From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2267 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Wednesday, April 3 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2267 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool RE: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:27:59 -0500 From: "Duke Miller" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool John All I got was an empty briefcase. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:45 AM To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool The whole discussion about buying before breakouts reminds me of a "guide" to trading cups that I acquired some time ago. Some of you may have seen it, I have no idea how widely distributed it is, but I've never seen it anywhere since then. The guide talks about buying before the cup is even completed - the "cup completion cheat" buy point. AHMH's chart looks like it may be a candidate. Obviously, this is a step or two off of the CANSLIM path, but I thought it might be of interest anyway. If I've uploaded it properly, it should be here: http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/rockaway_johnnie/lst?.dir=/Public&.view=l John C. - -----Original Message----- From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:09 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Holy CANSLIM, Batman! How interesting. And it's only rated A in Stock Checkup! I looked at the charts pursuant to some earlier discussions about buying before the breakout. On March 22, the AHMH RS line broke into new ground, and has risen since. We often read in IBD about the RS line breaking into new ground, usually, when the stock hasn't hit its pivot yet. And look at the three days around this event...all on huge volume. I'd be interested in others' feedback on this. On the same subject, Mike, do you have a way of running a screen to spit out other AHMH's...i.e., List all stocks with 8/11 or higher? (I'd pay dearly for that.) Robin (aka Duke) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:11 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Duke, (and others) here's one for you... AHMH ... a "10" - lacking only industry ranking Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:09 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Bill, Great input here. How about a show of hands of those who've been stopped out of A+ Stock Checkup stocks! And as always, thanks, Mike. I'm one of the heavy users, and if it doesn't hit 6/11 or better, I'm onto the next one. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Bill Triffet Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:56 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Mike, First, I'd like to say thanks for the tool. I have yet to see anyone else - WON's products included - attempt to do something so basic as rate a stock directly to the c-a-n-s-l-i-m acronym attributes. Maybe because it's such a subjective thing that it's easier to dance around the numbers than really grade a stock based on canslim. The Stock Evaluator on the IBD site is pretty weak with in that regard. I guess if they actually graded a stock on ACTUAL IBD canslim data that would be construed as touting a stock. This is why most of us go to at least 3-5 different places to review a stock or use Daily Graphs where the data is all there but not exactly spelled out so as to not tout the issue. I think it's a great tool in addition to several others. Given it's price (g) I have no complaints and it comes close in some of the canslim criteria for me. Things like (M)arket direction and (N)ew can be very subjective and must be reviewed several ways. Come to think of it, lately when I see a high (L) rating it's usually extended as that is how it got there. I'm of the consensus of several others here that with data being so immediate, it's better to look for the gems in rising groups - not at the top. - -Bill - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gibbons" To: Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:24 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) > have been > overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least > once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are > using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by > one list subscriber in a single day! > > Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are making > of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the > validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail > ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of > CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. > > For those of you who may have missed it, the link is > http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > Proactive Technologies, LLC > http://www.proactech.com > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:29:51 -0500 From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Sorry. I'm having problems with this whole public access FTP thing. If you'd like a copy, just e-mail me directly and I'll send it back to you (at least to the first few people!) John C. - -----Original Message----- From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:28 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool John All I got was an empty briefcase. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:45 AM To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool The whole discussion about buying before breakouts reminds me of a "guide" to trading cups that I acquired some time ago. Some of you may have seen it, I have no idea how widely distributed it is, but I've never seen it anywhere since then. The guide talks about buying before the cup is even completed - the "cup completion cheat" buy point. AHMH's chart looks like it may be a candidate. Obviously, this is a step or two off of the CANSLIM path, but I thought it might be of interest anyway. If I've uploaded it properly, it should be here: http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/rockaway_johnnie/lst?.dir=/Public&.view=l John C. - -----Original Message----- From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:09 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Holy CANSLIM, Batman! How interesting. And it's only rated A in Stock Checkup! I looked at the charts pursuant to some earlier discussions about buying before the breakout. On March 22, the AHMH RS line broke into new ground, and has risen since. We often read in IBD about the RS line breaking into new ground, usually, when the stock hasn't hit its pivot yet. And look at the three days around this event...all on huge volume. I'd be interested in others' feedback on this. On the same subject, Mike, do you have a way of running a screen to spit out other AHMH's...i.e., List all stocks with 8/11 or higher? (I'd pay dearly for that.) Robin (aka Duke) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:11 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Duke, (and others) here's one for you... AHMH ... a "10" - lacking only industry ranking Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:09 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Bill, Great input here. How about a show of hands of those who've been stopped out of A+ Stock Checkup stocks! And as always, thanks, Mike. I'm one of the heavy users, and if it doesn't hit 6/11 or better, I'm onto the next one. