From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2025 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, January 11 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2025 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] ASIA? Re: [CANSLIM] ASIA? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:15:22 -0700 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ASIA? Wow, that's some link. Here is a suggestion on long links, I've only used it once, but it seemed to work. http://www.makeashorterlink.com/index.php Thanks for the chart. I'll stick with my interpretation, but I'll add that the handle seems a little loose, not ideal. I would say the breakout fails around 19, a 7 to 8% drop in price from the breakout. I think the pivot point was close to 20.25 or so, I tend to discount those intraday spikes, if they occur, and use the close, so that would not take the Dec. 4 (or whichever date it was) high into account, just the close. Not sure this is a legitimate approach, just a personal quirk maybe. Anyway, I think that anyone in this stock should stick with it a bit longer. On 11 Jan 2002 at 15:14, Katherine Malm wrote: > Just an experiment, but here's a marked chart: > > http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/katherinemalm/vwp?.dir=/CANSLIM&.dnm=ASIA+011102.jpg&.src=ph&.done=http%3a//photos.yahoo.com/bc/katherinemalm/vwp%3f.dir=/CANSLIM%26.dnm=Up%2bDn%2bRatio%2bArticle%2b123101.jpg%26.src=ph > > Katherine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Patrick Wahl > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:52 PM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] ASIA? > > > I think we went around about this subject a few months ago, but I would put a > different interpretation on the chart. I think the 12/4 spike marked the end of the > right side of the cup, and the choppy sideways movement from that point constitutes > a handle. So buying on 12/4 was not the proper buy point. > > The more appropriate buy point would be the day in January where price gapped up > to close at about 20.90 or so. To me the formation of a handle part way up a cup > doesn't make sense. Handles form at logical sell points, and the logical sell point is > the resistance formed at the old high - the left side of the cup around end of June, > first of July. Without a sort of definite point like an old high, any consolidation point > along the way up the right side of the cup can be called a handle. > > Just my interpretation, I think during the discussion of this point a few months ago I > was in a decided minority (one, maybe). > > On 10 Jan 2002 at 23:30, Dave wrote: > > > In hindsight if I had been watching ASIA on 12/4 I probably would have > > bought. If you consider 11/27 to be the start of a short handle, the pivot > > would be 17.33 and the stock could have been bought up to 18.20. In this > > case, you would still be in the stock. > > > > As for now, it's definitely a gamble. Personally I like the month-long > > consolidation and the near record volume over the past few days, and think > > that if the Nasdaq resumes its rally, there's a good chance ASIA will go > > along for the ride. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of esetser > > > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:51 PM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] ASIA? > > > > > > > > > So you only consider cup with handles as true breakouts? I buy > > > cups, cup > > > with handles, double bottoms, and flat bases, maybe others. > > > > > > At 10:44 PM 1/10/02 -0500, you wrote: > > > >I'm biased, but I prefer to see it as a high handle beginning > > > on 12/6. The > > > >volume that day was not so great, and there was no true > > > handle, so I don't > > > >consider it a true breakout. > > > > > > > >The handle beginning after that failure is nice and long and > > > volume dried > > > >up nicely towards the end. The volume on 1/6-1/7 was very high. > > > > > > > >Only time will tell the true story... > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of esetser > > > >> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:25 PM > > > >> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ASIA? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> I read this one differently. I see ASIA as a stock with a > > > breakout to a > > > >> new on 12/6. (And as a matter of fact, I bot it that day.) > > > >> That breakout > > > >> became suspect as the stock corrected and closed near its > > > low during the > > > >> day, and went on to be a failed breakout for anyone buying > > > in during the > > > >> day. The action since then is short of the 5 weeks minimum to > > > >> define a new > > > >> base, and is confusing in light of the new high it set.. I'm > > > >> not sure where > > > >> I would put a pivot on this one. The volume was fabulous for 2 > > > >> days, but > > > >> has remained almost as high for the last 2 day pullback, so I > > > >> would be very > > > >> cautious. > > > >> > > > >> At 04:58 PM 1/10/02 -0500, you wrote: > > > >> >Hi, > > > >> > > > > >> >Just curious on comment about ASIA. Last few days it looked > > > >> to be breaking > > > >> >out of a nice chart formation. Alas, it seems to be > > > breaking down or > > > >> >allowing for another re-entry point. Any thoughts? > > > >> > > > > >> >Is this stock considered Canslim "worthy" even though it has > > > >> seen higher > > > >> >days (ie. not breaking to new highs)? > > > >> > > > > >> >Thanks, > > > >> >Erik > > > >> >PS. Forgive me if this has been the topic of recent > > > >> discussion. I just moved > > > >> >and missed the last week of my Canslim Group emails. > > > >> > > > > >> >----- Original Message ----- > > > >> >From: "Mike Hofmann" > > > >> >To: > > > >> >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:08 