From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1754 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, October 26 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1754 In this issue: AW: [CANSLIM] TARO [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs Excel Sheet AW: [CANSLIM] intro RE: AW: [CANSLIM] Flaws in ADVP Re: AW: [CANSLIM] TARO [CANSLIM] CANSLIM appraoch based on M RE: [CANSLIM] TARO Re: [CANSLIM] TARO [CANSLIM] TTN [CANSLIM] Risk assesment Re: [CANSLIM] Risk assesment [CANSLIM] ADVP (non canslim, don't open if offended) Re: [CANSLIM] Risk assesment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:44:32 +0200 From: Andreas Himmelreich Subject: AW: [CANSLIM] TARO I am in since http://www.growthstockanalytics.com/ has recomended it ...Last two picks of them have been great. How are your experiences with it ? > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Hill, Ernie [SMTP:Ernie.Hill@ElPaso.com] > Gesendet am: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:08 AM > An: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Betreff: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO > > Picked up TARO today at 42.43 as it moved thru my pivot point on almost 1.5x > ADV > > E > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hill, Ernie > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:58 AM > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO > > > I am calling the pivot 42.30. > > Gann lines are not part of CANSLIM, rather they are they are resistance and > support levels projected out into the future by the squaring of price and > time. They are from the work done by W.D. Gann a legendary trader of the > markets. I find that they help me make trades with lower risk and greater > opportunity. Lately my picks have done well for the first week or two only > to get shot down by M afterwards. I will now be taking profits (if any) > based on target prices projected from Gann line work until M proves itself > to have legs. > > E > > -----Original Message----- > From: BIKEAR@aol.com [mailto:BIKEAR@aol.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:22 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO > > > whaT would the pivot be? plus what is the Gann line? hope to hear > > > > ****************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso > Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the > sender. > ****************************************************************** > > > > > ****************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso > Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the > sender. > ****************************************************************** > << Datei: ATT00003.htm >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:48:43 +0200 From: Andreas Himmelreich Subject: [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs Excel Sheet Who of you have subscribed to Daily Graphs? If you are interested: I have "programmed" (nothing special) an Excel Sheet, that combines all reports of them, so you can filter on all criteria. Reply directly to me if you are interested ... - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:33:43 +0200 From: Andreas Himmelreich Subject: AW: [CANSLIM] intro we say in germany, if the Dow gets a cold, the DAX (a German Index comparable to the DOW) gets at least lung cancer .... If the Dow is up the DAX is up and the other way around, its almost always like this. Another thing is Japan, they kind of run on their own ... > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Patrick Wahl [SMTP:pwahl@prodigy.net] > Gesendet am: Friday, October 26, 2001 6:11 AM > An: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Betreff: Re: [CANSLIM] intro > > > > On 25 Oct 01, at 20:39, walter hish wrote: > > > > there is to know about successful investing and taking into > > consideration the few books I've read, the one answer I cannot find is > > why the world stock markets seem to move in unison. Just to big to be a > > co-incidence. Can anyone recommend a book to read to explain this mass > > movement of money. > > Take a look at "Intermarket Technical Analysis" by John Murphy, > he gets into foreign markets, currencies, interest rates and how the > whole mess is tied together. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 07:21:06 -0600 From: esetser Subject: RE: AW: [CANSLIM] Flaws in ADVP I think this does change the overall view of stocks performance. In fact, let's say you only look at cups with 7 weeks minimum and you only consider handles, say, at 70% of the cup (instead of 50%). This is close to how I've been picking stocks. Now the environment is that you have seen a few stocks break out and fail, a few break out and move higher, and several that are still trading close to their pivot. The main difference is you have a smaller group of stocks that have been worth watching, and I would guess, a higher percentage of successes so far. I have seen some failures, but my impression is that I'm seeing a higher success rate than others in the group. At 03:40 AM 10/26/01 -0700, you wrote: > Maybe this is the answer I was looking for to a general question I posted >the other day. I am having a problem with the couple of weeks after Sept. >11. Many stocks look like