From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2012 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Tuesday, January 8 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2012 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives RE: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives RE: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives [CANSLIM] Bulkowski re: patterns besides C&H ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:52:43 -0800 From: "Mike Hofmann" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C19793.58287E40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Joe ... thought I'd take the liberty of responding. I assumed that = the link was the one from Katherine's message to which Eric was = responding. Here it is in case you don't have the original message: http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq Mike ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Joe Maguire=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch Hello Eric Tangen .. Hello Joe.. the sometimes lunker here...... = Happy New Year to you and yours. Say I missed the post you sent to = Katherine re.....Institiional buying/selling pressure ... could you send = me that www ...sure wud appreciate that.=20 Thyanks in advance. Joe Maguire San Diego=20 "Tangen, Eric" wrote:=20 This is waaaay cool - and it will shows alot more than just one = stock...its got institutional buying/selling pressure broken down by = sector and most active issues. Highly recommened. Thanks again = Katherine. ERIC TANGEN=20 ----Original Message-----=20 From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]=20 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:29 PM=20 To: CANSLIM List Posting=20 Subject: [CANSLIM] I-Watch=20 =20 FYI/Reference materials: Here's an interesting site that shows = institutional block trading vs. retail. Here's an example using EPIQ: = http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq Katherine - ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C19793.58287E40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Joe ... thought I'd take the liberty = of=20 responding. I assumed that the link was the one from Katherine's message = to=20 which Eric was responding. Here it is in case you don't have the = original=20 message:
 
h= ttp://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq
 
Mike
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Joe=20 Maguire
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 = 3:22=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = I-Watch

 Hello Eric Tangen .. Hello Joe.. the sometimes = lunker=20 here...... Happy New Year to you and yours. Say I missed the post you = sent to=20 Katherine re.....Institiional buying/selling pressure ... could you = send me=20 that www ...sure wud appreciate that.
Thyanks in advance. Joe=20 Maguire  San Diego
"Tangen, Eric" wrote:=20
This is waaaay cool - and it will shows alot more than = just one=20 stock...its got institutional buying/selling pressure broken down by = sector=20 and most active issues. Highly=20 recommened. Thanks again=20 Katherine.  ERIC TANGEN=20
----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]=20
Sent: Monday, = January 07, 2002=20 1:29 PM
To:=20 CANSLIM List Posting
Subject: [CANSLIM] I-Watch=20
 
FYI/Reference materials: Here's an = interesting site=20 that shows institutional block trading vs. retail. Here's an = example using=20 EPIQ: h= ttp://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq Ka= therine
- ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C19793.58287E40-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 17:35:07 -0800 From: Joe Maguire Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch - --------------BAEAAA53FB1B6AFBA16F3CC5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mike.. Thxs, Katherine got back... boy what a great group ..when it rains it pours .Best Joe Mike Hofmann wrote: > Hi Joe ... thought I'd take the liberty of responding. I assumed that > the link was the one from Katherine's message to which Eric was > responding. Here it is in case you don't have the original > message: http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=epiq Mike > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Joe Maguire > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:22 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch > Hello Eric Tangen .. Hello Joe.. the sometimes lunker > here...... Happy New Year to you and yours. Say I missed the > post you sent to Katherine re.....Institiional > buying/selling pressure ... could you send me that www > ...sure wud appreciate that. > Thyanks in advance. Joe Maguire San Diego > "Tangen, Eric" wrote: > > > This is waaaay cool - and it will shows alot more than > > just one stock...its got institutional buying/selling > > pressure broken down by sector and most active issues. > > Highly recommened.Thanks again Katherine. ERIC TANGEN > > > > ----Original Message----- > > From: Katherine Malm > > [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:29 PM > > To: CANSLIM List Posting > > Subject: [CANSLIM] I-Watch > > FYI/Reference materials: Here's an interesting > > site that shows institutional block trading vs. > > retail. Here's an example using EPIQ: > > http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=epiq > > Katherine > > - --------------BAEAAA53FB1B6AFBA16F3CC5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  Mike.. Thxs, Katherine got back... boy what a great group ..when it rains it pours .Best Joe

Mike Hofmann wrote:

