From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1362 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Sunday, May 13 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1362 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] virus Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? Re: [CANSLIM] OSG opinions? Re: [CANSLIM] OSG opinions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 08:58:31 -0700 From: Dan Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] virus I have not heard of, seen, or experienced any virus, etc associated with a jpg, gif, or bmp file. Has anyone? Spencer48@aol.com wrote: > Ann: > > Very good reason why I rarely open any downloads-even from Canslimmers. > Even though I believe the Canslimmers will give useful info in the graphs or > data they send, what one must worry about nowadays is whether the files that > are sent are UNKNOWINGLY infected. And I'm afraid that the virus or trojan > will be too new for Norton to identify/eradicate it, or that I will forget to > use Norton to scan it before opening. > > jans > > In a message dated 5/12/2001 11:14:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > annholly@mediaone.net writes: > > << Just got a virus, after receiving several pieces of junk mail. The virus > was > something about Snow White, put something entitled sexy virgin.scr in my > TEMP folder. I seem to have solved it, thanks to Norton/Symantec. Watch out. > I hope I didn't inadvertently send it out to list. (scanned before mailing > this) > > Ann >> > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 15:35:42 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C0DBC2.5F8405C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Geeez, Danny, what do you want me to do? Tell you the day and the exact = hour to buy it? Maybe buy it for you and gift it over? Come on, I think = I already do enough for this group, without having to also present "buy = now" candidates! I posted on this one as it appeared to me to meet = virtually anyone's requirements for a CANSLIM quality stock worth = WATCHING. Note the operative word is "watching", that means you gotta do = some of the work yourself. Next time I see one like this, I'll not bother to mention it. Or just = buy it for myself. But note, I clearly stated that I would not be buying = it for myself, nor was suggesting any member of this group should rush = out and buy it. If you did, that was your choice. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ----- Original Message -----=20 From: dannygottlieb=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com ; CANSLIM=20 Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? Tom, this is to refresh your memory.Still waiting for it to pop. Danny ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: CANSLIM=20 Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:09 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? I stopped my review long enough to post this, IGT looks to me to be = about as good as it gets, even in a good "M". RS 96, EPS 97, ROE 82%, Cash Flow $2.67 compared to last year's = earnings of $1.81 Group A, GRS 96, 5 year earnings growth a weak 20%, but forecast for = present year is 50% (recently increased) and next year 11% (also = recently increased) Funds have 21%, management 7% A/D B, Timeliness A, SMR A, ranked 4th in its group (Leisure - = Gaming) Chart wise, shows a nice tight LLUR pattern from last Sept to = 3/7/01, when it peaked at 57.25. Up to that point it had not traded = measurably under its 50 dma. On 3/19 it dropped sharply below its 50 = dma, anyone who had bot and held it as a LLUR should have exited then, = if not sooner using trailing stops (it's close that day was over 16% = below the high of 3/7). Since then, it has formed a smooth cup which at its low had given up = 42% of the gains from late Sep to the high. Much of the bottom of the = cup only gave up 25% of this gain. What is lacking in the bottom of the = cup is any evidence of capitulation selling. Volume remained close to or = above ADV, suggesting institutional support. It looks like it started a = handle at 55, then broke out briefly just under the high. May be simply = a continuation of the handle, but upward due recent improvement in = market sentiment. Or it may be doing a base on base. Either way, volume = is now declining,=20 Please note: I did not look beyond the 6 month chart. I am not saying members should rush out and buy this one. I won't, = because it's well above my price range. I do think this stock is worth = studying for learning purposes, and following for some time to see how = it does from here. For some members, it should be on your watch list. Opinions and comments welcomed, Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C0DBC2.5F8405C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Geeez, Danny, what do you want me to do? Tell you = the day and=20 the exact hour to buy it? Maybe buy it for you and gift it over? Come = on, I=20 think I already do enough for this group, without having to also present = "buy=20 now" candidates!  I posted on this one as it appeared to me to meet = virtually anyone's requirements for a CANSLIM quality stock worth = WATCHING. Note=20 the operative word is "watching", that means you gotta do some of the = work=20 yourself.
 
Next time I see one like this, I'll not bother to = mention it.=20 Or just buy it for myself. But note, I clearly stated that I would not = be buying=20 it for myself, nor was suggesting any member of this group should rush = out and=20 buy it. If you did, that was your choice.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 dannygottlieb
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com ; CANSLIM=20
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 = 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a = "perfect"=20 CANSLIM??

