From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1524 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, June 22 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1524 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] ASCA - some may like this one Re: [CANSLIM] A market observation - Valuation Re: [CANSLIM] ESCM Re: [CANSLIM] IRM Re: [CANSLIM] CPRT,ANF,PPDI,IGT,DGX,SHFL,GPI [CANSLIM] Breakout Strategy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:51:52 -0700 From: "Sisyphus" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ASCA - some may like this one >That's one of the many hazards this group suffers, because we use >different sites for our data. I use DGO religiously, and it >shows the past two quarters earnings as up (Y2Y) 200% and 123% >respectively. WILDLY different from what I have: Current Qtr EPS 0.19 46.15% Last Qtr EPS 0.04 -200.00% 3 Qtr Ago EPS 0.01 0.00% 4 Qtr Ago EPS -0.02 -150.00% > For the current year, forecast shown is an >increase of 765%, and an additional 10% for year 2002. My source: Proj. % EPS Growth 1 Yr. 856.25 And so on...you get the picture. >Remember >that DGO excludes any non-recurring financial events, so what >they consider is based only on what is perceived to be continuing >matters. I agree with this approach, which is why I am willing to >pay for DGO data. I've never used DGO, so am totally unfamiliar with it. It seems, though,= at least for this stock, to give number very different not just from my= data source but from all the others I consulted online. I wonder what,= exactly, these non-recurring items are. >DGO ranks stocks within a group based first on RS, then on EPS. >PENN has an RS of "only" 96, so it ends up ranked #6 in the >group, WMS, with the same RS but a lower EPS would rank even >lower, and IGT with an RS of 95 falls even lower. Wonder why it ranks them one way at DGO and another at investors.com.... Thanks for your insight. Enlightening, as always. John - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: 22 Jun 2001 16:57:14 CDT From: Fanus Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] A market observation - Valuation This would probably be everyone's perfect stock. But how many stocks are= there trading close to new highs with years of increasing earnings and revenues, trading for half its assets? CANSLIM is based on growth which = is the opposite of Value investment. I hope... Otherwise I misunderstood t= he whole CANSLIM concept, in which case I will have to read WON's books yet another time. But we are getting off base here with regard to the topic of this list. I= was just curious on how you calculate the value of 800 and 1100 for S&P and N= AZ. = I didn't mean to start a off topic thread on how Warren Buffet would inve= st. - - Fanus "Ian" wrote: > Actually, I think Warren Buffet's 'perfect' stock would be a CANSLIM st= ock > trading for 50 cents on the dollar (based on tangible assets). After al= l, he > is the one who moved from pure Ben Graham value to GARP. > = > = > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Fanus > To: > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:26 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] A market observation - Valuation > = > = > And I am not sure Warren Buffet would ever buy a CANSLIM stock, so I am= not > sure his defition of value is compatible with CANSLIM. I am pretty sur= e > WON's > definition of Value would be quite different than Warren Buffet. If Wa= rren > Buffet think the NASDAQ should be 1100, but other people is willing to = pay > 2000 for it, does this mean they are wrong? I still think one should rather > look what the market is telling you than trying to tell the maket what= its > value should be. > = > - Fanus > = > Victor Ming wrote: > > Hi Fanus, > > > > As the much respected Warren Buffett once said, "PRICE > > is what you pay, VALUE is what you get!" > > > > fg > > > > --- Fanus wrote: > > > Hi Ian > > > > > > Can you eloborate a little on your statement of: > > > "and the the S&P > > > should be 800 and the NAZ should be 1100" and > > > explain how you get to these > > > values? > > > > > > The