PM > > > >> >Subject: Re: AW: [CANSLIM] DFXI > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> ... and still more than you really wanted to know about "kudos": > > > >> >> > > > >> >> From a really cool site called "Take Our Word For It" > > > >> >> (http://www.takeourword.com/): > > > >> >> > > > >> >> "Kudos is simply Greek for "praise". It is thought to > > > have entered > > > >> >English > > > >> >> as university slang. By 1799 we have a back-formed verb > > > kudize "to > > > >> >praise", > > > >> >> so kudos itself was probably in use prior to that, though > > > >> the first known > > > >> >> recorded use of kudos comes from 1831. Thereafter we find > > > >> it used by the > > > >> >> likes of Disraeli and Darwin. Darwin wrote, in one of his > > > >> letters: "Lyell > > > >> >> has read about half of the volume in clean sheets, and gives > > > >> me very great > > > >> >> kudos." > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Pronunciation in Britain is "cue-doss" while in America it > > > >> is "koo-doze". > > > >> >> As with many Greek words, -os indicates a singular noun. > > > Many people > > > >> >assume > > > >> >> kudos is the plural form, with the singular being a > > > kudo. They are > > > >> >wrong. > > > >> >> Just wrong. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> There was once a computer operating system called QDOS. Was > > > >> it named by a > > > >> >> Brit, so that it sounded like kudos, or is that simply a > > > >> coincidence?" > > > >> >> > > > >> >> ... and there you have it. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >> >> From: "Warren Keuffel" > > > >> >> To: > > > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:23 PM > > > >> >> Subject: Re: AW: [CANSLIM] DFXI > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Jumping in here for Mike -- "Kudos" basically means > > > >> "Congratulations". > > > >> >> > However I was curious about the etymology of the word so > > > >> >> > consulted my American Heritage dictionary which defines it > > > >> as "Acclaim > > > >> >> > or prestige as a result of achievement or position." But > > > >> no guidance on > > > >> >> > etymology, darn it. More than you wanted to know, right? > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Warren > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Andreas Himmelreich wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >Sorry to ask Mike, what means Kudos? > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > >>-----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > > > >> >> > >>Von: Mike Gibbons [SMTP:webmaster@cwhcharts.com] > > > >> >> > >>Gesendet am: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:08 PM > > > >> >> > >>An: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> >> > >>Betreff: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>Kudos to you, you should be feeling pleased this morning > > > >> and justly > > > >> >so. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>Aloha, > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>Mike Gibbons > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>-----Original Message----- > > > >> >> > >>From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> >> > >>[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Dave > > > >> >> > >>Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:29 AM > > > >> >> > >>To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> >> > >>Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>True, the handle was a bit sloppy but for the most part > > > >> volume in the > > > >> >> > >>handle was below normal. It also made a pretty nice ascending > > > >> >triangle. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>As for the action at the end of the day, I think you're > > > >> reading too > > > >> >much > > > >> >> > >>into it. The stock made a tremendous surge on volume in > > > >> the last half > > > >> >> hour > > > >> >> > >>of trading. It then pulled back on lower volume but > > > >> didn't undercut > > > >> >that > > > >> >> > >>"intraday breakout point". It then found some new buyers > > > >> at the very > > > >> >end > > > >> >> > >>of the session. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>You can find flaws in any chart formation. I've > > > missed many huge > > > >> >winners > > > >> >> > >>by refusing to buy what I perceived as a flawed handle, > > > >> or by putting > > > >> >> too > > > >> >> > >>much weight on intraday analysis. Even IBD will go on to > > > >> call "perfect > > > >> >> > >>cup-handle breakouts" on stocks that have somewhat > > > questionable > > > >> >> > >>formations. I won't be surprised to see DFXI mentioned > > > >> tomorrow as a > > > >> >> good > > > >> >> > >>example. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>Of course hindsight is 20/20. Nevertheless I'm glad I > > > >> bought yesterday > > > >> >> :) > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>>>Yes it did but fell back below it's high of the day. Also, > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >>>action in the > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>>>handle has been sloppy - one normally hopes to see price > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >>>pullback on falling > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>>>volume but in fact it's made a couple of attempts to BO on > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >>>above average > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>>>volume since forming the pivot on 12/10. I wouldn't > > > >> rush in with an > > > >> >> > >>>>overnight order! > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >>>>Mike Gibbons > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>- > > > >> >> > >>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> > >>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> > >>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>- > > > >> >> > >>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> > >>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> > >>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > >- > > > >> >> > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > - > > > >> >> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> - > > > >> >> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >_________________________________________________________ > > > >> >Do You Yahoo!? > > > >> >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >- > > > >> >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> - > > > >> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >- > > > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:12:40 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ASIA? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01C19ABA.CB0B6240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Patrick, That's just about the coolest thing I've seen on the net in ages! (OK, = so I'm not very adventurous.) Thanks and here's the new link to the = chart: http://makeashorterlink.com/?R22F6694 Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Patrick Wahl=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:15 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ASIA? Wow, that's some link. Here is a suggestion on long links, I've only = used it once,=20 but it seemed to work. http://www.makeashorterlink.com/index.php Thanks for the chart. I'll stick with my interpretation, but I'll add = that the handle=20 seems a little loose, not ideal. I would say the breakout fails = around 19, a 7 to 8%=20 drop in price from the breakout. I think the pivot point was close to = 20.25 or so, I=20 tend to discount those intraday spikes, if they occur, and use the = close, so that=20 would not take the Dec. 4 (or whichever date it was) high into = account, just the=20 close. Not sure this is a legitimate approach, just a personal quirk = maybe. Anyway,=20 I think that anyone in this stock should stick with it a bit longer. On 11 Jan 2002 at 15:14, Katherine Malm wrote: > Just an experiment, but here's a marked chart: >=20 > = http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/katherinemalm/vwp?.dir=3D/CANSLIM&.dnm=3DASIA+= 011102.jpg&.src=3Dph&.done=3Dhttp%3a//photos.yahoo.com/bc/katherinemalm/v= wp%3f.dir=3D/CANSLIM%26.dnm=3DUp%2bDn%2bRatio%2bArticle%2b123101.jpg%26.s= rc=3Dph >=20 > Katherine > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: Patrick Wahl=20 > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:52 PM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] ASIA? >=20 >=20 > I think we went around about this subject a few months ago, but I = would put a=20 > different interpretation on the chart. I think the 12/4 spike = marked the end of the=20 > right side of the cup, and the choppy sideways movement from that = point constitutes=20 > a handle. So buying on 12/4 was not the proper buy point. >=20 > The more appropriate buy point would be the day in January where = price gapped up=20 > to close at about 20.90 or so. To me the formation of a handle = part way up a cup=20 > doesn't make sense. Handles form at logical sell points, and the = logical sell point is=20 > the resistance formed at the old high - the left side of the cup = around end of June,=20 > first of July. Without a sort of definite point like an old high, = any consolidation point=20 > along the way up the right side of the cup can be called a handle. >=20 > Just my interpretation, I think during the discussion of this = point a few months ago I=20 > was in a decided minority (one, maybe). =20 >=20 > On 10 Jan 2002 at 23:30, Dave wrote: >=20 > > In hindsight if I had been watching ASIA on 12/4 I probably = would have > > bought. If you consider 11/27 to be the start of a short handle, = the pivot > > would be 17.33 and the stock could have been bought up to 18.20. = In this > > case, you would still be in the stock. > >=20 > > As for now, it's definitely a gamble. Personally I like the = month-long > > consolidation and the near record volume over the past few days, = and think > > that if the Nasdaq resumes its rally, there's a good chance ASIA = will go > > along for the ride. > >=20 > >=20 > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of esetser > > > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:51 PM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] ASIA? > > > > > > > > > So you only consider cup with handles as true breakouts? I = buy > > > cups, cup > > > with handles, double bottoms, and flat bases, maybe others. > > > > > > At 10:44 PM 1/10/02 -0500, you wrote: > > > >I'm biased, but I prefer to see it as a high handle beginning > > > on 12/6. The > > > >volume that day was not so great, and there was no true > > > handle, so I don't > > > >consider it a true breakout. > > > > > > > >The handle beginning after that failure is nice and long and > > > volume dried > > > >up nicely towards the end. The volume on 1/6-1/7 was very = high. > > > > > > > >Only time will tell the true story... > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of = esetser > > > >> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:25 PM > > > >> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ASIA? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> I read this one differently. I see ASIA as a stock with a > > > breakout to a > > > >> new on 12/6. (And as a matter of fact, I bot it that day.) > > > >> That breakout > > > >> became suspect as the stock corrected and closed near its > > > low during the > > > >> day, and went on to be a failed breakout for anyone buying > > > in during the > > > >> day. The action since then is short of the 5 weeks minimum = to > > > >> define a new > > > >> base, and is confusing in light of the new high it set.. = I'm > > > >> not sure where > > > >> I would put a pivot on this one. The volume was fabulous = for 2 > > > >> days, but > > > >> has remained almost as high for the last 2 day pullback, so = I > > > >> would be very > > > >> cautious. > > > >> > > > >> At 04:58 PM 1/10/02 -0500, you wrote: > > > >> >Hi, > > > >> > > > > >> >Just curious on comment about ASIA. Last few days it = looked > > > >> to be breaking > > > >> >out of a nice chart formation. Alas, it seems to be > > > breaking down or > > > >> >allowing for another re-entry point. Any thoughts? > > > >> > > > > >> >Is this stock considered Canslim "worthy" even though it = has > > > >> seen higher > > > >> >days (ie. not breaking to new highs)? > > > >> > > > > >> >Thanks, > > > >> >Erik > > > >> >PS. Forgive me if this has been the topic of recent > > > >> discussion. I just moved > > > >> >and missed the last week of my Canslim Group emails. > > > >> > > > > >> >----- Original Message ----- > > > >> >From: "Mike Hofmann" > > > >> >To: > > > >> >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:08 PM > > > >> >Subject: Re: AW: [CANSLIM] DFXI > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> ... and still more than you really wanted to know about = "kudos": > > > >> >> > > > >> >> From a really cool site called "Take Our Word For It" > > > >> >> (http://www.takeourword.com/): > > > >> >> > > > >> >> "Kudos is simply Greek for "praise". It is thought to > > > have entered > > > >> >English > > > >> >> as university slang. By 1799 we have a back-formed verb > > > kudize "to > > > >> >praise", > > > >> >> so kudos itself was probably in use prior to that, = though > > > >> the first known > > > >> >> recorded use of kudos comes from 1831. Thereafter we = find > > > >> it used by the > > > >> >> likes of Disraeli and Darwin. Darwin wrote, in one of = his > > > >> letters: "Lyell > > > >> >> has read about half of the volume in clean sheets, and = gives > > > >> me very great > > > >> >> kudos." > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Pronunciation in Britain is "cue-doss" while in America = it > > > >> is "koo-doze". > > > >> >> As with many Greek words, -os indicates a singular noun. > > > Many people > > > >> >assume > > > >> >> kudos is the plural form, with the singular being a > > > kudo. They are > > > >> >wrong. > > > >> >> Just wrong. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> There was once a computer operating system called QDOS. = Was > > > >> it named by a > > > >> >> Brit, so that it sounded like kudos, or is that simply a > > > >> coincidence?" > > > >> >> > > > >> >> ... and there you have it. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >> >> From: "Warren Keuffel" > > > >> >> To: > > > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:23 PM > > > >> >> Subject: Re: AW: [CANSLIM] DFXI > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Jumping in here for Mike -- "Kudos" basically means > > > >> "Congratulations". > > > >> >> > However I was curious about the etymology of = the word so > > > >> >> > consulted my American Heritage dictionary which = defines it > > > >> as "Acclaim > > > >> >> > or prestige as a result of achievement or position." = But > > > >> no guidance on > > > >> >> > etymology, darn it. More than you wanted to know, = right? > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Warren > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Andreas Himmelreich wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >Sorry to ask Mike, what means Kudos? > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > >>-----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > > > >> >> > >>Von: Mike Gibbons [SMTP:webmaster@cwhcharts.com] > > > >> >> > >>Gesendet am: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:08 PM > > > >> >> > >>An: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> >> > >>Betreff: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>Kudos to you, you should be feeling pleased this = morning > > > >> and justly > > > >> >so. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>Aloha, > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>Mike Gibbons > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>-----Original Message----- > > > >> >> > >>From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> >> > >>[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf = Of Dave > > > >> >> > >>Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:29 AM > > > >> >> > >>To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > >> >> > >>Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>True, the handle was a bit sloppy but for the most = part > > > >> volume in the > > > >> >> > >>handle was below normal. It also made a pretty nice = ascending > > > >> >triangle. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>As for the action at the end of the day, I think = you're > > > >> reading too > > > >> >much > > > >> >> > >>into it. The stock made a tremendous surge on volume = in > > > >> the last half > > > >> >> hour > > > >> >> > >>of trading. It then pulled back on lower volume but > > > >> didn't undercut > > > >> >that > > > >> >> > >>"intraday breakout point". It then found some new = buyers > > > >> at the very > > > >> >end > > > >> >> > >>of the session. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>You can find flaws in any chart formation. I've > > > missed many huge > > > >> >winners > > > >> >> > >>by refusing to buy what I perceived as a flawed = handle, > > > >> or by putting > > > >> >> too > > > >> >> > >>much weight on intraday analysis. Even IBD will go = on to > > > >> call "perfect > > > >> >> > >>cup-handle breakouts" on stocks that have somewhat > > > questionable > > > >> >> > >>formations. I won't be surprised to see DFXI = mentioned > > > >> tomorrow as a > > > >> >> good > > > >> >> > >>example. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>Of course hindsight is 20/20. Nevertheless I'm glad = I > > > >> bought yesterday > > > >> >> :) > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>>>Yes it did but fell back below it's high of the = day. Also, > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >>>action in the > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>>>handle has been sloppy - one normally hopes to see = price > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >>>pullback on falling > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>>>volume but in fact it's made a couple of attempts = to BO on > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >>>above average > > > >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> > >>>>volume since forming the pivot on 12/10. I = wouldn't > > > >> rush in with an > > > >> >> > >>>>overnight order! > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >>>>Mike Gibbons > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>- > > > >> >> > >>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email = "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> > >>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> > >>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >>- > > > >> >> > >>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email = "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> > >>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> > >>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email. > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > >- > > > >> >> > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email = "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email. > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > - > > > >> >> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email = "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> - > > > >> >> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email = "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >_________________________________________________________ > > > >> >Do You Yahoo!? > > > >> >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >- > > > >> >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> - > > > >> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >- > > > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > >=20 > >=20 > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >=20 >=20 >=20 > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >=20 - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01C19ABA.CB0B6240 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Patrick,
 
That's just about the coolest thing I've seen on the net in ages! = (OK, so=20 I'm not very adventurous.) Thanks and here's the new link to the=20 chart:
 
http://makeashorterlink.co= m/?R22F6694
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Patrick = Wahl=20
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 = 4:15=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = ASIA?

Wow, that's some link.  Here is a suggestion on = long=20 links, I've only used it once,
but it seemed to work.

http://www.makeashorte= rlink.com/index.php

Thanks=20 for the chart.  I'll stick with my interpretation, but I'll add = that the=20 handle
seems a little loose, not ideal.  I would say the = breakout=20 fails around 19, a 7 to 8%
drop in price from the breakout.  = I think=20 the pivot point was close to 20.25 or so, I
tend to discount those = intraday spikes, if they occur, and use the close, so that
would = not take=20 the Dec. 4 (or whichever date it was) high into account, just the=20
close.  Not sure this is a legitimate approach, just a = personal quirk=20 maybe.  Anyway,
I think that anyone in this stock should = stick with=20 it a bit longer.

On 11 Jan 2002 at 15:14, Katherine Malm=20 wrote:

> Just an experiment, but here's a marked = chart:
>=20
> http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/katherinemalm/vwp= ?.dir=3D/CANSLIM&.dnm=3DASIA+011102.jpg&.src=3Dph&.done=3Dhtt= p%3a//photos.yahoo.com/bc/katherinemalm/vwp%3f.dir=3D/CANSLIM%26.dnm=3DUp= %2bDn%2bRatio%2bArticle%2b123101.jpg%26.src=3Dph
>=20
> Katherine
>   ----- Original Message -----=20
>   From: Patrick Wahl
>   To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
>   Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:52=20 PM
>   Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] ASIA?
>
>=20
>   I think we went around about this subject a few = months=20 ago, but I would put a
>   different interpretation = on the=20 chart.  I think the 12/4 spike marked the end of the =
>  =20 right side of the cup, and the choppy sideways movement from that = point=20 constitutes
>   a handle.  So buying on 12/4 was = not the=20 proper buy point.
>
>   The more appropriate = buy point=20 would be the day in January where price gapped up
>   = to=20 close at about 20.90 or so.  To me the formation of a handle part = way up=20 a cup
>   doesn't make sense.  Handles form at = logical=20 sell points, and the logical sell point is
>   the = resistance=20 formed at the old high - the left side of the cup around end of June,=20
>   first of July.  Without a sort of definite = point=20 like an old high, any consolidation point
>   along = the way=20 up the right side of the cup can be called a handle.
>=20
>   Just my interpretation, I think during the = discussion of=20 this point a few months ago I
>   was in a decided = minority=20 (one, maybe). 
