From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2237 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Monday, March 25 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2237 In this issue: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Re: [CANSLIM] "M" [CANSLIM] Bond Market Overreaction? RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:24:52 -1000 From: "Mike Gibbons" Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) have been overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by one list subscriber in a single day! Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are making of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. For those of you who may have missed it, the link is http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:37:04 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C1D3F9.C4D81EE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mike, The posts here on the list are frequently peppered with discussions = about the validity of breakouts, validity of "standard" CANSLIM = consolidation/technical patterns, industry strength as an indicator, = condition of the market and its conduciveness to CANSLIM stocks, whether = the WON guidelines for EPS/RS can be "stretched", the validity of data = from various sources (QP2, MarketGuide, Yahoo, DGO), etc. I wouldn't = necessarily read anything into the lack of debate over your tool or its = data elements. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mike Gibbons=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) = have been overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least = once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are using = it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by one list subscriber in a single day! Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are = making of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the = validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I = was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. For those of you who may have missed it, the link is http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C1D3F9.C4D81EE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Mike,
 
The posts here on the list are frequently peppered with discussions = about=20 the validity of breakouts, validity of "standard" CANSLIM=20 consolidation/technical patterns, industry strength as an indicator, = condition=20 of the market and its conduciveness to CANSLIM stocks, whether the WON=20 guidelines for EPS/RS can be "stretched", the validity of data from = various=20 sources (QP2, MarketGuide, Yahoo, DGO), etc. I wouldn't necessarily read = anything into the lack of debate over your tool or its data = elements.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Mike = Gibbons=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 = 12:24=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim = Evaluation=20 Tool


Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I = (and my=20 server) have been
overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have = used the=20 tool at least once
and several of you have accessed it frequently. = Some of=20 you are using it
extensively - the current record is 100 stocks = analyzed by=20 one list
subscriber in a single day!

Apart from being = pleasantly=20 surprized at the use that many of you are making
of it, I'm also = surprized=20 that only one of you has questioned the validity
of the data, and = the=20 assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I was
expecting a = lively=20 debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their
applicability in = the=20 recent market conditions.

For those of you who may have missed = it, the=20 link is
http://www.cwhcharts.com/cansli= m

Aloha,

Mike=20 Gibbons
Proactive Technologies, LLC
http://www.proactech.com


-
-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C1D3F9.C4D81EE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:47:02 -0600 From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C1D3FB.29CB0EB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mike, Katherine brings up a great point - your great site can be used as one of a number of tools for screening. The information we all seek is available from many sources, free or subscription, but it's the convenience of getting the information consolidated that is key. As WON states, the weight of the evidence is key in determining whether to buy. There are few "perfect" CANSLIM stocks. Good luck to all. Edward W. Gjertsen II, CFP Vice President Mack Investment Securities, Inc. ed@macktracks.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:37 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Hi Mike, The posts here on the list are frequently peppered with discussions about the validity of breakouts, validity of "standard" CANSLIM consolidation/technical patterns, industry strength as an indicator, condition of the market and its conduciveness to CANSLIM stocks, whether the WON guidelines for EPS/RS can be "stretched", the validity of data from various sources (QP2, MarketGuide, Yahoo, DGO), etc. I wouldn't necessarily read anything into the lack of debate over your tool or its data elements. Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Gibbons To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) have been overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by one list subscriber in a single day! Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are making of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. For those of you who may have missed it, the link is http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C1D3FB.29CB0EB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mike,

 

Katherine brings up a great point = – your great site can be used as one of a number of tools for = screening.  The information we all seek is available from many sources, free or subscription, but it’s the convenience of getting the information = consolidated that is key.  As WON states, the weight of the evidence is key in determining whether to buy.  There are few “perfect” = CANSLIM stocks.  Good luck to all. 

