From: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com (buffy-digest) To: buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: buffy-digest V2 #330 Reply-To: buffy@lists.xmission.com Sender: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-buffy-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk buffy-digest Monday, June 8 1998 Volume 02 : Number 330 In this issue: BUFFY: Buffy: misc. stuff BUFFY: Buffy episodes Re: BUFFY: Buffy fan mail Re: BUFFY: Buffy Movie Re: BUFFY: one more thing about letters Re: BUFFY: salaries Re: BUFFY: city? Re: BUFFY: SNL next week?? BUFFY: Buffy Wardrobe and Costume Designer BUFFY: Salon entertainment column BUFFY: Merchandise update BUFFY: Review--Welcome to the Hellmouth/The Harvest **SPOILERS!!** BUFFY: Problem elimination Re: BUFFY: Ramifications of Willow's Spellcasting. BUFFY: Buffy fanmail BUFFY: buffy-digest V2 #329 See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the buffy or buffy-digest mailing lists and on how to retrieve back issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 22:04:50 -0700 From: Kathy Perkins Subject: BUFFY: Buffy: misc. stuff Just had to add a couple of comments. First, thanks to the person who caught the Daily Show's error about the universal donor thing. Has anyone send them a note or e-mail about it? Also, I don't think the "he's backstage looking at himself in the mirror" comment was meant to be a remark about vanity but a reference to the fact that his character can't look in the mirror. I thought DB did rather well on the interview (or as well as anyone ever does on those interviews), and he seemed to be enjoying himself. It was a shame that the Daily Show's people think only teenagers watch BtVS. Second, about the "vamping out". The first movie I remember seeing where that was done was Fright Night, and it was a neat effect (still is). It lets you see the vamp's true face, so to speak. Well, I guess I'll go back to lurking now... Kathy Perkins katperk@mindspring.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 22:14:47 -0700 From: Kathy Perkins Subject: BUFFY: Buffy episodes I'm glad they're showing season 1 and 2 reruns, but does anyone know why they're not showing them in order? Kathy Perkins katperk@mindspring.com GASPer - keeper of Giles' round end table keeper of Willow's fish tank scuba diver and her desire to glare disapprovingly at stragglers on the day of her teaching debut - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 02:23:20 -0400 From: Lawless Subject: Re: BUFFY: Buffy fan mail > < fanmail. This gives me a 'vibe' that she thinks shes too good to read mail > from nobodys and it makes her look egotistical > in my mind.. From what I have heard on the MTV > Live interview with David, he reads all his fanmail and even calls some Maybe so, and I bet Cliff from the IHOP commercials reads more of his fanmail than David Boreanaz. I'd be willing to be that Sarah gets at least ten times more letters than David, which can have a lot to do with it. Sarah's got a much larger fanbase when you add in her two recent films, and everything else she's done. That right there is enough. When you add in the fact that Sarah also probably works ten times as much as David, it's easy to see how he can have more time for his mail. However, I've written to David twice and never gotten a response, and I've written to Sarah twice since she's been on Buffy and have (given they were from Studio Fan Mail, bust it's still a response). Lawless - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 02:26:34 -0400 From: Lawless Subject: Re: BUFFY: Buffy Movie I was thinking about that, and while it might be a hard sell to the fan base not to use the regulars, I think it'd be an even harder sell to the general public if they did. The fans are going to go see the film regardless, they don't need to worry that much about them. What they need to figure out is how to draw in more viewers than the small number that watches Buffy every Tuesday night, and with the regulars, there's no way that'd work. IMO, there's almost a 95% chance they won't use regulars. Lawless David Williams wrote: > There's not really a lot of info here on the Buffy movie (or anywhere else > the story's appeared), apart from its mere existence. The big question is, > will they be using the cast from the TV series? I can imagine money issues, > etc., but it seems like it would be a hard sell to the fan-base to use - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 02:38:50 -0400 From: Lawless Subject: Re: BUFFY: one more thing about letters Most, if not all of the cast photos they send out are pre-prints. They used to send out an 8x10 black and white one, and now Studio Fan Mail sends out a pre-printed 4x6 color