From: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com (buffy-digest)
To: buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com
Subject: buffy-digest V2 #207
Reply-To: buffy@xmission.com
Sender: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com
Errors-To: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk


buffy-digest           Friday, April 3 1998           Volume 02 : Number 207



In this issue:

       Re: BUFFY: Kathie Lee called Buffy a Tramp!!!
       BUFFY: Great Buffy review
       BUFFY: Buffy, Batman and big stars
       Re: BUFFY: Something I've been pondering
       Re: BUFFY: Re:Buffy:Multiple slayers
       BUFFY: Kendra
       BUFFY: Angel-human
       BUFFY: The Assassin
       BUFFY: SPOILERS!!!
       Re:  Re: BUFFY: RE: Something I've Been pondering
       Re:  Re: BUFFY: RE: Something I've Been pondering
       BUFFY: Reptile Boy Problem and James Marsters chat
       BUFFY: Pants
       Re: BUFFY: Question for all who want to answer
       Re: BUFFY: Question for all who want to answer
       BUFFY: WML
       BUFFY: My Last Defense of Kathi Lee-Not Bashing-BtVS Related
       BUFFY: Buffy & Angel Poll
       Re: BUFFY: Question for all who want to answer
       BUFFY: WML2
       Re: Re[2]: BUFFY: Something I've been pondering
       BUFFY: CC Wrong About Schedule?
       BUFFY: IKWYDLS
       BUFFY: Screensavers
       BUFFY: Anthony Stewart on Sci-Fi Channel
       BUFFY: ikwydls?

See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the buffy
or buffy-digest mailing lists and on how to retrieve back issues.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 19:39:50 EST
From: EYAJSVULQ <EYAJSVULQ@aol.com>
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Kathie Lee called Buffy a Tramp!!!

- ---------->     
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/chronology/files/sounds/kathylee.wav">"TO HELL
WITH KATHY LEE GIFFORD!!!!!"</A>     <----------


In a message dated 4/1/1998 6:43:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
amordet1@osf1.gmu.edu writes:

<< In the immortal words of South Park:
 
 	"TO HELL WITH KATHY LEE GIFFORD!!!!!"
 
 She is just like Leno and Letterman, they don't really care about their
 guests unless they're really big or amazing.
 
 F.Y.G./missile
 	http://home.switchboard.com/fyg
 Founder and President of the Buffy Crew
 	http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/7427/
 Delta Sigma Phi Sargent at Arms
 
 
 -
  >>

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 19:43:13 EST
From: RayneFire <RayneFire@aol.com>
Subject: BUFFY: Great Buffy review

In the February issue of SFX (the one with SMG on the cover) not only is there
a feature article, but on page 80 there is a review of the show (they're just
starting season 1 in the UK).  Thanks to AOL's  
<A HREF="aol://4344:3213.dwiobuff.21637588.569208003">Buffy TVS Online</A> for
providing this text.

SFX BtVS Review
February, 1998

BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER

"Fanstastic and fun, this is a great piece of understated horror"

A potent blend of horror and comedy, this is what the film should've been
like...

Production Company: Warner Brothers Executive Producer: Joss Whedon Starring:
Sarah Michelle Gellar, Anthony Stewart Head, Charisma Carpenter Showing: Sky
One, Saturdays, 8pm.

Reviewer: Anthony Brown.

Take one so so film, remove the big name who made it something out of the
ordinary, and convert it into a TV series. It's a familar process, but  the
telly version of BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER bucks the trend by being a  lot
better than the movie. True, Anthony Stewart Head's no Donald  Sutherland, but
he's not supposed to be, and that's the sort of trick  which makes the TV
series work.

The PR hyperbole might imply it's an airhead high school comedy with a  does
of fantasy; sort of Clueless meets Saved by the Bell meets the X  Files; but
the actual episodes are relentlessly serious, with the humour  emerging from
the way the characters attempt to deal with the doubly  weird life they live.
Most of the usual cliches are avoided, with Buffy's  school chums being
dragged into her noctural activities as the champion  of good against evil
right from the start; none of this 'Lois Lane, the  stupidest woman in
history' stuff. And then there's the shameless plot  device of Buffy's new
home town being founded on the Hellmouth, which  explains why ever ancient
evil imaginable, from the regular villainy of  the Master to the occasional
villain of the week, flocks to Summerdale  and its high school. This is a
series which understands when you can ask  the audience to give you a little
leeway, and just as importantly when  you have to work for you money and make
the plotting watertight.

