From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1172 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, March 2 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1172 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses [CANSLIM] DCS Re: [CANSLIM] Selling Strategies - Question RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses RE: [CANSLIM] OFF LIST(Mutual Fund Answer) Re: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses Re: [CANSLIM] DCS Re: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses RE: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership Re: [CANSLIM] OFF LIST(Mutual Fund Answer) RE: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership Re: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:12:52 -0500 From: "Ann Hollingworth" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses What are some examples of the "charting software" to which you refer? Ann Hollingworth Reading Recovery Teacher Massachusetts Mutual Funds can be bought and sold by using a mental stop or have your charting software give you an alert when you hit your set stop. - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:24:45 EST From: Vanchee1@aol.com Subject: [CANSLIM] DCS DCS 91/98 BCB per IBD Fri. On back page weekend graphic review, looks like a W formation from Nov 4 to today. What do you think? Chris - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:48:48 -0800 From: "Bill Triffet" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Selling Strategies - Question Hi Brett, I could be wrong here but I thought WON goes by closing prices. If it goes to the 8%, I put in a sell (market) order the next morning. When in the morning? I'm not sure what is best here. It's a personal choice. I would wait 30min to see where the market is at as there is so much confusion first thing. I may lose a bit more this way but then I won't be shaken out for say a bounce off the 50dma first thing. Since I now have some computer access to the net now during work hours, I'm fairly confident with this method.You may do different. As far as hard stops. I never use them. I use mental stops. You will find that I am in the minority on this issue these days. Then again, I'm not really trading this market due to its volatility. Those that are I'm certain are using hard stops. - -Bill Triffet - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brett Roy" To: Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:03 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Selling Strategies - Question > Glad I found this group ... checked the archives and did not stumble accross any relevant messages but if I did, please advise! > > My question is on sell stops (8%) that are recommended by O'Neil. His book does not recommend stop orders so how do you handle these, just by keeping an 'eye' on the stock? > > For example if I buy at 100 and the stock after a few weeks gets to 93 I am close to my stop point. What happens if it starts the next day at 93, gets down to 90, then closes the day at 93 again. Should there have been a sell there? How about is starts at 93 gets down to 91 at the close, then I notice it is below, then it opens at 93 the next AM? > > Newbie asking for advice! > Thanks, > Brett > > > -- > Brett Roy > brettr@vistacreek.com > -------------- > "Don't stare at me, Eddie. I'm a humane man, but right now I could kick a kitten through an electric fan." > -- -- Frasier addressing his father's dog after having a bad day > > -- > > - > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:55:13 -0500 From: "Rick Parsons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses Ann, I use Windows On WallStreet: http://www.windowonwallstreet.com/default_user.cfm It has a quote screen where you can add securities and set your stop or alert price and it will give you a separate alert window if the security hits your stop. WOW is real time, about $80/month. Another program which will do the same thing in a different way is BigEasy (now owned by Ameritrade): www.bigeasyinvestor.com. The program is free and the daily data download is free too!! Very nicely laid out charting and screening package. It is integrated with the internet. If you have, for example, IBM on a chart, you can click on Research and bring up a large number of possible web sites that will give you research information on just IBM. I believe most charting software packages have this alert feature. Rick - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ann Hollingworth Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 5:13 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses What are some examples of the "charting software" to which you refer? Ann Hollingworth Reading Recovery Teacher Massachusetts Mutual Funds can be bought and sold by using a mental stop or have your charting software give you an alert when you hit your set stop. - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:04:38 -0500 From: "Rick Parsons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] OFF LIST(Mutual Fund Answer) Walt, I guess we all have our own terminology and use words in different ways. The way I look at it, CANSLIM does not time the market, the market tells CANSLIM there are fewer and fewer CANSLIM type stocks available and thus CANSLIMers are forced to cash. Correct me here if I am wrong. My definition of optimization is that there is much backtesting going on to determine which value of a parameter will return the highest percentage gain with the least drawdown. I don't recall backtesting as part of CANSLIM. Rick - --------------------- Bill, Timing the market is essential to the optimization of CANLSIM, and I would suggest that applies to mutual funds as well. The most recent problem with the markets (for me) have been a couple of head fakes that I went for. I'm a little gun shy, but still believe that it is necessary to follow WON's system. As for beating the S&P, there are a number of funds that trounce the index. I'll list a few later, but first here are some buy and hold(B&H) numbers that may be of interest: Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown Sector Track Record(01/03/01) www.yardeni.com/public/track.pdf Cumulative returns from 1992-2000(Top Three Sectors) S&P 500; 217% Health Care; 258% Financials; 383% Technology; 548% Returns for 2000 S&P 500; -10.5% Health Care; +31% Financials; +14% Technology; -33% It's not rocket science to be able to determine where money should be placed to realize the greatest gains, if you believe that these historical returns will hold for the future. However, instead of B&H, why not try to catch the rising sectors(not just these three), while shedding the laggards? That's what Bill Donohue does for the 62 Fidelity funds that he tracks and in 1999, he claimed a 51.6% return for the previous three years. Bill uses a system that was first devised by Mark Pankin. www.pankin.com I use a modified Pankin system in that instead of only Fidelity Selects, I've included 5,000 funds winnowed down to about 30. If you are interested in the Pankin System, I have his "proprietary" numbers that are in the public domain, since they have been posted on several web sites in the past. If you wish, I will pass them on to you. Some funds that I have held in the past: Five Year Annualized Return DRGTX; 36.4% TVFQX; 31.6% FSLBX; 29.4% FSELX; 28.2% Funds with a three year record: BFOCX: '98; +104%, '99; +143%; '00; -16%; YTD; -43% UOPIX: '98; +185%, '99; + 233%; '00; -74%; YTD; -36% It would seem from the two funds above that a modicum of timing would have produced adequate results. Best wishes, Walt - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:15:12 -0800 From: "Bill Triffet" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses Another option is your brokerages free email alerts. I use Fidelity and they have up to 8 email alerts. - -Bill Triffet - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Parsons" To: Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:55 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses > Ann, I use Windows On WallStreet: > http://www.windowonwallstreet.com/default_user.cfm > It has a quote screen where you can add securities and set your stop or > alert price and it will give you a separate alert window if the security > hits your stop. WOW is real time, about $80/month. > > Another program which will do the same thing in a different way is BigEasy > (now owned by Ameritrade): www.bigeasyinvestor.com. The program is free and > the daily data download is free too!! Very nicely laid out charting and > screening package. It is integrated with the internet. If you have, for > example, IBM on a chart, you can click on Research and bring up a large > number of possible web sites that will give you research information on just > IBM. > > I believe most charting software packages have this alert feature. > > > Rick > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ann Hollingworth > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 5:13 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses > > > What are some examples of the "charting software" to which you refer? > > Ann Hollingworth > Reading Recovery Teacher > Massachusetts > > > > Mutual Funds can be bought and sold by using a mental stop or have your > charting software give you an alert when you hit your set stop. > > > - > > > - > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:10:43 -0500 From: "Rick Parsons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses The mutual fund industry does hate traders. I know since I have been an aggressive mutual fund trader doing more than 15 trades a year. I am with Fidelity and their policy is if you do more than 15 trades a year, then they charge me commissions on NTF (no transaction fee) funds. The commissions are $75 each way regardless of trade size. If one has a large portfolio, $75 is a small percentage. (.00075 of a $100,000 portfolio). So it is a very small price to pay to avoid losses. Rick - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 17:17:06 -0700 From: DougC Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DCS I don't subscribe to IBD so I'm not familiar with the purpose of the weekend graphic review. I just use DGO for my stock selection. Is the review just to show what the basic base patterns might look like? Cause that's about the only reason I see for highlighting this stock. It does look like a double bottom pattern. But then again it could be a triple bottom, or even a quadruple bottom. From abs. peak of 21.25 on 08/24 to abs. low of 15.50 on 10/26 is a 37% range. Pretty steep I think for a mundane stock in the Aerospace/Defense Group. Do they give any description or discussion of why they highlight it? The numbers don't look all that great. And the debt is 147%. GRS is 66. Funds 26%. the last Quarter ending Dec 31 has rev increase over previous years quarter of only 4% but earnings jump 239%. And as far as the current place that the price is at is concerned I'd be willing to bet that that at some point in time soon, before it goes up much further, it's going to jump down to the 50dma which is