From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1713 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Saturday, October 6 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1713 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 12:55:20 -0700 From: Neal Frankle Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C14E66.28124040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also appreciate Tom's contributions. Tom...you fought the good fight! Neal ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Dan Forant=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:04 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Tom =20 You should know not to play where the big dogs eat. Someone more than = likely turned you in. I appreciated what you were doing and the loyalty = to this group. To those from DGO and IBD monitoring this group, I like = TC2000, and your paper is not worth $1.25 on the newsstand, and = certainly not worth the subscription price. =20 DanF =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: DGOnline Customer Service ; CANSLIM=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:57 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs Online CANSLIM Discussion Group Members I was served with legal notice this morning that I was in violation = of my agreement with DGO by posting the data on those stocks I had = listed in my DGO List last Saturday. I was warned that not only could my = service be discontinued, but I could be legally prosecuted for = unauthorized use. I will, of course, cease and desist from my well = intended practice. I felt then, and still feel now, that what I did was posting = intellectual property I had developed. I did not post the entire DGO = List, rather only those stocks that I had reviewed and found worthy of = mention. Obviously, Ms. McKnight and her corporate counsel feel = differently. I would also note that despite my frequent and strong support of DGO = in this discussion group, I have never once received a thank you from = DGO. I cooperated with a reporter from IBD, who had sought interviews = from members of this group. I don't know if she ever posted the article = as I never heard back from her once she got her information. I also note = that there have been numerous instances in which an article appeared in = IBD shortly after similar discussions in this group. Not once was this = group credited or acknowledged as providing the topic or idea for the = article. To me that is theft of intellectual property, and used for = commercial purposes to boot. Maybe Jeff Salisbury needs to put a = copyright on this group's discussions, and demand payment when they = steal our ideas. This legal notice I received again confirms to me that this group is = being monitored covertly by DGO, and likely by IBD as well. I guess that = is some kind of back handed compliment, in a way, but I don't like the = sneaky approach. The most upsetting part of this for me is getting this notice in a = morning delivery by Fedex when a simple email would have sufficed. It's = not like they don't have my email address, after all. Granted, it might = not have the same legal standing, but I also don't need to be hit in the = head with a baseball bat. And here I was thinking they had finally = recognized my ability to make good money even in a solid bear market = (BTW, my VR fund is up over 15% in the past six trading days, and = continues to beat every major index, but I'm not giving the list of = stocks to DGO or IBD). Unless Ms. McKnight further objects, I intend to continue reviewing = the entire DGO List, and posting my thoughts and observations. Hopefully = I can at least continue that service to this group. But with this "one = way" policy so directly demonstrated, along with the continued failure = of DGO to provide even minimal screening tools in the latest beta = version, and the continuing limitation of reports to just those stocks = in the DG books rather than all stocks, I will not make further = recommendations to members to buy this service and will look for = alternative means to achieve the same results. Sincerely, Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C14E66.28124040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I also appreciate Tom's = contributions. =20 Tom...you fought the good fight!
Neal
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Dan=20 Forant
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 = 7:04=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance=20 of my posting DGO Data

Tom
 
You should know not to play where the = big dogs=20 eat. Someone more than likely turned you in. I appreciated what you = were doing=20 and the loyalty to this group. To those from DGO and IBD = monitoring this=20 group,  I like TC2000, and your paper is not worth $1.25 on the=20 newsstand, and certainly not worth the subscription = price.
 
DanF
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: DGOnline Customer Service ; CANSLIM
Sent: Friday, October 05, = 2001 8:57=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance=20 of my posting DGO Data

To: Ms. Susan McKnight, = President, Daily=20 Graphs Online
    CANSLIM Discussion Group=20 Members
 
I was served with legal notice this morning that = I was in=20 violation of my agreement with DGO by posting the data on those = stocks I had=20 listed in my DGO List last Saturday. I was warned that not only = could my=20 service be discontinued, but I could be legally prosecuted for = unauthorized=20 use. I will, of course, cease and desist from my well intended=20 practice.
 
I felt then, and still feel now, that what I did = was=20 posting intellectual property I had developed. I did not post the = entire DGO=20 List, rather only those stocks that I had reviewed and found worthy = of=20 mention.  Obviously, Ms. McKnight and her corporate counsel = feel=20 differently.
 
I would also note that despite my frequent and = strong=20 support of DGO in this discussion group, I have never once received = a thank=20 you from DGO. I cooperated with a reporter from IBD, who had sought=20 interviews from members of this group. I don't know if she ever = posted the=20 article as I never heard back from her once she got her = information. I=20 also note that there have been numerous instances in which an = article=20 appeared in IBD shortly after similar discussions in this group. Not = once=20 was this group credited or acknowledged as providing the topic or = idea for=20 the article. To me that is theft of intellectual property, and used = for=20 commercial purposes to boot. Maybe Jeff Salisbury needs to put a = copyright=20 on this group's discussions, and demand payment when they steal our=20 ideas.
 
