From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2048 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Thursday, January 17 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2048 In this issue: [CANSLIM] ROOM [CANSLIM] MCAF AW: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion [CANSLIM] UTSI, ROOM, TTIL still interesting (as soon the market gives again green signals ...) [CANSLIM] NMTC down grade. Re: [CANSLIM] MCAF Re: [CANSLIM] ROOM CHKP (was Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:34:55 +0100 From: Andreas Himmelreich Subject: [CANSLIM] ROOM After this storm is over, Room might have built a nice CWH .... - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:31:40 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: [CANSLIM] MCAF This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00F3_01C19F42.26B15BA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh...here's the explanation for the SYMC vs. MCAF anomaly.... Will post a technical post analysis later. I should just call this DYII, FIC revisited... Katherine Jan 17 2002 11:21 AM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 24.85 -7.44 (-23%): Robertson = Stephens is raising several issues following MCAF's earnings report last = night; believes that the quality of revenue has eroded a bit following = co's change in license revenue structure; notes that in Q4 subscribers = grew by only 125K vs 200K sub adds in Q3. While firm remains confident = that 2002 numbers are beatable, thinks stk remains expensive, and would = not be constructive on the name until a move to $20 or below.=20 Jan 16 2002 5:26 PM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: -- Update -- During = its conference call, the co guides higher Q1 rev/EPS to $19.1 mln/$0.06 = (consensus is $18.95 mln/$0.05); FY02 projections are revs of $80-$90 = mln, 69-72% gross mgn, and EPS should be in the range of $0.25-$0.28 (in = the mid-point of rev consensus of $85.82 mln, and better than EPS = consensus of $0.22).=20 Jan 16 2002 4:43 PM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: Reports Q4 (Dec) = earnings of $0.09, four cents better than the Multex consensus of $0.05; = revenues were $18.6 mln vs the consensus of $17.8 mln.=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_00F3_01C19F42.26B15BA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oh...here's the explanation for the SYMC vs. MCAF anomaly....
 
Will post a technical post analysis later.
 
I should just call this DYII, FIC revisited...
 