they were forming a cup, or a V, but if you >eliminate those that were not at least 7 weeks long, it really changes the >picture. Someone else mentioned that in statistics (which is a foreign >language to me) that extreme points often distort things. > >Charlie > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com >[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of esetser >Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:55 PM >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Subject: Re: AW: [CANSLIM] Flaws in ADVP > > >Yes, I do see a 6 week cup and handle. I also saw it mentioned in IBD, and >went back and looked to see why it didn't make my list. Ah yes, 6 weeks. >Since WON defines a cup with handle base as 7-8 weeks minimum, I never >added this one to my watch list. Even at 7-8, he says longer bases are >less failure prone, so I steer clear of anything shorter than 7 weeks for >cup bases, and I like to see the cup portion 7 weeks with the handle >somewhere after that. > >At 06:21 PM 10/25/01 +0700, you wrote: >>You don't see a six week cup and handle starting on 8/31? I do. Volume >>dried up nicely in the handle as well. I think the breakout was mentioned >>in IBD too. Specifically, what do you see wrong with the pattern? >> >>While I believe it is a good idea to look at insider buying and selling >>(placing weight on buying), I don't believe it was ever mentioned by WON as >>a CANSLIM criteria. If it was, I sure can't find it in the book. >> >>Peter >> >>At 12:07 PM 10/25/2001 +0200, Andreas Himmelreich wrote: >>>Well the thing is, there might be some contrarians out there who make >>>money, but like value investors there are not >>>that many who really make money. >>> >>>Its much more easy to go with the trend ... Lets face it: ADVP was not >>>really a good breakout, I can not see a pattern ... >>> >>>And: checking insider behaiviour is part of Canslim (since it is a critera >>>to buy it in the first place, you want to also check >>>how the insiders behaive ...) >>> >>> > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- >>> > Von: Peter Christiansen [SMTP:peterc@loxinfo.co.th] >>> > Gesendet am: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:32 AM >>> > An: canslim@lists.xmission.com >>> > Betreff: [CANSLIM] Flaws in ADVP >>> > >>> > Anyone watch The Traders on webfn.com last Thursday (you can also watch >>> the >>> > archive)? Goran Yordanoff was talking about the distribution and >insider >>> > selling he had been seeing in ADVP over the last two weeks. He started >>> > selling it short the week before the breakout. On the day of the >>> breakout, >>> > even though he was frightened, he doubled up on his short position. He >>> > said if you are going to be a professional, you have to take a >contrarian >>> > viewpoint. He said the trend followers, are amateur traders. I would >>> > guess that includes canslimers. >>> > >>> > Any thoughts? Anyone else see anything wrong with ADVP at the time of >the >>> > breakout? I didn't buy it, but thought the breakout looked pretty >decent. >>> > >>> > Peter >>> > >>> > "The crowd has never thirsted for the truth" - Gustave LeBon >>> > >>> > >>> > - >>> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >>> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >>> > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >>> >>>- >>>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >>>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >>>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >> >>"The crowd has never thirsted for the truth" - Gustave LeBon >> >> >>- >>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >> >> > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 07:25:46 -0600 From: esetser Subject: Re: AW: [CANSLIM] TARO One note on this one. I show the ADV at 720.5 K shares and yesterday's trade at 921.5 K shares. This calculates out to 1.28 % of daily volume, so it was quite a bit short of 1.5 X ADV according to my numbers. At 11:44 AM 10/26/01 +0200, you wrote: >I am in since http://www.growthstockanalytics.com/ has recomended it >...Last two picks of them have been great. How are your experiences with it >? > >> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Hill, Ernie [SMTP:Ernie.Hill@ElPaso.com] >> Gesendet am: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:08 AM >> An: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' >> Betreff: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO >> >> Picked up TARO today at 42.43 as it moved thru my pivot point on almost >1.5x >> ADV >> >> E >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hill, Ernie >> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:58 AM >> To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' >> Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO >> >> >> I am calling the pivot 42.30. >> >> Gann lines are not part of CANSLIM, rather they are they are resistance >and >> support levels projected out into the future by the squaring of price and >> time. They are from the work done by W.D. Gann a legendary trader of the >> markets. I find that they help me make trades with lower risk and greater >> opportunity. Lately my picks have done well for the first week or two >only >> to get shot down by M afterwards. I will now be taking profits (if any) >> based on target prices projected from Gann line work until M proves >itself >> to have legs. >> >> E >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BIKEAR@aol.com [mailto:BIKEAR@aol.