From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2169 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Tuesday, February 26 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2169 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 21:50:37 -0600 From: "John Adair" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C1BF0F.9FE3B6C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Katherine et al It seem to me we are doing just that but If we are not lets do it. Ie would you buy this stock. Of course by the time we got an answer the stock probably would have broken out. A lunker - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:59 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Warren I'll second that point of view. I think it's instructive for individuals to post a message such as "what do you think about this stock" so members of the list can review and comment. If nothing else, it's great practice at evaluating fundamentals and technicals, even if it is not a stock that you yourself would consider. So that it doesn't seem as though I'm reversing course here, I'll also second Tom's earlier comment that it is impossible to comment on or learn from a lengthy *list* of stocks (though I am not suggesting that those who post discontinue doing so--certainly a personal choice). Finally, in order to clarify my earlier point of view, I don't think that attempting to compile a collective list of "the" stocks is helpful, as each individual has a particular style. Duke, if you are reading this, I'd like to suggest an alternative to your compiled list and instead suggest people do as Warren suggests here and simply post, once a week or so, a stock for review. The tag line would simply be "would you buy this and why?" or "would you sell this and why?" The stocks we throw out could be *anything* for any reason and not necessarily something we own or that we are looking to buy. For example, it might be a stock we do not own but that we feel is showing signs of distress. It might be a stock that is setting up for breakout, but for reasons of our own, we may or may not have left it on our list. It might be a stock with "a good story." Etc. Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: Warren Keuffel To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:36 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 My $0.02 -- and Ann, I'm not replying to you specifically -- just using your message as a place to hang my comment -- what *I* find most valuable is when someone suggests a stock or three and others point out problems with the pattern or the fundies -- doing this helps me fine-tune what I should be looking at when evaluating *any* stocks. For example, there was a stock mentioned not too long ago (forget which one it was) and I was considering whether to ignore the less than perfect pattern when someone else pointed out that it was a kissing cousin of a MLM. As soon as I heard that I the stock was in the circular file, as I have a very low personal opinion of any MLM (living in Utah I see far too many MLM scams.) Again, my $0.02 -- so to those who want to post picks and those who want to comment -- THANKS! Warren Ann wrote: > I'll attest to to that--You have helped me immensely, Katherine. > > > > As one who hasn't had time to contribute to the list in awhile, let > alone mine for stocks, I would be very disappointed if the list turned > into a stock-picking club. I wouldn't be able to continue to learn > quietly on the sidelines by reading all these discussions, and would > have to drop out because of my other time commitments and inability to > contribute my fair share. > > > > Thanks again, Katherine, > > > > Ann > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Katherine Malm < mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net> > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com < mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:54 AM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > > But the truth is, I'll go out of my way to help absolutely > anybody, share what I know so that others can become better > investors, > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email " majordomo@xmission.com " - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C1BF0F.9FE3B6C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ka= therine et al

 It seem to me we are doing just = that  but If we are not lets do = it.

Ie= would you buy this stock. Of course by the time we got an answer the stock = probably would have broken out.

A = lunker

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
Sent: Tuesday, February = 26, 2002 1:59 PM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

 

Warren<= /p>

 <= /p>

I'll second that point of view. I think it's instructive for individuals to post a = message such as "what do you think about this stock" so members of the = list can review and comment. If nothing else, it's great practice at = evaluating fundamentals and technicals, even if it is not a stock that you yourself would = consider. So that it doesn't seem as though I'm reversing course here, I'll also = second Tom's earlier comment that it is impossible to comment on or learn = from a lengthy *list* of stocks (though I am not suggesting that those who post discontinue doing so--certainly a personal choice). Finally, in order to clarify my earlier point of view, I don't think that attempting to compile a collective list of "the" stocks is helpful, as = each individual has a particular style. <= /p>

 <= /p>

Duke, if you are reading this, I'd like to suggest an alternative to your compiled = list and instead suggest people do as Warren suggests here and simply post, once = a week or so, a stock for review. The tag line would simply be "would you = buy this and why?" or "would you sell this and why?" The = stocks we throw out could be *anything* for any reason and not necessarily = something we own or that we are looking to buy. For example, it might be a stock we = do not own but that we feel is showing signs of distress. It might be a stock = that is setting up for breakout, but for reasons of our own, we may or may not = have left it on our list. It might be a stock with "a good story." = Etc. <= /p>

 <= /p>

Katherine<= /p>

----- Original Message -----

=

To: canslim@lists.xmission.com

Sent: Tuesday, = February 26, 2002 1:36 PM

Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

 <= /p>

My = $0.02 -- and Ann, I'm not replying to you specifically -- just using
your message as a place to hang my comment -- what *I* find most
valuable is when someone suggests a stock or three and others point out =
problems with the pattern or the fundies -- doing this helps me
fine-tune what I should be looking at when evaluating *any* = stocks.  For
example, there was a stock mentioned not too long ago (forget which one =
it was) and I was considering whether to ignore the less than perfect =
pattern when someone else pointed out that it was a kissing cousin of a =
MLM.  As soon as I heard that I the stock was in the circular file, = as I
have a very low personal opinion of any MLM (living in Utah I see far =
too many MLM scams.)