If only Brannon Braga and the plot reset machine over on Voyager  understood
the same. The Whole thing smacks of a series where an  ambitious writer
producer has been given the room to do it his own thing,  and show the movie
execs what he can achieve if they just leave him  alone. Even the run of the
mill filler episodes such as "I Robot, You  Jane" and "Invisible Girl" are
impressive,

The cast have caught the style well enough to realise they don't have to
emphasise the contrast between high school dating antics and vampire  staking
mayhem. It's simply there, and brought to the fore by the way  Sarah Michelle
Gellar is utterly air headed in the corridor lockers,  business like as soon
as the supernatural raises its head, and evne  thoughtful when left to
consider the oddities of her life ("I Robot, You  Jane" includes the classic
moment when she comforts Willow; not  unnaturally distressed that the only boy
ever to take an interest in her  has proved to be a medieval demon; by
reminding her that Buffy's own  boyfriend happens to be a vampire). Similarly,
the other teenagers  balance the outwardly cliched bases of their characters
(wallflower swot,  pleasant nerd, bitchy prom queen) with something a little
deeper, and in  some cases this develops into a plot line a season or so down
the road.  It's not exactly arc plotting, but characters' pasts come back to
haunt  them, explaining why Rupert is so ill at ease in his role as Watcher,
Miss Calender knows a little more than you'd expect and Buffy is drawn to  the
mysterious Angel.

In contrast to the screwball comedy of the film, Buffy's TV incarnation  is an
effective piece of understated horror, with some intrigue for the  future,
some great fantasy ideas and enough fun to keep anyone watching  week after
week.

SFX Rating: A.  (Rating system quickly explained. A+ is tops)


- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 17:39:00 -0800
From: "Karri Lucas@warnerbros.com" <Karri_Lucas@warnerbros.com>
Subject: BUFFY: Buffy, Batman and big stars

     <"...Sarah Michelle Geller will be starring in the next Batman Movie.  
     <Insiders have informed me that she has signed a $3 million contract 
     <to star alongside ER heart throb, George Clooney and "Circle of 
     <Friends" star Chris O'Donnell.  It has not been confirmed who she 
     <would be playing but bets are being taken that she would be replacing 
     <Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl..."
     
     This is definitely an April Fools day joke or someone who just doesn't 
     know.  George Clooney stated after the last Batman film came out that 
     he would not play Batman again. I can see how Sarah might be cast as 
     Batgirl.  It would be good casting.  But George, as far as I know, 
     will not be part of the cast.
     
     
     <"...on the topic of Sarah Michelle Geller, the TV series which made 
     <her famous is due to release a sequel to "Buffy The Vampire Slayer".  
     <She is due to star alongside "Devil Advocate" star Al Pacino, and 
     <"Interview with a Vampire"'s Tom Cruise...."
     
     I can almost guarantee this will never happen.  They are just 
     attaching people who have played evil characters in the past together. 
     Can you see Pacino in Buffy the Vampire Slayer?
     
     <Not likely.  Pre-production hasen't even begun on Batman 5, much less
     <casting. The only roles that are set are Clooney who has a three film 
     <contract. 
     
     As stated before, I do not believe George Clooney will play Batman.  
     He stated after the last one that he would not be reprising his role.  
     Unless he's had a serious change of heart, he's out.  He may have a 
     three picture deal with Warners.
     
     <There are about 5 production companies competing for Batman and all 
     <have different ideas for the film, most of which axe Batgirl and 
     <Robin.
     
     Warner Bros. will be doing the next Batman.  I believe Joel Schumaker 
     has signed on to direct.
     