 

Edward W. Gjertsen II, CFP
Vice President
Mack Investment Securities, Inc.
ed@macktracks.com

-----Original = Message-----
From: = owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com<= /span> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
Sent: Monday, March 25, = 2002 12:37 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com<= /span>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Canslim Evaluation Tool

 

Hi Mike,

 

The posts here on the list are frequently = peppered with discussions about the validity of breakouts, validity of "standard" CANSLIM consolidation/technical patterns, industry strength as an indicator, condition of the market and its conduciveness = to CANSLIM stocks, whether the WON guidelines for EPS/RS can be "stretched", the validity of data from various sources (QP2, MarketGuide, Yahoo, DGO), etc. I wouldn't necessarily read anything into = the lack of debate over your tool or its data elements.

 

Katherine

----- Original Message = - -----

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:24 PM

Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool

 


Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) have = been
overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least = once
and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are using = it
extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by one list
subscriber in a single day!

Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are = making
of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the = validity
of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I = was
expecting a lively debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their
applicability in the recent market conditions.

For those of you who may have missed it, the link is
http://www.cwhcharts.com/cansli= m

Aloha,

Mike Gibbons
Proactive Technologies, LLC
http://www.proactech.com



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your = email.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C1D3FB.29CB0EB0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:56:11 -0800 From: "Bill Triffet" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Mike, First, I'd like to say thanks for the tool. I have yet to see anyone else - WON's products included - attempt to do something so basic as rate a stock directly to the c-a-n-s-l-i-m acronym attributes. Maybe because it's such a subjective thing that it's easier to dance around the numbers than really grade a stock based on canslim. The Stock Evaluator on the IBD site is pretty weak with in that regard. I guess if they actually graded a stock on ACTUAL IBD canslim data that would be construed as touting a stock. This is why most of us go to at least 3-5 different places to review a stock or use Daily Graphs where the data is all there but not exactly spelled out so as to not tout the issue. I think it's a great tool in addition to several others. Given it's price (g) I have no complaints and it comes close in some of the canslim criteria for me. Things like (M)arket direction and (N)ew can be very subjective and must be reviewed several ways. Come to think of it, lately when I see a high (L) rating it's usually extended as that is how it got there. I'm of the consensus of several others here that with data being so immediate, it's better to look for the gems in rising groups - not at the top. - -Bill - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gibbons" To: Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:24 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) have been > overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least once > and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are using it > extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by one list > subscriber in a single day! > > Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are making > of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the validity > of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I was > expecting a lively debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their > applicability in the recent market conditions. > > For those of you who may have missed it, the link is > http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > Proactive Technologies, LLC > http://www.proactech.com > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:17:20 -0800 From: Ian Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Personally, I'm glad the NASDAQ - and particularly the NASDAQ-100 is weak in the face of strength in other places. IMHO, it is a very healthy sign. To me, it means the market is separating the healthy companies from many bloated sick techs, whose businesses show no sign of rebounding anytime soon. It tells me that the market IS willing to run up healthy companies in healthy sectors - so it is ok to buy healthy growing companies with friendly charts. I believe that the fact that every company is not being run up indiscriminately will make for a healthier market in the long run. NYSE-buyers who sat on the sidelines missed out on massive gains from Oct 98 to March 2000. Perhaps NAZ-tech-only-buyers will be the ones missing out on the next big bull??? I find myself cringing each time the NAZ jumps in a manic short squeeze, since all it means is more nervousness when it comes back. Ian - ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Wahl To: Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 7:08 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" > I kept my vix post pretty thin since no one else seemed to be commenting much on > the market, but a few other things I've noticed - 4 indices I looked at peaked at > about Jan. 5 - the Russell, Dow, S&P and Nasdaq. The first 2 have exceeded the > Jan 8 highs in the last two weeks, S&P is just hovering below those January highs, > but the NASDAQ is still considerably below them. I also looked at a cumulative > advance deline line for the NYSE and the NASDAQ, and I notice the NYSE line is > up strongly, Nasdaq line is lagging badly. > > As to what it all means, that is more of a guess, but in the last big run up in the > 1990's the NASDAQ was the leader. I don't know if leadership has changed and the > other indices will pull the NASDAQ up, or if the NASDAQ will drag the others down. > Anyway, NASDAQ doesn't look too healthy to me, would like to see all the indices > looking equally strong, or even the NASDAQ leading, not the NYSE. > > > Yes Bill K., M is Market, last letter of CANSLIM. > > On 25 Mar 2002 at 7:54, Tom Worley wrote: > > > Haven't had much talk on "M" lately, aside from the one post on VIX (which I > > agree with, by the way, it's staying too low for comfort). > > > > Took a fast look around this morning, and noticed the severe overbought > > conditions on both NYSE and NASDAQ have corrected to neutral. And 10 day > > moving average of up/down volume is now slightly negative on NYSE and > > substantially more on Naz. > > > > 10 day moving average of new highs remains moderately positive on both of > > these exchanges. > > > > The S&P500 chart looks surprisingly healthy (at least to me). And the > > Russell 2000 has done better than I perceived from my portfolios. The rest > > looked decent if they can hold in this area, or better still start trending > > up. > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@bellsouth.net > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:07:17 -0600 From: Subject: [CANSLIM] Bond Market Overreaction? I thought you might be interested in this report. Good Market update. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Capital Market Comment Bond Market Overreaction? M Capital Research 3/25/02 Written By: Frank Mastrapasqua, Ph.D. Steve Mathews A sell-off in the 30-year bond last Wednesday helped re-ignite fears that the Fed may soon begin to raise interest rates, possibly as early as the May meeting. Equities felt the wrath of the credit market and declined, fueled by concerns that rising rates could stifle the forthcoming rebound. Although the equity market regained some of the losses incurred during the middle of the week, a more negative sentiment has begun to permeate the investment landscape. Although investors have tried to focus upon the signs of economic recovery and the necessity that profits respond accordingly, the fear that such a rebound will induce interest rate pressures have left many market participants perplexed and non committal. Moreover, “credit” issues continue to surface, adding another element of uncertainty and contributing to a directionless market. Several banks have maintained tightened lending standards, and consequently a sustainable rise in commercial and industrial (C&I) loan volume has yet to materialize. Yield spreads between long-term Treasury bonds and corporate bonds rated Baa and below are wide by historical standards, indicating that investors are anxious and demanding higher returns. In addition, the commercial paper market remains closed for many companies, further illustrating the pervasive fear that has gripped the financial markets. Certain blue chip companies have encountered severe criticism when issuing bonds. Last week, General Electric’s (GE) finan Adding little to clarify the Fed’s view or profit prospects was the February CPI report. Data released last week offered little evidence that inflation is on the verge of unexpectedly rising. Some prognosticators and the media tried to portray a greater than expected rise in the “core” CPI as a sign that pricing pressures might be building, thereby prompting a series of rate increases. However, a 3.8% increase in tobacco prices accounted for the entire upside surprise. Year over year, the CPI has risen only 1.1%, the slowest pace since 1964. The CRB (Commodity Research Bureau) futures index, which some use as a gauge of inflationary pressures, rose 7% over the past two weeks. However, from an economic cycle perspective, this reading illustrates that demand is beginning to improve and deflationary pressures have started to dissipate. Despite the recent gain, commodity prices have dropped over 6% during the last twelve months and stand at roughly the same level they were two and a half years ago. As the financial markets grapple with the many crosscurrents that characterize any recovery, the stage is set for a healthy rebound that should gather momentum as the year progresses. Competition, excess capacity, and the structural productivity gains achieved last decade should produce an environment where price increases remain contained. In addition, a strong dollar suggests that fears of inflation appear premature. Last week, the U.S. dollar recorded its biggest weekly gain against the yen since January 2000. Volatility in the credit markets is characteristic of changes in the business cycle and policy shifts. Prior transition periods from recession to recovery have exhibited upward pressure on long-term rates in the early stages only to be followed by lower rates as fears dissipate. This time should prove to be no exception. Despite the psychological dilemma that have captured investors, the power of the recovery should in time dominate the investment landscape. IF YOU LIKED THIS REPORT, PLEASE REGISTER WITH US NOW - IT'S FREE! http://www.virtualmoneymanager.com/register/index.asp © 2002 Mastrapasqua & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. Disclaimer The information and opinions contained in this report should not be treated as fact or as insight that will produce desired investment results over time. Investment conclusions always bear risk, and that risk may not be reasonable for any particular reader. Obviously the writer, even assuming good intentions, does not know of the reader's particular financial circumstance and therefore is not able to assess the propriety of whether a named security makes sense as part of a given individual, family, or institutional portfolio. Mastrapasqua & Associates clients may, from time to time, own some of the companies mentioned. We hold out no obligation to give readers of this column advanced notification of when we may change an opinion. To our knowledge, none of the information contained in our column would, when it becomes publicly available, have an influence on the valuation of a particular stock. 'Buyer Beware' is a great rule for all investors to follow. This caveat is perhaps best followed by 'do your own independent homework' and 'inflated expectations and short investment time frames are the curse of investment dreams.' Above all else you must take personal responsibility for your investments. Should you prefer to transfer this responsibility to this column, we do not accept any portion of that attempted responsibility transfer. Investors should receive investment advice based on an assessment of their own particular investment circumstances and not on the basis of recommendations in this report. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VirtualMoneyManager.com is a financial service of Mastrapasqua & Associates, a prominent US money manager with over $1.8 billion in assets. At VirtualMoneyManager.com you can find weekly independent investment research including the Capital Market Comment and the company specific Focus Report. ___________________________________________ Serious Research for the Serious Investor http://www.virtualmoneymanager.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:47:02 -0600 From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C1D3FB.29CB0EB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mike, Katherine brings up a great point - your great site can be used as one of a number of tools for screening. The information we all seek is available from many sources, free or subscription, but it's the convenience of getting the information consolidated that is key. As WON states, the weight of the evidence is key in determining whether to buy. There are few "perfect" CANSLIM stocks. Good luck to all. Edward W. Gjertsen II, CFP Vice President Mack Investment Securities, Inc. ed@macktracks.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:37 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Hi Mike, The posts here on the list are frequently peppered with discussions about the validity of breakouts, validity of "standard" CANSLIM consolidation/technical patterns, industry strength as an indicator, condition of the market and its conduciveness to CANSLIM stocks, whether the WON guidelines for EPS/RS can be "stretched", the validity of data from various sources (QP2, MarketGuide, Yahoo, DGO), etc. I wouldn't necessarily read anything into the lack of debate over your tool or its data elements. Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Gibbons To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) have been overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by one list subscriber in a single day! Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are making of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. For those of you who may have missed it, the link is http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C1D3FB.29CB0EB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mike,

