From: canslim-owner@xmission.com To: canslim-digest@xmission.com Subject: canslim Digest V1 #43 Reply-To: canslim@xmission.com Errors-To: canslim-owner@xmission.com Precedence: canslim Digest Thursday, 16 January 1997 Volume 01 : Number 043 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] Increasing group size? [CANSLIM] a stock named pkx Re: [CANSLIM] Weekend Review Sort Sequence Re: [CANSLIM] Views on novice picks? [CANSLIM] Growth for hi tech with high stock prices? Re: [CANSLIM] Views on novice picks? Re: [CANSLIM] a stock named pkx Re: [CANSLIM] Semiconductor Stocks Re: [CANSLIM] Increasing Re: [CANSLIM] a stock named pkx Re: [CANSLIM] Semiconductor Stocks [CANSLIM] introduction Re: [CANSLIM] Views on novice picks? Re: [CANSLIM] Increasing group size? (fwd) See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the canslim or canslim-digest mailing lists and on how to retrieve back issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Zoran Mitrovski Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 13:39:13 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Increasing group size? I think this group is working just fine, and there's no need to force anybody into anything. I also believe that increasing the number of members would not do much good to the quality and the quantity of the traffic content. The group is developing in the right direction, and we just need some more patience. I agree with Tom that compared to other lists this one deserves a five star rating both for the content and overall mutual tolerance level. Everybody just ask yourself what do you expect to gain from the list. I did, and I am getting what I expected, no more no less. Perhaps, some of you guys have some unreasonably high expectations from all this. If some of you ocassionally experience a pain in your egos because of lack of response to your messages, big deal. Such is life... Try harder to make your next posting more marketable/intriguing/mindboggling/attractive. You can use that skill in real life anyway. There's no rule saying that every posting needs a thread. Just warming up my fingers after relaxing in Macedonia... My brain is still stiff though. I have lots of reading and stock/market researching to do to get back into the groove. Man, once you get out of all this even for few weeks it takes time to get back to the right feeling. Cheers, Zoran ;^) P.S. Jeff, when I responded to David's canslim message, it sent it out to him personally. I thought you fixed that field problem. ------------------------------ From: Haw-Jye Shyu Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 16:02:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: [CANSLIM] a stock named pkx Hi folks: I found a stock from the Wall Street Journal. The symbol is PKX. It was suggested by one of the stock picker who is last year winner against the Random Walk theory. After looking the daily chart, it seems to be forming a CUP and Handle pattern. The P/E is about 8. The price is about 24 3/4. I did not subscripbe the IBD therefore I do not have too much info CANSLIM regarding to this stock. What do you think about this one? HJS ------------------------------ From: Craig Griffin Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 16:31:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Weekend Review Sort Sequence Sent this earlier, but have been having trouble with my ISP, please excuse if this is second iteration. Richard, Re; Group strength sorting of the Weekend Review Althought Group strenghth is not shown as a data element anywhere on the chart, that appears to be how the stocks are sorted: For instance MCHP has a GRS (group relative strength) of 99 in this week's DG, so does MXIM. Further down the list CLDR has a GRS of 98. Note that IBD has lots of groups: CLDR is in "Oil & Gas - Drilling" whereas PRDE, further down the list is in "Oil&Gas-Field Services" with a GRS of 95. So basicly, it is sorted as claimed, those stocks in the strongest groups are sorted first (presumably because if you have two stocks to choose from you will want the one from the strongest group - all else being equal). Therefore the first 30 stocks on the list are the ones to focus on first. Best regards, Craig At 11:11 PM 1/15/97 -0600, you wrote: > I also asked a question the other day, but I'm not sure it ever got to >this group, at least if it did, I don't remember seeing it, so I'll ask >again. > > In the IBD WEEKEND REVIEW that comes out on Friday, I can't figure out >how the info is sorted. The paper says that its by "group strength", >but after looking at it, I still can't see the sequence. Can anyone >explain this to me? > ><< Richard S. >> ------------------------------ From: Craig Griffin Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 17:32:00 -0500 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Views on novice picks? At 01:51 AM 1/16/97 -0500, you wrote: >Some companies I find interesting: > >I'm a novice so