From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1860 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Wednesday, November 28 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1860 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM]buying LLUR Re: [CANSLIM] intraday volume details [CANSLIM] CPRT Re: [CANSLIM] TRR and M RE: [CANSLIM] TRR and M ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:05:11 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]buying LLUR Hi John, I like to think of the song with that line "knock three times on the ceiling if you waa-ant me..." (who sang that anyway?) or the idea of "third time's a charm" to describe the ascending base. Instead of me describing it in my own words, I'll use a quote from an article written by Loren Fleckenstein at TradingMarkets.com, "How to Find Ascending Bases That Lead to Powerful Advances." He says, "[T]he ascending base [is] a rare and tricky pattern that can lead powerful advances in leadership stocks. In this pattern, the stock will form three successive consolidation zones. Some may be long enough -- five weeks -- to be called a base. The first two breakouts will fail, but then, rather than selling off, the stock forms a successive zone characterized by higher highs and higher lows than the prior zone. The third, final zone should tighten relative to the ranges of the prior zones. The breakout from the third zone is where you buy (remembering, of course, to set an initial stop to protect you in the event the breakout fails)." When you look at these on a chart, it looks like a slightly upward tilting base. The reason it happens varies, and I didn't mean to mislead you by indicating that it would be FDA news pending or something like that per se, just an example of how "the unknown" can contribute to creating the pattern. The "unknown" can be many things which are not always clear while the pattern is forming, but is most often a market trying to find its footing. The examples that Loren gives in his article include (take a look on a daily chart): AOL in early '99: (1) 1/11/99, B/O of 2 wk consolidation, failed. (2) recovered and 2 wks later tried to B/O again, failed, then consolidated with low of consolidation above low of zone (1) (3) 2/23/99, moved to new high, then fell back. B/O on 3/9/99 JDSU in '99: (1) failed B/O 5/12/99 (2) failed B/O 6/7/99 (3) successful B/O 6/29/99 The Investor's Corner 8/21/01 has QCOM as an example from about 8/5/99 to its successful B/O in late Oct. Recent examples are harder for me to find. The closest might be BVF, but the high volume weeks 9/21 and 9/28 may negate the pattern. In general, you want this "upward trending" base pattern to last at least 6 weeks. There should be 3 peaks and 3 bottoms. Buy when it breaks this pattern on volume. Hope that helps, Katherine For those who have a membership at TradingMarkets.com, the article is at: http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/stocks/education/patterns/07112000-7113. cfm If you want to read it, but don't have a membership, I think they still have a 3 day free trial. - ----- Original Message ----- From: John Adair Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:19 PM Thanks Katherine I am unclear about the ascending base definition. If you run across one please point it out. Could you be referring to pending earnings whispers or FDA approval etc causing the rise. And if so are there any distinguishing characteristics - -----Original Message----- Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:43 AM Tom, I've been thinking a great deal about this LLUR pattern since joining the group and thought I might add a slightly different point of view. I see the Ascending Base and LLUR as very different in nature. The stock in an LLUR is a stock that has already created a low level base at some point and is in a long uptrend. The ascent is range bound and has very low volatility. For the investor, this allows entry into the pattern with some degree of certainty, even though they are not entering as the stock is coming out of a basing pattern. For the swing trader, it gives a defined area for shorting at the top of the range and/or going long at the bottom of the range. Once a stock has finished its ascent, it will breakaway from this upward pattern and either move sideways into a new consolidation, then either breakout into a new ascent or breakdown into a decline phase. The ascending base, however is a pattern that, under certain conditions, might have been a flat base. However, if the market is a bit iffy or there is pending news on the stock or industry as yet unresolved, this will force the normally flat basing pattern into a bit of an incline. Under these conditions, the investor would *not* want to enter until the basing pattern was resolved. So, you would look for a solid break out from the pattern on high volume, just as with any other. Katherine - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:14:50 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] intraday volume details This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_01F1_01C177ED.21EFC240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rolf, Sharing your pain today. A front has moved into Austin and we have gone = from about 80F on Thanksgiving to about 58F today. Hey, that's = *freezing* in my book! I think what you are looking for is tick (or time & sales) info, and = from what I've been able to figure out (with Gene's help) is that to get = this, you've got to pay. I had to call my Schwab team and ask them to = pull up info like this from Reuters. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: rolf hertenstein=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:07 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] intraday volume details Greetings! This has come up before but I can't seem to find it. =20 Is there a non-fee website that gives details on volume per trade? The intraday YAHOO plots aren't quite fine enough to determine if a high-volume trade was up or down. =20 Many thanks for this repeat info! =20 Rolf =20 P.S. it's about 20F with 6" of snow here in CO, just so you warm southern and CA/AZ members can say 'Ahhhh'.=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_01F1_01C177ED.21EFC240 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Rolf,
 