Tom, this is to refresh your = memory.Still waiting=20 for it to pop. Danny
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: CANSLIM=20
Sent: Saturday, April 28, = 2001 12:09=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] IGT - a = "perfect"=20 CANSLIM??

I stopped my review long enough to post this, = IGT looks to=20 me to be about as good as it gets, even in a good "M".
 
RS 96, EPS 97, ROE 82%, Cash Flow $2.67 = compared=20 to last year's earnings of $1.81
 
Group A, GRS 96, 5 year = earnings=20 growth a weak 20%, but forecast for present year is = 50%=20 (recently increased) and next year 11%=20 (also recently increased)
 
Funds have 21%, management 7%
 
A/D B, Timeliness A, SMR A, ranked 4th in its = group=20 (Leisure - Gaming)
 
Chart wise, shows a nice tight LLUR pattern from = last Sept=20 to 3/7/01, when it peaked at 57.25. Up to that point it had not = traded=20 measurably under its 50 dma.  On 3/19 it dropped sharply below = its 50=20 dma, anyone who had bot and held it as a LLUR should have exited = then, if=20 not sooner using trailing stops (it's close that day was over 16% = below the=20 high of 3/7).
 
Since then, it has formed a smooth cup which at = its low=20 had given up 42% of the gains from late Sep to the high. Much of the = bottom=20 of the cup only gave up 25% of this gain. What is lacking in the = bottom of=20 the cup is any evidence of capitulation selling. Volume remained = close to or=20 above ADV, suggesting institutional support. It looks like it = started a=20 handle at 55, then broke out briefly just under the high. May be = simply a=20 continuation of the handle, but upward due recent improvement in = market=20 sentiment. Or it may be doing a base on base. Either way, volume is = now=20 declining,
 
Please note: I did not look beyond the 6 = month=20 chart.
 
I am not saying members should rush out and buy = this one.=20 I won't, because it's well above my price range. I do think this = stock is=20 worth studying for learning purposes, and following for some time to = see how=20 it does from here.  For some members, it should be on your = watch=20 list.
 
Opinions and comments welcomed,
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C0DBC2.5F8405C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 14:59:57 -0500 From: Gene Ricci Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0211_01C0DBBD.600ADB40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, please do you not stop or modify what you're doing for us. I really = do appreciate knowing what you're watching because it forces me to try = and see what you're seeing. I'm not always successful but I'm getting = better at it. Thanks for your excellent posts! Gene ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? Geeez, Danny, what do you want me to do? Tell you the day and the = exact hour to buy it? Maybe buy it for you and gift it over? Come on, I = think I already do enough for this group, without having to also present = "buy now" candidates! I posted on this one as it appeared to me to meet = virtually anyone's requirements for a CANSLIM quality stock worth = WATCHING. Note the operative word is "watching", that means you gotta do = some of the work yourself. Next time I see one like this, I'll not bother to mention it. Or just = buy it for myself. But note, I clearly stated that I would not be buying = it for myself, nor was suggesting any member of this group should rush = out and buy it. If you did, that was your choice. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ----- Original Message -----=20 From: dannygottlieb=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com ; CANSLIM=20 Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? Tom, this is to refresh your memory.Still waiting for it to pop. = Danny ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: CANSLIM=20 Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:09 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? I stopped my review long enough to post this, IGT looks to me to = be about as good as it gets, even in a good "M". RS 96, EPS 97, ROE 82%, Cash Flow $2.67 compared to last year's = earnings of $1.81 Group A, GRS 96, 5 year earnings growth a weak 20%, but forecast = for present year is 50% (recently increased) and next year 11% (also = recently increased) Funds have 21%, management 7% A/D B, Timeliness A, SMR A, ranked 4th in its group (Leisure - = Gaming) Chart wise, shows a nice tight LLUR pattern from last Sept to = 3/7/01, when it peaked at 57.25. Up to that point it had not traded = measurably under its 50 dma. On 3/19 it dropped sharply below its 50 = dma, anyone who had bot and held it as a LLUR should have exited then, = if not sooner using trailing stops (it's close that day was over 16% = below the high of 3/7). Since then, it has formed a smooth cup which at its low had given = up 42% of the gains from late Sep to the high. Much of the bottom of the = cup only gave up 25% of this gain. What is lacking in the bottom of the = cup is any evidence of capitulation selling. Volume remained close to or = above ADV, suggesting institutional support. It looks like it started a = handle at 55, then broke out briefly just under the high. May be simply = a continuation of the handle, but upward due recent improvement in = market sentiment. Or it may be doing a base on base. Either way, volume = is now declining,=20 Please note: I did not look beyond the 6 month chart. I am not saying members should rush out and buy this one. I won't, = because it's well above my price range. I do think this stock is worth = studying for learning purposes, and following for some time to see how = it does from here. For some members, it should be on your watch list. Opinions and comments welcomed, Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ------=_NextPart_000_0211_01C0DBBD.600ADB40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom, please do you not stop or modify = what=20 you're doing for us. I really do appreciate knowing what you're watching = because=20 it forces me to try and see what you're seeing. I'm not always = successful but=20 I'm getting better at it.
 