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:22 AM >> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO >> >> >> whaT would the pivot be? plus what is the Gann line? hope to hear >> >> >> >> ****************************************************************** >> This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso >> Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the >> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. >> If you have received this email in error please notify the >> sender. >> ****************************************************************** >> >> >> >> >> ****************************************************************** >> This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso >> Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the >> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. >> If you have received this email in error please notify the >> sender. >> ****************************************************************** >> << Datei: ATT00003.htm >> > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 07:43:20 -0600 From: esetser Subject: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM appraoch based on M 1 - In times of strong M, we want to be aggressive, buying stocks as they move quickly (since they often run away), and holding during short bouts of weakness since they are likely to continue stronger. 2 - In times of weak M, we increase cash by selling, and once we are 100% cash, sit on the sidelines waiting for signals to get back in. I think it's the questionable "M" times that are difficult to handle. In the face of repeated failed follow-through days over the 1 1/2 years, I've begun to adjust my approach to investing in these new rallies. My original approach, was to jump to number 1 above as soon as the FT day occurred. This has cost me significant losses over the last 1 1/2 years. As time has gone on, I've modified my approach in several ways, and I thought I share these with the group and get some feedback on these. These are more evolving ideas than hard rules for me at this point, but I still think they are worth discussing. 1 - After a follow-through day, wait for several break-outs to occur before buying my first position. 2 - Start out with no more than 25% to 50% of my total positions, and wait for further confirmation of success before risking more funds. 3 - Select CANSLIM stocks with stronger overall characteristics, while passing on those with even small flaws: Look for very strong volume on the breakout, preferring at leasat 2X ADV. Look for strong secondary indicators such as ROE, U/D Vol, Cash Flow, etc. Choose only handles that are very high in the cup, maybe 70% or higher. Steer clear of any stock with any significant downside volatility on the right side of the cup. Etc., - I think you get the idea. Let me know what you think. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:26:45 -0400 From: "Dave" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00F2_01C15E08.B692AE20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Volume was not 1.5x -- it was only slightly above average. Handle is a bit flawed and pivot is more than 12% below the high. I like the stock but it seems like cheating to call it a breakout. In this market I have found cheating doesn't work. Still on my watch list, though... -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Hill, Ernie Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:08 PM To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO Picked up TARO today at 42.43 as it moved thru my pivot point on almost 1.5x ADV E -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Ernie Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:58 AM To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO I am calling the pivot 42.30. Gann lines are not part of CANSLIM, rather they are they are resistance and support levels projected out into the future by the squaring of price and time. They are from the work done by W.D. Gann a legendary trader of the markets. I find that they help me make trades with lower risk and greater opportunity. Lately my picks have done well for the first week or two only to get shot down by M afterwards. I will now be taking profits (if any) based on target prices projected from Gann line work until M proves itself to have legs. E -----Original Message----- From: BIKEAR@aol.com [mailto:BIKEAR@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:22 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO whaT would the pivot be? plus what is the Gann line? hope to hear ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. ****************************************************************** ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. ****************************************************************** - ------=_NextPart_000_00F2_01C15E08.B692AE20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Volume was not 1.5x -- it was only slightly = above=20 average. Handle is a bit flawed and pivot is more than 12% below the=20 high.
 