photo. Lawless Juliet_Coberly@themoneystore.com wrote: > Pandora said, > "A couple of weeks later I got a signed pic of David (very hot) and a cast > photograph (signed by the entire cast on the back). I didn't even ask!" - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 02:52:06 -0400 From: Lawless Subject: Re: BUFFY: salaries Carol wrote: > You didn't mention ASH. As he probably has the most acting experience > of them all, I wonder how his salary > compares. I don't know about that, Sarah, Oz, and Armin Shimerman all have more acting experience that ASH, but in the case of salaries, acting experience doesn't matter a whole lot, but rather how important the role is and what kind of viewers your character can draw in. Lawless - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 03:21:19 -0400 From: Lawless Subject: Re: BUFFY: city? NiK wrote: > >yea she has a computer she was on a chat a few times > > She also mentioned that while she was somewhere on the eastcoast away from > her home she mentioned that she didn't have internet access. She said this > while she was talking about all the sites about her. This makes me think > that she has seen probably all of the more popular SMG sites. She has an AOL account, so she could pretty much check e-mail from anywhere. And it most likely wasn't her in chat. Just keep in mind that she's not going to advertise that she's Sarah, her profile isn't filled out, and her screename doesn't have anything to do with her name or Buffy. All of those people on AOL are imposters. Lawless - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 03:24:23 -0400 From: Lawless Subject: Re: BUFFY: SNL next week?? It's been bumped for the tribute show. Lawless Kasey Johns wrote: > OK, everyone's said that Sarah was on SNL next week. I just saw a teaser, > though, for "SNL Remembers Phil Hartman - next week"....... ??? Guess I'm > off to check NBC.com.... - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 09:47:28 +0100 (BST) From: La Belle Dame Sans Merci Subject: BUFFY: Buffy Wardrobe and Costume Designer Does anyone know where I can snail mail or email the person in charge of costumes on Buffy the Vampire Slayer? thanks! toni (still working hard on my Spike page!) Toni Mandry enpfs@csv.warwick.ac.uk http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/Set/1247 "Either this wallpaper goes, or I do." Oscar Wilde's last words - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 06:37:16 -0400 From: David Williams Subject: BUFFY: Salon entertainment column Today's edition of the Salon webzine has a rundown on the season finale from Joyce Milman, their entertainment critic. She's always been a fan, and it's a very positive review. http://www.salonmagazine.com/ent/tv/mill/ - -- David Williams Dept. of Theology, Boston College 1232, the octal of the Beast. - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 03:58:37 -0700 From: giles1girl@webtv.net (Marie Smith) Subject: BUFFY: Merchandise update hi, this is Lupe ( twikos@webtv.net ), i know that there are alot of people that are looking for Buffy merchandise well if you are read this message!!! here are all the places that I know of that you can find Buffy merchandise (they are listed from the most merchandise available to least): 1. http://www.buffystore.com (they have t-shirts/books/magazines/posters & many other items!!) 2. http://www.mania.com/store/categories/BuffyTheVampireSlayer.asp (they have T-Shirts/books/& other merchandise, check it out!) 3. http://www.awit.com/buffy.htm (they have T-Shirts/babydoll shirts, check it out!) 4. http://www.ultimatetv.com/tvstore/shows/buffy.html (they have T-Shirts/babydoll shirts, check it out!) 5. *NEW* http://www.pixposters.com (they have the Poster or the Rolling Stone Cover of Sarah (Buffy), check it out!!!) Note: some of the Warner Brothers stores have Buffy Merchandise so if you have a local Warner Brothers Store, call them & ask if they have any Buffy Merchandise!. If you are around Los Angeles, you can go to: Astounding 2319-A West Olive Avenue Burbank, CA 91506 Phone #: 1-818-953-7234 you can call them for more information, they have many BTVS shirts! well I hope this information helps some of you? if you would like to contact me, email me at: twikos@webtv.net hope this information helps some of you find all the Buffy merchandise you would like. talk to you guys later if i know anything else. Lupe twikos@webtv.net P.S. if you have a website, it would be really helpfull for Buffy Fans if some of you would put this info on your site, just in case they don't get to read this message, thanks! :) - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 09:53:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Hickerson Subject: BUFFY: Review--Welcome to the Hellmouth/The Harvest **SPOILERS!!