Katherine
 
Jan 17 = 2002
11:21 AM
In = Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 24.85 = - -7.44 (-23%):=20 Robertson Stephens is raising several issues following = MCAF's=20 earnings report last night; believes that the quality of revenue = has=20 eroded a bit following co's change in license revenue structure; = notes=20 that in Q4 subscribers grew by only 125K vs 200K sub adds in Q3. = While=20 firm remains confident that 2002 numbers are beatable, thinks stk = remains=20 expensive, and would not be constructive on the name until a move = to $20=20 or below.
Jan 16 = 2002
5:26 PM
In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: -- Update -- During = its=20 conference call, the co guides higher Q1 rev/EPS to = $19.1=20 mln/$0.06 (consensus is $18.95 mln/$0.05); FY02 projections = are revs=20 of $80-$90 mln, 69-72% gross mgn, and EPS should be in the range = of=20 $0.25-$0.28 (in the mid-point of rev consensus of $85.82 mln, and = better than EPS consensus of=20 $0.22).
Jan 16 = 2002
4:43 PM
In = Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 = - -4.11: Reports=20 Q4 (Dec) earnings of $0.09, four cents better than the Multex = consensus of=20 $0.05; revenues were $18.6 mln vs the consensus of $17.8=20 mln.
- ------=_NextPart_000_00F3_01C19F42.26B15BA0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:38:01 +0100 From: Andreas Himmelreich Subject: AW: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion Because MCAFs price PE level is ballistic ... CHKP has still nice fundamentals, but rolling over as well ... That happens, but only in 1 out of 4 cases, I would say (see BPRX as another good example like a individual stock can go against a whole IG) > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Tom Worley [SMTP:stkguru@netside.net] > Gesendet am: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:01 PM > An: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Betreff: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion > > The Onion | InfographicI will be interested in your conclusions how two stocks in the same group can head in the opposite direction on the same day, and big time, and on volume. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Katherine Malm > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:00 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion > > > LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!! > > I needed that this morning! I'm sitting here watching my MCAF plunge into the depths of hell....Doing a post analysis and noting all the red flags I saw and IGNORED over the last couple of weeks. Rewriting my sell rules a bit so that it says 3 red flags = sell. Duh. Watching the last 51% of gains disappear into cyberspace at the same time SYMC is sucking all my dollars away. See me hitting my head on the desk?(next to my iMac, BTW)...thump thump thump. Journal note: practice what you preach, practice what you preach, practice what you preach, practice..... > > Katherine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: stkguru@netside.net > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:52 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion > > > Tom Worley at stkguru@netside.net has sent you an article from The Onion, America's Finest News Source. > > Tom Worley included the following message: > With all the hype of new technology, I got a chuckle out of this one. > > > > > Infographic > > > Click here to download a printable version of this chart in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. > If you do not already have a copy of the Adobe Acrobat Reader, you can download a free copy of the Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe's home-page. > > > > > You can also see this article online: > http://www.theonion.com/onion3801/infograph_3801.html > > The Onion? is not intended for readers under 18 years of age. > - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > << Datei: ATT00008.htm >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:35:14 -0600 From: Gene Ricci Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_05C4_01C19F42.A6286E50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The Onion | InfographicCould be as simple as customer perception.... = Semantec taking market share away from McAfee because of their = competitive advantage.... I made the switch to Semantec about a year ago = because of their prowess with Norton's antivirus software and Ghost. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion thanks. BTW, I am trying out this concept of "vacation" for the rest of the = month, so should be present during the day a little more. Still gotta = get the hang of the concept, already did about an hour or so of office = work.=20 Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion I'll do a post analysis...can't figure out why SYMC and MCAF can run = completely opposite...makes no sense...yet. Just another example of why = you need to let the technicals speak for exit. I'll post the technical = warnings...later we'll figure out the anomaly. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:00 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion I will be interested in your conclusions how two stocks in the = same group can head in the opposite direction on the same day, and big = time, and on volume. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The = Onion LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!! I needed that this morning! I'm sitting here watching my MCAF = plunge into the depths of hell....Doing a post analysis and noting all = the red flags I saw and IGNORED over the last couple of weeks. Rewriting = my sell rules a bit so that it says 3 red flags =3D sell. Duh. Watching = the last 51% of gains disappear into cyberspace at the same time SYMC is = sucking all my dollars away. See me hitting my head on the desk?(next to = my iMac, BTW)...thump thump thump. Journal note: practice what you = preach, practice what you preach, practice what you preach, = practice..... Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: stkguru@netside.net=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:52 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion Tom Worley at stkguru@netside.net has sent you an = article from The Onion, America's Finest News Source. =20 Tom Worley included the following message: With all the hype of new technology, I got a chuckle out = of this one. =20 =20 Infographic =20 =20 =20 Click here to download a printable version = of this chart in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.=20 If you do not already have a copy of the = Adobe Acrobat Reader, you can download a free copy of the Adobe Acrobat = Reader from Adobe's home-page. =20 =20 You can also see this article online: http://www.theonion.com/onion3801/infograph_3801.html The Onion=AE is not intended for readers under 18 years = of age. - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email = "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" = or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.=20 =20 - ------=_NextPart_000_05C4_01C19F42.A6286E50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The Onion | Infographic
Could be as simple as customer = perception....=20 Semantec taking market share away from McAfee because of their = competitive=20 advantage.... I made the switch to Semantec about a year ago = because of=20 their prowess with Norton's antivirus software and Ghost.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom = Worley=20
Sent: Thursday, January 17, = 2002 10:08=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've = Been Sent=20 An Article From The Onion

thanks.
 
BTW, I am trying out this concept of = "vacation" for the=20 rest of the month, so should be present during the day a little more. = Still=20 gotta get the hang of the concept, already did about an hour or so of = office=20 work.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Thursday, January 17, = 2002 11:13=20 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've = Been Sent=20 An Article From The Onion

I'll do a post analysis...can't figure out why SYMC and MCAF = can run=20 completely opposite...makes no sense...yet. Just another example of = why you=20 need to let the technicals speak for exit. I'll post the technical=20 warnings...later we'll figure out the anomaly.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Thursday, January 17, = 2002=20 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = You've Been=20 Sent An Article From The Onion

I will be interested in your conclusions = how two=20 stocks in the same group can head in the opposite direction on the = same=20 day, and big time, and on volume.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Katherine=20 Malm
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Thursday, January = 17, 2002=20 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = You've Been=20 Sent An Article From The Onion

LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!!
 
I needed that this morning! I'm sitting here watching my = MCAF=20 plunge into the depths of hell....Doing a post analysis and = noting all=20 the red flags I saw and IGNORED over the last couple of weeks. = Rewriting=20 my sell rules a bit so that it says 3 red flags =3D sell. Duh. = Watching=20 the last 51% of gains disappear into cyberspace at the same time = SYMC is=20 sucking all my dollars away. See me hitting my head on the = desk?(next to=20 my iMac, BTW)...thump thump thump. Journal note: practice what = you=20 preach, practice what you preach, practice what you preach,=20 practice.....
 