I like the stock but it seems like cheating = to call it=20 a breakout. In this market I have found cheating doesn't work. Still on = my watch=20 list, though...
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Hill,=20 Ernie
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:08 = PM
To:=20 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]=20 TARO

Picked up TARO today at 42.43 as it moved = thru my=20 pivot point on almost 1.5x ADV
 
E
-----Original Message-----
From: Hill, Ernie=20
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:58 AM
To:=20 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]=20 TARO

I=20 am calling the pivot 42.30.
 
Gann lines are not part of CANSLIM, = rather they are=20 they are resistance and support levels projected out into the future = by the=20 squaring of price and time. They are from the work done by W.D. Gann = a=20 legendary trader of the markets. I find that they help me make = trades with=20 lower risk and greater opportunity. Lately my picks have done well = for the=20 first week or two only to get shot down by M afterwards. I will now = be=20 taking profits (if any) based on target prices projected from Gann = line work=20 until M proves itself to have legs.
 
E
-----Original Message-----
From: BIKEAR@aol.com = [mailto:BIKEAR@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, = 2001 7:22=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM] TARO

whaT would the pivot be? plus what is the Gann line? =  hope to=20 hear


********************************************************= **********
This=20 email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso =
Corporation are=20 confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual = or entity=20 to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in = error=20 please notify the=20 =
sender.
**********************************************************= ********


********************************************************= **********
This=20 email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso =
Corporation are=20 confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or = entity=20 to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in = error=20 please notify the=20 =
sender.
**********************************************************= ********
 - ------=_NextPart_000_00F2_01C15E08.B692AE20-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 20:26:28 -0700 From: "Perry Stanfield" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C15E5C.7DDB22C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does the fact that this stock is up over 400% this year already concern = anyone? I know that this is not a Canslim concern.............it's a = Pitbull thing, to avoid stocks beyond double the 52 week low. I've = inched this criteria up to 3X for my screens, but TARO slipped by me due = to it being closer to 4X. Good Investing everyone Perry ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Dave=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:26 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO Volume was not 1.5x -- it was only slightly above average. Handle is a = bit flawed and pivot is more than 12% below the high. I like the stock but it seems like cheating to call it a breakout. In = this market I have found cheating doesn't work. Still on my watch list, = though... =20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Hill, Ernie Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:08 PM To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO Picked up TARO today at 42.43 as it moved thru my pivot point on = almost 1.5x ADV =20 E -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Ernie=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:58 AM To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TARO I am calling the pivot 42.30. =20 Gann lines are not part of CANSLIM, rather they are they are = resistance and support levels projected out into the future by the = squaring of price and time. They are from the work done by W.D. Gann a = legendary trader of the markets. I find that they help me make trades = with lower risk and greater opportunity. Lately my picks have done well = for the first week or two only to get shot down by M afterwards. I will = now be taking profits (if any) based on target prices projected from = Gann line work until M proves itself to have legs. =20 E -----Original Message----- From: BIKEAR@aol.com [mailto:BIKEAR@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:22 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TARO whaT would the pivot be? plus what is the Gann line? hope to = hear=20 ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso=20 Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the=20 use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.=20 If you have received this email in error please notify the=20 sender. ****************************************************************** ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso=20 Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the=20 use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.=20 If you have received this email in error please notify the=20 sender. ****************************************************************** - ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C15E5C.7DDB22C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Does the fact that this stock is up over 400% this = year=20 already concern anyone?   I know that this is not a Canslim=20 concern.............it's a Pitbull thing, to avoid stocks beyond double = the 52=20 week low.     I've inched this criteria up to 3X for = my=20 screens, but TARO slipped by me due to it being closer to = 4X.
 
Good Investing everyone
 
Perry
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Dave
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 = 7:26=20 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = TARO

Volume was not 1.5x -- it was only slightly = above=20 average. Handle is a bit flawed and pivot is more than 12% below the=20 high.
 
I like the stock but it seems like cheating = to call=20 it a breakout. In this market I have found cheating doesn't work. = Still on my=20 watch list, though...
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Hill,=20 Ernie
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:08 = PM
To:=20 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]=20 TARO

Picked up TARO today at 42.43 as it moved = thru my=20 pivot point on almost 1.5x ADV
 
E
-----Original Message-----
From: Hill, Ernie=20
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:58 AM
To: = 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]=20 TARO

I am calling the pivot = 42.30.
 
Gann lines are not part of CANSLIM, = rather they=20 are they are resistance and support levels projected out into the = future=20 by the squaring of price and time. They are from the work done by = W.D.=20 Gann a legendary trader of the markets. I find that they help me = make=20 trades with lower risk and greater opportunity. Lately my picks = have done=20 well for the first week or two only to get shot down by M = afterwards. I=20 will now be taking profits (if any) based on target prices = projected from=20 Gann line work until M proves itself to have = legs.
 