This legal notice I received again confirms to = me that=20 this group is being monitored covertly by DGO, and likely by IBD as = well. I=20 guess that is some kind of back handed compliment, in a way, but I = don't=20 like the sneaky approach.
 
The most upsetting part of this for me is = getting this=20 notice in a morning delivery by Fedex when a simple email would have = sufficed. It's not like they don't have my email address, after all. = Granted, it might not have the same legal standing, but I also don't = need to=20 be hit in the head with a baseball bat. And here I was thinking they = had=20 finally recognized my ability to make good money even in a solid = bear market=20 (BTW, my VR fund is up over 15% in the past six trading days, and = continues=20 to beat every major index, but I'm not giving the list of stocks to = DGO or=20 IBD).
 
Unless Ms. McKnight further objects, I intend to = continue=20 reviewing the entire DGO List, and posting my thoughts and = observations.=20 Hopefully I can at least continue that service to this group. But = with this=20 "one way" policy so directly demonstrated, along with the continued = failure=20 of DGO to provide even minimal screening tools in the latest beta = version,=20 and the continuing limitation of reports to just those stocks in the = DG=20 books rather than all stocks, I will not make further = recommendations to=20 members to buy this service and will look for alternative means to = achieve=20 the same results.
 
Sincerely,
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
- ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C14E66.28124040-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 14:51:53 -0500 From: Gene Ricci Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0AC8_01C14E76.70408AB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, do you have an email address for Ms. McKnight? Thanks in advance, Gene ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: DGOnline Customer Service ; CANSLIM=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:57 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs Online CANSLIM Discussion Group Members - ------=_NextPart_000_0AC8_01C14E76.70408AB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom, do you have an email address for = Ms.=20 McKnight?
Thanks in advance,
Gene
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom = Worley=20
To: DGOnline Customer Service = ; CANSLIM
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 = 7:57=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance of=20 my posting DGO Data

To: Ms. Susan McKnight, = President, Daily=20 Graphs Online
    CANSLIM Discussion Group=20 Members
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0AC8_01C14E76.70408AB0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 15:43:01 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C14E7D.950B2A60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Howard, I actually think their customer service is pretty good, I get responses = from DGO late at night and on weekends, which is better than I get from = other services. Am I getting special treatment, or is this usual for = other DGO subscribers? I share your dissatisfaction with the lack of screening tools. So much = of CANSLIM evolves around being able to screen for watch list = candidates, yet the very source of authentic data refuses to give up the = tools we need, even for a price. Even with the beta version, all we get = are pre-packaged reports, which are limited to the stocks in the DG = books. For someone like me, who looks beyond price and liquidity = restrictions of DG books, this means I must find my candidates = elsewhere. DGO doesn't seem to care that I have contributed to their = subscribership, as you confirm I have done. They want to protect their = data, I guess they fear someone will not subscribe because I post data = on a dozen or so stocks. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mhboatman@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:13 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Tom, I am sorry to hear about this "attitude" from Ms. McKnight. I am = sure she feels she is "corporate right." However, sometimes being = right, and expressing it, may be the wrong thing to do. This was one = example. I maybe a lurker here but I am also (and have been a long term) IBD = and a DGO subscriber. The very fact that I subscribed in the first = place was a direct result of your strong endorsement of DGO. However, I am un-impressed with the amount of service DGO provides for = the cost. I like the service but.... without some sort of a screening = program it is not worth the cost, period! Unfortunately, on lessor matters, I have had some less than friendly = exchanges with the folks at both DGO and IBD. Their customer service = level stinks! That plus their response to your efforts to help newbies = and others (which was what caused me to subscribe to DGO in the first) = is causing me to look for less expensive and better on line tools from = other sources. I have never liked dealing with people that I can't = respect. Ms. Mcknight thank you for causing me to rethink where I obtain my = on-line investment data (DGO). Less you forget, it is your customers = who pay for your presents there. And Tom, I thank you for your support. We all appreciate your = willingness and ability to encourage the folks who watch this list. We = do hope you will continue. Howard - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C14E7D.950B2A60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Howard,
 
I actually think their customer service is pretty = good, I get=20 responses from DGO late at night and on weekends, which is better than I = get=20 from other services. Am I getting special treatment, or is this usual = for other=20 DGO subscribers?
 