reason I am asking, is that I am always a little > > > confused when people > > > putting valuations on indexes and stocks. I know I > > > always have a tendancy to > > > always oversimplify things. Make it easier for me to > > > understand. But in my > > > view, the current price of something is its value at > > > the moment. Value for me > > > is, the price people are willing to pay. And if > > > people are willing to pay 1200 > > > for the S&P and 2000 for the NASDAQ, then this is > > > their value. Am I > > > oversimplifying this too much? > > > > > > Regards > > > - Fanus > > > > > > > > > "Ian" wrote: > > > > Hi all: > > > > > > > > I always make my CANSLIM buy/watch list using the > > > most recent quarters > > > > revenue/EPS growth as my starting point. I then > > > check for outlook, > > > > valuation, recent volume history, fundamental > > > history and chart resistance. > > > > > > > > I have about 70 tickers on my list from Q1 2001. > > > Because of my valuation > > > > concern, these are all small and microcaps, many > > > with low prices and many > > > > with non-existant volume. I Have a 'top tier' of > > > issues in my sweet spot > > > > ($11-$26, with $11-$16 optimal). > > > > > > > > I just thought that I would point out that, in > > > keeping with recent history > > > > (the last 9 months of the bear), many of these > > > bottomed in the recent panic > > > > during Wednesday and Thursday of this week. They > > > have all rebounded off > > > > these bottoms, albeit on low low volumes. I also > > > see that recent IBD > > > > high-fliers like BEIQ, ACRT and EPIQ have also > > > bounced. > > > > > > > > The trigger for me writing this post is that these > > > stocks are behaving well > > > > today. Even though all the major indexes are red, > > > and the Russelll 2000 is > > > > down more than the S&P and NAZ and DOW, that my > > > watch stocks are green by a > > > > ratio of about 2 to 1. This adds to my confidence > > > that these issues (and > > > > perhaps 'M') may have put in a bottom for the > > > quarter. I will watch closely > > > > to see if they continue to hold up into next > > > Wednesday and Thursday. I > > > find > > > > I have to watch this kind of thing to read 'M' > > > (along with the major index > > > > price/volume action), since my brain tells me that > > > we are still insanely > > > > over-valued given the grim outlook for tech and > > > the economy, and the the > > > S&P > > > > should be 800 and the NAZ should be 1100. > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > > > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your > > > email. > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > > > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your > > email. > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > = > = > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > = > = > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:27:19 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ESCM If the convertibles are already "in the money" (past the exercise price of the stock) then the shares they represent would be counted in earnings reports (assuming that the convertibles were in the money when the earnings report was made). As to whether they were counted in any projected earnings report, you would have to review the report to see how the analyst approached this issue. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ESCM Tom: If they do redeem the covertibles into new shares won't this then reduce projected earnings? jans In a message dated 6/22/2001 12:08:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, stkguru@netside.net writes: << I haven't researched it, but willing to bet that most of that high debt is represented by the convertible bonds. With the price performance, sooner or later the company will call the bonds and force conversion into newly issued shares, thus wiping out the debt. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:31:47 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IRM I don't have a precise answer, because I would have to research the company. Since I have no interest in owning it, I don't plan to take the time to do that. But cash flow is normally measured EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization). Thus, the depreciation or amortization on any capital spending would make a difference on the spread between cash flow and net earnings. But I would not expect such a huge difference from this alone. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:27 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IRM Tom: I wouldn't buy IRM because the Mkt is so bad (I believe). However, IRM has made a pretty nice C&H formation. My take on the cash flow is this: Assume that they did make money during the year is at least equal to their investment in new builidngs and equipment. Now their income statement shows an earnings loss because of their heavy investment in new buildings and equipment. This investment leads to a large depreciation expense. Thus, all the money they earned + their large depreciation expense goes toward their cash flow. Does this make sense? How would you analyze their large cash flow vs. a 47=A2 loss in 2000. jans - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:01:51 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CPRT,ANF,PPDI,IGT,DGX,SHFL,GPI Hi Jerry, I am always willing to encourage a lurker to begin participating, so here goes. I will skip IGT and DGX as they have been well discussed recently here. CPRT - b/o and crossed the pivot yesterday on over 2X ADV, corrected today on slightly less volume, good CS #, strong management ownership (32%) but also funds already have a lot (27%), ROE at 15%, cash flow well ahead of earnings ANF - personally, I don't like the retail sector, esp right now. Broke out from a 3 week base on weak volume, volume finally picked up as it approached the pivot, but corrected today on volume without reaching the pivot, to me looks like the b/o will fail PPDI - if you look at the 200 DMA line, it is clear that this stock has been gaining in price (more than doubled so far this year). But it has been so volatile that a bad entry could actually have you in a loss or with a bare profit. If I was a gambler, I might take a flyer on it if it again reached the 200 DMA, but too volatile for me. SHFL - this one has been discussed a lot here, but no mention recently. Completed a 3:2 split, up on volume for the past 4 days, pretty impressive given the state of the market. No clear base forming, so hard to read an entry point. GPI - recovered nicely from the big drop on 6/7, 6/8, but volume not impressive. Earnings forecast this year as well as next for only 7% growth, I would avoid this one. Nice list otherwise. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: Jerry Sparrow To: Canslim Group (E-mail) Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 4:28 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] CPRT,ANF,PPDI,IGT,DGX,SHFL,GPI As a first attempt of a lurking coming out of the woodwork, I am looking at the following below. What are the group thoughts? I am including the quick info on these stocks. Ind Daily Grp Graphs Symbol Overall Tech Fund Attrat Grp Tech Grp Fund Rank (1-197) Timeliness EPS RS Grp RS SMR Acc/Dis CPRT A+ 97 99 99 84 78 22 A 97 90 A A A ANF A+ 99 93 99 93 89 18 A 93 98 A A B PPDI A+ 95 90 94 95 85 9 A 95 97 A A A IGT A+ 99 96 91 98 93 6 A 97 95 A A A DGX A+ 97 98 99 95 85 9 A 99 93 A B A SHFL A+ 96 99 86 98 93 6 A 95 98 A A B GPI A+ 99 97 97 99 83 4 A 95 99 A B A Jerry Sparrow, CPA Corporate Controller Biscuitville Restaurants, Inc. ***************************************************************** ********************************* The Firelan(tm) Virus Scanning Service has scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content. http://www.firelan.net ***************************************************************** ********************************* - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 21:17:08 -0100 From: "Denis Breglia" Subject: [CANSLIM] Breakout Strategy This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C0FB60.B1ECEB20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I note the criticism of