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Bill Triffet Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:56 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Mike, First, I'd like to say thanks for the tool. I have yet to see anyone else - WON's products included - attempt to do something so basic as rate a stock directly to the c-a-n-s-l-i-m acronym attributes. Maybe because it's such a subjective thing that it's easier to dance around the numbers than really grade a stock based on canslim. The Stock Evaluator on the IBD site is pretty weak with in that regard. I guess if they actually graded a stock on ACTUAL IBD canslim data that would be construed as touting a stock. This is why most of us go to at least 3-5 different places to review a stock or use Daily Graphs where the data is all there but not exactly spelled out so as to not tout the issue. I think it's a great tool in addition to several others. Given it's price (g) I have no complaints and it comes close in some of the canslim criteria for me. Things like (M)arket direction and (N)ew can be very subjective and must be reviewed several ways. Come to think of it, lately when I see a high (L) rating it's usually extended as that is how it got there. I'm of the consensus of several others here that with data being so immediate, it's better to look for the gems in rising groups - not at the top. - -Bill - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gibbons" To: Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:24 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) > have been > overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least > once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are > using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by > one list subscriber in a single day! > > Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are making > of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the > validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail > ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of > CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. > > For those of you who may have missed it, the link is > http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > Proactive Technologies, LLC > http://www.proactech.com > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:33:01 -0800 From: "David Gerber" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool I would like it, John. Thanks, Dave - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:29 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > Sorry. I'm having problems with this whole public access FTP thing. If > you'd like a copy, just e-mail me directly and I'll send it back to you (at > least to the first few people!) > > John C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:28 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > John > > All I got was an empty briefcase. > > Duke > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Cefaloni, John L > Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:45 AM > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > The whole discussion about buying before breakouts reminds me of a > "guide" to trading cups that I acquired some time ago. Some of you may > have seen it, I have no idea how widely distributed it is, but I've > never seen it anywhere since then. The guide talks about buying before > the cup is even completed - the "cup completion cheat" buy point. > AHMH's chart looks like it may be a candidate. > > Obviously, this is a step or two off of the CANSLIM path, but I thought > it might be of interest anyway. > > If I've uploaded it properly, it should be here: > http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/rockaway_johnnie/lst?.dir=/Public&.view=l > > John C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:09 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Holy CANSLIM, Batman! > > How interesting. And it's only rated A in Stock Checkup! > > I looked at the charts pursuant to some earlier discussions about buying > before the breakout. On March 22, the AHMH RS line broke into new > ground, and has risen since. We often read in IBD about the RS line > breaking into new ground, usually, when the stock hasn't hit its pivot > yet. And look at the three days around this event...all on huge volume. > > > I'd be interested in others' feedback on this. > > On the same subject, Mike, do you have a way of running a screen to spit > out other AHMH's...i.e., List all stocks with 8/11 or higher? (I'd pay > dearly for that.) > > Robin (aka Duke) > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:11 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Duke, > > (and others) here's one for you... AHMH ... a "10" - lacking only > industry ranking > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > Proactive Technologies, LLC > http://www.proactech.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:09 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Bill, > > Great input here. How about a show of hands of those who've been > stopped out of A+ Stock Checkup stocks! > > And as always, thanks, Mike. I'm one of the heavy users, and if it > doesn't hit 6/11 or better, I'm onto the next one. > > Duke > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Bill Triffet > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:56 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Mike, > > First, I'd like to say thanks for the tool. > > I have yet to see anyone else - WON's products included - attempt to do > something so basic as rate a stock directly to the c-a-n-s-l-i-m acronym > attributes. Maybe because it's such a subjective thing that it's easier > to dance around the numbers than really grade a stock based on canslim. > The Stock Evaluator on the IBD site is pretty weak with in that regard. > I guess if they actually graded a stock on ACTUAL IBD canslim data that > would be construed as touting a stock. This is why most of us go to at > least 3-5 different places to review a stock or use Daily Graphs where > the data is all there but not exactly spelled out so as to not tout the > issue. > > I think it's a great tool in addition