currently at 19..around 16% below the current price of 22bucks. Just my humble opinion. Overall way too risky for me especially considering this 'oversold' market. But you're a risk-taker right? Good luck. At 05:24 PM 3/2/01 -0500, you wrote: >DCS 91/98 BCB per IBD Fri. On back page weekend graphic review, looks like a >W formation from Nov 4 to today. What do you think? > >Chris > >- - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 16:27:38 -0800 From: Eric Shen Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Mutual Funds - Cut Your Losses Rick, Do you mean that you move your entire portfolio in/out of a mutual fund? No wonder they hate people like you. :-) Eric Rick Parsons wrote: > > The mutual fund industry does hate traders. I know since I have been an > aggressive mutual fund trader doing more than 15 trades a year. I am with > Fidelity and their policy is if you do more than 15 trades a year, then they > charge me commissions on NTF (no transaction fee) funds. The commissions > are $75 each way regardless of trade size. If one has a large portfolio, > $75 is a small percentage. (.00075 of a $100,000 portfolio). So it is a > very small price to pay to avoid losses. > > Rick > > - - -- Eric Shen MS LOC3-8 Intel Corporation email: eshen@level1.com 9750 Goethe Road Tel: (916) 855 5177 x4497 Sacramento, CA 95827 - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:36:49 -0500 From: "Rick Parsons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00A5_01C0A350.1FDA8660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Boucher is a regular on TradingMarkets.com and has lessons and = courses posted on this site. The site is not free, however. They do = have a three day free trial. I am just starting his 10 week course. Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of David Squires Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:04 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership Hi all, Doug has mentioned hedge fund manager Mark Boucher. Anyone who has not = read his book "The Hedge Fund Edge" is doing themselves a big = disservice. Although WON will always be my sentimental favorite, Boucher = is, IMO, the perfect speculator. He has studied AND TESTED every = worthwhile trading method, many back to the 1900's, kept what worked and = trashed what didn't. What more could you want?!! DSquires ----- Original Message -----=20 From: DougC=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership I've noticed that many of the stocks being talked about recently by = this group have around 40% or more fund ownership. In WON"s book I don't = believe he mentions anything about a upper limit to fund ownership as a = criteria for CANSLIM selection. He just says that it's good to have some = fund ownership but I don't know if he puts a min or max number on it. = But I think Tom's point is very important that with more fund ownership = there is increased risk of being subject to intense selling. Especially = in this market even when it appears to 'experts' that it is oversold. = One writer I've read so far, Mark Boucher - who teaches a trading course = with very stringent selection criteria for longs and shorts and appears = to use CANSLIM as a foundation, advocates not initiating any long = positions on stocks with more than 16% fund ownership. When the market = was still rocketing up I think many people, including myself, overlooked = an upper limit to fund ownership as a criteria. But now after reading = through Boucher's courses I am going to use 16% as a limit. It helps to = keep me less inclined to dabble in this very dangerous market. I also = want to mention that several professional swing and intermediate term = traders and market commentators I follow are staying out of the market. = And these are guys who play both sides, long and short. So it does = appear to be very gutsy for anyone to be trading this market. After = getting whipsawed more than a few times for the past year I'm finally = going to start listening to those with much more experience than I have = and stay out until there is a followthru AND many stocks with complete = bases.=20 At 09:05 AM 3/1/01 -0500, you wrote: Funds already own 38% of the float, that could be a problem esp if = they falter in earnings. High PE (trailing is 53, projected is over 39). = Up/down ratio is 0.9, acceptable with the good CS elements, but not = exciting. # 2 in the group, but GRS is only 36. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ICQ # 5568838 =20 =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Squires=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:56 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Pick for Chris Hi Chris, =20 I'm sure you know I'm not a proponent of buying right now but if = you had to buy something CEFT is about the best looking chart I've seen = lately. It looks almost identical to GLW in the summer of 2000 just = before its huge run. Chart is attached. =20 Good Trading, Dave Squires =20 =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Vanchee1@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:15 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Pick for Chris Thanks Jeff, I will take a good look at LNCR.=20 Chris.=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_00A5_01C0A350.1FDA8660 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mark Boucher is a regular on TradingMarkets.com and has = lessons=20 and courses posted on this site.  The site is not free, = however.  They=20 do have a three day free trial.  I am just starting his 10 week=20 course.
 