Sharing your pain today. A front has = moved into=20 Austin and we have gone from about 80F on Thanksgiving to about 58F = today. Hey,=20 that's *freezing* in my book!
 
I think what you are looking for is = tick (or time=20 & sales) info, and from what I've been able to figure out (with = Gene's help)=20 is that to get this, you've got to pay. I had to call my Schwab team and = ask=20 them to pull up info like this from Reuters.
 
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 rolf=20 hertenstein
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, = 2001 6:07=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] intraday = volume=20 details

Greetings!
 
This has come = up before=20 but I can't seem to find it.
 
Is there = a non-fee=20 website that gives details on volume per
trade?  = The intraday=20 YAHOO plots aren't quite fine enough
to determine if = a=20 high-volume trade was up or down.
 
Many thanks for = this=20 repeat info!
 
 Rolf
 
P.S. it's about = 20F with=20 6" of snow here in CO, just so you
warm southern = and CA/AZ=20 members can say=20 'Ahhhh'. 
- ------=_NextPart_000_01F1_01C177ED.21EFC240-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:00:37 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Jaenike Subject: [CANSLIM] CPRT - --0-942967637-1006963237=:49275 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Appears to have broken out of short base on base double bottom yesterday. Up again today on volume, may come back into range. Shorter base than I would prefer, but RS at new high, trending up, good overall numbers. Volume dryups at base lows. Opinions? - --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. - --0-942967637-1006963237=:49275 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Appears to have broken out of short base on base double bottom yesterday. Up again today on volume, may come back into range. Shorter base than I would prefer, but RS at new high, trending up, good overall numbers. Volume dryups at base lows. Opinions?


Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. - --0-942967637-1006963237=:49275-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:02:56 -0500 From: "Andy Johnson" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TRR and M This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00BD_01C177FC.3C467940 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_00BE_01C177FC.3C467940" - ------=_NextPart_001_00BE_01C177FC.3C467940 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I thought you guys might be interested in this........... William O'Neil + Co. Refutes DJ Newswire Report on TRR 11/26/01 = 12:47 PM EST =20 Updated: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:47 PM ET Printer-friendly = version =20 =20 LOS ANGELES, Nov. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- A Dow Jones Newswire released = an inaccurate story 11/26/01 stating that TRC Companies Inc. (NYSE: TRR, = news, msgs) was "touted by William O'Neil." TRR appeared along with 124 = other stocks in one of the O'Neil database screening products published = the week of 11/23/01. These and all publicly-traded stocks in the = database are computer-screened weekly using objective performance = criteria to provide a list of stronger- performing stocks only, and are = definitely not to be misconstrued as buy recommendations.=20 "TRR has never been a buy recommendation by William O'Neil + Co., = nor does our firm 'tout' stocks we might recommend to institutional = investors," stated Susan McKnight, President of William O'Neil + Co.=20 According to William O'Neil + Co., the Dow Jones Newswire writer = refused to print a retraction after he was made aware of the = inaccuracies in his report.=20 MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here http://tbutton.prnewswire.com/prn/11690X34744066 SOURCE William O'Neil + Co.=20 CONTACT: Kathleen Sherman, Director, Corp. Communications, = +1-310-448-6746 =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:49 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TRR and M Hi Earl, I read yesterday's and today's action on TRR simply as a major = breakout on heavy volume, followed by a failed breakout on slightly more = than just half of that volume. That means a lot of investors are = holdings shares just bought yesterday at a loss still. I wouldn't touch = it here or for a few days until they decide what they do. At the moment, = it simply returned to the base. Progress since the 9/21/01 lows?? IRA up 27%, VRfund up 42.6% - wish = it was the other way around, but I count both as a success in a = difficult market. The IRA seems stuck in the 70-80% gain range for the = year to date, can't seem to shake out of it. Looking less likely that I = will meet or exceed my goal of 100% for this year, may have to wait for = a more favorable "M". Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: esetser=20 To: canslim@xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] TRR and M Anyone else watching TRR? I picked a few stocks out of recent IBD = stocks in the news, and ran through the charts today. TRR caught my eye = with a pretty nice breakout from a cup with handle base yesterday. I = watched it some today, but ended up very busy at work, and came back to = consider a purchase late in the day. At this point, it was down over 8% and = well below the pivot. Ouch, guess I'll go back in my hole for a while! On M, I still see a large number (majority?) a breakouts failing, questionable leadership, and not much in the way of profits if you = want to hold for a while. I've done a little better lately since my last = holding has had a few good days. This puts me near even for post-Sept 11 purchases. How is everyone else doing since the FT day in = September? - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_001_00BE_01C177FC.3C467940 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I thought you guys might be interested in=20 this...........
 