to several others. Given it's > price > (g) I have no complaints and it comes close in some of the canslim > criteria for me. Things like (M)arket direction and (N)ew can be very > subjective and must be reviewed several ways. Come to think of it, > lately when I see a high > (L) rating it's usually extended as that is how it got there. I'm of the > consensus of several others here that with data being so immediate, it's > better to look for the gems in rising groups - not at the top. > > -Bill > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Gibbons" > To: > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:24 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > > Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) > > have > been > > overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least > > once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are > > using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by > > one list subscriber in a single day! > > > > Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are > making > > of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the > > validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail > > ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of > > CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. > > > > For those of you who may have missed it, the link is > > http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim > > > > Aloha, > > > > Mike Gibbons > > Proactive Technologies, LLC > > http://www.proactech.com > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:37:31 -0700 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool If it isn't too long, maybe you could just put it in a message to the group? On 3 Apr 2002 at 10:29, Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-A wrote: > Sorry. I'm having problems with this whole public access FTP thing. If > you'd like a copy, just e-mail me directly and I'll send it back to you (at > least to the first few people!) > > John C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:28 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > John > > All I got was an empty briefcase. > > Duke > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Cefaloni, John L > Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:45 AM > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > The whole discussion about buying before breakouts reminds me of a > "guide" to trading cups that I acquired some time ago. Some of you may > have seen it, I have no idea how widely distributed it is, but I've > never seen it anywhere since then. The guide talks about buying before > the cup is even completed - the "cup completion cheat" buy point. > AHMH's chart looks like it may be a candidate. > > Obviously, this is a step or two off of the CANSLIM path, but I thought > it might be of interest anyway. > > If I've uploaded it properly, it should be here: > http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/rockaway_johnnie/lst?.dir=/Public&.view=l > > John C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:09 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Holy CANSLIM, Batman! > > How interesting. And it's only rated A in Stock Checkup! > > I looked at the charts pursuant to some earlier discussions about buying > before the breakout. On March 22, the AHMH RS line broke into new > ground, and has risen since. We often read in IBD about the RS line > breaking into new ground, usually, when the stock hasn't hit its pivot > yet. And look at the three days around this event...all on huge volume. > > > I'd be interested in others' feedback on this. > > On the same subject, Mike, do you have a way of running a screen to spit > out other AHMH's...i.e., List all stocks with 8/11 or higher? (I'd pay > dearly for that.) > > Robin (aka Duke) > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:11 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Duke, > > (and others) here's one for you... AHMH ... a "10" - lacking only > industry ranking > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > Proactive Technologies, LLC > http://www.proactech.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:09 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Bill, > > Great input here. How about a show of hands of those who've been > stopped out of A+ Stock Checkup stocks! > > And as always, thanks, Mike. I'm one of the heavy users, and if it > doesn't hit 6/11 or better, I'm onto the next one. > > Duke > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Bill Triffet > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:56 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Mike, > > First, I'd like to say thanks for the tool. > > I have yet to see anyone else - WON's products included - attempt to do > something so basic as rate a stock directly to the c-a-n-s-l-i-m acronym > attributes. Maybe because it's such a subjective thing that it's easier > to dance around the numbers than really grade a stock based on canslim. > The Stock Evaluator on the IBD site is pretty weak with in that regard. > I guess if they actually graded a stock on ACTUAL IBD canslim data that > would be construed as touting a stock. This is why most of us go to at > least 3-5 different places to review a stock or use Daily Graphs where > the data is all there but not exactly spelled out so as to not tout the > issue. > > I think it's a great tool in addition to several others. Given it's > price > (g) I have no complaints and it comes close in some of the canslim > criteria for me. Things like (M)arket direction and (N)ew can be very > subjective and must be reviewed several ways. Come to think of it, > lately when I see a high > (L) rating it's usually extended as that is how it got there. I'm of the > consensus of several others here that with data being so immediate, it's > better to look for the gems in rising groups - not at the top. > > -Bill > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Gibbons" > To: > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:24 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > > Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) > > have > been > > overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least > > once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are > > using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by > > one list subscriber in a single day! > > > > Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are > making > > of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the > > validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail > > ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of > > CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. > > > > For those of you who may have missed it, the link is > > http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim > > > > Aloha, > > > > Mike Gibbons > > Proactive Technologies, LLC > > http://www.proactech.com > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: 3 Apr 2002 07:37:56 -0800 From: "Tim Fisher" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Did, roasted some espresso from aged Torajan beans I bot in Indonesia at 3:45 AM and drank 3 cups ;) At 10:25 AM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: >ALWAYS the voice of reason, Katherine. I was waiting for you to suggest >Tim might have OD'ed on caffeine this a.m.! LOL. > >Duke Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:40:29 -0500 From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool It's a 200 KB .pdf file. There's lots of charts that go along with the text. Can't just post it into the body of an e-mail. - -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Wahl [mailto:pjwahl@attbi.