** Warning: You reap what you sew. I'm getting head to harvest some major SPOILERS for the very first episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. If you've missed it and want to see it unawares, please turn back now. In short: And so it begins... If you watch Babylon Five, then you may recognize the line I used above. I do that delibarately. First of all, it sounds really good. But the other, far better reason is that like Babylon Five, I am quickly discovering that Buffy is a show that gains richness upon repeated viewings. There will be things that will make much more sense in the overall context of the show, once you see where Joss and company are going with the overall storyline. Which may be one reason I enjoyed getting to see the 2 hour premiere of Buffy after having expereinced the entire second season as a whole. It gave me some perspective to enjoy the episode on differnet levels than if I'd just seen it back when it was first on. Not that I don't regret discovering the show until the season premire this season, mind you. Thankfully the WB is helping me get fully caught up season one this summer. But, I'm rambling. The reason we're here is to take a closer look at the the pilot episode of Buffy. I will have to say that for the most part pilot episodes are a curious beast. Looking back over the years at pilot episodes, it's hard to judge a series by them. At times you can see glimmers of hope for a series, at others the entire series changes afater that first episode. In my mind, what a pilot show do is give you a chance to meet most of the major characters, get the ball rolling on some subplots, and deliver an entertaining story that will interest you enough to want to watch beyond that first episode. Welcome the Hellmouth/The Harvest does all three of these. I will admit the first thirty minutes of the show were a bit of a drag for me at times. But I think part of it is that I already know all these characters from having watched the show for a while. So, being introduced to everyone just doesn't hold as much interest for me as it normally would. That's not a major negative since it's pretty much a personal bias. I am not grading off for that. What Joss really does well is bridging the gap between the movie and the show. It's nice to see some references to the film here, but also that he's willing to take the show in a new direction. Gone is the cramps Buffy gets when a vamp is nearby, which I think it good. That is far too great a weakness to have on the show week in and week out. Also gone is the notion she will only fight vamps. It's nice to see her slayer powers will be needed to battle the forces of evil that will be attracted by the Hellmouth. It gives the show a far bigger texture, scope, and context. It also allows Buffy to retell some of the old monster legends in new ways. New is good. As long as the old is done well. And there's some amount of setup for the on-going plotlines. The Master's attempt to free himself, Angel and who is he?, Darla's prescence, etc. There is some interesting stuff set into motion here. I know precisely where some of it goes, while I only have a vague idea of how other bits will play out. I am interested to see how it all plays out this summer. And Joss succees because there is a plotline that really grabs your intereted and holds it, once it starts. Buffy's trying to stop the Harvest propels the narrative forward, giving time to the rest of the introductory elements but also lending a sense of urgency to the overall story. One thing that really struck me here was how much more vicious the vamps seemed here than they did under Spike and Dru's leadership. It's nothing I can place my finger on precisely, and the vamps were still scary, interesting villains on the show this year, but for some reason they seemed more aggressive and scary. I chalk this up to a few things. One is that they have yet to really fear or respect Buffy and it's obvious that there hasn't been a slayer in Sunnydale for quite some time. So, why fear her just yet? Another is the Master seems to be far more gruesome and mean a leader than Spike is. Yes, Spike can be chilling (see Lie to Me for example) but you don't get the impression he's as bad as the Master is. At least in some areas. I may have to review some vamp episodes from this year and see if I can some more positive proof to back up my feelings. And I've got to admit that the final sequence in the Bronze was one of the best realized action sequences I've seen. The direction, the writing, and the acting were all first rate. It's easy to see where Joss might have got some of his "training" for his superlative work behind the camera here. There were