I share your dissatisfaction with the lack of = screening tools.=20 So much of CANSLIM evolves around being able to screen for watch list=20 candidates, yet the very source of authentic data refuses to give up the = tools=20 we need, even for a price. Even with the beta version, all we get are=20 pre-packaged reports, which are limited to the stocks in the DG books. = For=20 someone like me, who looks beyond price and liquidity restrictions of DG = books,=20 this means I must find my candidates elsewhere.
 
DGO doesn't seem to care that I have contributed to = their=20 subscribership, as you confirm I have done. They want to protect their = data, I=20 guess they fear someone will not subscribe because I post data on a = dozen or so=20 stocks.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Mhboatman@aol.com
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Saturday, October 06, = 2001 2:13=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance=20 of my posting DGO Data

Tom, I am sorry to hear about this "attitude" from Ms.=20 McKnight.  I am sure she feels she is "corporate right."  = However,=20 sometimes being right, and expressing it, may be the wrong thing to = do. =20 This was one example.

I maybe a lurker here but I am also (and = have=20 been a long term) IBD and a DGO subscriber.  The very fact that I = subscribed in the first place was a direct result of your strong = endorsement=20 of DGO.

However, I am un-impressed with the amount of service = DGO=20 provides for the cost.  I like the service but.... without some = sort of a=20 screening program it is not worth the cost, = period!

Unfortunately, on=20 lessor matters, I have had some less than friendly exchanges with the = folks at=20 both DGO and IBD.  Their customer service level stinks!  = That plus=20 their response to your efforts to help newbies and others (which was = what=20 caused me to subscribe to DGO in the first) is causing me to look for = less=20 expensive and better on line tools from other sources.  I have = never=20 liked dealing with people that I can't respect.

Ms. Mcknight = thank you=20 for causing me to rethink where I obtain my on-line investment data=20 (DGO).  Less you forget, it is your customers who pay for your = presents=20 there.

And Tom,  I thank you for your support.  We = all=20 appreciate your willingness and ability to encourage the folks who = watch this=20 list.  We do hope you will = continue.

Howard

-
-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C14E7D.950B2A60-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 12:55:53 -0700 From: "Perry Stanfield" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C14E66.3B83AB00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, Tom, I was hoping for an email address too.........I for one have = been on the fence with HGS vs. DGO; this has helped a lot and I don't = mind telling somebody. Perry ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gene Ricci=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 12:51 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Tom, do you have an email address for Ms. McKnight? Thanks in advance, Gene ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: DGOnline Customer Service ; CANSLIM=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:57 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs Online CANSLIM Discussion Group Members =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C14E66.3B83AB00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, Tom, I was hoping for an email address = too.........I for=20 one have been on the fence with HGS vs. DGO; this has helped a lot and I = don't=20 mind telling somebody.
 
Perry
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Gene = Ricci
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Saturday, October 06, = 2001 12:51=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance=20 of my posting DGO Data

Tom, do you have an email address = for Ms.=20 McKnight?
Thanks in advance,
Gene
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: DGOnline Customer Service ; CANSLIM
Sent: Friday, October 05, = 2001 7:57=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance=20 of my posting DGO Data

To: Ms. Susan McKnight, = President, Daily=20 Graphs Online
    CANSLIM Discussion Group=20 Members
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C14E66.3B83AB00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 17:48:30 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C14E8F.1C4BBCE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry, Gene, Perry, I don't have a specific address for Ms. McKnight. = But you could write CustService and ask them to forward it to her. Their = address is custserv@dailygraphs.com You could also try susan.mcknight@investors.com - or = susan.mcknight@dailygraphs.com - one of those might work. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gene Ricci=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Tom, do you have an email address for Ms. McKnight? Thanks in advance, Gene ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: DGOnline Customer Service ; CANSLIM=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:57 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs Online CANSLIM Discussion Group Members =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C14E8F.1C4BBCE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry, Gene, Perry, I don't have a specific address = for Ms.=20 McKnight. But you could write CustService and ask them to forward it to = her.=20 Their address is custserv@dailygraphs.com
 
You could also try susan.mcknight@investors.com= - or=20 susan.mcknight@dailygraphs= .com=20 - - one of those might work.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Gene = Ricci
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Saturday, October 06, = 2001 3:51=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance=20 of my posting DGO Data

Tom, do you have an email address = for Ms.=20 McKnight?
Thanks in advance,
Gene
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: DGOnline Customer Service ; CANSLIM
Sent: Friday, October 05, = 2001 7:57=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance=20 of my posting DGO Data

