HOUR FILMMAKING MARATHON The LDS FILM FESTIVAL is launching its 2ND 24-HOUR FILMMAKING MARATHON. Get together with a group of friends and be part of this exhilarating competition. No pre-registration is necessary. Just sign-up at 12.00 p.m. (noon) on FRIDAY, JANUARY 16, at the Provo City Library at Academy Square (550 N. University Avenue). You will receive a theme for a short film that you have to finish in 24 hours. On SATURDAY, JANUARY 17, no later than 12.00 p.m. (noon) you hand in your finished film. All films will be screened and judged at the 3RD LDS FILM FESTIVAL on Thursday, January 22, at 6.00 p.m. You will be allowed to use any equipment and format of your choice but have to turn in your film on a Mini-DV tape. You have only 24 hours to write, shoot and edit your film. Your finished film can be no longer than 4 minutes. No more than five people (cast and crew) per group will be allowed to take part. You need to know your team members when you sign-up. At least one member of the group needs to be present for sign-up and drop-off. No foul language, sexual content or graphic violence will be permitted. All films must be completely original and all permissions must be retained for any copyrighted media. The entry fee is $ 25.00 per participating group. 60% of the entry fee goes to the price money. All participants contribute to the prize money that will be awarded to the winner of the 24-HOUR FILMMAKING MARATHON (for example: if 30 groups participate the price money will be $ 450.00). You will also receive 2 free tickets for one screening of your film. Additionally, the best films will be part of the "BEST OF 2004" program and tour around the world. This is your chance to become an award-winning filmmaker practically overnight... MAKE A MOVIE IN 24 HOURS BECOME AN AWARD-WINNING FILMMAKER IN 24 HOURS START: FRIDAY, JANUARY 16, 12.00 NOON Sign-up at the Provo City Library (550 N. University Ave.) FINISH: SATURDAY, JANUARY 17, 12.00 NOON Drop-off Deadline at the Provo City Library SCREENING: THURSDAY, JANUARY 22, 6.00 P.M. Screening of all elligible films at the Provo City Library LOG ON: http://www.ldsbox.com You either signed up for our newsletter or were recommended to us by a friend. If you would like to unsubscribe from future LDSBOX mailings, simply reply to this message with the word REMOVE in the subject line. - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:55:22 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) From: "Chantaclair" Subject: [AML] re: Who else has a webpage? Still lurking now and again folks. Nice to see you about. RE: Webpages, mine is http://Chantaclair.com Feel free to meander, it is quite extensive, if not updated. . . Marsha - -- AML-List, a mailing list for the discussion of Mormon literature ------------------------------ End of aml-list-digest V2 #244 ******************************