From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1556 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Sunday, July 8 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1556 In this issue: [CANSLIM] My opinion on M [CANSLIM] Schwager book review Re: [CANSLIM] Tom's posts Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 08:46:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Cameron Subject: [CANSLIM] My opinion on M I'm not looking to invest on Monday - or until I see some change in the market. A key indicator for me is the section that shows the stocks moving up on the highest percentage of ADV. The number of stocks listed has been very small over the last 2 weeks. In the past, this has been a good indicator that the market is not behaving well. Of course, take this all with a grain of salt - this is from a man who is getting creamed this year... ===== Dave Cameron dfcameron@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 08:55:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Cameron Subject: [CANSLIM] Schwager book review All right - I just couldn't resist. Despite Patrick's lukewarm recommendation of Jack Schwager's latest book "Stock Market Wizards", I decided to spend the $28 and buy the book. Why? Because I found some real value in Schwager's first two books. In fact, I use to buy "Market Wizards" for friends interested in investing (a book I recommend to everyone). Anyway... I'm forced to admit that I agree with Patrick. I respect his opinion, so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. This book is the least valuable of the three "Wizards" books. His interviews seem more superficial. I figured it could be more helpful, because his earlier books interview currency traders, high level day traders, bond traders, etc. in arenas we couldn't enter. This one was similar in that Schwager interviewed people who do things that most of us on this list couldn't do without being full-timers or having connections or a lot of capital... I would add that there are a few good insights, depending on how new you are to investing. Cutting your losses (rough for many of us) is stressed. Some psychological points are valuable. Several of the traders lost a lot of money until they found a good system that worked with their psyche and gained experience with it. All in all, if you are newer to investing than Patrick or I are, you may find it more valuable. Dave - --- Patrick Wahl wrote: > Since I asked a question about the usefulness of "Stock Market > Wizards" about a month ago, thought I would try to answer my own > question, since I was able to pick up a copy at the library. > > Its reasonably interesting, but I don't think there is anything > specific in it I could point to that will help anyone make money. > The people he talks to are all full-time money managers, and as > such they for the most part are going to have a slightly different > approach than we part time investors have. What is interesting is > that there are many varied approaches. One guy scans the new > lows list for new ideas, one guy just tries to pick up a few points > > here and there, one person just shorts everything, one guy, who > wouldn't give away anything, appeared to be a CANSLIM guy. > > I guess if there was a useful theme, to me, it was to be skeptical > of > analysts comments, which I already am, but now even more so. > These people usually had some first hand experience with analysts > and had little favorable to say about them. The other would be not > > to figure that whatever the current price is is correct (as if the > last > 12 months hadn't already done that). Sounds like there are quite a > > few bad ideas out there. > > So I guess its a useful book for just filling out my overall view > of the > workings of the market and the people who are on the inside. > > One other book I read -"How to Daytrade Futures Online" by Larry > Williams. Obviously not a subject for this list, but if anyone can > > grab a copy at a library, he has a very good section on the nature > of speculation, which applies to investing in anything. > > - > ===== Dave Cameron dfcameron@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 11:32:48 -0500 From: "Patti Curry" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom's posts This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C107A1.B7302780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guys, please give Tom the credit he is due. Before you get upset please = consider that Tom is known as the moderator of the board because he is a = charter member, is very knowledgeable about CANSLIM, and freely shares = his time so that we can learn. Although he has his own style of = investing, he only shares the pure form which is what we are about in = this forum. He is only trying to maintain the integrity of the board. = I know that if he wasn't here in this capacity we would no doubt be way = off topic more often than not to the point that the forum would = gradually fall apart. We should be thanking him often for the time he = puts in daily answering e-mails and working up the invaluable DGO List = each week. He doesn't have to do any of this. "Thanks, Tom!" All the best, Patti ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jay Oken=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Cc: Rbrown@acton.com=20 Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume Ron,=20 =20 Tom does not regularly adhere to Canslim by his own account either, = yet he comes down on those who offer other investment advice. In = addition, he acts like he is the owner of the board and seldom allows = for opinions other than his own. When I first joined this board it was = active with many postings and quite a bit of varied discussion. As Tom = has taken over, and felt the need to respond to EVERY post on the board, = it has become less active with less lively discussions.=20 =20 I thank all of you who have responded to my posts in the past and who = have taken the time post insightful information here. I will be signing = off from the Tom Worley show as well. =20 Regards. =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C107A1.B7302780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Guys, please give Tom the credit = he is=20 due.  Before you get upset please consider that Tom is known = as the=20 moderator of the board because he is a charter member, = is very=20 knowledgeable about CANSLIM, and freely shares his time so that we can=20 learn.  Although he has his own style of investing, he only = shares the=20 pure form which is what we are about in this forum.  He is only = trying to=20 maintain the integrity of the board.  I know that if he wasn't here = in this=20 capacity we would no doubt be way off topic more often than not to = the=20 point that the forum would gradually fall apart.  We should be = thanking him=20 often for the time he puts in daily answering e-mails and working = up the =20 invaluable DGO List each week.  He doesn't have to do any of = this. =20 "Thanks, Tom!"
 