To: Ms. Susan McKnight, = President, Daily=20 Graphs Online
    CANSLIM Discussion Group=20 Members
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C14E8F.1C4BBCE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 18:42:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Tom One way for IBD/DGO to buy your silence would be to hire you and make you sign a non disclosure agreement. They get what they want. You get paid for your service to them (error correction and software tester). The group would miss out-- but what do they care... Regards Kent Norman - --- Tom Worley wrote: > Hi Ernie, > > That was part of their heavy handedness that upset > me so. I have been an avid supporter of DGO, a > simple email would have been sufficient. I think the > service is good, to the degree that it presents a > comprehensive amount of data on a single security. > But if I got a buck for every time I have pointed > out errors in their data, I would be entitled to a > free year just from that. It's not like I haven't > helped them, especially during their original beta > period before going commercial. > > Only way I see for DGO to repair the PR harm done is > for WON to be available weekly for an online chat. > Let us hear from the boss, and ask him the questions > directly that we presently wait for the monitors to > give to IBD to write an article about. > > I must admit, I would like to be a fly on the wall > in the DGO offices on Monday. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > AIM: TexWorley > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Hill, Ernie > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 12:08 AM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my > posting DGO Data > > > Hi Tom, > > > > Very foolish move by dgo! > > > > Perhaps they should read the archives, and they > would see that you have provided very good > advertising for them. If anything they should be > paying you, or providing you with a free > subscription. Instead they have likely alienated the > majority of the people on this list. I don't know > what kind of degree if any Ms. McKnight may have, > but if her degree is in marketing she should ask for > a refund of her tuition. > > > > E > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Worley [mailto:stkguru@netside.net] > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:57 PM > To: DGOnline Customer Service; CANSLIM > Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my > posting DGO Data > > > > To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs > Online > > CANSLIM Discussion Group Members > > > > I was served with legal notice this morning that I > was in violation of my agreement with DGO by posting > the data on those stocks I had listed in my DGO List > last Saturday. I was warned that not only could my > service be discontinued, but I could be legally > prosecuted for unauthorized use. I will, of course, > cease and desist from my well intended practice. > > > > I felt then, and still feel now, that what I did > was posting intellectual property I had developed. I > did not post the entire DGO List, rather only those > stocks that I had reviewed and found worthy of > mention. Obviously, Ms. McKnight and her corporate > counsel feel differently. > > > > I would also note that despite my frequent and > strong support of DGO in this discussion group, I > have never once received a thank you from DGO. I > cooperated with a reporter from IBD, who had sought > interviews from members of this group. I don't know > if she ever posted the article as I never heard back > from her once she got her information. I also note > that there have been numerous instances in which an > article appeared in IBD shortly after similar > discussions in this group. Not once was this group > credited or acknowledged as providing the topic or > idea for the article. To me that is theft of > intellectual property, and used for commercial > purposes to boot. Maybe Jeff Salisbury needs to put > a copyright on this group's discussions, and demand > payment when they steal our ideas. > > > > This legal notice I received again confirms to me > that this group is being monitored covertly by DGO, > and likely by IBD as well. I guess that is some kind > of back handed compliment, in a way, but I don't > like the sneaky approach. > > > > The most upsetting part of this for me is getting > this notice in a morning delivery by Fedex when a > simple email would have sufficed. It's not like they > don't have my email address, after all. Granted, it > might not have the same legal standing, but I also > don't need to be hit in the head with a baseball > bat. And here I was thinking they had finally > recognized my ability to make good money even in a > solid bear market (BTW, my VR fund is up over 15% in > the past six trading days, and continues to beat > every major index, but I'm not giving the list of > stocks to DGO or IBD). > > > > Unless Ms. McKnight further objects, I intend to > continue reviewing the entire DGO List, and posting > my thoughts and observations. Hopefully I can at > least continue that service to this group. But with > this "one way" policy so directly demonstrated, > along with the continued failure of DGO to provide > even minimal screening tools in the latest beta > version, and the continuing limitation of reports to > just those stocks in the DG books rather than all > stocks, I will not make further recommendations to > members to buy this service and will look for > alternative means to achieve the same results. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > AIM: TexWorley > > > > > ****************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it from > the ElPaso > Corporation are confidential and intended solely > for the > use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. > If you have received this email in error please > notify the > sender. > > ****************************************************************** > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 18:46:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Perhaps reversing the letters in the stock symbol would satisfy them :-) Kent > For example, the posting > contains the same titles for each category of data, > also the abbreviations and figures for each stock > are identical to those found in the Work". > Naturally, this is true since I delete from the > downloaded spread sheet those rows for stocks I did > not find worthy of mention, leaving the remaining > data unchanged. Maybe if I deleted some of the > lesser important columns, and changed the column > headings on the rest, and used different stock > symbols (didn't know they were copyrighted by DGO, > did you? Wonder if the exchanges have to pay them to > use the symbols?), they would be happy? > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1713 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.