 

Katherine brings up a great point = – your great site can be used as one of a number of tools for = screening.  The information we all seek is available from many sources, free or subscription, but it’s the convenience of getting the information = consolidated that is key.  As WON states, the weight of the evidence is key in determining whether to buy.  There are few “perfect” = CANSLIM stocks.  Good luck to all. 

 

Edward W. Gjertsen II, CFP
Vice President
Mack Investment Securities, Inc.
ed@macktracks.com

-----Original = Message-----
From: = owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com<= /span> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
Sent: Monday, March 25, = 2002 12:37 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com<= /span>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Canslim Evaluation Tool

 

Hi Mike,

 

The posts here on the list are frequently = peppered with discussions about the validity of breakouts, validity of "standard" CANSLIM consolidation/technical patterns, industry strength as an indicator, condition of the market and its conduciveness = to CANSLIM stocks, whether the WON guidelines for EPS/RS can be "stretched", the validity of data from various sources (QP2, MarketGuide, Yahoo, DGO), etc. I wouldn't necessarily read anything into = the lack of debate over your tool or its data elements.

 

Katherine

----- Original Message = - -----

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:24 PM

Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool

 


Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) have = been
overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least = once
and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are using = it
extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by one list
subscriber in a single day!

Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are = making
of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the = validity
of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I = was
expecting a lively debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their
applicability in the recent market conditions.

For those of you who may have missed it, the link is
http://www.cwhcharts.com/cansli= m

Aloha,

Mike Gibbons
Proactive Technologies, LLC
http://www.proactech.com



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your = email.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C1D3FB.29CB0EB0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2237 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.