Katherine
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 stkguru@netside.net =
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Thursday, January = 17, 2002=20 9:52 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = You've Been=20 Sent An Article From The Onion

Tom Worley at stkguru@netside.net has=20 sent you an article from The Onion, America's Finest = News=20 Source.

Tom Worley included the = following=20 message:
With all the hype of new technology, I got a = chuckle=20 out of this one.


=
- ------=_NextPart_000_05C4_01C19F42.A6286E50-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:42:48 +0100 From: Andreas Himmelreich Subject: [CANSLIM] UTSI, ROOM, TTIL still interesting (as soon the market gives again green signals ...) - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:59:42 -0800 From: "Bill Triffet" Subject: [CANSLIM] NMTC down grade. Amazing what a downgrade will do for a stock! I had been following this one since its Dec. gap up looking for an entry. On a side note (just a strange observation): If you lay the 1 year charts of NMTC and DYII together (I used Clearstation) they run parallel. Hmmm. - -Bill - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:40:54 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MCAF This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C19F4B.D2791A00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Katherine, I took a quick look around, as I was curious about this anomaly. Several = items I noted: MCAF notes their tax rate in 2002 expected to jump to 38% from 28%, = keeping them from guiding earnings guidance even higher. They are the antivirus of choice for MSN's Hotmail. Wish they would also = be an antispam for that source. And with Hotmail being free, wonder just = how much revenues they are taking in from MS for this. They indicate they are bundled with Windows XP, but my new computer = (with WIN XP) came with Norton from=20 Symantec. Both beat expectations by a wide margin, but actual results, fundies, = and forward looking statements look stronger for SYMC. Sell on news, MCAF results older than SYMC. I see little "dumb" about still owning MCAF in light of the past few = months, especially if you bought it cheap. Maybe I might have cut my = position some in the past few days, but if I had been smart enough to = buy it in late Sept or early Oct, likely I would still now have a = position. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:31 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] MCAF Oh...here's the explanation for the SYMC vs. MCAF anomaly.... Will post a technical post analysis later. I should just call this DYII, FIC revisited... Katherine Jan 17 2002 11:21 AM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 24.85 -7.44 (-23%): Robertson = Stephens is raising several issues following MCAF's earnings report last = night; believes that the quality of revenue has eroded a bit following = co's change in license revenue structure; notes that in Q4 subscribers = grew by only 125K vs 200K sub adds in Q3. While firm remains confident = that 2002 numbers are beatable, thinks stk remains expensive, and would = not be constructive on the name until a move to $20 or below.=20 Jan 16 2002 5:26 PM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: -- Update -- = During its conference call, the co guides higher Q1 rev/EPS to $19.1 = mln/$0.06 (consensus is $18.95 mln/$0.05); FY02 projections are revs of = $80-$90 mln, 69-72% gross mgn, and EPS should be in the range of = $0.25-$0.28 (in the mid-point of rev consensus of $85.82 mln, and better = than EPS consensus of $0.22).=20 Jan 16 2002 4:43 PM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: Reports Q4 (Dec) = earnings of $0.09, four cents better than the Multex consensus of $0.05; = revenues were $18.6 mln vs the consensus of $17.8 mln.=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C19F4B.D2791A00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Katherine,
 
I took a quick look around, as I was curious = about this=20 anomaly. Several items I noted:
 
MCAF notes their tax rate in 2002 expected to = jump to 38%=20 from 28%, keeping them from guiding earnings guidance even = higher.
 
They are the antivirus of choice for MSN's = Hotmail. Wish=20 they would also be an antispam for that source. And with Hotmail being = free,=20 wonder just how much revenues they are taking in from MS for = this.
 
They indicate they are bundled with Windows XP, = but my new=20 computer (with WIN XP) came with Norton from
Symantec.
 
Both beat expectations by a wide margin, but = actual=20 results, fundies, and forward looking statements look stronger for=20 SYMC.
 
Sell on news, MCAF results older than = SYMC.
 
I see little "dumb" about still owning MCAF in = light of=20 the past few months, especially if you bought it cheap. Maybe I might = have cut=20 my position some in the past few days, but if I had been smart enough to = buy it=20 in late Sept or early Oct, likely I would still now have a=20 position.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Thursday, January 17, = 2002 11:31=20 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] MCAF

Oh...here's the explanation for the SYMC vs. MCAF = anomaly....
 