William O'Neil + Co. Refutes DJ = Newswire Report=20 on TRR 11/26/01 12:47 PM EST  
Updated: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:47 PM ET  Printer-friendly=20 version
 

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- A Dow Jones Newswire = released an=20 inaccurate story 11/26/01 stating that TRC Companies Inc. (NYSE: = TRR,= news, = msgs)=20 was "touted by William O'Neil." TRR appeared along with 124 other = stocks=20 in one of the O'Neil database screening products published the = week of=20 11/23/01. These and all publicly-traded stocks in the database are = computer-screened weekly using objective performance criteria to = provide a=20 list of stronger- performing stocks only, and are definitely not = to be=20 misconstrued as buy recommendations.=20

"TRR has never been a buy recommendation by William O'Neil + = Co., nor=20 does our firm 'tout' stocks we might recommend to institutional=20 investors," stated Susan McKnight, President of William O'Neil + = Co.=20

According to William O'Neil + Co., the Dow Jones Newswire = writer=20 refused to print a retraction after he was made aware of the = inaccuracies=20 in his report. 

                    MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT -  =
Click Here

               http://tbutton.=
prnewswire.com/prn/11690X34744066

SOURCE William O'Neil + Co.=20

CONTACT: Kathleen Sherman, Director, Corp. Communications,=20 +1-310-448-6746

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom = Worley=20
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, = 2001 11:49=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TRR and = M

Hi Earl,
 
I read yesterday's and today's action on TRR = simply as a=20 major breakout on heavy volume, followed by a failed breakout on = slightly more=20 than just half of that volume. That means a lot of investors are = holdings=20 shares just bought yesterday at a loss still. I wouldn't touch it here = or for=20 a few days until they decide what they do. At the moment, it simply = returned=20 to the base.
 
Progress since the 9/21/01 lows?? IRA up 27%, = VRfund up=20 42.6% - wish it was the other way around, but I count both as a = success in a=20 difficult market. The IRA seems stuck in the 70-80% gain range for the = year to=20 date, can't seem to shake out of it. Looking less likely that I will = meet or=20 exceed my goal of 100% for this year, may have to wait for a more = favorable=20 "M".
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 esetser=20
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, = 2001 9:57=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] TRR and = M

Anyone else watching TRR?  I picked a few stocks = out of=20 recent IBD stocks
in the news, and ran through the charts = today. =20 TRR caught my eye with a
pretty nice breakout from a cup with = handle base=20 yesterday.  I watched it
some today, but ended up very busy = at work,=20 and came back to consider a
purchase late in the day.  At = this=20 point, it was down over 8% and well
below the pivot.  Ouch, = guess=20 I'll go back in my hole for a while!