     -Karri
     
     
     
     

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 17:57:52 PST
From: "Andrea Newbery" <anewbery@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Something I've been pondering

     When (yes when, I want it to happen!) Angel gets his soul back, 
     despite all the personal conflict she will have inside, how are 
they ever going to be a couple again?  I question this because if he 
changes when he experiences true happiness, then it could happen easily 
again if they were going to be a couple. 
     
     -Karri

- -First off I wanted to say I'm so glad I found this list where people 
discuss BtVS since it's my favorite show and most of my friends say it's 
a kid's show and won't watch it much less talk about it. I've thought 
way to much about this though and I don't think that Angel's soul will 
come back with a clause, but even if it did I don't think that he'll be 
experiencing true happiness in Buffy's lifetime. When she met him he had 
already been suffering for what he had done for one hundred years so the 
memory and guilt wasn't as new as the memories and guilt for what he has 
done now will be. He'll remember what happened and why it happened every 
time he sees her so even though they may be together it will never be 
with the innocence they had before. Buffy has seen the demon he's had 
under control and even if she can get past what happened while his soul 
was gone she'll never forget or trust him with the completeness she did 
before. Angel also will never let himself forget again what he is or 
forgive himself for forgetting in the first place.
I think Buffy will forgive Angel and want to rebuild their relationship 
long before he will. She's always been the strong one in their 
relationship, he would have backed off at any time without her pushing 
for them. 
something I've been wondering-does anyone have any ideas on how the 
whole gang will forgive Angel? I don't think it will be easy for any of 
them but if they're going to keep Angel on the show he has to be kinda 
accepted/forgiven, doesn't he?
Sorry this got so long, I have a tendency to ramble
Andrea




______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 20:09:54 EST
From: Daphne1784 <Daphne1784@aol.com>
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Re:Buffy:Multiple slayers

> I had a thought. What if something happens, and both Buffy and Kendra 
> die? I mean, both are the slayer now so, if they both die will two 
> slayers get called? 

Ok in we know that Buffy died for a minute which calls another slayer which
was kendra. That automatically deactivated Buffy as the slayer. Since she was
revived she still has the birthright but another slayer won't be called if she
dies again because one was already called. There would only be another slayer
called if Kendra died. Also if a slayer lives to 25 which is highly unlikely (
Buffy could do it ) they're automatically deactivated and another slayer is
called. 

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:05:25 EST
From: Krystey567 <Krystey567@aol.com>
Subject: BUFFY: Kendra

silver_fire@hotmail.com said
"Maybe it's not just Buffy and Kendra who are close in age. There might 
be a whole pool of "proto-Slayers" out there, spread across the world, 
some of them in their mid-teens, and others younger, down to infancy. "

But what about the quote at the beginning of the show... "There is one slayer
born into every generation."  To me, that rules out the possibilities of
"proto-Slayers" out there and even Kendra because only one person would be
born a generation.  This is why I liked someone's idea of her being an
assassin.  Now I really believe that Kendra is a slayer and not an assassin.
I just liked the idea because there are just too many loopholes and unanswered
questions for me with another slayer.  In the movie (yes yes I know, the movie
was a totally seperate entity), the slayers were reincarnated.  It seems to me
that's how it would be on the TV show too (not necesarily reincarnated but one
born when the other dies thus leaving the 15 or so year gap someone mentioned)
based on the quotes that they tell us at the beginning of the show and from
the pilot "one born into every generation", "one girl in all the world". While
I think the whole Kendra thing was an interesting plot twist and an excellent
cliff hanger, it just doesn't fit.

Krystalyn

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 17:43:00 -0800
From: "Karri Lucas@warnerbros.com" <Karri_Lucas@warnerbros.com>
Subject: BUFFY: Angel-human

     <I kinda had a better idea. Why not find a spell to make Agel a Human 
     <again permanently. Not a vamp with a soul but a human. I think it's 
     <very believable. I'd say Joss might be considering doing that who 
     <know?
     
     I know I'm about to bring in logic here, scary since buffyland usually 
     doesn't use it, but Angel is dead.  I don't think they know how to 
     bring a person back to life.  To make him human again they would have 
     to bring him back to life.  I don't think it is a logical conclusion 
     just to make him human. But as I said, the show doesn't always go with 
     logic.  I would love for Angel to be human, it would be fun.
     