 
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of David=20 Squires
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:04 PM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fund=20 Ownership

Hi all,
 
Doug has mentioned hedge fund manager Mark = Boucher. Anyone=20 who has not read his book "The Hedge Fund Edge" is doing themselves a = big=20 disservice. Although WON will always be my sentimental favorite, = Boucher is,=20 IMO, the perfect speculator. He has studied AND TESTED every = worthwhile=20 trading method, many back to the 1900's, kept what worked and trashed = what=20 didn't. What more could you want?!!
 
DSquires
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 DougC =
Sent: Thursday, March 01, = 2001 3:18=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Fund = Ownership

I've noticed that many of the stocks being talked = about=20 recently by this group have around 40% or more fund ownership. In = WON"s book=20 I don't believe he mentions anything about a upper limit to fund = ownership=20 as a criteria for CANSLIM selection. He just says that it's good to = have=20 some fund ownership but I don't know if he puts a min or max number = on it.=20 But I think Tom's point is very important that with more fund = ownership=20 there is increased risk of being subject to intense selling. = Especially in=20 this market even when it appears to 'experts' that it is oversold. = One=20 writer I've read so far, Mark Boucher - who teaches a trading course = with=20 very stringent selection criteria for longs and shorts and appears = to use=20 CANSLIM as a foundation, advocates not initiating any long positions = on=20 stocks with more than 16% fund ownership. When the market was still=20 rocketing up I think many people, including myself, overlooked an = upper=20 limit to fund ownership as a criteria. But now after reading through = Boucher's courses I am going to use 16% as a limit. It helps to keep = me less=20 inclined to dabble in this very dangerous market. I also want to = mention=20 that several professional swing and intermediate term traders and = market=20 commentators I follow are staying out of the market. And these are = guys who=20 play both sides, long and short. So it does appear to be very gutsy = for=20 anyone to be trading this market. After getting whipsawed more than = a few=20 times for the past year I'm finally going to start listening to = those with=20 much more experience than I have and stay out until there is a = followthru=20 AND many stocks with complete bases.

At 09:05 AM 3/1/01 = - -0500, you=20 wrote:
Funds already own 38% of the float, = that=20 could be a problem esp if they falter in earnings. High PE = (trailing is=20 53, projected is over 39). Up/down ratio is 0.9, acceptable with = the good=20 CS elements, but not exciting. # 2 in the group, but GRS is only=20 36.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
ICQ = #=20 5568838
 
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: David = Squires=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:56 = AM
Subject: Re:=20 [CANSLIM] Pick for Chris

Hi=20 Chris,
 
I'm sure you know I'm = not a=20 proponent of buying right now but if you had to buy something = CEFT is=20 about the best looking chart I've seen lately. It looks almost = identical=20 to GLW in the summer of 2000 just before its huge run. Chart is=20 attached.
 
Good = Trading,
Dave=20 Squires
 
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Vanchee1@aol.com =
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:15=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Pick for = Chris

Thanks Jeff, I will take a good look at = LNCR.=20

Chris.=20 =
<= /BODY> - ------=_NextPart_000_00A5_01C0A350.1FDA8660-- - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:38:26 -0600 From: "walter nusbaum" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OFF LIST(Mutual Fund Answer) - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Parsons" To: Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 5:04 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] OFF LIST(Mutual Fund Answer) > Walt, > I guess we all have our own terminology and use words in different ways. > The way I look at it, CANSLIM does not time the market, the market tells > CANSLIM there are fewer and fewer CANSLIM type stocks available and thus > CANSLIMers are forced to cash. Correct me here if I am wrong. > > My definition of optimization is that there is much backtesting going on to > determine which value of a parameter will return the highest percentage gain > with the least drawdown. I don't recall backtesting as part of CANSLIM. > > Rick Rick, It could be a matter of interpretation, but WON says, "You can be right on every one of the factors in the first six chapters(CANSLI); however if you're wrong about the direction(M) of the broad general market, three out of four of your stocks will slump with the market, and you will lose money.........Therefore, it is essential to try to preserve as much of the profit you have built up as possible, rather than to ride most investments up and down through difficult cycles like many people do......You will usually be better off staying on the sidelines in cash and avoiding short-term counterfeit rallies during the first few legs of a bear market". I dunno, but that says to me, "Everybody out of the pool". I didn't mention backtesting, but I'm certainly guilty of it. The dictionary definition of optimize is: "to make as perfect, effective, or functional as possible". That's what were doing when we lighten up, get off margin, sell weaker holdings, etc., in the face of a market decline. Thanks for your note. Best wishes, Walt > Bill, > Timing the market is essential to the optimization of CANLSIM, and I would > suggest that applies to mutual funds as well. The most recent problem with > the markets (for me) have been a couple of head fakes that I went for. I'm a > little gun shy, but still believe that it is necessary to follow WON's > system. > > As for beating the S&P, there are a number of funds that trounce the index. > I'll list a few later, but first here are some buy and hold(B&H) numbers > that may be of interest: > > Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown Sector Track Record(01/03/01) > www.yardeni.com/public/track.pdf > > Cumulative returns from 1992-2000(Top Three Sectors) > S&P 500; 217% > Health Care; 258% > Financials; 383% > Technology; 548% > > Returns for 2000 > S&P 500; -10.5% > Health Care; +31% > Financials; +14% > Technology; -33% > > It's not rocket science to be able to determine where money should be placed > to realize the greatest gains, if you believe that these historical returns > will hold for the future. However, instead of B&H, why not try to catch the > rising sectors(not just these three), while shedding the laggards? That's > what Bill Donohue does for the 62 Fidelity funds that he tracks and in 1999, > he claimed a 51.6% return for the previous three years. > > Bill uses a system that was first devised by Mark Pankin. www.pankin.com > I use a modified Pankin system in that instead of only Fidelity Selects, > I've included 5,000 funds winnowed down to about 30. If you are interested > in the Pankin System, I have his "proprietary" numbers that are in the > public domain, since they have been posted on several web sites in the past. > If you wish, I will pass them on to you. > > Some funds that I have held in the past: > Five Year Annualized Return > DRGTX; 36.4% > TVFQX; 31.6% > FSLBX; 29.4% > FSELX; 28.2% > > Funds with a three year record: > BFOCX: '98; +104%, '99; +143%; '00; -16%; YTD; -43% > UOPIX: '98; +185%, '99; + 233%; '00; -74%; YTD; -36% > > It would seem from the two funds above that a modicum of timing would have > produced adequate results. > Best wishes, > Walt > > > > > > > - > > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:40:24 -0500 From: "Rick Parsons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01C0A350.A06BBBA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm using Outlook 2000, not Outlook Express. A right click on the = envelope does not show "properties" in my case. Besides wouldn't it show canslim@lists.xmission.com as the sender? Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of walter nusbaum Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 1:35 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rick Parsons=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 11:54 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership How does one do a private reply to an individual like DougC? There = is no display of his email address. Rick, Before opening an email, put your cursor over the name or the = envelope to the left and right click. A window will drop down. Choose = "Properties" and the sender's address will appear. Best wishes, Walt - ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01C0A350.A06BBBA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm using Outlook 2000, not Outlook Express.  A = right click=20 on the envelope does not show "properties" in my=20 case.
Besides wouldn't it show canslim@lists.xmission.com as the sender?
 