Thanks for your excellent=20 posts!
Gene
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom = Worley=20
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 2:35 = PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a = "perfect"=20 CANSLIM??

Geeez, Danny, what do you want me to do? Tell you = the day=20 and the exact hour to buy it? Maybe buy it for you and gift it over? = Come on,=20 I think I already do enough for this group, without having to also = present=20 "buy now" candidates!  I posted on this one as it appeared to me = to meet=20 virtually anyone's requirements for a CANSLIM quality stock worth = WATCHING.=20 Note the operative word is "watching", that means you gotta do some of = the=20 work yourself.
 
Next time I see one like this, I'll not bother to = mention=20 it. Or just buy it for myself. But note, I clearly stated that I would = not be=20 buying it for myself, nor was suggesting any member of this group = should rush=20 out and buy it. If you did, that was your choice.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 dannygottlieb
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= ; CANSLIM=20
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 = 10:31=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - = a=20 "perfect" CANSLIM??

Tom, this is to refresh your = memory.Still=20 waiting for it to pop. Danny
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: CANSLIM
Sent: Saturday, April 28, = 2001 12:09=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] IGT - a = "perfect"=20 CANSLIM??

I stopped my review long enough to post this, = IGT looks=20 to me to be about as good as it gets, even in a good = "M".
 
RS 96, EPS 97, ROE 82%, Cash Flow = $2.67 compared=20 to last year's earnings of $1.81
 
Group A, GRS 96, 5 year = earnings=20 growth a weak 20%, but forecast for present year is = 50%=20 (recently increased) and next year 11%=20 (also recently increased)
 
Funds have 21%, management 7%
 
A/D B, Timeliness A, SMR A, ranked 4th in its = group=20 (Leisure - Gaming)
 
Chart wise, shows a nice tight LLUR pattern = from last=20 Sept to 3/7/01, when it peaked at 57.25. Up to that point it had = not=20 traded measurably under its 50 dma.  On 3/19 it dropped = sharply below=20 its 50 dma, anyone who had bot and held it as a LLUR should have = exited=20 then, if not sooner using trailing stops (it's close that day was = over 16%=20 below the high of 3/7).
 
Since then, it has formed a smooth cup which = at its low=20 had given up 42% of the gains from late Sep to the high. Much of = the=20 bottom of the cup only gave up 25% of this gain. What is lacking = in the=20 bottom of the cup is any evidence of capitulation selling. Volume = remained=20 close to or above ADV, suggesting institutional support. It looks = like it=20 started a handle at 55, then broke out briefly just under the = high. May be=20 simply a continuation of the handle, but upward due recent = improvement in=20 market sentiment. Or it may be doing a base on base. Either way, = volume is=20 now declining,
 
Please note: I did not look beyond the 6 = month=20 chart.
 
I am not saying members should rush out and = buy this=20 one. I won't, because it's well above my price range. I do think = this=20 stock is worth studying for learning purposes, and following for = some time=20 to see how it does from here.  For some members, it should be = on your=20 watch list.
 