 Hi Joe ... thought I'd take the liberty of responding. I assumed that the link was the one from Katherine's message to which Eric was responding. Here it is in case you don't have the original message: http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=epiq Mike 
----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Maguire
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch
  Hello Eric Tangen .. Hello Joe.. the sometimes lunker here...... Happy New Year to you and yours. Say I missed the post you sent to Katherine re.....Institiional buying/selling pressure ... could you send me that www ...sure wud appreciate that.
Thyanks in advance. Joe Maguire  San Diego
"Tangen, Eric" wrote:
This is waaaay cool - and it will shows alot more than just one stock...its got institutional buying/selling pressure broken down by sector and most active issues. Highly recommened.Thanks again Katherine.  ERIC TANGEN
----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:29 PM
To: CANSLIM List Posting
Subject: [CANSLIM] I-Watch
FYI/Reference materials: Here's an interesting site that shows institutional block trading vs. retail. Here's an example using EPIQ: http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=epiq Katherine
- --------------BAEAAA53FB1B6AFBA16F3CC5-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:50:49 -0500 From: "Dan Forant" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C197BC.FCCFB0C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Excellent, thanks DanF ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: CANSLIM List Posting=20 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:28 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] I-Watch FYI/Reference materials: Here's an interesting site that shows institutional block trading vs. = retail. Here's an example using EPIQ: http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq Katherine - ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C197BC.FCCFB0C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Excellent, thanks
 
DanF
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 = 2:28=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = I-Watch

FYI/Reference materials:
 
Here's an interesting site that shows institutional block trading = vs.=20 retail. Here's an example using EPIQ:
 
h= ttp://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq
 
Katherine
- ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C197BC.FCCFB0C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 20:08:00 -0600 From: Jerry Weiss Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_006D_01C197B7.01BF2D00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Katherine: You always have something of interest in your e-mails. However, note what the following says: "Thomson I-Watch offers individual investors a window into the = previously closed world of institutional trading. Before completing = large block trades, "Big Money" traders express their interest by = posting "advertising" buy or sell messages, revealing the short-term = supply and demand for a particular stock." It doesn't actually show block trading, it shows an alleged "interest" = in block trading that may or may not be carried out. I would imagine = that there are many instances where it would be profitable for them to = show an "interest" that they know is seen by fellow investors and not = carry out the inferred buy or sell. I would suggest that folks use this = info with a grain of salt and simply consider it a possibility, not a = sure thing. Jer ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: CANSLIM List Posting=20 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:28 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] I-Watch FYI/Reference materials: Here's an interesting site that shows institutional block trading vs. = retail. Here's an example using EPIQ: http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq Katherine - ------=_NextPart_000_006D_01C197B7.01BF2D00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Katherine:
You always have something of interest = in your=20 e-mails.
However, note what the following = says:
 
"Thomson I-Watch offers individual investors a window into the = previously=20 closed world of institutional trading. Before completing large block = trades,=20 "Big Money" traders express their interest by posting "advertising" buy = or sell=20 messages, revealing the short-term supply and demand for a particular=20 stock."
 
It doesn't actually show block trading, = it shows an=20 alleged "interest" in block trading that may or may not be carried = out.  I=20 would imagine that there are many instances where it would be profitable = for=20 them to show an "interest" that they know is seen by fellow investors = and not=20 carry out the inferred buy or sell.  I would suggest that = folks=20 use this info with a grain of salt and simply consider it a possibility, = not a=20 sure thing.
 
Jer

 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 = 1:28=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = I-Watch

FYI/Reference materials:
 
Here's an interesting site that shows institutional block trading = vs.=20 retail. Here's an example using EPIQ:
 
h= ttp://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq
 
Katherine
- ------=_NextPart_000_006D_01C197B7.01BF2D00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:33:48 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C197BA.9C77E960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry, Jerry. I was aware of this, but didn't explain it very clearly in = my note. Thanks for bringing that to the list's attention. An example from today is IP. There were actually triple 9's to sell, but = also you can see there was a large "selling interest" on the I-Watch = site. The other part of the explanation indicates that it's only those = notices going through Thompson's financial system. http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Dip Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jerry Weiss=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch Katherine: You always have something of interest in your e-mails. However, note what the following says: "Thomson I-Watch offers individual investors a window into the = previously closed world of institutional trading. Before completing = large block trades, "Big Money" traders express their interest by = posting "advertising" buy or sell messages, revealing the short-term = supply and demand for a particular stock." It doesn't actually show block trading, it shows an alleged "interest" = in block trading that may or may not be carried out. I would imagine = that there are many instances where it would be profitable for them to = show an "interest" that they know is seen by fellow investors and not = carry out the inferred buy or sell. I would suggest that folks use this = info with a grain of salt and simply consider it a possibility, not a = sure thing. Jer ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: CANSLIM List Posting=20 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:28 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] I-Watch FYI/Reference materials: Here's an interesting site that shows institutional block trading = vs. retail. Here's an example using EPIQ: http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq Katherine - ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C197BA.9C77E960 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry, Jerry. I was aware of this, but didn't explain it very = clearly in my=20 note. Thanks for bringing that to the list's attention.
 