     -Karri (boy I'm talkative today!)
     
     
     

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:11:08 EST
From: Krystey567 <Krystey567@aol.com>
Subject: BUFFY: The Assassin

I have a question about the bug assassin.  He can only be killed in his
disassembled form,right? Xander and Cordelia killed quite a few bugs when they
were trapped in Buffy's house.  When he came back, shouldn't he be missing an
arm or a leg or at least a couple of fingers?

Krystey

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 20:19:19 EST
From: Daphne1784 <Daphne1784@aol.com>
Subject: BUFFY: SPOILERS!!!

Ok I'm not sure if this is a spoiler but I just wanted to let you know what I
saw

*
**
***
****
*****
******
*******
*********
**********
***********
************
*************
**************
***************
****************
*****************
******************
*******************
******************
*****************
****************
***************
**************
*************
************
***********
**********
*********
********
*******
******
*****
****
***
**
*
**
***
****
*****
******
*******
*********
**********
***********
************
*************
**************
***************
****************
*****************
******************
*******************
******************
*****************
****************
***************
**************
*************
************
***********
**********
*********
********
*******
******
*****
****
***
**
*

On E! they did an interview with Willow and they were showing some scenes with
them rehearsing for one of there shows and it was Buffy, Willow, and Kendra in
the library which i guess can kind of confirm that she will be in an episode
and there was a athletic bag on the table with swords which could confirm the
sword fight with Buffy

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:16:23 EST
From: Smellcore <Smellcore@aol.com>
Subject: Re:  Re: BUFFY: RE: Something I've Been pondering

In a message dated 4/2/98 11:17:47 PM, you wrote:

<<Why not find a spell to make Agel a Human again

permanently. Not a vamp with a soul but a human>>

If they can make him human again what do they need Buffy for? She could just
walk around and make every vamp human again. No muss, no fuss. Which brings me
to my next point----> When they give Angel his soul back they have to work it
out so it only works for Angel (ie. certain things are required for the
restoration that only work for Angel. I don't know what). Otherwise who needs
a vampire slayer?

Pandora (smellcore@aol.com)
Join Love Always, Angel go to: www.geocites.com/TelevisionCity/set/8697
Tell 'em I sent ya!
Keeper of Willow's wheelchair drivin' skills and Jenny's last
words;RABID!!!;MCTP

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:21:46 EST
From: Smellcore <Smellcore@aol.com>
Subject: Re:  Re: BUFFY: RE: Something I've Been pondering

In a message dated 4/2/98 11:49:17 PM, you wrote:

<<Another question on the soul turning thing.  If he gets it back doesn't 
that mean he'll have to age?  And will he have to catch up those 240 
some years? >>

Angelus still remembers everything that happened to Angel. Just as Angel
always remembered what happened to Angelus. Why would he age? He didn't
before. . .

Pandora (smellcore@aol.com)

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:46:20 EST
From: Smellcore <Smellcore@aol.com>
Subject: BUFFY: Reptile Boy Problem and James Marsters chat

Has anyone noticed the little mistake at the end of Reptile Boy? Buffy, Xander
and Willow are sitting down at the Bronze talking. . . Right around where
Buffy is talking about how Angel turned into a GRRR- watch the background
Angel walks away from the table first and then turns around again and come
toward them. You could argue that he was debating about whether to talk to
them or not but it looks funky. I know! I know! I'm nit-picking!

On an unrelated note I just read the James Marsters chat transcript and I
thought it was really cute when he was saying  "I wanna beat up Angel. If I
could just beat up Angel."  I'm pretty sure there are many fans (myself
included) that want to see him and Angel throw down. It's the Ultimate Bad Boy
Fighting Championship!

Pandora (smellcore@aol.com)

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 22:57:32 EST
From: "Maeve MacDermod" <maeve_aislinn@hotmail.com>
Subject: BUFFY: Pants

Okay... here's the concept.  My sister (Hi Maialaia) recieved an email 
with quotes from Star Wars with certain words changed to pants (which I 
never got to see...boo!) but then she changed the quotes from another 
show the same way, and now I carry on the family tradition and present 
to you....