All the best, Patti
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Jay=20 Oken
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 = 10:17=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small = cap, low=20 trading volume

Ron,
 
Tom does not regularly adhere to = Canslim by his=20 own account either, yet he comes down on those who offer other = investment=20 advice. In addition, he acts like he is the owner of the board and = seldom=20 allows for opinions other than his own. When I first joined this board = it was=20 active with many postings and quite a bit of varied discussion. As Tom = has=20 taken over, and felt the need to respond to EVERY post on the board, = it has=20 become less active with less lively discussions.
 
I thank all of you who have responded = to my posts=20 in the past and who have taken the time post insightful information = here. I=20 will be signing off from the Tom Worley show as well.
 
Regards.
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C107A1.B7302780-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 12:33:30 -0400 From: "Dan Forant" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_006E_01C107AA.31E4D680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Really, let's not be so sensitive. This is the best list going. Very = informative. I like getting the info posters go out of their way to send = to us such as DGO and HGS stock lists. I remember a few months past, = posts were scarce. Let's not go there again. DanF ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Norman=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Cc: Rbrown@acton.com ; imjoken@mindspring.com=20 Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 11:33 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume Hey guys, leaving is not the answer. It would be much more productive = to simply modify your posts to as near CANSLIM as possible. After all, = this is a CANSLIM board. =20 I too have taken exception to some attitudes here. But I realize that = attitude aside most participants have something to offer. Stick around, = ignore the posts you find objectionable, and give-n-take information as = it is offered. The alternatives are the Raging Bulls and Tokyo Joe's of = the world! Norman Boyd theboyd@tisd.net ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jay Oken=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Cc: Rbrown@acton.com=20 Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume Ron,=20 Tom does not regularly adhere to Canslim by his own account either, = yet he comes down on those who offer other investment advice. In = addition, he acts like he is the owner of the board and seldom allows = for opinions other than his own. When I first joined this board it was = active with many postings and quite a bit of varied discussion. As Tom = has taken over, and felt the need to respond to EVERY post on the board, = it has become less active with less lively discussions.=20 I thank all of you who have responded to my posts in the past and = who have taken the time post insightful information here. I will be = signing off from the Tom Worley show as well. Regards. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ron Brown=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 7:51 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume Tom, I am not adhering to CANSLIM in the strictest definition of the = word. =20 I am talking opportunity, and if you have been in this market, the = opportunities have been in the small caps. I believe I said consider = getting into small caps early if they have the right credentials. Since = I can't adhere strictly to the gospel, I will keep my opinions to myself = in the future. =20 Anyone out there holding large cap tech stocks can tell us where = the real risk has been in the market for the last 1 1/2 years. = Liquidity is a two-edged sword if you are on the wrong side of the = elephants as they head for the exits. With the advent of internet trading the game has changed, and you = had better be nimble with either small or large cap stocks, or you are = dead. In a market like this, the true risks are waiting to buy extended = breakouts, then getting your head handed to you. Inexperienced traders = who do not have the discipline to pull the trigger either getting in or = getting out had better be in cash. The ONLY way to play a market like = this is to be in strong stocks in strong group, and many of the winners = have been in small cap groups. =20 I'm sorry I invaded your territory. See you, Ron ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 8:14 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume Ron, I must disagree on this. In no way do I encourage CANSLIMers to = invest / trade small cap stocks, regardless of price or ADV. A small cap = stock, by definition, means the higher the price, the less the ADV (and = institutional involvement and liquidity). And inversely, the higher the = ADV, the lower the price and higher the risk. On Friday, the Russell 2000 slipped back into a loss for 2001, = the