your views are of interest to me: > >Nextell: coming out of a long base; to be hyped by the >media shortly on the PCS; with good customer base >and apparent license agreements with other telephone >co. > CALL (Nextel) is a company with no earnings. It has assets, cash flow, a good story, and recent news. I think it is possible to use CANSLIM techniques to buy stocks without earnings, but I don't have guidelines to go on (remember the "C" and "A" in CANSLIM refer to Current and Annual earnings). CALL seems to be in the bottom of it's base. Could take weeks, months, or years to breakout. I think there are a lot better CANSLIM candidates. I would at least wait for a breakout to own it. > >AMD:Moving up off of handle, may be too late for buy. > AMD - similar to CALL, see comments above. Earnings turnaround may be coming. I think this stock fits a lot better into the CANSLIM criteria. But, it has a 5 year earnings history of $2.57, $2.30, $3.02, $2.29, and $-.51. Not too sure on the last number, didn't take the time to look up this latest quarter's earnings (which is the news driving the stock price). However, that doesn't look like 5 years of growth, it looks like 5 years of sideways to down. It is the tail that gets wagged by the dog named Intel. I would look for better candidates. >Newsoft: NH Can't identify the above stock. >================================= >Warren > Warren, Get a trial subscription to DG if you get the time (NASDAQ edition only is all you really need - that's where 90%+ of the good ones are), and take a look at 5 year and last 4 qtrs of earnings when evaluating stocks. Lots of stocks will do well which don't have earnings, but stocks with consistent earnings growth and/or exceptional earnings growth is what CANSLIM is all about. Hope this helps. Craig ------------------------------ From: OWENTIME@delphi.com Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 17:34:32 -0500 (EST) Subject: [CANSLIM] Growth for hi tech with high stock prices? Are mergers likely with major companies like Microsoft or Intel purchasing smaller companies in complementary areas? Opinions? I noticed XIRCOM @ 24 today after an agreement to sell 12.5% of its stock to INTEL. A deal worth 52++ million over 3 years to XIRCOM which is quite nice, but two things: 1.) Intel is expecting a flattening of earnings ahead. 2.) With Intel owning 12.5% of XIRCOM stock, would this "flatten" XIRCOM's bright break out; and as Intel inevitably drops in price, XIRCOM in its dependence upon INTEL, would flatten quite a bit? Would it then be an easier takeover at a lower price by INTEL and a long slow recovery model similar to one hinted at by a major automaker who expects stormy weather until well into '98. Reason I ask: Intel is at that mature level of development where (like Mircrosoft too) it would make a lot of sense for it to start acquiring hardware mfrs. to round out its market, and begin to expand beyond one sector. Could this potentially acretive move to merge with other companies, more easily excuse the acretive aspects of a merger in a down market to otherwise soften the blow to shareholders who can now rebound with optimism for newer better quarters ahead? Would XIRCOM be an attractive company to INTEL or does INTEL routinely acquire double digit levels of stock in complementary companies? Ideas? I'm wondering about a similar possibility with Microsoft waiting until Apple is a little cheaper and then snapping it up in a similar fashion in the next few months. Ideas? If so, cups and handles would be grabbed by bankers and lawyers on their timetables. I'm not sure which has the better fundamentals though, Apple with Next and a Unix based operating system and Intel chips, or an Intel conglomerate emerging beyond owning 12% of XIRCOM and possibly others if the economy goes south and inflation kicks in? Could it be then, that this bull has much new life but can grow best in the high tech sector with more newly merged corporate companies with KO like cups and handles and diverse holdings? The expectations of shareholders may be on profits, but I wonder how many banks expect to finance hi tech. mergers soon. Yes, no, maybe?? In such a case, a downturn would be the perfect tonic for bargains in merging and in buying reinvigorated companies. These potential mergers would seem likely next Fall at the earliest, probably to retrieve '98 as a salavagable year with fresh growth. ------------------------------ From: Eric Shen - FDC Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 14:58:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Views on novice picks? Craig Griffin wrote: > > Warren, > > Get a trial subscription to DG if you get the time (NASDAQ edition only is > all you really need - that's where 90%+ of the good ones are), and take a > look at 5 year and last 4 qtrs of earnings when evaluating stocks. Lots of > stocks will do well which don't have earnings, but stocks with consistent > earnings growth