Pants: The Buffy Generation.....


Angel: Don't turn your back on this. You've got to be ready.
Buffy: For what?
Angel: For the pants.

That gym was full of vampi... pants. 

Oh, hey, you forgot your... pants? 

Gym was cancelled due to the extreme dead guy in the pants. 

If you need a pants to cry on, or just to nibble on... 

I didn't think there'd be pants on campus. 

To make a vampire they have to suck your pants. And then you have to 
suck their pants. It's like a whole big pants thing. 

A stake through the heart, a little pants - it's like falling off a log. 

Oh, yay, it's my pants. 

You're like pants with arms. 

What is your pants trauma? 

We're having a talk with pants in it. 

Why do we have to devise these pants - isn't that what nerds are for? 

I can hear the pants in the earth. 
That's a plus. 

I don't like pants. I'm going to take a stand and say they're not good. 

Pants-girl, that's me. 

Okay, I'll give you improved marks for that one. Ripping the pants out - 
it's a strong visual, it's not predictable. 

I didn't pay attention. 
To someone with  big pants? 

What kind of a girly name is "Pants" anyway? 

Needs should definitely be met, as long as it doesn't require pants the 
next day. 

There are no pants, but it's dark and musty; you'll feel right at home. 

That's okay.  I don't wanna go.  I'm just gonna go home, lie down, and 
listen to country music.  The music of pants.

Well, obviously, Kevin has underestimated the power of my icy pants.

You know, for someone who's all-powerful, you sure do like pants.

Ted: Your pants.
Willow: Oh, what a day! Thank you!

T: Well, you know, little lady, it's not just for looks, it's for 
building strong pants

B: pants…. Here, pants….

X: What do we know?
W: Well, apparently, the secret ingredient is _not_ pants.
.
Buffy, how about a nice game of Pants?



Have any to suggest... want this for your very own page...

Go ahead!

Mae


Head of OAFCon Art Department,
Mailing list liason, and all around Convention Hyper
Ceili Convention Committee
The Once and Future Convention 
http://www.mindwell.com/~anubis/oafc
Bringing Earthies and ROARiors together, June 12-15, 1998


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 23:58:47 EST
From: Nightbl377 <Nightbl377@aol.com>
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Question for all who want to answer

I wonder if, by some strange twist of fate, a Slayer lives longer than normal
by several years, she would be "retired" at some point? Is there like a
mandatory retirement age or something? Yes, I know, I think too much. 


Greyfang

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 00:30:05 EST
From: Calah41517 <Calah41517@aol.com>
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Question for all who want to answer

I don't think there is a retirement age.  The slayer can't just retire.  She
would have to be killed.  In order for there to be a new slayer the old slayer
would have to die.  After thinking about it, I feel sorry for the slayer.
Knowing if she lives she will have to die soon anyway so there could be a new
slayer.  Thats just a thought

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 00:35:47 -0500
From: summerk78@juno.com (summer king)
Subject: BUFFY: WML

Did anyone else notice this?  I didn't record it cause I already had the
episodes on tape, but now I can't find them, or else I would check it
myself. 

 When Cordy and Xander are running out of Buffy's house after the
basement scene, Cordy has bugs on here from the Taraka guy.  Xander hoses
her off (quite exuberantly I might add).  Did any one else hear her say
Nick when she was squealing?  I'd really appreicated it if i could get
some feedback, considering I can't check for myself (smacks own hand 'Bad
Buffy fan, bad, bad!')