last index to do so. Whether that marks the end of the small cap run = remains to be seen, it certainly shows that even the strongest of the = indexes have risk, and the risks are increasing as "M" deteriorates. Bottom line, small cap stocks have not been mainstream = investing, much less mainstream CANSLIM, for a number of years. And that = did not change this year. What changed briefly is that small and micro = cap stocks offered the only remaining source of earnings growth year to = year. Anytime you try to get in early, whether it is on a big cap = stock still basing or a small cap stock suggesting a double or triple, = you are increasing your risks. There has been for over a century an unchanging rule in the = markets: the higher the return, the higher the risk. And that rule = remains inviolate regardless of "M", the system you use, and works in = both bear and bull markets. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ron Brown=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 8:53 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume Hi Joe and Tom, I would like to put my two cents in here if you don't mind. I = agree with Tom that an investor who is going to play in this market = cannot afford to overlook low priced stocks. Clearly, the long term relative strength in the markets since = early April has been in the small caps. In recent weeks, the RUT has = faltered, and is trading at support, and is in danger of breaking the = 200 DMA. If so, the run for the RUT may be over. The market itself is = at a critical juncture, and if the gap is filled on the Nasdaq, I fear = we may be in for a retest of the April 4th low in the Nasdaq. Personally, I buy stocks from $5 up trading at least 40,000 = shares per day based on a 50 DMA. My biggest winners this year began = their run in the $6 to $10 range. If a person ignores this category of = stock, you will miss out on many huge winners like ALLY, which is = featured in Monday's IBD and was finally mentioned on CNBC last week. =20 One year ago, it was a $2.50 stock, and it closed Friday at = $38.26, over a 1600% increase for the year. It came up on our radar = screens around $12 in a strong leisure-gaming group. Finally, the media = is taking notice. ALLY probably has some gas left in the tank, but the = publicity comes after the huge run up, and at a point when the market is = facing a potential melt down. =20 I believe the key is the group, and if it breaks down, ALLY = will probably go with it. The story in IBD should give it a boost, but = watch the quality of the trading. It is still a leader in the group, = but it moved up Thursday on light volume, then sold off Friday on = heavier volume. I am out of ALLY now, but if the group holds up, and if = it bounces, I will considering getting back into it. =20 I am trying to reinforce Tom's point that if you find a stocks = with all the right credentials, you should consider getting in early. = If you do, scale in; buy a small quantity then add to your position as = the stocks heads higher. Know your stop, and pull the trigger if your = trade goes against you. Ron ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 11:20 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume Hi Joe, I differ sharply from some of the guidelines of CANSLIM. = With my background and experience, it works for me, but likely would not = work for most. Thus I agree with you that most CANSLIMers should avoid = either low priced stocks, or stocks with low ADV. Several years ago, it = seemed that WON recommended stocks of at least $12 per share. More = recently, it seems he leans more towards a minimum price of $15 to $17. = As to ADV, I don't recall any specific recommendations from WON, but = some of the seminar attendees may have heard something. An ADV of 40 to = 50 thousand seems to be a fairly widely accepted minimum among = CANSLIMers. For me personally, most stocks I buy are well under $10 / = share, and 10,000 ADV. But then, I break a lot of rules in trying to get in early. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jwpowers1@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 12:10 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Small cap, low trading volume I have avoided trading stocks under $10 and with under = $1,000,000 trading a=20 day, price * 50 day volume., I really like $2,000,000 I = don't want to be=20 more than a ripple going in or out.=20 What % of daily trading volume does O'Neil recommend as a = max? Or what do=20 you use?=20 My other choice would be to carry a lot more uncorrelated = smaller positions. =20 Is anyone doing this? 20 stocks vs 6-8?=20 Thanks for any input.=20 Joe=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_006E_01C107AA.31E4D680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Really, let's not be so sensitive. This is the best = list=20 going. Very informative. I like getting the info posters go out of their = way to=20 send to us such as DGO and HGS stock lists. I remember a few months = past, posts=20 were scarce. Let's not go there again.
 