Will post a technical post analysis later.
 
I should just call this DYII, FIC revisited...
 
Katherine
 
Infographic   =
=
Click here=20 to download a printable version of this = chart in=20 Adobe Acrobat PDF format. If you do not already have a copy = of the=20 Adobe Acrobat Reader, you can download a = free copy=20 of the Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe's=20 home-page.

You can also see this article = online:
http://www= .theonion.com/onion3801/infograph_3801.html

The=20 Onion=AE is not intended for readers under 18 years = of=20 age.
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20 "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write = "subscribe=20 canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in = your=20 email.
Jan 17 = 2002
11:21 AM
In = Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 24.85 = - -7.44 (-23%):=20 Robertson Stephens is raising several issues following = MCAF's=20 earnings report last night; believes that the quality of revenue = has=20 eroded a bit following co's change in license revenue structure; = notes=20 that in Q4 subscribers grew by only 125K vs 200K sub adds in Q3. = While=20 firm remains confident that 2002 numbers are beatable, thinks = stk=20 remains expensive, and would not be constructive on the name = until a=20 move to $20 or below.
Jan 16 = 2002
5:26 PM
In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: -- Update -- = During its=20 conference call, the co guides higher Q1 = rev/EPS to $19.1=20 mln/$0.06 (consensus is $18.95 mln/$0.05); FY02 projections = are=20 revs of $80-$90 mln, 69-72% gross mgn, and EPS should be in the = range of=20 $0.25-$0.28 (in the mid-point of rev consensus of $85.82 mln, = and better than EPS consensus of=20 $0.22).
Jan 16 = 2002
4:43 PM
In = Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 = - -4.11:=20 Reports Q4 (Dec) earnings of $0.09, four cents better than the = Multex=20 consensus of $0.05; revenues were $18.6 mln vs the consensus of = $17.8=20 mln.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C19F4B.D2791A00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:45:06 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ROOM Hi Andreas, I would be cautious with ROOM, great sequential sales growth not reflected in sequential earnings growth. Year to year earnings comparisons nice, but against a soft year. And with all that has happened since 9/11, hotels are cutting prices to attract visitors and increase occupancy, and avoid laying off staff or cutting services. So I would expect to see a continued erosion in their gross and net profit margins. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Himmelreich" To: Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:34 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] ROOM > After this storm is over, Room might have built a nice CWH .... > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:46:34 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: CHKP (was Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion) Stagnant earnings, falling sales, watch out. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Himmelreich" To: Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: AW: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion > Because MCAFs price PE level is ballistic ... > CHKP has still nice fundamentals, but rolling over as well ... > > That happens, but only in 1 out of 4 cases, I would say (see BPRX as > another good example like a individual stock can go against a whole IG) > > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Tom Worley [SMTP:stkguru@netside.net] > > Gesendet am: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:01 PM > > An: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Betreff: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion > > > > The Onion | InfographicI will be interested in your conclusions how two > stocks in the same group can head in the opposite direction on the same > day, and big time, and on volume. > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@netside.net > > AIM: TexWorley > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Katherine Malm > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:00 AM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion > > > > > > LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!! > > > > I needed that this morning! I'm sitting here watching my MCAF plunge > into the depths of hell....Doing a post analysis and noting all the red > flags I saw and IGNORED over the last couple of weeks. Rewriting my sell > rules a bit so that it says 3 red flags = sell. Duh. Watching the last 51% > of gains disappear into cyberspace at the same time SYMC is sucking all my > dollars away. See me hitting my head on the desk?(next to my iMac, > BTW)...thump thump thump. Journal note: practice what you preach, practice > what you preach, practice what you preach, practice..... > > > > Katherine > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: stkguru@netside.net > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:52 AM > > Subject: [CANSLIM] You've Been Sent An Article From The Onion > > > > > > Tom Worley at stkguru@netside.net has sent you an article from > The Onion, America's Finest News Source. > > > > Tom Worley included the following message: > > With all the hype of new technology, I got a chuckle out of > this one. > > > > > > > > > > Infographic > > > > > > Click here to download a printable version of this > chart in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. > > If you do not already have a copy of the Adobe > Acrobat Reader, you can download a free copy of the Adobe Acrobat Reader > from Adobe's home-page. > > > > > > > > > > You can also see this article online: > > http://www.theonion.com/onion3801/infograph_3801.html > > > > The Onion? is not intended for readers under 18 years of age. > > - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In > the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not > use quotes in your email. > > > > << Datei: ATT00008.htm >> > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2048 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.