On M, I still see a = large number=20 (majority?) a breakouts failing,
questionable leadership, and not = much in=20 the way of profits if you want to
hold for a while.  I've = done a=20 little better lately since my last holding
has had a few good = days. =20 This puts me near even for post-Sept 11
purchases.  How is = everyone=20 else doing since the FT day in September?

-
-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your = email.
- ------=_NextPart_001_00BE_01C177FC.3C467940-- - ------=_NextPart_000_00BD_01C177FC.3C467940 Content-Type: image/gif; name="printer_friendly_format.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Location: http://www.quicken.com/images/printer_friendly_format.gif R0lGODlhEAAPAPcAAAAAABAICBgYGCEhISkpKTNmZjNmZjlzc1IICEJCOUpKQlpaUkl1dVJ7a2tj WnNrY2uMc0KEhF+GhneYmJQAAIR7c84AANYQENYpKd5KSt5aWudzc4yMe5Sle6yLRLW1e8uyd4SE hJyUhJSUlJycnI2pqaWcjK2llLW1pbe3t729vca9re+MjPe1tc7OhM7Gpc7GtdbOtd7WvefWjOvc vf/vjMTExMbGxs7OztLd3d7e3t/f3+fexvfOzv/e3u/nzvfv1ufn5+np6enu7u/v7//v7/f39/f3 ///39////6e9vQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEAABcALAAAAAAQAA8A AAhuAC8IFFiioMGDAwnmSMKwYQ4JQxIOKZHkIEUJORJeKLGwIcMcDDRurHgwCUaREzw2ZGCwAEEG KhkWyJGjhEuOBXLq1FnTZoGYKlvOpEm0aE+fRokW4FiQZ9KiSHPsnLoz44WlFg/OHCiVKs+BAQEA Ow== - ------=_NextPart_000_00BD_01C177FC.3C467940-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:18:09 -0500 From: "Tangen, Eric" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TRR and M This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C17830.A6B9EAD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Thanks - that was a nice insight into the petty jealously of the Dow Jones folks. ERIC TANGEN - ----Original Message----- From: Andy Johnson [mailto:andy_johnson@drewcorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:03 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TRR and M I thought you guys might be interested in this........... William O'Neil + Co. Refutes DJ Newswire Report on TRR 11/26/01 12:47 PM EST Updated: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:47 PM ET Printer-friendly version LOS ANGELES, Nov. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- A Dow Jones Newswire released an inaccurate story 11/26/01 stating that TRC Companies Inc. (NYSE: TRR , news , msgs ) was "touted by William O'Neil." TRR appeared along with 124 other stocks in one of the O'Neil database screening products published the week of 11/23/01. These and all publicly-traded stocks in the database are computer-screened weekly using objective performance criteria to provide a list of stronger- performing stocks only, and are definitely not to be misconstrued as buy recommendations. "TRR has never been a buy recommendation by William O'Neil + Co., nor does our firm 'tout' stocks we might recommend to institutional investors," stated Susan McKnight, President of William O'Neil + Co. According to William O'Neil + Co., the Dow Jones Newswire writer refused to print a retraction after he was made aware of the inaccuracies in his report. MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here http://tbutton.prnewswire.com/prn/11690X34744066 SOURCE William O'Neil + Co. CONTACT: Kathleen Sherman, Director, Corp. Communications, +1-310-448-6746 - ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:49 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TRR and M Hi Earl, I read yesterday's and today's action on TRR simply as a major breakout on heavy volume, followed by a failed breakout on slightly more than just half of that volume. That means a lot of investors are holdings shares just bought yesterday at a loss still. I wouldn't touch it here or for a few days until they decide what they do. At the moment, it simply returned to the base. Progress since the 9/21/01 lows?? IRA up 27%, VRfund up 42.6% - wish it was the other way around, but I count both as a success in a difficult market. The IRA seems stuck in the 70-80% gain range for the year to date, can't seem to shake out of it. Looking less likely that I will meet or exceed my goal of 100% for this year, may have to wait for a more favorable "M". Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: esetser To: canslim@xmission.com Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] TRR and M Anyone else watching TRR? I picked a few stocks out of recent IBD stocks in the news, and ran through the charts today. TRR caught my eye with a pretty nice breakout from a cup with handle base yesterday. I watched it some today, but ended up very busy at work, and came back to consider a purchase late in the day. At this point, it was down over 8% and well below the pivot. Ouch, guess I'll go back in my hole for a while! On M, I still see a large number (majority?) a breakouts failing, questionable leadership, and not much in the way of profits if you want to hold for a while. I've done a little better lately since my last holding has had a few good days. This puts me near even for post-Sept 11 purchases. How is everyone else doing since the FT day in September? - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email " majordomo@xmission.com " - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C17830.A6B9EAD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks=20 - - that was a nice insight into the petty jealously of the Dow Jones = folks.=20