Opinions and comments welcomed,
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0211_01C0DBBD.600ADB40-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 15:34:43 -0500 From: "Norman" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_008A_01C0DBC2.3BD00200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, I didn't get that Danny wanted you to time his buys. I think maybe he = was just tossing IGT out there as something you mentioned and he is = watching closely. I do that with nearly every stock mentioned here. = Maybe it was on his watch list before you mentioned it? And I suspect = several of the lurkers are doing the same as Danny, waiting. Keep up the good work! This forum is most educational for this CANSLIM = newbie. Norman Boyd - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? Geeez, Danny, what do you want me to do? Tell you the day and the = exact hour to buy it? Maybe buy it for you and gift it over? Come on, I = think I already do enough for this group, without having to also present = "buy now" candidates! I posted on this one as it appeared to me to meet = virtually anyone's requirements for a CANSLIM quality stock worth = WATCHING. Note the operative word is "watching", that means you gotta do = some of the work yourself. Next time I see one like this, I'll not bother to mention it. Or just = buy it for myself. But note, I clearly stated that I would not be buying = it for myself, nor was suggesting any member of this group should rush = out and buy it. If you did, that was your choice. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ----- Original Message -----=20 From: dannygottlieb=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com ; CANSLIM=20 Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? Tom, this is to refresh your memory.Still waiting for it to pop. = Danny ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: CANSLIM=20 Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:09 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] IGT - a "perfect" CANSLIM?? I stopped my review long enough to post this, IGT looks to me to = be about as good as it gets, even in a good "M". RS 96, EPS 97, ROE 82%, Cash Flow $2.67 compared to last year's = earnings of $1.81 Group A, GRS 96, 5 year earnings growth a weak 20%, but forecast = for present year is 50% (recently increased) and next year 11% (also = recently increased) Funds have 21%, management 7% A/D B, Timeliness A, SMR A, ranked 4th in its group (Leisure - = Gaming) Chart wise, shows a nice tight LLUR pattern from last Sept to = 3/7/01, when it peaked at 57.25. Up to that point it had not traded = measurably under its 50 dma. On 3/19 it dropped sharply below its 50 = dma, anyone who had bot and held it as a LLUR should have exited then, = if not sooner using trailing stops (it's close that day was over 16% = below the high of 3/7). Since then, it has formed a smooth cup which at its low had given = up 42% of the gains from late Sep to the high. Much of the bottom of the = cup only gave up 25% of this gain. What is lacking in the bottom of the = cup is any evidence of capitulation selling. Volume remained close to or = above ADV, suggesting institutional support. It looks like it started a = handle at 55, then broke out briefly just under the high. May be simply = a continuation of the handle, but upward due recent improvement in = market sentiment. Or it may be doing a base on base. Either way, volume = is now declining,=20 Please note: I did not look beyond the 6 month chart. I am not saying members should rush out and buy this one. I won't, = because it's well above my price range. I do think this stock is worth = studying for learning purposes, and following for some time to see how = it does from here. For some members, it should be on your watch list. Opinions and comments welcomed, Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ------=_NextPart_000_008A_01C0DBC2.3BD00200 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom,
 
I didn't get that Danny wanted you to time his buys.  I think = maybe he=20 was just tossing IGT out there as something you mentioned and he is = watching=20 closely.  I do that with nearly every stock mentioned here.  = Maybe it=20 was on his watch list before you mentioned it?    And I = suspect=20 several of the lurkers are doing the same as Danny, waiting.
 
Keep up the good work!  This forum is most educational for = this=20 CANSLIM newbie.
 
Norman Boyd
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom = Worley=20
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 2:35 = PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - a = "perfect"=20 CANSLIM??

Geeez, Danny, what do you want me to do? Tell you = the day=20 and the exact hour to buy it? Maybe buy it for you and gift it over? = Come on,=20 I think I already do enough for this group, without having to also = present=20 "buy now" candidates!  I posted on this one as it appeared to me = to meet=20 virtually anyone's requirements for a CANSLIM quality stock worth = WATCHING.=20 Note the operative word is "watching", that means you gotta do some of = the=20 work yourself.
 
Next time I see one like this, I'll not bother to = mention=20 it. Or just buy it for myself. But note, I clearly stated that I would = not be=20 buying it for myself, nor was suggesting any member of this group = should rush=20 out and buy it. If you did, that was your choice.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 dannygottlieb
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= ; CANSLIM=20
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 = 10:31=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT - = a=20 "perfect" CANSLIM??

Tom, this is to refresh your = memory.Still=20 waiting for it to pop. Danny
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: CANSLIM
Sent: Saturday, April 28, = 2001 12:09=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] IGT - a = "perfect"=20 CANSLIM??

I stopped my review long enough to post this, = IGT looks=20 to me to be about as good as it gets, even in a good = "M".
 