An example from today is IP. There were actually triple 9's to = sell,=20 but also you can see there was a large "selling interest" on the I-Watch = site.=20 The other part of the explanation indicates that it's only those notices = going=20 through Thompson's financial system.
htt= p://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Dip
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Jerry = Weiss=20
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 = 8:08=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = I-Watch

Katherine:
You always have something of interest = in your=20 e-mails.
However, note what the following=20 says:
 
"Thomson I-Watch offers individual investors a window into the = previously=20 closed world of institutional trading. Before completing large block = trades,=20 "Big Money" traders express their interest by posting "advertising" = buy or=20 sell messages, revealing the short-term supply and demand for a = particular=20 stock."
 
It doesn't actually show block = trading, it shows=20 an alleged "interest" in block trading that may or may not be carried=20 out.  I would imagine that there are many instances where it = would be=20 profitable for them to show an "interest" that they know is seen by = fellow=20 investors and not carry out the inferred buy or sell.  = I would=20 suggest that folks use this info with a grain of salt and simply = consider it a=20 possibility, not a sure thing.
 
Jer

 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Monday, January 07, = 2002 1:28=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = I-Watch

FYI/Reference materials:
 
Here's an interesting site that shows institutional block = trading vs.=20 retail. Here's an example using EPIQ:
 