Again, my $0.02 -- so to those who want to post picks and those who want =
to comment -- THANKS!

Warren

Ann wrote:

> I'll attest to to that--You have helped me immensely, = Katherine.
>
> 
>
> As one who hasn't had time to contribute to the list in awhile, let =
> alone mine for stocks, I would be very disappointed if the list = turned
> into a stock-picking club. I wouldn't be able to continue to learn =
> quietly on the sidelines by reading all these discussions, and = would
> have to drop out because of my other time commitments and inability = to
> contribute my fair share.
>
> 
>
> Thanks again, Katherine,
>
> 
>
> Ann
>
> 
>
> 
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>
>     From: Katherine Malm <mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net> >
>     To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= <mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.= com>
>
>     Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:54 AM
>
>     Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb = 2002 15:11:27 -0500
>
>
>     But the truth is, I'll go out of my way to = help absolutely
>     anybody, share what I know so that others = can become better
>     investors,
>



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your = email.<= /p>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C1BF0F.9FE3B6C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:06:23 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C1BF1A.35AFE7A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My only further comment on Katherine's suggestion is that I REALLY like = the original poster to "present" the stock pick. I want to know why that = poster likes / dislikes the stock based on CANSLIM and chart = interpretation reasons. My response is often colored by my perception of that poster's = understanding. And I am sure my review is similarly affected. Most posts that consist only of "what do you think of xyz stock?" or of = a list dumped from some automated screen simply feel my Delete key. = Probably many members do that as well to my WWW weekly list, and I = understand. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: John Adair=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:50 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Katherine et al=20 It seem to me we are doing just that but If we are not lets do it. Ie would you buy this stock. Of course by the time we got an answer = the stock probably would have broken out. A lunker=20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:59 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 =20 Warren =20 I'll second that point of view. I think it's instructive for = individuals to post a message such as "what do you think about this = stock" so members of the list can review and comment. If nothing else, = it's great practice at evaluating fundamentals and technicals, even if = it is not a stock that you yourself would consider. So that it doesn't = seem as though I'm reversing course here, I'll also second Tom's earlier = comment that it is impossible to comment on or learn from a lengthy = *list* of stocks (though I am not suggesting that those who post = discontinue doing so--certainly a personal choice). Finally, in order to = clarify my earlier point of view, I don't think that attempting to = compile a collective list of "the" stocks is helpful, as each individual = has a particular style.=20 =20 Duke, if you are reading this, I'd like to suggest an alternative to = your compiled list and instead suggest people do as Warren suggests here = and simply post, once a week or so, a stock for review. The tag line = would simply be "would you buy this and why?" or "would you sell this = and why?" The stocks we throw out could be *anything* for any reason and = not necessarily something we own or that we are looking to buy. For = example, it might be a stock we do not own but that we feel is showing = signs of distress. It might be a stock that is setting up for breakout, = but for reasons of our own, we may or may not have left it on our list. = It might be a stock with "a good story." Etc.=20 =20 Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Warren Keuffel=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:36 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 =20 My $0.02 -- and Ann, I'm not replying to you specifically -- just = using=20 your message as a place to hang my comment -- what *I* find most=20 valuable is when someone suggests a stock or three and others point = out=20 problems with the pattern or the fundies -- doing this helps me=20 fine-tune what I should be looking at when evaluating *any* stocks. = For=20 example, there was a stock mentioned not too long ago (forget which = one=20 it was) and I was considering whether to ignore the less than perfect=20 pattern when someone else pointed out that it was a kissing cousin of = a=20 MLM. As soon as I heard that I the stock was in the circular file, as = I=20 have a very low personal opinion of any MLM (living in Utah I see far=20 too many MLM scams.) Again, my $0.02 -- so to those who want to post picks and those who = want=20 to comment -- THANKS! Warren Ann wrote: > I'll attest to to that--You have helped me immensely, Katherine. > > =20 > > As one who hasn't had time to contribute to the list in awhile, let=20 > alone mine for stocks, I would be very disappointed if the list = turned=20 > into a stock-picking club. I wouldn't be able to continue to learn=20 > quietly on the sidelines by reading all these discussions, and would = > have to drop out because of my other time commitments and inability = to=20 > contribute my fair share. > > =20 > > Thanks again, Katherine, > > =20 > > Ann > > =20 > > =20 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Katherine Malm > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com = > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:54 AM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > > But the truth is, I'll go out of my way to help absolutely > anybody, share what I know so that others can become better > investors, > - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C1BF1A.35AFE7A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My only further comment on Katherine's = suggestion is that=20 I REALLY like the original poster to "present" the stock pick. I want to = know=20 why that poster likes / dislikes the stock based on CANSLIM and chart=20 interpretation reasons.
 