>
>   On 10 Jan 2002 at = 23:30,=20 Dave wrote:
>
>   > In hindsight if I had = been=20 watching ASIA on 12/4 I probably would have
>   > = bought.=20 If you consider 11/27 to be the start of a short handle, the=20 pivot
>   > would be 17.33 and the stock could have = been=20 bought up to 18.20. In this
>   > case, you would = still be=20 in the stock.
>   >
>   > As = for now,=20 it's definitely a gamble. Personally I like the = month-long
>  =20 > consolidation and the near record volume over the past few days, = and=20 think
>   > that if the Nasdaq resumes its rally, = there's a=20 good chance ASIA will go
>   > along for the=20 ride.
>   >
>   > =
>  =20 > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > = From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com
>  =20 > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 esetser
>   > > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 = 11:51=20 PM
>   > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>  =20 > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] ASIA?
>   >=20 >
>   > >
>   > > So = you only=20 consider cup with handles as true breakouts?  I = buy
>  =20 > > cups, cup
>   > > with handles, double = bottoms, and flat bases, maybe others.
>   >=20 >
>   > > At 10:44 PM 1/10/02 -0500, you=20 wrote:
>   > > >I'm biased, but I prefer to = see it as=20 a high handle beginning
>   > > on 12/6.=20 The
>   > > >volume that day was not so = great, and=20 there was no true
>   > > handle, so I=20 don't
>   > > >consider it a true=20 breakout.
>   > > >
>   > = >=20 >The handle beginning after that failure is nice and long=20 and
>   > > volume dried
>   = > >=20 >up nicely towards the end. The volume on 1/6-1/7 was very=20 high.
>   > > >
>   > > = >Only time will tell the true story...
>   > = >=20 >
>   > > >> -----Original=20 Message-----
>   > > >> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com
>  =20 > > >> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf = Of=20 esetser
>   > > >> Sent: Thursday, January = 10,=20 2002 11:25 PM
>   > > >> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>  =20 > > >> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ASIA?
>   = > >=20 >>
>   > > >>
>   = > >=20 >> I read this one differently.  I see ASIA as a stock with = a
>   > > breakout to a
>   > = >=20 >> new on 12/6.  (And as a matter of fact, I bot it that=20 day.)
>   > > >> That = breakout
>  =20 > > >> became suspect as the stock corrected and closed = near=20 its
>   > > low during the
>   = > >=20 >> day, and went on to be a failed breakout for anyone=20 buying
>   > > in during the
>   = >=20 > >> day.  The action since then is short of the 5 weeks = minimum=20 to
>   > > >> define a = new
>  =20 > > >> base, and is confusing in light of the new high it = set..=20 I'm
>   > > >> not sure = where
>  =20 > > >> I would put a pivot on this one.  The volume = was=20 fabulous for 2
>   > > >> days,=20 but
>   > > >> has remained almost as high = for the=20 last 2 day pullback, so I
>   > > >> would = be=20 very
>   > > >> = cautious.
>   >=20 > >>
>   > > >> At 04:58 PM = 1/10/02=20 -0500, you wrote:
>   > > >>=20 >Hi,
>   > > >> = >
>   >=20 > >> >Just curious on comment about ASIA.  Last few = days it=20 looked
>   > > >> to be=20 breaking
>   > > >> >out of a nice = chart=20 formation.  Alas, it seems to be
>   > > = breaking=20 down or
>   > > >> >allowing for = another=20 re-entry point.  Any thoughts?
>   > > = >>=20 >
>   > > >> >Is this stock = considered=20 Canslim "worthy" even though it has
>   > > = >>=20 seen higher
>   > > >> >days (ie. not = breaking=20 to new highs)?
>   > > >> = >
>  =20 > > >> >Thanks,
>   > > >>=20 >Erik
>   > > >> >PS. Forgive me if = this has=20 been the topic of recent
>   > > >> = discussion. I=20 just moved
>   > > >> >and missed the = last week=20 of my Canslim Group emails.