 
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of walter=20 nusbaum
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 1:35 PM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fund=20 Ownership

 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Rick Parsons
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 = 11:54=20 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fund=20 Ownership

How does one do a private reply to an individual = like=20 DougC?  There is no display of his email=20 address.
 
 
Rick,
Before opening an email, = put your=20 cursor over the name or the envelope to the left and right click. A = window=20 will drop down. Choose "Properties" and the sender's address will=20 appear.
Best = wishes,
Walt
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01C0A350.A06BBBA0-- - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:02:44 -0600 From: "Norman" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_014A_01C0A34B.5CF41A70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rick, Properties in OE will expose the address from which the mail came. If = the person bounces the mail off another server it might be impossible to = trace them though. I checked Outlook (since I use OE) and couldn't find = where the sender's address could be found. I would think this is = possible though. Norman Boyd ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rick Parsons=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:40 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership I'm using Outlook 2000, not Outlook Express. A right click on the = envelope does not show "properties" in my case. Besides wouldn't it show canslim@lists.xmission.com as the sender? Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of walter nusbaum Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 1:35 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rick Parsons=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 11:54 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fund Ownership How does one do a private reply to an individual like DougC? = There is no display of his email address. Rick, Before opening an email, put your cursor over the name or the = envelope to the left and right click. A window will drop down. Choose = "Properties" and the sender's address will appear. Best wishes, Walt - ------=_NextPart_000_014A_01C0A34B.5CF41A70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Rick,
 
Properties in OE will expose the address from which the mail = came.  If=20 the person bounces the mail off another server it might be impossible to = trace=20 them though.  I checked Outlook (since I use OE) and couldn't find = where=20 the sender's address could be found.  I would think this is = possible=20 though.
 
Norman Boyd
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Rick Parsons
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 = 6:40=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fund=20 Ownership

I'm using Outlook 2000, not Outlook Express.  A = right=20 click on the envelope does not show "properties" in my=20 case.
Besides wouldn't it show canslim@lists.xmission.com as the sender?
 
 
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of walter=20 nusbaum
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 1:35 PM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fund=20 Ownership

 
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Rick Parsons =
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Friday, March 02, = 2001 11:54=20 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fund = Ownership

How does one do a private reply = to an=20 individual like DougC?  There is no display of his email=20 address.
 
 
Rick,
Before opening an = email, put your=20 cursor over the name or the envelope to the left and right click. = A window=20 will drop down. Choose "Properties" and the sender's address will=20 appear.
Best = wishes,
Walt
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_014A_01C0A34B.5CF41A70-- - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1172 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.