DanF
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Norman
Cc: Rbrown@acton.com ; imjoken@mindspring.com =
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 = 11:33=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small = cap, low=20 trading volume

Hey guys, leaving is not the answer.  It would be much more=20 productive to simply modify your posts to as near CANSLIM as = possible. =20 After all, this is a CANSLIM board. 
 
I too have taken exception to some attitudes here.  But I = realize=20 that attitude aside most participants have something to = offer. =20 Stick around, ignore the posts you find objectionable, and give-n-take = information as it is offered.  The alternatives are the Raging = Bulls and=20 Tokyo Joe's of the world!
 
Norman Boyd
theboyd@tisd.net
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Jay=20 Oken
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 = 10:17=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Small = cap, low=20 trading volume

Ron,
 
Tom does not regularly adhere to = Canslim by his=20 own account either, yet he comes down on those who offer other = investment=20 advice. In addition, he acts like he is the owner of the board and = seldom=20 allows for opinions other than his own. When I first joined this = board it=20 was active with many postings and quite a bit of varied discussion. = As Tom=20 has taken over, and felt the need to respond to EVERY post on the = board, it=20 has become less active with less lively discussions.
 
I thank all of you who have = responded to my=20 posts in the past and who have taken the time post insightful = information=20 here. I will be signing off from the Tom Worley show as = well.
 
Regards.
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ron = Brown=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 = 7:51=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Small cap, low=20 trading volume

Tom,
 
I am not adhering to CANSLIM in = the strictest=20 definition of the word. 
 
I am talking opportunity, and if = you have=20 been in this market, the opportunities have been in the small = caps. =20 I believe I said consider getting into small caps = early=20 if they have the right credentials.  = Since I can't adhere strictly to the gospel, = I will keep=20 my opinions to myself in the future. 
 
Anyone out there holding large = cap tech=20 stocks can tell us where the real risk has been in the market for = the last=20 1 1/2 years.  Liquidity is a two-edged sword if you are on = the wrong=20 side of the elephants as they head for the exits.
 
With the advent of internet = trading the game=20 has changed, and you had better be nimble with either small or = large cap=20 stocks, or you are dead.  In a market like this, the true = risks are=20 waiting to buy extended breakouts, then getting your head = handed to=20 you.  Inexperienced traders who do not have the discipline to = pull=20 the trigger either getting in or getting out had better be in = cash. =20 The ONLY way to play a market like this is to be in strong stocks = in=20 strong group, and many of the winners have been in small cap = groups. =20
 
I'm sorry I invaded your=20 territory.
 
See you,
 
Ron
 
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Sunday, July 08, = 2001 8:14=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Small cap,=20 low trading volume

Ron,
 
I must disagree on this. In no way do I = encourage=20 CANSLIMers to invest / trade small cap stocks, regardless of = price or=20 ADV. A small cap stock, by definition, means the higher the = price, the=20 less the ADV (and institutional involvement and liquidity). And=20 inversely, the higher the ADV, the lower the price and higher = the=20 risk.
 
On Friday, the Russell 2000 slipped back = into a loss=20 for 2001, the last index to do so. Whether that marks the end of = the=20 small cap run remains to be seen, it certainly shows that even = the=20 strongest of the indexes have risk, and the risks are increasing = as "M"=20 deteriorates.
 
Bottom line, small cap stocks have not been = mainstream=20 investing, much less mainstream CANSLIM, for a number of years. = And that=20 did not change this year. What changed briefly is that small and = micro=20 cap stocks offered the only remaining source of earnings growth = year to=20 year.
 