times when the lighting, the direction, and the editing were just superb. It's a fun pilot to watch. I had a great time. And it's really got me excited about the repeats of season one this summer. So, I guess that's about it, excpet for a few small things. --Why did WB have to run it as a 2 part ep? Why couldn't it have just been run as a two hour episode? It would have made more sense, at least to me. --Because of that, did we miss anything? Was anything cut? Will I still need to buy this on video when it comes out for the lost footage? (I only say this since I know that Star Trek: the Next Generation has edited out some footage from the final 2 hour eps for syndication, so if you missed it the first time and want the whole story, you've got to buy it on video!) --There are times when I just want to smack Cordy in this ep. But then I kept going, "Remember where this is all going..." Well, that's about it for now. A great start to a great show. I love it. Final Rating: 8.5 (out of 10.0) Next up: A re-run of "Killed by Death." Copyright 1998 by Michael Hickerson mhickers@usit.net Coming soon: The Buffy, season two wrap-up! I am working my way through my tapes now and hope to have it out in the next few weeks. I am also planning on reviewing all the first season eps as I see them. Visit the Buffy reviews archive: www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Boulveard/4507 for updates, new reviews, old reivews, etc. - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jun 98 10:05:33 EDT From: (Charles Summers) Subject: BUFFY: Problem elimination Got a pesky problem that you can't solve yourself? Like Slayer trouble? CALL THE WORM MAN Fees are negotiable and reasonable and your problems will be solved--permanently Member in Good Standing--Order of Turaca DISCLAIMERS: 1. The Worm Man kills only by "icking" victims. Can not kill "non-ickable" people 2. Can not get under doors where the crack is duct-taped. Will not reassemble to open doorknobs. 3. No victims with knowledge of industrial adhesives. No exceptions! 4. Absolutely no refunds. - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 09:25:31 -0500 From: Mia_McDavid@em.fcnbd.com Subject: Re: BUFFY: Ramifications of Willow's Spellcasting. Jeff said: >>In Becoming part one Giles tells Willow that casting the curse could >>"open a door you might not be able to close." That got me thinking, what >>ramifications could Willow face from having cast the curse. We already >>know that something took her over during the final stages of the spell. >>Did it leave her afterwards or is it still there, or could it come back >>when ever it wanted to? Is there some price she has to pay for having >>cast the curse? I mean think about it. Angel's soul, the soul of a good >>man, was at peace. The curse placed it in a body it had to share with a >>demon, for the soul purpose of having it suffer for the demon's sins. >>There could be an argument made that the act of casting the curse is an >>act of evil. >>Opinions everyone? I'm *so* the opinions girl . . . Angel's soul, the soul of a good man . . . maybe by now it is. Now that he's repentant and he has tried to atone. When the *original* curse was cast, he'd been a bad man, and he'd become a vampire, if not with full knowledge, at least in a sinful moment and with no resistance. Was the spell Willow cast the same as the original curse? Maybe; we don't know. The intent in the casting was not the same, though. It was not about vengeance the second time, it was about reuniting Buffy and Angel, and, incidentally, saving the world. Or the other way around . . . Too many unknowns here . . . the wording of the new spell seems to be different, taken from the closed-captioning. The intent was definitely different . . . In any case, I agree that Willow has placed herself in contact with Outside Powers, and it will be interesting to see whether there are any ramifications next season. Mia Member WPWP Keeper of the Opening Wolf Howl I *LOVE* this show! - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 11:05:08 -0400 From: Schimmel <75211.522@compuserve.com> Subject: BUFFY: Buffy fanmail Allego wrote: << People in production offices do not answer fan mail for actors, nor have I ever heard of a central mailing center that does>> This was actually on television once (I think on 60 Minutes); and showed someone answering fan mail for one of the actors on 90210. He talked about how he tried to put personal touches in the letters, like mentioning skateboarding, etc. It must be really boring for actors to read fanmail; and I'm glad SMG is honest about it! With her schedule, she doesn't have time to read it, but at least she doesn't lie about it like many other actors do. Sandra - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 17:30:35 +0200 (MET DST) From: 328251@cienz.unizar.es Subject: BUFFY: buffy-digest V2 #329 buffy-digest Sunday, June 7 1998 Volume 02 : Number 329 In this issue: BUFFY: Buffy In Milwaukee/Madison, WI Re: BUFFY: Good news for Joss! BUFFY: WTTH vs. B2 BUFFY: SMG On Saturday Night Live Re: BUFFY: overpaid Re: BUFFY: Good news for Joss! BUFFY: Buffy fan mail BUFFY: Human Angel BUFFY: IMHO BUFFY: hello cutie BUFFY: SNL next week?? Re: BUFFY: IMHO BUFFY: Phases BUFFY: One less Buffy Fan BUFFY: RE: Buffy fan mail BUFFY: Nick and Charisma in YM BUFFY: Vampire question? Re: BUFFY: Vampire question? BUFFY: Two Movie Notes BUFFY: Sarah's interview! BUFFY: Bufy:help me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Re: BUFFY: Buffy fan mail BUFFY: city? BUFFY: Celbs. Re: BUFFY: city? Re: BUFFY: city? BUFFY: Buffy Re: Celebs See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the buffy or buffy-digest mailing lists and on how to retrieve back issues. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 19:44:04 -0500 From: NiK Subject: BUFFY: Buffy In Milwaukee/Madison, WI Hello all, While driving around the east side of milwaukee today, i saw two things having to do with buffy. First off, I saw a WB18 billboard with 7th Heaven, Dawson's Creek, and Buffy on it (the buffy picture was the blue-ish one of buffy and angel hugging). This was neat to see. If anyone lives in milwaukee and wants to see it in person, it is on I-143 right before the Highrise Bridge. Then, I went to Atomic Records and picked up the onion (a joke newspaper) and looked where they have this graph kinda thing and it was titled "Buffy Mania". here is all the writing in it: Buffy Mania WB's Buffy The Vampire Slayer is one of the breakout hits of this TV season. Why do people like it? 26% Enjoy pertness 16% Sarah Michelle Gellar the Alicia Silverstone of mid-1998 13% Grateful to show for exposing John Ritter as the evil killer robot he really is 18% Best movie-to-show adaption since Harry & The Hendersons 29% Bored of masturbating to Jennifer Love Hewitt 29% Girl pretty 29% Only program with the guts to show what it's really like in today's vampire-ridden high schools For some strange reason, there seems to be 160% instead of the normal 100% when adding up all the things. Well, anyways, they have the milk picture of Sarah in the background (although there appears to be no milk on her lips). To see the picture, go to http://www.theonion.com/onion3321/infograph_3321.html - - -NiK panam@mail.execpc.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 20:56:55 -0400 From: Jeff Rohaly Subject: Re: BUFFY: Good news for Joss! quoted from a Variety article: >Whedon is also developing a ``Buffy'' feature, based on the WB network's TV >series, which itself was adapted from the 1992 Whedon-written feature film of >the same name. I know this is all very preliminary, but a few comments: 1. I guess this is one way to keep SMG as Buffy and allow her to have a movie career too. 2. If they do use the television cast, I'm thinking about timing. They wouldn't be able to film until next summer's hiatus, in which case it would be ready for release sometime early in the year 2000 (I can't write that last phrase without thinking about that damn guy singing in his high-pitched voice from Conan O'Brien.) Or they could wait and release it in the summer of 2000 and, a la The X-Files, it could be used to follow up on that season's finale, which would be the fourth season. 3. Charisma Carpenter. Giant 40 foot tall movie screen image. Oooh. Jeff Rohaly rohaly@iaw.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 18:04:12 -0700 From: tron302@ix.netcom.com Subject: BUFFY: WTTH vs. B2 A couple things I thought were cool. At the beginning of the end of WTTH where Buffy prepares to meet Luke=20 playing a vessel, we see the sun setting. At the beginning of the end of B2 where Buffy prepares to thwart Ang=20 playing a blood donor, we see the sun rising. In the first, Buffy succeeds in saving the world from the Master's goal=20 of opening a vortex (like cork from a bottle) by "dusting" the vessel=20 with misdirection ("The sun doesn't rise for another six hours, moron"). = =20 In the latter, Buffy succeeds in saving the world from Ang's goal of=20 opening a vortex by "skewering" her love with another form of=20 misdirection ("Close your eyes."). :=B7} tr tron302@ix.netcom.com "Keep out of it Sit and Spin." Ang, B2 - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 21:02:52 -0500 From: NiK Subject: BUFFY: SMG On Saturday Night Live For all those who didn't know, SNL will be repeating the episode with Sarah Michelle Gellar on June 13th, exactly one night from tonight. (Thank you Buffy.Org!) - - -NiK panam@mail.execpc.