>   > > >>=20 >
>   > > >> >----- Original Message = -----
>   > > >> >From: "Mike Hofmann" = <sfmcanslim@hotmail.com>
= >  =20 > > >> >To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com= >
>  =20 > > >> >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:08=20 PM
>   > > >> >Subject: Re: AW: = [CANSLIM]=20 DFXI
>   > > >> >
>   = > >=20 >> >
>   > > >> >> ... and = still=20 more than you really wanted to know about "kudos":
>   = >=20 > >> >>
>   > > >> >> = From a=20 really cool site called "Take Our Word For It"
>   = > >=20 >> >> (http://www.takeourword.com/):>  =20 > > >> >>
>   > > >> = >>=20 "Kudos is simply Greek for "praise".  It is thought=20 to
>   > > have entered
>   > = >=20 >> >English
>   > > >> >> = as=20 university slang.  By 1799 we have a back-formed = verb
>  =20 > > kudize "to
>   > > >>=20 >praise",
>   > > >> >> so kudos = itself=20 was probably in use prior to that, though
>   > = >=20 >> the first known
>   > > >> = >>=20 recorded use of kudos comes from 1831.  Thereafter we=20 find
>   > > >> it used by = the
>  =20 > > >> >> likes of Disraeli and Darwin.  Darwin = wrote,=20 in one of his
>   > > >> letters:=20 "Lyell
>   > > >> >> has read about = half of=20 the volume in clean sheets, and gives
>   > > = >>=20 me very great
>   > > >> >>=20 kudos."
>   > > >> = >>
>  =20 > > >> >> Pronunciation in Britain is "cue-doss" = while in=20 America it
>   > > >> is=20 "koo-doze".
>   > > >> >> As with = many Greek=20 words, -os indicates a singular noun.
>   > > = Many=20 people
>   > > >> = >assume
>  =20 > > >> >> kudos is the  plural form, with the = singular=20 being a
>   > > kudo.  They = are
>  =20 > > >> >wrong.
>   > > >> = >>=20 Just wrong.
>   > > >>=20 >>
>   > > >> >> There was = once a=20 computer operating system called QDOS.  Was
>   = > >=20 >> it named by a
>   > > >> >> = Brit,=20 so that it sounded like kudos, or is that simply a
>   = >=20 > >> coincidence?"
>   > > >>=20 >>
>   > > >> >> ... and there = you=20 have it.
>   > > >> = >>
>  =20 > > >> >>
>   > > >> = >>=20 ----- Original Message -----
>   > > >> = >>=20 From: "Warren Keuffel" <wkeuffel@xmission.com>
&g= t;  =20 > > >> >> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com= >
>  =20 > > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:23=20 PM
>   > > >> >> Subject: Re: AW: = [CANSLIM]=20 DFXI
>   > > >> = >>
>   >=20 > >> >>
>   > > >> >> = >=20 Jumping in here for Mike -- "Kudos" basically = means
>   >=20 > >> "Congratulations".
>   > > = >>=20 >> >  However <ahem> I was curious about the = etymology of=20 the word so
>   > > >> >> > = consulted my=20 American Heritage dictionary which defines it
>   > = >=20 >> as  "Acclaim
>   > > >> = >>=20 > or prestige as a result of achievement or position."=20 But
>   > > >> no guidance = on
>  =20 > > >> >> > etymology, darn it.  More than = you=20 wanted to know, right? <g>
>   > > = >>=20 >> >
>   > > >> >> >=20 Warren
>   > > >> >>=20 >
>   > > >> >> > Andreas = Himmelreich=20 wrote:
>   > > >> >>=20 >
>   > > >> >> > >Sorry to = ask=20 Mike, what means Kudos?
>   > > >> = >> >=20 >
>   > > >> >> >=20 >
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
>   > = >=20 >> >> > >>Von: Mike Gibbons=20 [SMTP:webmaster@cwhcharts.com]
>   > > >> = >>=20 > >>Gesendet am: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:08=20 PM
>   > > >> >> > >>An: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>  =20 > > >> >> > >>Betreff: RE: [CANSLIM]=20 DFXI
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> > = >>Kudos to=20 you, you should be feeling pleased this morning
>   = > >=20 >> and justly
>   > > >>=20 >so.
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>Aloha,
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> > = >>Mike=20 Gibbons
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>-----Original Message-----
>   > > = >>=20 >> > >>From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com
>  =20 > > >> >> >=20 >>[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 Dave
>   > > >> >> > = >>Sent:=20 Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:29 AM
>   > > = >>=20 >> > >>To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
>  =20 > > >> >> > >>Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]=20 DFXI
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> > = >>True,=20 the handle was a bit sloppy but for the most part
>   = >=20 > >> volume in the
>   > > >> = >>=20 > >>handle was below normal. It also made a pretty nice=20 ascending
>   > > >>=20 >triangle.
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> > = >>As for=20 the action at the end of the day, I think you're
>   = > >=20 >> reading too
>   > > >>=20 >much
>   > > >> >> > = >>into it.=20 The stock made a tremendous surge on volume in
>   = > >=20 >> the last half
>   > > >> >> = hour
>   > > >> >> > >>of = trading.=20 It then pulled back on lower volume but
>   > > = >>=20 didn't undercut
>   > > >>=20 >that
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>"intraday breakout point". It then found some new=20 buyers
>   > > >> at the = very
>  =20 > > >> >end
>   > > >> = >>=20 > >>of the session.