my prior message and can only respond that the = canslim.net Breakout list provides me with stocks to paper trade. I've = used other websites in the past which purport to list stocks which will = outperform. In every case I've found that over a period of weeks to = months I would have been better off with a tradable index such as DIA, = SPY or QQQ. I'm not endorsing the canslim.net Breakout list. I'm not = recommending that it be used for daytrading. For this "game" I'm = assuming that canslim.net has made a judgment that these stocks are = canslim. I'm simply evaluating whether canslim.net's choices outperform = as I've decided to measure performance.=20 In my last message I provided the results of buying and holding until 18 = Jun all of the stocks which were listed on the canslim.net breakout list = from 4 June to 8 June and had volume of at least 300% of ADV. In this = message I will provide the results of buying and holding until 22 Jun = the breakout list stocks which were listed from 11 Jun to 15 Jun. The = new wrinkle is that I used stop losses at 8% below my purchase price. =20 The results of this exercise aren't very encouraging. 10 of 11 picks = on 6/11 and 6/12 were stopped within 10 days (13 of 21 of all picks). = The 6/13 and 6/15 picks beat all three indices. The 6/12 and 6/14 = picks lost to all three indices. There was only one outstanding pick, = SFCC on 6/15. And SFCC was also a stopped 6/11 and 6/12 pick. (If I = were trading for real I probably would have ignored the 6/15 pick after = being stopped out twice!) Any comments? Does anyone see an indicator that SFCC demonstrated on = 6/15 that wasn't apparent on 6/11 and 6/12? Would a quick inspection of = the charts of the (losers?) have indicated obvious reasons for not = buying? Is what I'm doing a complete waste of time? For each date the stock, the cost (assumed at market close), 22 Jun = Close Price (or Sell Date at Stop Price), %Gain (Loss), comment=20 6/11/01 AMWD, 37.34, (Stopped 6/18 @ 34.35), ( 8.00) BANR, 21.09, 22.95 = 8.10 CNTL, 29.25, (Stopped 6/15 @ 26.91), ( 8.00) DFXI, 42.38, (Stopped 6/15 @ 38.99), ( 8.00) HDL, 15.53, (Stopped 6/20 @ 14.29), ( 8.00) SFCC, 19.69, (Stopped 6/12 @ 18.11), ( 8.00) TGX, 12.30 (Stopped 6/13 @ 11.32), ( 8.00) Average = ( 5.70) DIA 109.35 106.24 = ( 2.84) SPY 126.10 122.85 = ( 2.58) QQQ 46.05 43.25 = ( 6.08) 6/12/01 DAKT, 32.80, (Stopped 6/15 @ 30.18), ( 8.00) EASI, 40.74, (Stopped 6/14 @ 37.48), ( 8.00) SFCC, 20.90, (Stopped 6/13 @ 19.23), ( 8.00) TGX, 13.79, (Stopped 6/13 @ 12.69), ( 8.00) Average = ( 8.00) DIA 109.53 106.24 = ( 3.00) SPY 125.88 122.85 = ( 2.41) QQQ 45.80 43.25 ( = 5.57) 6/13/01 AZO, 35.27 38.07 = 7.94 MNTG, 11.90 (Stopped 6/14 @ 10.95) ( 8.00) Average = ( 0.03) DIA 108.81 106.24 = ( 2.36) =20 SPY 124.80 122.85 = ( 1.56) QQQ 44.55 43.25 = ( 2.92) 6/14/01 AZO, 36.67, 38.07, = 3.68 MNTG, 12.24, (Stopped 6/15 @ 11.26) ( = 8.00) PSTA, 7.42, (Stopped 6/21 @ 6.83) ( = 8.00) Average = ( 4.11) DIA 106.60 106.24 = ( 0.34) SPY 122.00 122.85 = 0.70 QQQ 42.25 43.25 = 2.37 6/15/01 AZO, 37.48, 38.07, = 1.57 FIC, 54.65, 53.37, = 2.40 PSTA, 8.02, (Stopped 6/20 @ 7.38) ( = 8.00) =20 SFCC, 17.60, 25.30, = 43.75 =20 WTM, 378.00, 388.00, = 2.65 Average = 8.47 DIA 106.70 106.24 = ( 0.43)=20 SPY 121.85 122.85 = 0.82 QQQ 42.60 43.25 = 1.53 - ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C0FB60.B1ECEB20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I note the criticism of my prior message and can = only respond=20 that the canslim.net Breakout list provides me with stocks to paper = trade.  I've used other websites in the past which purport to list = stocks=20 which will outperform.  In every case I've found that over a period = of=20 weeks to months I would have been better off with a tradable index such = as DIA,=20 SPY or QQQ.  I'm not endorsing the canslim.net Breakout = list. =20 I'm not recommending that it be used for daytrading.  For this = "game"=20 I'm assuming that canslim.net has made a judgment that these stocks are=20 canslim.  I'm simply evaluating whether canslim.net's choices=20 outperform as I've decided to measure = performance. 
 