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 22:01:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "F.Y.G." Subject: Re: BUFFY: overpaid It may be ridiculous to you but the actors do earn it..now Helen Hunt and Paul Reiser getting a million bucks an episdoe..Thast REALLY crazy. OhBuffy: It never comes up but what are the other actors on the show getting paid? On Thu, 4 Jun 1998 Juliet_Coberly@themoneystore.com wrote: > Pandora said > "Thirty grand or rather 43 grand with the raise is still ridiculous." > > I agree. If I were on the show, they could pay me 43 grand for the whole > year, and I'd be happy... > > > > > > - > > F.Y.G./missile http://members.xoom.com/fyg Founder and President of the Buffy Crew http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/7427/ Delta Sigma Phi Sargent at Arms - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 21:17:39 -0500 From: Kasey Johns Subject: Re: BUFFY: Good news for Joss! At 08:56 PM 6/6/98 -0400, you wrote: >2. If they do use the television cast, I'm thinking about timing. They >wouldn't be able to film until next summer's hiatus, in which case it would >be ready for release sometime early in the year 2000 (I can't write that >last phrase without thinking about that damn guy singing in his >high-pitched voice from Conan O'Brien.) Jeff, you are a thing of evil for mentioning Conan... *g* god, I hate that "feature"... anyway - this is all based on assumption that it will follow (read that - "be integrated") into the show storyline. I mean, it *would* be rather stupid on Joss' part to have the movie based in some totally different timeline, but it's not improbable. >3. Charisma Carpenter. Giant 40 foot tall movie screen image. Oooh. Close up on an IMAX. 6 stories tall. Now you're talkin. - - --Kj - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 22:58:38 -0400 From: Schimmel <75211.522@compuserve.com> Subject: BUFFY: Buffy fan mail NiK wrote: <> Face it, hardly any actors read fanmail- it mostly goes directly to some warehouse in San Diego or someplace where it's answered by bored studio part-timers who are primed with what to say and how to say it. If you really think that David Boreanaz is reading all his fanmail, then there's some swampland in Louisiana you might consider buying... Sandra - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 20:16:59 PDT From: "L. S." Subject: BUFFY: Human Angel I just had a thought. I wonder what Angel's last name was when he was human?? He prolly wasn't born Angelus. Thats all! Leanne ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Jun 98 21:24:13 PDT From: jphelan@radware.net (Jim Phelan) Subject: BUFFY: IMHO I've always wondered what everyone meant by IMHO. Could anyone tell me what this means? Thanks!! Laura - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 22:25:51 -0400 From: "Ryan Harrington" Subject: BUFFY: hello cutie I just capture that Hello Cutie sound. Someone was wanting it before but I dont remember who. Email me if you want it. ~Ryan http://www.geocities.com/~ryanhhhh - - -Yay to Geocities for giving everyone extra space!!!!!!! - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 22:38:11 -0500 From: Kasey Johns Subject: BUFFY: SNL next week?? OK, everyone's said that Sarah was on SNL next week. I just saw a teaser, though, for "SNL Remembers Phil Hartman - next week"....... ??? Guess I'm off to check NBC.com.... - - --Kj - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 23:42:43 -0400 From: "R. Smith" Subject: Re: BUFFY: IMHO Jim Phelan wrote: > > I've always wondered what everyone meant by IMHO. Could anyone > tell me what this means? > Thanks!! > Laura > > - In My Humble Opinion. - - -R - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 00:51:56 EDT From: Subject: BUFFY: Phases I just saw season one and then I watched Phases. I loved how they had all the references from season one in it. The cheerleader trophy moving its eyes, Xander "remembering" being a hyena, Willow having the affair with the computer demon, everything I missed the first time around. Krystalyn http://members.aol.com/krystey567/ Not a Buffy page but it has a really cool picture of me as Buffy that my boyfriend created. =) - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 00:52:52 EDT From: Subject: BUFFY: One less Buffy Fan Today, or rather yesterday (its past 12), I lost a friend to a really bad car accident. She was a Buffy fan, and its wierd cause this whole thing is reminding me of what Buffy said to Willow in WTTH. "Seize the moment because tomorrow you could be dead" Well some of you on the list must know that there isn't a more true statement in this world, and for those of you who don't: Please take my advice, and listen to BUFFY. Amy - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 02:02:18 EDT From: Subject: BUFFY: RE: Buffy fan mail In a message dated 6/6/98 8:05:38 PM, 75211.522@compuserve.com wrote: <> I worked for a daytime soap opera for a while and part of my job was sorting through all of the fan mail and seeing to it that the actors received it. ALL of the actors that were on that show at the time, were really interested in their fan mail. People in production offices do not answer fan mail for actors, nor have I ever heard of a central mailing center that does. The truth is that actors get a lot of fan mail and a great deal of really weird mail. Also, unless a show is in production all the time, like a soap opera, the actors most likely do not receive their mail every day. Who knows when SMG actually receives the fan mail considering that it has to be sorted, counted, sent over to the production offices at Buffy, which by the way are not actually located on the main WB lot in Burbank, and then it has to be forwarded to her. If you sent a letter recently, I wouldn't be too upset if you don't receive a reply for a while, and if you sent a letter a while ago, consider that it takes a long time to answer thousands of letters. If you sent a polite letter, most likey you will receive a reply, but not always. Some actors are not into the whole fan letter-give me an autograph deal. C. - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 23:25:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Thu Ngo Subject: BUFFY: Nick and Charisma in YM Hey, ummm, don't know if this has been posted, but Nick and Charisma are on the cover of YM's Love issue, on sale now! I didn't buy it (cuz I didn't have any money), but I did read the little interview. There's a kinda full-page pic of the two together (aww, how cute!), and two little interviews, one about THEIR lives, and one about XANDER and CORDY. == Thu Ngo ~ savoir127@yahoo.com ~ - - ----- "It's a big rock. Can't wait to tell my friends. They don't have a rock this big." _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 07:41:43 PDT From: "Marat Sade" Subject: BUFFY: Vampire question? Ok, I was wondering, why do the vampires face on buffy change? No other vampire's faces ever change... I mean vampire are surpossed to blend in with the living and if there faces change they can't. Opnion? Marat ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 11:29:23 EDT From: Subject: Re: BUFFY: Vampire question? In a message dated 98-06-07 10:44:50 EDT, you write: > Ok, I was wondering, why do the vampires face on buffy change? No other > vampire's faces ever change... I mean vampire are surpossed to blend in > with the living and if there faces change they can't. Opnion? Well, they appear to change when they're attacking, feeding, or showing off their wrinklies to the boys. As far as faces not changing in other vampire universes, I disagree. The vampires in "Interview With A Vampire," and "Kindred: The Embraced," as well as in several movies I've seen, looked different when they were angered and/or fed. Sometimes the morphing wasn't as drastic, but when they were in true vampy mode none of them look like your average Joe Schmoe to me. LilyRei - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 12:10:16 -0400 From: Jeff Rohaly Subject: BUFFY: Two Movie Notes 1. If you want to read an early review from Variety of Seth Green's new movie, Can't Hardly Wait, it's at the following URL: http://www.variety.com/filmrev/cfropen.asp?recordID=1117477593 2. I saw a promo trailer for Dead Man On Campus, the movie that has Alyson Hannigan in it. It looks as though she has a very small part: she was on screen for about 2 seconds out of the 2 minute promo. It's an MTV studio production. And the release date has apparently been pushed back again, this time to August 21. Jeff Rohaly rohaly@iaw.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 13:47:37 -0400 From: "Ryan Harrington" Subject: BUFFY: Sarah's interview! Her interview is on right now on MTV! Check it out. I'm in eastern time BTW. ~Ryan http://www.geocities.com/~ryanhhhh - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 14:01:21 EDT From: Subject: BUFFY: Bufy:help me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ok i need some advise on my web page . it's about buffy and i'm new to stuff like this so i was wondering of you all can cheek it out and like tell me things that i should put or explain in ther but i can't put pics on ther so thats out of the question i'm just looking for like stuff .....................like i have this one part signs of obsesion (this part of the web page is not to be taking as an insult) and if you would read what i have this give me some like pointersok well here is the site Buffy