>   > > >> = >>=20 > >>
>   > > >> >> > = >>You=20 can find flaws in any chart formation. I've
>   > = >=20 missed many huge
>   > > >>=20 >winners
>   > > >> >> > = >>by=20 refusing to buy what I perceived as a flawed = handle,
>   >=20 > >> or by putting
>   > > >> = >>=20 too
>   > > >> >> > >>much = weight=20 on intraday analysis. Even IBD will go on to
>   > = >=20 >> call "perfect
>   > > >> >> = >=20 >>cup-handle breakouts" on stocks that have = somewhat
>  =20 > > questionable
>   > > >> >> = >=20 >>formations. I won't be surprised to see DFXI=20 mentioned
>   > > >> tomorrow as=20 a
>   > > >> >> = good
>  =20 > > >> >> > >>example.
>   = >=20 > >> >> > >>
>   > > = >>=20 >> > >>Of course hindsight is 20/20. Nevertheless I'm = glad=20 I
>   > > >> bought = yesterday
>  =20 > > >> >> :)
>   > > >> = >>=20 > >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>>Yes it did but fell back below it's high of the day.=20 Also,
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>action in the
>   > > >> = >> >=20 >>>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>>handle has been sloppy - one normally hopes to see=20 price
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>pullback on falling
>   > > >> = >> > >>>
>   > > >> = >>=20 > >>>>volume but in fact it's made a couple of attempts = to BO=20 on
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>above average
>   > > >> = >> >=20 >>>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>>volume since forming the pivot on 12/10. I=20 wouldn't
>   > > >> rush in with=20 an
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>>>overnight order!
>   > > = >>=20 >> > >>>>
>   > > >> = >>=20 > >>>>Mike Gibbons
>   > > = >>=20 >> > >>>>
>   > > >> = >>=20 > >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>-
>   > > >> >> > = >>-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > >> >> > >>-In the email body, write = "subscribe=20 canslim" or
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your=20 email.
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>-
>   > > >> >> > = >>-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > >> >> > >>-In the email body, write = "subscribe=20 canslim" or
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your=20 email.
>   > > >> >> >=20 >>
>   > > >> >> >=20 >
>   > > >> >> >=20 >-
>   > > >> >> > >-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > >> >> > >-In the email body, write = "subscribe=20 canslim" or
>   > > >> >> >=20 >-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your=20 email.
>   > > >> >> >=20 >
>   > > >> >> >=20 >
>   > > >> >> >=20 >
>   > > >> >> = >
>  =20 > > >> >> >
>   > > = >>=20 >> >
>   > > >> >> >=20 -
>   > > >> >> > -To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > >> >> > -In the email body, write "subscribe = canslim"=20 or
>   > > >> >> > -"unsubscribe=20 canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>   = > >=20 >> >> >
>   > > >>=20 >>
>   > > >> >> = - -
>  =20 > > >> >> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > >> >> -In the email body, write "subscribe = canslim"=20 or
>   > > >> >> -"unsubscribe=20 canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>   = > >=20 >> >
>   > > >> = >
>  =20 > > >>=20 = >_________________________________________________________
>&nbs= p; =20 > > >> >Do You Yahoo!?
>   > > = >>=20 >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> &nb= sp;=20 > > >> >
>   > > >>=20 >
>   > > >> >-
>   = >=20 > >> >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > >> >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim"=20 or
>   > > >> >-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email.
>   > > >>=20 >
>   > > >> >
>   = > >=20 >>
>   > > >>
>   = > >=20 >> -
>   > > >> -To = subscribe/unsubscribe,=20 email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > >> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim"=20 or
>   > > >> -"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do not=20 use quotes in your email.
>   > >=20 >>
>   > > >
>   > = >=20 >
>   > > >-
>   > > = >-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim"=20 or
>   > > >-"unsubscribe canslim".  Do = not use=20 quotes in your email.
>   > > = >
>  =20 > > >
>   > >
>   >=20 >
>   > > -
>   > > -To = subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" = or
>  =20 > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your=20 email.
>   > >
>   >=20
>   >
>   > = - -
>   >=20 -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" = or
>   >=20 -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> =
>
>
>   -
>   -To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>= ;  =20 -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
>  =20 -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> =



-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01C19ABA.CB0B6240-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2025 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.