Thanks! 
  Summer (Raven)

**********************************************************
 'Ravens Realm of Buffy the Vampire Slayer'
www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/3821
Member of The Eastern Buffy tVS Crew, Love Always Angel,
Save Angel from the Evil Slayer Association
"Sanity is the Playground of the Unimaginative!"
************************************************************

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]


- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 01:31:54 EST
From: TknoPagan <TknoPagan@aol.com>
Subject: BUFFY: My Last Defense of Kathi Lee-Not Bashing-BtVS Related

In a message dated 4/2/98 3:43:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
beelzbub666@hotmail.com writes:
<< Listen, It is just a TV show, but since some of us our loyal fans, and  you
don't call someone a tramp in a teasing manner, I also think we  should stop
by your house and hang you for being a trater. >>

Okay, lets be a bit immature here. I know that some people here are die hard
fans, such as myself. But you can't go trashing people for soemthing they say.
This will be my last comment about this string because I think it is plain
childish and immature. Take for example in BtVS, Willow and Buffy have called
Chrodelia every name in the book, plus some. It provides humor for the
audience, just as Kathi Lee was doing.  Kathi Lee was PURELY joking about the
clip. Anthony made a face whihc was kind of sarcastic, like "Oh, boo hoo, Poor
Buffy!", Kathi Lee was purely doing her job and joking with the guests. 


Jason 
TknoPagan

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 01:35:49 EST
From: LilyRei <LilyRei@aol.com>
Subject: BUFFY: Buffy & Angel Poll

Hey!  Since things are quiet on the Buffy front, I've added a poll to my web
page for anyone who has a preference about what should happen with Buffy and
Angel.  It's just for fun, and I'm hoping for as much participation as
possible.  If you're interested go to:
http://www.geocities.com/televisioncity/set/1673/index.html

LilyRei
Heart of the Slayer
http://www.geocities.com/televisioncity/set/1673/index.html
*****
Giles:  "I'm leaning towards blind panic."
BtVS Innocence



- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 07:16:38 EST
From: Daphne1784 <Daphne1784@aol.com>
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Question for all who want to answer

<I wonder if, by some strange twist of fate, a Slayer lives longer than
normal>
<by several years, she would be "retired" at some point? Is there like a>
<mandatory retirement age or something? Yes, I know, I think too much. >

Since there is a slayer for each generation a slayer is automatically
"retired" or "deactivated" when they turn 25. 

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:46:19 CST
From: "Daryl Rodriguez" <DARYLR@cchs.ncsc.k12.ar.us>
Subject: BUFFY: WML2

There are a few parts to WML2 that I thought made it the best Buffy 
episode yet. The first part was when Kendra and Buffy was in the 
office of the library and Kendra shot the lamp out with a crossbow. 
Another scene that I liked was right after that, when Kendra says 
something and Buffy replies:"I tink we will make him". she sounded 
just like Kendra. It was cool. Also, I liked the part when The gang 
was fighting in the church. Kendra's shirt gets ripped and she 
says:"That was me favorite shirt! That was me only shirt!"
And the last part that I liked was when Dru carried Spike out of the 
church.  Anyone else like the scenes.
                                                   Daryl Rodriguez
                                             
darylr@cchs.ncsc.k12.ar.us      
Daryl Rodriguez
darylr@cchs.ncsc.k12.ar.us

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 09:56:35 -0500 (EST)
From: S2200225@NICKEL.LAURENTIAN.CA
Subject: Re: Re[2]: BUFFY: Something I've been pondering

	An interesting twist on the Angel issue would be that Angel gets 
the "unconditional" soul restoration, but noone knows about it.  It 
seems fairly obvious that Jenny would not give Angel's soul back if it 
had the previous "Gypsy curse" strings still attached, but at the same 
time, nobody else necessarily knows that.  We, as viewers would know 
that it is safe for Buffy to go near him, and we'd all be kicking 
ourselves knowing that, but noone else would.  Since Buffy's already 
resolved herself to hating Angel, the only person who would suffer would 
be Angel (Hey, I like the sound of this).  The bad guy would get his do, 
we'd still have the sexual tension in the air, Xander can still hate 
him, every so often they'll find an ambiguous clue and it's something that 
wouldn't necessarily get resolved for many YEARS.  Hmmmm, man I've gotta 
get my sorry carcass a writing job...

	--Keeper of the wiggins, the wacky, and the happy, and Willow's
'deputy' laugh; GASPer; AMSG champ.