and/or exceptional earnings growth is what CANSLIM is all about. > > Hope this helps. > > Craig > > Daily Graphs is nice, but it may be information overload. Also, it requires a sizable investment for a yearly subscription. You can start by looking at Value Line in your local library for earnings history. It also has information about sales, cash flow and margin. From there, you can go on the Web and get stock graphs of the stocks. The downside about Value Line is that it doesn't do justice for small caps stocks. Of course, not all the good performers are small cap stocks... Eric - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Shen 916-356-5536 Intel Corporation, FM5-161 fax: 916-356-5719 1900 Prairie City Rd, Folsom, CA 95630 eshen@pcocd2.intel.com - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------ From: Zoran Mitrovski Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 18:58:03 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] a stock named pkx HJS wrote: > Hi folks: > > I found a stock from the Wall Street Journal. The symbol is PKX. > It was suggested by one of the stock picker who is last year winner against > the Random Walk theory. After looking the daily chart, it seems to be forming a CUP and Handle pattern. > The P/E is about 8. The price is about 24 3/4. > I did not subscripbe the IBD therefore I do not have too much info CANSLIM > regarding to this stock. > > What do you think about this one? HJS, here is what I found on PKX. I got even a lower PE = 6.8 I couldn't see no cup on the chart even less a handle. Also, it seems as if it is just taking off from a bottom. Both the stock and it's group (Iron &Steel) appear to be bouncing off a hard bottom. This is a very interesting situation. An EPS at 99; RS at 51; and PE at 7-8 !! I've never seen anything like this. From the chart there seem to be major accumulation going on. In seven trading days it went from 20 to 24+. Wierd stuff, these foreign co's. Expect overhead supply to impose hardship on price movement untill 28 because of a May peak at that value. Today, a wierdly calm day on 50k volume and a perfect sideways movement after few days of explosive accumulation. Hmmm... Data and news follows... Cheers, Zoran Pohang Iron &Steel (NYSE: PKX) EPS RS A/D 99 51 A Capitalization % LT Debt to Total Cap 34% Owned by Institutions 11% Market Capitalization 8.8 Bil Avg Dly Vol (30 days) 114,400 Business Overview Korea-based Pohang Iron and Steel Co. (POSCO) is one of the world's top steel producers and has interests in a number of other industries, including engineering and construction and telecommunications. The company makes a variety of hot and cold rolled steel products including plate steel, stainless steel, hot strip, and wire rods, which it sells to the auto and shipbuilding industries, among others. Subsidiary POSCO Engineering & Construction Co. designs and constructs highways, ports, plants, skyscrapers, and commercial buildings. Subsidiary Shinsegi Telecomm offers cellular phone services to customers in Korea. Subsidiary POSDATA Co. is a specialized systems integrator that targets high tech businesses. RESEARCH ALERT - Pohang (KOREA:53040) (NYSE:PKX) cut Reuters, Monday, December 09, 1996 at 11:25 -- Goldman Sachs said it dropped Pohang Iron & Steel Co Ltd from its recommended list and rated it a market outperform. -- Further details were not immediately available. -- Shares were down 1/2 at 20-1/8. ------------------------------ From: Craig Griffin Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 19:43:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Semiconductor Stocks Patrick, The semi's had another good day. Looks like this rally is for real, although, it's about time for a little profit taking. Notice UTEK had another up day and it looks like it might be on its way (ie. a valid breakout perhaps). FUSN has a handle that is too far down in the cup to really qualify as a handle. Best case, this one is halfway up the right side of the cup and climbing IMO. May consolidate here for a while before moving up and then forming a handle (best case scenario). I too have a fondness for HELX, having riden it to a triple year before last (1995). I seems that it may indeed be ready to form the right side of the cup now (and a deep one it is). Since it is not in DG these days, I don't know what recent earnings or estimates look like. I looked at NVLS and AMAT and LRCX last night after seeing your post. Remarkably, NVLS and AMAT have nearly identical charts, with LRCX looking like the weak sister by comparison. All of those stocks are in the semi fab supply chain in one way or another. The GRS on ELEC-SEMICONDUCTOR MFG is a 99 and it looked like a b/o on ATML today on earnings that merely met expectations (go figure). Anyhow, I jumped in on the high volume move through 37. There is some overhead supply from last spring in the 39-42 area, but it looks like at worst a handle might form there. Current