Page - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 18:01:46 -0500 From: NiK Subject: Re: BUFFY: Buffy fan mail >Some actors are not into >the whole fan letter-give me an autograph deal. This is true, but I'm not looking for an autograph. A piece of paper with a name on it means nothing to me, and if i were a celeb i wouldn't give autographs through the mail because I'm sure half of the people that I give it to are just going to go and sell it to someone to make a buck. All i was really looking for was the fact that SMG actually read my letter, maybe knew how much I liked her, and knows that i'm alive. Even if she read her mail and didn't reply to it, i wouldn't care as long as it got to her. Oh well, all you can do is all you can do. - - -NiK panam@mail.execpc.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 04:16:58 -0400 From: wparris Subject: BUFFY: city? does anyone know what city sarah lives in? i know shes in CA. Does anyon know if sarah even owns a computer? - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 16:26:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeani Arera Subject: BUFFY: Celbs. Does anyone kn ow: any Magazines or other t.v. programs any of the cast members will be in?????? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ And another thing. . . why does Principal Snyder have to be such a jerk? I mean, he didn't have to expell Buffy. AHY I hate his character so much!!! Why did Joss have to go and get rid of Principal Flutie anyway? He was so nice! Oh, yeah. . . I don't appreicate any rude comments from those Snyder lovers or any of you beetnicks out there. So if you reply rudely. . . you'll get an even ruder remark from lil' old meeh. So watch what you write! 'Cause everytime I write something harmless. Some rudeass gives me a really bad comment . Like Jill K. == *!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*! *!*I'm naming all the stars. You can't see the stars love, that's the ceiling... also its day. I can see them. But I've named them all the same name in this terrible confusion. - - - Dru and Spike Innocence Keeper of Willow's Black eye & Flat Hair too! _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 19:53:22 EDT From: Subject: Re: BUFFY: city? yea she has a computer she was on a chat a few times - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 19:09:12 -0500 From: NiK Subject: Re: BUFFY: city? >yea she has a computer she was on a chat a few times She also mentioned that while she was somewhere on the eastcoast away from her home she mentioned that she didn't have internet access. She said this while she was talking about all the sites about her. This makes me think that she has seen probably all of the more popular SMG sites. - - -NiK panam@mail.execpc.com - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 21:15:03 EDT From: Subject: BUFFY: Buffy Re: Celebs Seth Green (Oz) is in July's issue of Jump magazine. For those of you who don't know of this magazine, its kind of like seventeen or teen. This issue isn't on newsstands yet, but will be soon. Anyway, they have an interview with some of the guys from the movie Can't Hardly Wait. They just asked them some stupid questions about whether they were popular in high school, and about girlfriends and stuff. There are 3 pictures of Seth (he looks really cute, he has sort of brownish hair in these for those of you who were wondering whether he had his "good" hair) , two of them are group pics. If anyone want the whole article but doesn't want to cough up $3 for the mag, let me know offlist, and i'll e-mail you a copy. Britt a.k.a. IluvBtVS@aol.com - - - - ------------------------------ End of buffy-digest V2 #329 *************************** To subscribe to buffy or buffy-digest, send the command subscribe buffy-digest or subscribe buffy to majordomo@xmission.com. You will need to go through a confirmation process, and the listowners have to manually approve your subscription request, so it may take some time. Back issues of this digest can be found at: ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/lists/buffy/archive/ For help, contact Jill Kirby (jtkirby@mcs.com) or sah (romana@mindspring.com) - - ------------------------------ End of buffy-digest V2 #330 *************************** To subscribe to buffy or buffy-digest, send the command subscribe buffy-digest or subscribe buffy to majordomo@xmission.com. You will need to go through a confirmation process, and the listowners have to manually approve your subscription request, so it may take some time. Back issues of this digest can be found at: ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/lists/buffy/archive/ For help, contact Jill Kirby (jtkirby@mcs.com) or sah (romana@mindspring.com)