RS 96, EPS 97, ROE 82%, Cash Flow = $2.67 compared=20 to last year's earnings of $1.81
 
Group A, GRS 96, 5 year = earnings=20 growth a weak 20%, but forecast for present year is = 50%=20 (recently increased) and next year 11%=20 (also recently increased)
 
Funds have 21%, management 7%
 
A/D B, Timeliness A, SMR A, ranked 4th in its = group=20 (Leisure - Gaming)
 
Chart wise, shows a nice tight LLUR pattern = from last=20 Sept to 3/7/01, when it peaked at 57.25. Up to that point it had = not=20 traded measurably under its 50 dma.  On 3/19 it dropped = sharply below=20 its 50 dma, anyone who had bot and held it as a LLUR should have = exited=20 then, if not sooner using trailing stops (it's close that day was = over 16%=20 below the high of 3/7).
 
Since then, it has formed a smooth cup which = at its low=20 had given up 42% of the gains from late Sep to the high. Much of = the=20 bottom of the cup only gave up 25% of this gain. What is lacking = in the=20 bottom of the cup is any evidence of capitulation selling. Volume = remained=20 close to or above ADV, suggesting institutional support. It looks = like it=20 started a handle at 55, then broke out briefly just under the = high. May be=20 simply a continuation of the handle, but upward due recent = improvement in=20 market sentiment. Or it may be doing a base on base. Either way, = volume is=20 now declining,
 
Please note: I did not look beyond the 6 = month=20 chart.
 
I am not saying members should rush out and = buy this=20 one. I won't, because it's well above my price range. I do think = this=20 stock is worth studying for learning purposes, and following for = some time=20 to see how it does from here.  For some members, it should be = on your=20 watch list.
 
Opinions and comments welcomed,
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_008A_01C0DBC2.3BD00200-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 18:00:00 -0700 From: "Ian" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OSG opinions? Tom: Would it be possible to tell me which 3 were the tops in their group? Thank you, Ian - ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley To: Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 9:50 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OSG opinions? > Sorry for the delay in responding, Ian, but the first time I > looked at this chart, I simply couldn't make up my mind, and > figured someone else would jump in. > > Anyway, I am still a little torn on this one. Looks like it is > building a slightly ragged base, now 4 weeks old. Doesn't seem > like there are high expectations (hence the trailing PE of 8) > despite the projected 38% growth in earnings this year. Doesn't > make sense. Funds already have 20%, but that could grow if they > felt good about it. Management has a good stake at 28% of the > issue. ROE weak at 12%, but cash flow good at $3.64 vs last > year's earnings of $2.49. It's not in the top 5 of its group, and > the GRS is only 56, but I suspect it's more crude oil shipping > related than general Transportation-Shipping. > > All in all, I guess I would have to do some homework on this one > before putting it on my watch list. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ian > To: > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:16 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] OSG opinions? > > > Since I appear to be hung up on shipping companies today, does > anyone have > an opinion on OSG (78 81 C A A)? > > Thanks, > > Ian > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 19:23:11 -0600 From: esetser Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OSG opinions? The answer will depend on your definition of "top 3" of course. DGO provides the top 5 stocks based on RS, but I like the IBD approach of summing the EPS and RS better. Using DGO, and using the sum approach, the top 3 would be: FRONY 78/96 TK 78/88 SJH 74/91 OSG 78/81, this one would be 4th ysing that approach At 06:00 PM 5/13/01 -0700, you wrote: >Tom: > >Would it be possible to tell me which 3 were the tops in their group? > >Thank you, > >Ian > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Tom Worley >To: >Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 9:50 PM >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OSG opinions? > > >> Sorry for the delay in responding, Ian, but the first time I >> looked at this chart, I simply couldn't make up my mind, and >> figured someone else would jump in. >> >> Anyway, I am still a little torn on this one. Looks like it is >> building a slightly ragged base, now 4 weeks old. Doesn't seem >> like there are high expectations (hence the trailing PE of 8) >> despite the projected 38% growth in earnings this year. Doesn't >> make sense. Funds already have 20%, but that could grow if they >> felt good about it. Management has a good stake at 28% of the >> issue. ROE weak at 12%, but cash flow good at $3.64 vs last >> year's earnings of $2.49. It's not in the top 5 of its group, and >> the GRS is only 56, but I suspect it's more crude oil shipping >> related than general Transportation-Shipping. >> >> All in all, I guess I would have to do some homework on this one >> before putting it on my watch list. >> >> Tom Worley >> stkguru@netside.net >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Ian >> To: >> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:16 PM >> Subject: [CANSLIM] OSG opinions? >> >> >> Since I appear to be hung up on shipping companies today, does >> anyone have >> an opinion on OSG (78 81 C A A)? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ian >> >> >> - >> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >> >> >> >> - >> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1362 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.