earnings are decelerating (114%, 92%, 71%, and then today 39%). So that's not very good. But the stock acted like the whisper numbers were even lower and it had some good uumph out of a long base, so I gave it a shot. We'll see. Best regards, Craig At 10:27 AM 1/15/97 GMT, you wrote: >The semiconductor-equipment group looks very strong, with a bunch of >them breaking out or having broken out already. The two best looking >charts are Fusion (FUSN) and Ultratech Stepper (UTEK). Helix also >spiked up a bit, and Novellus, Applied Materials, and Lam Research look >ok. > ------------------------------ From: "tom worley" Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 19:50:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Increasing My problem is lack of time. I do try to look at those stocks mentioned as favorites, or "on watch" by group members. But frankly, if the source is from a member I know little or nothing about, esp if it is not supported by std CANSLIM data, I am unlikely to reach that far down my priority list and ever look at it. I would like to see members both show some understanding of what CANSLIM stands for by including some of the basic data out of IBD. It's even better if they have looked at a DG and can comment a little from there. Our group is composed of a wide variety of experience levels, ranging from the novice investor to many who regularly apply CANSLIM. Much as I like micros, if it's not a CANSLIM candidate, and supported by readily available data, then I would prefer it not be tossed out here, save it for other places or send it privately to those who may be interested. Frankly, the quality of posting helps establish the credibility of the sender, that's why I encourage the lurkers to join in, I am convinced there is a lot of talent, expertise, knowledge, and experience out there that can be shared and help all of us. tom w - ---------- > From: Patrick Wahl > To: canslim@xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Increasing > Date: Wednesday, January 15, 1997 7:00 PM > > CA>From: Craig Griffin > > harsh, but I do agree that people should at least be encouraged to toss > out those names of those stocks they are watching, ------------------------------ From: "tom worley" Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 19:32:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] a stock named pkx I think the PE is not that low for that industry group if I recall correctly, esp in a time when the bull rages on and money flows to the big cap hi-PE techs. The RS tells you there is some interest, it's not completely out of favor, but hardly a popular, in-demand, stock. tom w - ---------- > From: Zoran Mitrovski > To: canslim@xmission.com > Cc: Zoran Mitrovski > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] a stock named pkx > Date: Thursday, January 16, 1997 6:58 PM > > > HJS wrote: > > > Hi folks: > > > > I found a stock from the Wall Street Journal. The symbol is PKX. > > It was suggested by one of the stock picker who is last year winner against > > the Random Walk theory. After looking the daily chart, it seems to be forming a CUP and Handle pattern. > > The P/E is about 8. The price is about 24 3/4. > > I did not subscripbe the IBD therefore I do not have too much info CANSLIM > > regarding to this stock. > > > > What do you think about this one? > > > HJS, here is what I found on PKX. > I got even a lower PE = 6.8 > > I couldn't see no cup on the chart even less > a handle. Also, it seems as if it is just taking off > from a bottom. Both the stock and it's group (Iron &Steel) > appear to be bouncing off a hard bottom. > > This is a very interesting situation. An EPS at 99; > RS at 51; and PE at 7-8 !! I've never seen anything like > this. From the chart there seem to be major accumulation > going on. In seven trading days it went from 20 to 24+. > Wierd stuff, these foreign co's. > Expect overhead supply to impose hardship on price > movement untill 28 because of a May peak at that value. > Today, a wierdly calm day on 50k volume and a perfect sideways > movement after few days of explosive accumulation. > > Hmmm... > > Data and news follows... > > Cheers, > Zoran > > Pohang Iron &Steel (NYSE: PKX) > EPS RS A/D > 99 51 A > > Capitalization > % LT Debt to Total Cap 34% > Owned by Institutions 11% > Market Capitalization 8.8 Bil > Avg Dly Vol (30 days) 114,400 > > > Business Overview > Korea-based Pohang Iron and Steel Co. (POSCO) is one of the world's top > steel producers and has interests in a number of other industries, including > engineering and construction and telecommunications. The company > makes a variety of hot and cold rolled steel products including plate steel, > stainless steel, hot strip, and wire rods, which it sells to the auto and > shipbuilding industries, among others. Subsidiary POSCO Engineering & > Construction Co. designs and constructs highways, ports, plants, > skyscrapers, and commercial buildings. Subsidiary