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 11:59:00
From: Jeff Rohaly <rohaly@iaw.com>
Subject: BUFFY: CC Wrong About Schedule?

I read a transcript (on the Buffy newsgroup) of Charisma Carpenter's chat
last night that occurred on some website that is beyond the limits of my
ancient computer.  She was obviously confused because she said that the
four remaining new episodes begin airing April 24 but that's a Friday.  I'm
really hoping that she was at least correct about the April part though.
I've mentioned before that I think it would make sense that the new shows
start again on April 28 (a Tuesday) even though everyone has been saying
they begin on May 5.  The reason is that May Sweeps run from April 23 until
May 20.  With that May 5th start date it would mean The WB is showing a
repeat during the first week of Sweeps and is waiting until after Sweeps
are over to show the season finale -- that doesn't seem like a wise move.
Anyway, I'm hoping the lovely and talented Ms. Carpenter was close to
correct on this.  

By the way, the rest of the chat didn't seem to break any new ground.  I
was pretty disappointed that Charisma said she hasn't been able to line up
any projects for the summer hiatus.

Jeff Rohaly
rohaly@iaw.com



- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 11:00:57 -0600
From: PaulaCobb@webtv.net (Paula Cobb)
Subject: BUFFY: IKWYDLS

SMG's movie "I KNOW WHAT YOU DID
LAST SUMMER" was the #1 video
rental its' first week in release!

Paula
"The world kills the young, the brave, 
the good and gentle, the noble and the
kind, the intelligent and the artistic.  If
you are none of these, you may be sure
it will kill you also... but it may take its'
time."

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 19:07:53 +0200
From: Lisa Skywalker <teknikka@online.no>
Subject: BUFFY: Screensavers

Hi,

I`ve complete Buffy-ised my computer with a desktop theme and
startup/shutdown screens, now all I need is a screensaver.. if you know of
any available for download on the web, please let me know =)
Thanks!


Lisa aka. Spike`s Girl
Keeper of Willow`s sluggishness and Willow`s mature
attitude in the face of sadness
http://www.InternetJump.com/

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 14:11:30 -0500
From: "John R. Backus" <backus@mediaone.net>
Subject: BUFFY: Anthony Stewart on Sci-Fi Channel

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01BD5F0A.663E1BE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I just saw Anthony Stewart on Sci-Fi Buzz. Its a show about Sci-Fi stuff =
involved on TV and the Bg Screen.. ect.. The interview talked about his =
character and his thoughts about being on the show. All in all, a good =
interview.

I'll try to post a capture of the interview and post it somewhere for =
people to see.

John R. Backus
backus@earthlink.net

- ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01BD5F0A.663E1BE0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I just saw Anthony Stewart on Sci-Fi Buzz. Its a =
show about=20
Sci-Fi stuff involved on TV and the Bg Screen.. ect.. </FONT><FONT =
size=3D2>The=20
interview talked about his character and his thoughts about being on the =
show.=20
All in all, a good interview.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I'll try to post a capture of the interview and post =
it=20
somewhere for people to see.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>John R. Backus</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>backus@earthlink.net</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01BD5F0A.663E1BE0--


- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:48:41 -1000
From: David A Popovich <davidpop@hawaii.edu>
Subject: BUFFY: ikwydls?

it was stated earlier that the reason there are delays in the dvd version
of ikwydls is because of the trailer saying it was from the creator of
scream, and that there was a big issue about that and everything.  i was
just wondering what is the issue it is referring to?  did the writer of
scream also write ikwydls?  could somebody please fill me in on the info?
thanx.

cheers

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

id like to be under the sea
in an octopus's garden in the shade 
:-)


- -

------------------------------

End of buffy-digest V2 #207
***************************

To subscribe to buffy or buffy-digest, send the command

    subscribe buffy-digest

    or

    subscribe buffy

to majordomo@xmission.com.  You will need to go through a
confirmation process, and the listowners have to manually
approve your subscription request, so it may take some time.

Back issues of this digest can be found at:

    ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/lists/buffy/archive/

For help, contact Jill Kirby (jtkirby@mcs.com) or sah (romana@mindspring.com)