h= ttp://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=3Depiq
 
Katherine
- ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C197BA.9C77E960-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:57:46 -0800 (PST) From: Fanus Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I-Watch If you read the description for the pie chart you will see it is generated by using transactions already executed and reported by the broker/dealer. In my books, an executed trade is pretty much a sure thing. Keep in mind, no suggestions was made on how to use the data. It was presented as "an interesting site" and I am thankful that Katherine shared this. - - Fanus - --- Jerry Weiss wrote: > Katherine: > You always have something of interest in your > e-mails. > However, note what the following says: > > "Thomson I-Watch offers individual investors a > window into the previously closed world of > institutional trading. Before completing large block > trades, "Big Money" traders express their interest > by posting "advertising" buy or sell messages, > revealing the short-term supply and demand for a > particular stock." > > It doesn't actually show block trading, it shows an > alleged "interest" in block trading that may or may > not be carried out. I would imagine that there are > many instances where it would be profitable for them > to show an "interest" that they know is seen by > fellow investors and not carry out the inferred buy > or sell. I would suggest that folks use this info > with a grain of salt and simply consider it a > possibility, not a sure thing. > > Jer > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Katherine Malm > To: CANSLIM List Posting > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:28 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] I-Watch > > > FYI/Reference materials: > > Here's an interesting site that shows > institutional block trading vs. retail. Here's an > example using EPIQ: > > > http://iw.thomsonfn.com/iwatch/cgi-bin/iw_ticker?ticker=epiq > > Katherine > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:48:03 -0500 From: "Treb Courie" Subject: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives I am a novice CANSLIMmer and have learned a lot from this list. Unfortunately, as we all know, the market over the past few months hasn't been a good one, so learning CANSLIM has been difficult. Now I've got another obstacle--I'm not going to have as much access to the internet over the next couple of months. I will be lucky to check my stocks every couple of days--probably only on weekends. Does anyone know how I should try to invest in this situation, using as much CANSLIM as possible? Should I just look for highly-rated stocks and maybe try to buy them in LLURs? I know that some people here, like Tom Worley, buy in the base more than WON advocates. How do you decide when to buy in the bases, and which stocks to buy before they breakout? Thanks for any advice out there. v/r Treb Courie - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:38:04 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives Hi Treb, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so cannot agree that "the past few months hasn't been a good one". My VR Fund did poorly in the competition, up only 21% for the fourth quarter. But if you had spent most of 2001 in cash, as "M" was telling you, then the 4th qtr alone could give a decent return for the year, certainly much better than a money market. During this quarter, my IRA mostly stagnated, but still finished the year up 76%, a most acceptable return, even if short of my goal, for a lousy year otherwise. During 1999 and 2000, my IRA did comparatively poor, largely due my almost total neglect of it. Very few trades, very little time watching the market due the demands and constraints of my day job. During 2001, I gave up some sleep, and put more time into my investment management, and it paid off. Being right in investing is usually little more than being in the right stocks (or sector) at the right time. Today, every index was down, my VR fund was up 1.5%, and my IRA up nearly 5%. I could sell both right now, and still be better off than a money market for the entire year. Daily access to the net, and the markets, is nice, but not essential. A lot of investors do nothing except on the weekend. They don't check stock prices, they don't make trades, nor do they make any buy / sell / hold decisions. That is all done on the weekend, using a longer term perspective. CANSLIM, for me, is about investing, not trading. While it's important to enter a stock at the right point, it's more important to enter the right stock. I choose to buy stocks while they are still basing, counting on my patience and an eventual break out. If I don't get it, I can usually exit with minor losses. I am also a fundamentalist, I buy earnings growth. Several of my stocks in my VR fund, for example, were down 40% or more (TTIL being the best example) before turning into a major winner. I averaged down on a few, and held more, because I believed in their fundies. Perhaps the best solution for you for the next few months is use the time to paper trade. Keep your powder dry until you have the time to feel comfortable about being in the market, and the time you have to spend on it. Or limit your investing to a small portion of your capital. Keeps you involved without full risk. I buy small caps with little or no institutional interest, that tends to mean, tho not guarantee, less volatility and more focus on fundies. But that helped me survive two years of neglect, and still have something left to show for it. Good luck, Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Treb Courie" To: Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives > I am a novice CANSLIMmer and have learned a lot from this list. > Unfortunately, as we all know, the market over the past few months hasn't > been a good one, so learning CANSLIM has been difficult. > > Now I've got another obstacle--I'm not going to have as much access to the > internet over the next couple of months. I will be lucky to check my stocks > every couple of days--probably only on weekends. > > Does anyone know how I should try to invest in this situation, using as much > CANSLIM as possible? Should I just look for highly-rated stocks and maybe > try to buy them in LLURs? I know that some people here, like Tom Worley, > buy in the base more than WON advocates. How do you decide when to buy in > the bases, and which stocks to buy before they breakout? > > Thanks for any advice out there. > > v/r > Treb Courie > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:54:15 -1000 From: "Mike Gibbons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Treb Courie Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:48 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives I am a novice CANSLIMmer and have learned a lot from this list. Unfortunately, as we all know, the market over the past few months hasn't been a good one, so learning CANSLIM has been difficult. Now I've got another obstacle--I'm not going to have as much access to the internet over the next couple of months. I will be lucky to check my stocks every couple of days--probably only on weekends. Does anyone know how I should try to invest in this situation, using as much CANSLIM as possible? Should I just look for highly-rated stocks and maybe try to buy them in LLURs? I know that some people here, like Tom Worley, buy in the base more than WON advocates. How do you decide when to buy in the bases, and which stocks to buy before they breakout? Thanks for any advice out there. v/r Treb Courie - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:03:34 -1000 From: "Mike Gibbons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives re: >>How do you decide when to buy in the bases, and which stocks to buy before they breakout? This is a somewhat shameless plug, but for trading in the base you could read the second article here... http://www.cwhcharts.com/methodologyFrame.htm Aloha, Mike Gibbons webmaster, cwhcharts.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Treb Courie Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:48 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM alternatives I am a novice CANSLIMmer and have learned a lot from this list. Unfortunately, as we all know, the market over the past few months hasn't been a good one, so learning CANSLIM has been difficult. Now I've got another obstacle--I'm not going to have as much access to the internet over the next couple of months. I will be lucky to check my stocks every couple of days--probably only on weekends. Does anyone know how I should try to invest in this situation, using as much CANSLIM as possible? Should I just look for highly-rated stocks and maybe try to buy them in LLURs? I know that some people here, like Tom Worley, buy in the base more than WON advocates. How do you decide when to buy in the bases, and which stocks to buy before they breakout? Thanks for any advice out there. v/r Treb Courie - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 10:38:44 -0700 From: Warren Keuffel Subject: [CANSLIM] Bulkowski re: patterns besides C&H Katherine, My copy of Bulkowski arrived yesterday and (like others) I was mightily impressed. I was particularly intrigued by his analysis of C&H patterns, particularly in how O'Neill's example was not actually a C&H! But what I am writing you about specifically is to inquire whether you have applied B.'s pattern analysis to other patterns observed in stocks you trade? Seems to me that, if B's research and analysis is accurate, that we would do well to have more arrows in our quivers than just C&H. Thanks, Warren - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2012 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.