E
-----Original Message-----
From: = BIKEAR@aol.com=20 [mailto:BIKEAR@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, = 2001 7:22=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: = Re:=20 [CANSLIM] TARO

whaT would the pivot be? plus what is the Gann line? =  hope=20 to hear


********************************************************= **********
This=20 email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso =
Corporation=20 are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the = individual or=20 entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this = email in=20 error please notify the=20 =
sender.
**********************************************************= ********


********************************************************= **********
This=20 email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso =
Corporation are=20 confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual = or entity=20 to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in = error=20 please notify the=20 =
sender.
**********************************************************= ********
 - ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C15E5C.7DDB22C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:33:28 -0400 From: "Dave" Subject: [CANSLIM] TTN TTN "broke out" recently, due to the fact that they are the parent company of the producer of equipment that has the potential to be deployed in post offices to sanitize mail. EPS is a low 54 but may be overlooked if they do land a contract to deploy sanitizing machines in post offices. Other IBD ratings are good (92/A/B/A) and the stock is at a new 52-wk high on good volume. Admittedly the chart is not perfect and this is certainly not a pure CANSLIM play but may be worth watching. It has better fundamentals than other stocks that have benefited hugely from recent events (ACAM, VISG, VSNX for example). If it can hold above 25 for a few days on lower volume I think it has the potential to surge again. - -- Dave - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:40:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Kent Norman Subject: [CANSLIM] Risk assesment I hear a lot of people talk about risk. As in one stock is more risky than another. When I try to determine how they asses risk, I get vague answers. The only thing I can quantify is volatility. Does anyone have a formula or suggestion on how to compare and quantify risk on individual stocks? Thanks Kent Norman __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:54:38 -0600 From: esetser Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Risk assesment You have it right that most "risk" formulas simply calculate volatility. I remember looking into this for mutual funds some time back. Basically, most formulas use up and down volatility, so any fund that outperforms significantly will have a high "risk" number because it moves up more than most stocks. I think there was some formula that only looked at down days, but I don't recall much else about it. Generally, I don't feel the "risk" formulas give meaningful data for most investment decisions. At 08:40 AM 10/26/01 -0700, you wrote: >I hear a lot of people talk about risk. As in one >stock is more risky than another. When I try to >determine how they asses risk, I get vague answers. >The only thing I can quantify is volatility. > >Does anyone have a formula or suggestion on how to >compare and quantify risk on individual stocks? > >Thanks >Kent Norman > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. >http://personals.yahoo.com > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:16:54 -0700 From: "Perry Stanfield" Subject: [CANSLIM] ADVP (non canslim, don't open if offended) Anyone still watching this old friend? Yes, it is some 25% below its 52 week high, but it appears very oversold based on stochastics. See how it skidded down to its 200 day MA and has stayed above it? Its PEG is now below 1. Waiting for a turn, with momentum going up through 60 or so, feels like a safer move to me than a C/H breakout. Comments? Perry - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:22:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Risk assesment I hear people talking about risk management and diversification. Sounds more like regression to the mean. I wonder if anyone has done a study of various CANSLIM base patterns and their relative success rates and average gain. Best I can recall, WON says the C&H (and others) produce the greatest gains with the lowest risk, but I have never seen the percentages or relative rankings. Kent - --- esetser wrote: > You have it right that most "risk" formulas simply > calculate volatility. I > remember looking into this for mutual funds some > time back. Basically, > most formulas use up and down volatility, so any > fund that outperforms > significantly will have a high "risk" number because > it moves up more than > most stocks. I think there was some formula that > only looked at down days, > but I don't recall much else about it. Generally, I > don't feel the "risk" > formulas give meaningful data for most investment > decisions. > > > At 08:40 AM 10/26/01 -0700, you wrote: > >I hear a lot of people talk about risk. As in one > >stock is more risky than another. When I try to > >determine how they asses risk, I get vague answers. > >The only thing I can quantify is volatility. > > > >Does anyone have a formula or suggestion on how to > >compare and quantify risk on individual stocks? > > > >Thanks > >Kent Norman > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > >http://personals.yahoo.com > > > >- > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your > email. > > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1754 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.