ERIC = TANGEN

----Original Message-----
From: Andy Johnson=20 [mailto:andy_johnson@drewcorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, = November 28,=20 2001 10:03 AM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re:=20 [CANSLIM] TRR and M

I thought you guys might be interested in=20 this...........
 
William O'Neil + Co. Refutes DJ = Newswire=20 Report on TRR 11/26/01 12:47 PM EST  
Updated: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:47 PM ET =  Printer-friendly=20 version
 

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- A Dow Jones Newswire = released an=20 inaccurate story 11/26/01 stating that TRC Companies Inc. = (NYSE: TRR= , news,= msgs)=20 was "touted by William O'Neil." TRR appeared along with 124 = other stocks=20 in one of the O'Neil database screening products published the = week of=20 11/23/01. These and all publicly-traded stocks in the database = are=20 computer-screened weekly using objective performance criteria = to provide=20 a list of stronger- performing stocks only, and are definitely = not to be=20 misconstrued as buy recommendations.=20

"TRR has never been a buy recommendation by William O'Neil + = Co., nor=20 does our firm 'tout' stocks we might recommend to institutional = investors," stated Susan McKnight, President of William O'Neil = + Co.=20

According to William O'Neil + Co., the Dow Jones Newswire = writer=20 refused to print a retraction after he was made aware of the=20 inaccuracies in his report. 

                    MAKE YOUR =
OPINION COUNT -  Click Here

               http://tbutton=
.prnewswire.com/prn/11690X34744066

SOURCE William O'Neil + Co.=20

CONTACT: Kathleen Sherman, Director, Corp. Communications,=20 +1-310-448-6746

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, = 2001 11:49=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TRR = and M

Hi Earl,
 
I read yesterday's and today's action on TRR = simply as a=20 major breakout on heavy volume, followed by a failed breakout on = slightly=20 more than just half of that volume. That means a lot of investors = are=20 holdings shares just bought yesterday at a loss still. I wouldn't = touch it=20 here or for a few days until they decide what they do. At the = moment, it=20 simply returned to the base.
 
Progress since the 9/21/01 lows?? IRA up 27%, = VRfund up=20 42.6% - wish it was the other way around, but I count both as a = success in a=20 difficult market. The IRA seems stuck in the 70-80% gain range for = the year=20 to date, can't seem to shake out of it. Looking less likely that I = will meet=20 or exceed my goal of 100% for this year, may have to wait for a = more=20 favorable "M".
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM: = TexWorley
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 esetser=20
To: canslim@xmission.com
Sent: Tuesday, November = 27, 2001 9:57=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] TRR and = M

Anyone else watching TRR?  I picked a few = stocks out=20 of recent IBD stocks
in the news, and ran through the charts=20 today.  TRR caught my eye with a
pretty nice breakout = from a cup=20 with handle base yesterday.  I watched it
some today, but = ended up=20 very busy at work, and came back to consider a
purchase late = in the=20 day.  At this point, it was down over 8% and well
below = the=20 pivot.  Ouch, guess I'll go back in my hole for a = while!

On M,=20 I still see a large number (majority?) a breakouts=20 failing,
questionable leadership, and not much in the way of = profits if=20 you want to
hold for a while.  I've done a little better = lately=20 since my last holding
has had a few good days.  This puts = me near=20 even for post-Sept 11
purchases.  How is everyone else = doing since=20 the FT day in September?

-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, = email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-I= n=20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe=20 canslim".  Do not use quotes in your=20 email.
- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C17830.A6B9EAD0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1860 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.