Shinsegi Telecomm > offers cellular phone services to customers in Korea. Subsidiary > POSDATA Co. is a specialized systems integrator that targets high tech > businesses. > > > RESEARCH ALERT - Pohang (KOREA:53040) (NYSE:PKX) cut > > Reuters, Monday, December 09, 1996 at 11:25 > > -- Goldman Sachs said it dropped Pohang Iron & Steel Co Ltd > from its recommended list and rated it a market outperform. > -- Further details were not immediately available. > -- Shares were down 1/2 at 20-1/8. ------------------------------ From: "tom worley" Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 20:14:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Semiconductor Stocks I generally agree with the current status of the semis and semi related groups. After a long fall from favor, the excess inventory appears absorbed. The demand seems to have caught up to, if not surpassed, all the added capacity (possibly due in part to new chip designs now coming on line). I foresee in the next year or so more retooling to adapt to even newer chips that will be coming out. I just got an overview of this industry today from Bear, but apparently left it at work. Will try to bring it home on Friday and share any insight from it. BTW, there is a lot of talk about different stocks forming cup and handle formations, but one observation I have is that I am seeing very few in fact. While this formation is the best to find, it doesn't happen often and rarely in such a volatile mkt. I reviewed some CANSLIM charts tonight (and will try to do more later) without finding a single one. Maybe I am too strict, I do tend to look for a near perfect formation before I award it a "C&H", but in the best of CONSISTENT market action they still don't form all that often. Don't try to "force" the formation, if you do that you will likely delude yourself into a buy action that you will not be able to support in hindsight. As always, just OMHO. tom w - ---------- > From: Craig Griffin > To: canslim@xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Semiconductor Stocks > Date: Thursday, January 16, 1997 7:43 PM > > Patrick, > > The semi's had another good day. > breakout perhaps). FUSN has a handle that is too far down in the cup to > really qualify as a handle. Best case, this one is halfway up the right > side of the cup and climbing IMO. May consolidate here for a while before > moving up and then forming a handle (best case scenario). > seems that it may indeed be ready to form the right side of the cup now (and > a deep one it is). > The GRS on ELEC-SEMICONDUCTOR MFG is a 99 and it looked like a b/o on ATML > today on earnings that merely met expectations (go figure). but it looks like at worst a handle > might form there. Current earnings are decelerating (114%, 92%, 71%, and > then today 39%). So that's not very good. > ------------------------------ From: Lehman Dennis Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 20:33:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: [CANSLIM] introduction I never done intro before so I hope I don't bore anyone. Name Dennis Lehman Age 52 Married with three children One has a law degree and CPA, the second is a electrician, the third is police officer. They all have collage degrees. Grand children 3 3/4(one due in Feb) Retired in 1986 at the age of 42 and moved to Boca from NJ had a business for 20 years. I still miss being in business, but you can not make enough profit in Florida. I also have my 80 year old mother living with us for the last five years it either us or a home and I can not do that to my mother. I had a large four bedroom house built with her room on the other side of the house for privacy. I belong to NAIC and used their SSG software which works, but it is a very long term buy, hold and add type of investing of large Stocks. Then I attended MR O'Neals seminar in Boca a few months ago and meet people who were doing very well with CANSLIM so too I took out a one year subscription and have been reading his books and playing his tapes ever since. I really believe in CANSLIM it makes good sense to me. I tried software for CandleStix,Charting and read many books . This really a nice place, on the net. I found other sites but do not have the feeling that I see in the posting. Thank You Lehman Dennis p006601b@pbfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us ------------------------------ From: "tom worley" Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 20:42:10 -0500 Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Views on novice picks? A five week "trial" subscription to the NASDAQ edition is a grand total of $14 plus $15 postage (sad when postage is worth more than the product, what is this country coming to) and a full year subscription (52 weekly books) is all of $363 plus $156. If in five weeks I can't make at least one successful decision worth $29 be it to cut a loser or buy/hold/sell a winner or in one year one successful trade