My response is often colored by my perception of = that=20 poster's understanding. And I am sure my review is similarly=20 affected.
 
Most posts that consist only of "what do you = think of xyz=20 stock?" or of a list dumped from some automated screen simply feel my = Delete=20 key. Probably many members do that as well to my WWW weekly list, and I=20 understand.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 John=20 Adair
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, = 2002 10:50=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: = Sun, 24 Feb=20 2002 15:11:27 -0500

Katherine=20 et al

 It seem to me we are doing = just that=20  but If we are not lets = do=20 it.

Ie=20 would you buy this stock. Of course by the time we got an answer the = stock=20 probably would have broken out.

A=20 lunker

 

-----Original=20 Message-----
From: = owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On=20 Behalf Of Katherine Malm
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, = 2002 1:59=20 PM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: = Sun, 24 Feb=20 2002 15:11:27 -0500

 

Warren

 

I'll second=20 that point of view. I think it's instructive for individuals to post a = message=20 such as "what do you think about this stock" so members of the list = can review=20 and comment. If nothing else, it's great practice at evaluating = fundamentals=20 and technicals, even if it is not a stock that you yourself would = consider. So=20 that it doesn't seem as though I'm reversing course here, I'll also = second=20 Tom's earlier comment that it is impossible to comment on or learn = from a=20 lengthy *list* of stocks (though I am not suggesting that those who = post=20 discontinue doing so--certainly a personal choice). Finally, in order = to=20 clarify my earlier point of view, I don't think that attempting to=20 compile a collective list of "the" stocks is helpful, as each = individual=20 has a particular style.

 

Duke, if you=20 are reading this, I'd like to suggest an alternative to your compiled = list and=20 instead suggest people do as Warren suggests here and simply post, = once a week=20 or so, a stock for review. The tag line would simply be "would you buy = this=20 and why?" or "would you sell this and why?" The stocks we throw out = could be=20 *anything* for any reason and not necessarily something we own or that = we are=20 looking to buy. For example, it might be a stock we do not own but = that we=20 feel is showing signs of distress. It might be a stock that is setting = up for=20 breakout, but for reasons of our own, we may or may not have left it = on our=20 list. It might be a stock with "a good story." Etc. =

 

Katherine

----- = Original=20 Message -----

From: Warren=20 Keuffel

To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20

Sent: Tuesday, = February=20 26, 2002 1:36 PM

Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM] Date:=20 Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

 

My $0.02 -- and Ann, I'm not = replying to=20 you specifically -- just using
your message as a place to hang my = comment=20 -- what *I* find most
valuable is when someone suggests a stock or = three=20 and others point out
problems with the pattern or the fundies -- = doing=20 this helps me
fine-tune what I should be looking at when = evaluating *any*=20 stocks.  For
example, there was a stock mentioned not too = long ago=20 (forget which one
it was) and I was considering whether to ignore = the less=20 than perfect
pattern when someone else pointed out that it was a = kissing=20 cousin of a
MLM.  As soon as I heard that I the stock was in = the=20 circular file, as I
have a very low personal opinion of any MLM = (living in=20 Utah I see far
too many MLM scams.)

Again, my $0.02 -- so = to those=20 who want to post picks and those who want
to comment --=20 THANKS!

Warren

Ann wrote:

> I'll attest to to=20 that--You have helped me immensely, Katherine.
>
> =20
>
> As one who hasn't had time to contribute to the list = in=20 awhile, let
> alone mine for stocks, I would be very = disappointed if=20 the list turned
> into a stock-picking club. I wouldn't be able = to=20 continue to learn
> quietly on the sidelines by reading all = these=20 discussions, and would
> have to drop out because of my other = time=20 commitments and inability to
> contribute my fair=20 share.
>
> 
>
> Thanks again,=20 Katherine,
>
> 
>
> = Ann
>
> =20
>
> 
>
>     ----- = Original=20 Message -----
>
>     From: Katherine = Malm=20 <mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net>>
>    =20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20 <mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.= com>
>
>    =20 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:54=20 AM
>
>     Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Date: Sun,=20 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 = - -0500
>
>
>     But=20 the truth is, I'll go out of my way to help=20 absolutely
>     anybody, share what I know = so that=20 others can become better
>    =20 investors,
>



-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, = email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email.

= - ------=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C1BF1A.35AFE7A0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2169 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.