Anytime you try to get in early, whether it = is on a=20 big cap stock still basing or a small cap stock suggesting a = double or=20 triple, you are increasing your risks.
 
There has been for over a century an = unchanging rule=20 in the markets: the higher the return, the higher the risk. And = that=20 rule remains inviolate regardless of "M", the system you use, = and works=20 in both bear and bull markets.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Ron Brown=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Sunday, July 08, = 2001 8:53=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Small cap,=20 low trading volume

Hi Joe and Tom,
 
I would like to put my two = cents in here=20 if you don't mind.  I agree with Tom that an = investor who is=20 going to play in this market cannot afford to overlook low = priced=20 stocks.
 
Clearly, the long term = relative strength=20 in the markets since early April has been in the small = caps.  In=20 recent weeks, the RUT has faltered, and is trading at support, = and is=20 in danger of breaking the 200 DMA.  If so, the run for = the RUT=20 may be over.  The market itself is at a critical = juncture, and if=20 the gap is filled on the Nasdaq, I fear we may be in for a = retest of=20 the April 4th low in the Nasdaq.
 
Personally, I buy stocks from = $5 up=20 trading at least 40,000 shares per day based on a 50 = DMA.  My=20 biggest winners this year began their run in the $6 to $10=20 range.  If a person ignores this category of stock, you = will miss=20 out on many huge winners like ALLY, which is featured in = Monday's IBD=20 and was finally mentioned on CNBC last week.  =
 
One year ago, it was a $2.50 = stock, and=20 it closed Friday at $38.26, over a 1600% increase for the = year. =20 It came up on our radar screens around $12 in a strong = leisure-gaming=20 group.  Finally, the media is taking notice.  ALLY = probably=20 has some gas left in the tank, but the publicity comes after = the huge=20 run up, and at a point when the market is facing a potential = melt=20 down. 
 
I believe the key is the = group, and if it=20 breaks down, ALLY will probably go with it.  The story in = IBD=20 should give it a boost, but watch the quality of the = trading.  It=20 is still a leader in the group, but it moved up Thursday on = light=20 volume, then sold off Friday on heavier volume.  = I am out of ALLY now, but if the group = holds up, and=20 if it bounces, I will considering getting back into it. =20
 
I am trying to reinforce = Tom's point that=20 if you find a stocks with all the right credentials, you = should=20 consider getting in early.  If you do, scale in; buy a = small=20 quantity then add to your position as the stocks heads = higher. =20 Know your stop, and pull the trigger if your trade goes = against=20 you.
 
Ron
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Saturday, July = 07, 2001=20 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM] Small=20 cap, low trading volume

Hi Joe,
 
I differ sharply from some of the = guidelines of=20 CANSLIM. With my background and experience, it works for me, = but=20 likely would not work for most. Thus I agree with you that = most=20 CANSLIMers should avoid either low priced stocks, or stocks = with low=20 ADV. Several years ago, it seemed that WON recommended = stocks of at=20 least $12 per share. More recently, it seems he leans more = towards a=20 minimum price of $15 to $17.  As to ADV, I don't recall = any=20 specific recommendations from WON, but some of the seminar = attendees=20 may have heard something. An ADV of 40 to 50 thousand seems = to be a=20 fairly widely accepted minimum among = CANSLIMers.
 
For me personally, most stocks I buy are = well=20 under $10 / share, and 10,000 ADV.
 
But then, I break a lot of rules in = trying to get=20 in early.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message = - -----
From:=20 Jwpowers1@aol.com =
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Sunday, July = 08, 2001=20 12:10 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = Small cap,=20 low trading volume

I have avoided trading = stocks under $10=20 and with under $1,000,000 trading a
day, price * 50 = day=20 volume., I really like $2,000,000  I don't want to be =
more than a ripple going in or out.

What % of = daily=20 trading volume does O'Neil recommend as a max?  Or = what do=20
you use?

My other choice would be to carry a = lot more=20 uncorrelated smaller positions.  
Is anyone doing = this?=20  20 stocks vs 6-8?

Thanks for any input.=20
Joe=20 =
- ------=_NextPart_000_006E_01C107AA.31E4D680-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1556 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.