for $519 profit, then I will quit calling myself a CANSLIMer. If I'm going to use the O'Neill system and philosophy, then I gotta have the data. Yes, there is a lot of data on each chart (52 different items to be exact), but, with experience, some will be more important to you than others and those will be the ones you focus on. Me personally, I only use about 15 or so of the items (never really counted them up to be honest), but the chart and moving day averages are critical. Value Line is for value investors, often referred to as "bottom fishers". Nothing wrong with the strategy, but they are not CANSLIM investors. I wasted several thou dollars a year on Value Line before I finally figured out it works for extremely conservative, long term, buy and hold types who don't mind if their stocks retreat 20 or so percent because they will hold them for ten or fifteen years. That's not my style, so I opt for DG. Value line also gives poor coverage to high PE stocks, which is where virtually every emerging new company and technology will be found. tom w - ---------- > From: Eric Shen - FDC > To: canslim@xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Views on novice picks? > Date: Thursday, January 16, 1997 5:58 PM > > Craig Griffin wrote: > > > > Warren, > > > > Get a trial subscription to DG if you get the time (NASDAQ edition only is > > all you really need - that's where 90%+ of the good ones are), and take a > > look at 5 year and last 4 qtrs of earnings when evaluating stocks. > > Hope this helps. > > > Daily Graphs is nice, but it may be information overload. Also, it > requires a sizable investment for a yearly subscription. > > You can start by looking at Value Line in your local library for > earnings history. It also has information about sales, cash flow and > margin. From there, you can go on the Web and get stock graphs of the > stocks. The downside about Value Line is that it doesn't do justice > for small caps stocks. ------------------------------ From: Zoran Mitrovski Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 20:56:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Increasing group size? (fwd) I'm sending this the second time cause I didn't see it posted the first time earlier today. Zoran Forwarded message: > From zmitrov@ee.rochester.edu Thu Jan 16 13:39:16 1997 > From: Zoran Mitrovski > Message-Id: <9701161839.AA25450@galaxy.ee.rochester.edu> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Increasing group size? > To: canslim@xmission.com > Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 13:39:13 -0500 (EST) > Cc: zmitrov@ee.rochester.edu (Zoran Mitrovski) > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Length: 1435 > > > I think this group is working just fine, and there's no > need to force anybody into anything. I also believe that > increasing the number of members would not do much > good to the quality and the quantity of the traffic > content. The group is developing in the right direction, > and we just need some more patience. I agree with Tom > that compared to other lists this one deserves a five > star rating both for the content and overall mutual > tolerance level. > > Everybody just ask yourself what do you expect to gain > from the list. I did, and I am getting what I expected, > no more no less. Perhaps, some of you guys have some > unreasonably high expectations from all this. > > If some of you ocassionally experience a pain in your > egos because of lack of response to your messages, big deal. > Such is life... Try harder to make your next posting > more marketable/intriguing/mindboggling/attractive. > You can use that skill in real life anyway. > There's no rule saying that every posting needs a thread. > > Just warming up my fingers after relaxing in Macedonia... > My brain is still stiff though. I have lots of reading > and stock/market researching to do to get back into the > groove. Man, once you get out of all this even for few > weeks it takes time to get back to the right feeling. > > Cheers, > Zoran > ;^) > > P.S. Jeff, when I responded to David's canslim message, it > sent it out to him personally. I thought you fixed that > field problem. > > ------------------------------ End of canslim Digest V1 #43 **************************** To subscribe to canslim Digest, send the command: subscribe canslim-digest in the body of a message to "majordomo@xmission.com". If you want to subscribe something other than the account the mail is coming from, such as a local redistribution list, then append that address to the "subscribe" command; for example, to subscribe "local-canslim": subscribe canslim-digest local-canslim@your.domain.net A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to subscribe to that instead, replace all instances of "canslim-digest" in the commands above with "canslim". Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.xmission.com, in pub/lists/canslim/archive. These are organized by date.