In my last message I provided the results of buying = and=20 holding until 18 Jun all of the stocks which were listed on the = canslim.net=20 breakout list from 4 June to 8 June and had volume of at least 300% = of=20 ADV.  In this message I will provide the results of buying and = holding=20 until 22 Jun the breakout list stocks which were listed from 11 Jun to = 15=20 Jun.  The new wrinkle is that I used stop losses at 8% below my = purchase=20 price. 
 
The results of this exercise aren't very=20 encouraging.   10 of 11 picks on 6/11 and 6/12 were stopped = within 10=20 days (13 of 21 of all picks).  The 6/13 and 6/15 picks beat all = three=20 indices.   The 6/12 and 6/14 picks lost to all three = indices. =20 There was only one outstanding pick, SFCC on 6/15.  And SFCC was = also a=20 stopped 6/11 and 6/12 pick.   (If I were trading for real I = probably=20 would have ignored the 6/15 pick after being stopped out = twice!)
 
Any comments?   Does anyone see an = indicator=20 that SFCC demonstrated on 6/15 that wasn't apparent on 6/11 and = 6/12? =20 Would a quick inspection of the charts of the (losers?) have indicated = obvious=20 reasons for not buying?  Is what I'm doing a complete waste of=20 time?
 
For each date the stock, the cost (assumed at market = close),  22 Jun Close Price (or Sell Date at Stop Price), %Gain = (Loss),=20 comment 
 
6/11/01
 
AMWD,     =20 37.34,      (Stopped 6/18 @=20 34.35),     (   8.00)
BANR,      =20 21.09,           &= nbsp;      =20 22.95           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;      =20 8.10
CNTL,      =20 29.25,       (Stopped 6/15 @=20 26.91),     (   8.00)
DFXI,        =20 42.38,       (Stopped 6/15 @=20 38.99),     (   8.00)
HDL,         15.53,=        =20 (Stopped 6/20 @ 14.29),     (   = 8.00)
SFCC,      =20 19.69,       (Stopped 6/12 @ =20 18.11),     (   8.00)
TGX,          = =20 12.30       (Stopped 6/13  @ =20 11.32),     (   8.00)
 
Average         &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;            = ;            =             &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;  =20 (   5.70)
 
DIA         =20 109.35           &= nbsp;          =20 106.24           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;=20 (   2.84)
SPY        =20 126.10           &= nbsp;          =20 122.85           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;=20 (   2.58)
QQQ         =20 46.05           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;=20 43.25           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp; (  =20 6.08)
 
6/12/01
 
DAKT,        =20 32.80,        (Stopped 6/15 @=20 30.18),       (   = 8.00)
EASI,          = ;=20 40.74,        (Stopped 6/14 @=20 37.48),       (   = 8.00)
SFCC,        =20 20.90,        (Stopped 6/13 @=20 19.23),       (   = 8.00)
TGX,          =   13.79,        =20 (Stopped 6/13 @ 12.69),      =20 (   8.00)
 
Average         &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;            = ;            =             &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;      =20 (   8.00)
 
DIA           =  109.53          &= nbsp;           =20 106.24           &= nbsp;           =20    (   3.00)
SPY           = 125.88           &= nbsp;          =20 122.85           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;  =20 (   2.41)
QQQ          &= nbsp;=20 45.80           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;=20 43.25          &= nbsp;         =20 (  5.57)
 
6/13/01
 
AZO,         = 35.27           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp; =20 38.07           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;          =20 7.94
MNTG,     =20 11.90          (Stopped = 6/14 @=20 10.95)            = (   8.00)
 
Average         &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;            = ;            =             &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;        =20 (   0.03)
 
DIA          &= nbsp;   =20 108.81           &= nbsp;      =20 106.24           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;    =20 (   2.36)        =20
SPY          &= nbsp;  =20 124.80           &= nbsp;      =20 122.85           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;    =20 (   1.56)
QQQ          &= nbsp;   =20 44.55           &n= bsp;         =20 43.25           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 (   2.92)
 
6/14/01
 
AZO,          =     =20 36.67,           &= nbsp;      =20 38.07,           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;=20 3.68
MNTG,          = ; =20 12.24,           = (Stopped 6/15=20 @ 11.26)         (  =20 8.00)
PSTA,          = ;     7.42,=20            (Stopped = 6/21=20 @   6.83)        =20 (   8.00)
 
Average         &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;            = ;            =             &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp; =20 (   4.11)
 
DIA          &= nbsp;       =20 106.60           &= nbsp;    =20 106.24           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;       =20 (   0.34)
SPY          &= nbsp;       122.00   &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;=20 122.85           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;           =20 0.70
QQQ          &= nbsp;       =20 42.25           &n= bsp;      =20 43.25           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;=20 2.37
 
6/15/01
 
AZO,          =        =20 37.48,           &= nbsp;       =20 38.07,           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;         =20 1.57
FIC,          =          =20 54.65,           &= nbsp;       =20 53.37,           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;         =20 2.40
PSTA,          = ;        =20 8.02,           (S= topped=20 6/20 @ = 7.38)         (   = 8.00)      
SFCC,          = ;     =20 17.60,           &= nbsp;        25.30,  &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;           =20      43.75      
WTM,          =       378.00,     =              = 388.00,           =             &= nbsp;         =20 2.65
 
Average         &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;            = ;            =             &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;       =20 8.47
 
DIA    =20             &= nbsp;     106.70     &n= bsp;          =20 106.24           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;      ( =20 0.43) 
SPY           &nbs= p;         121.85  = ;            =   =20 122.85           &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;         =20 0.82
QQQ          &= nbsp;          =20 42.60           &n= bsp;       =20 43.25           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;         =20 1.53
 
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C0FB60.B1ECEB20-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1524 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.