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool If it isn't too long, maybe you could just put it in a message to the group? On 3 Apr 2002 at 10:29, Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-A wrote: > Sorry. I'm having problems with this whole public access FTP thing. If > you'd like a copy, just e-mail me directly and I'll send it back to you (at > least to the first few people!) > > John C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:28 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > John > > All I got was an empty briefcase. > > Duke > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Cefaloni, John L > Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:45 AM > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > The whole discussion about buying before breakouts reminds me of a > "guide" to trading cups that I acquired some time ago. Some of you may > have seen it, I have no idea how widely distributed it is, but I've > never seen it anywhere since then. The guide talks about buying before > the cup is even completed - the "cup completion cheat" buy point. > AHMH's chart looks like it may be a candidate. > > Obviously, this is a step or two off of the CANSLIM path, but I thought > it might be of interest anyway. > > If I've uploaded it properly, it should be here: > http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/rockaway_johnnie/lst?.dir=/Public&.view=l > > John C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:09 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Holy CANSLIM, Batman! > > How interesting. And it's only rated A in Stock Checkup! > > I looked at the charts pursuant to some earlier discussions about buying > before the breakout. On March 22, the AHMH RS line broke into new > ground, and has risen since. We often read in IBD about the RS line > breaking into new ground, usually, when the stock hasn't hit its pivot > yet. And look at the three days around this event...all on huge volume. > > > I'd be interested in others' feedback on this. > > On the same subject, Mike, do you have a way of running a screen to spit > out other AHMH's...i.e., List all stocks with 8/11 or higher? (I'd pay > dearly for that.) > > Robin (aka Duke) > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:11 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Duke, > > (and others) here's one for you... AHMH ... a "10" - lacking only > industry ranking > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > Proactive Technologies, LLC > http://www.proactech.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:09 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Bill, > > Great input here. How about a show of hands of those who've been > stopped out of A+ Stock Checkup stocks! > > And as always, thanks, Mike. I'm one of the heavy users, and if it > doesn't hit 6/11 or better, I'm onto the next one. > > Duke > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Bill Triffet > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:56 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Mike, > > First, I'd like to say thanks for the tool. > > I have yet to see anyone else - WON's products included - attempt to do > something so basic as rate a stock directly to the c-a-n-s-l-i-m acronym > attributes. Maybe because it's such a subjective thing that it's easier > to dance around the numbers than really grade a stock based on canslim. > The Stock Evaluator on the IBD site is pretty weak with in that regard. > I guess if they actually graded a stock on ACTUAL IBD canslim data that > would be construed as touting a stock. This is why most of us go to at > least 3-5 different places to review a stock or use Daily Graphs where > the data is all there but not exactly spelled out so as to not tout the > issue. > > I think it's a great tool in addition to several others. Given it's > price > (g) I have no complaints and it comes close in some of the canslim > criteria for me. Things like (M)arket direction and (N)ew can be very > subjective and must be reviewed several ways. Come to think of it, > lately when I see a high > (L) rating it's usually extended as that is how it got there. I'm of the > consensus of several others here that with data being so immediate, it's > better to look for the gems in rising groups - not at the top. > > -Bill > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Gibbons" > To: > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:24 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > > Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) > > have > been > > overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least > > once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are > > using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by > > one list subscriber in a single day! > > > > Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are > making > > of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the > > validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail > > ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of > > CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. > > > > For those of you who may have missed it, the link is > > http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim > > > > Aloha, > > > > Mike Gibbons > > Proactive Technologies, LLC > > http://www.proactech.com > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:42:01 -0500 From: "webmaster@design21.com" Subject: RE: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool John, if you'll email it to me, I'll be happy to ftp it for you. - --Mona Original Message: - ----------------- From: Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA] john.cefaloni@us.army.mil Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:29:51 -0500 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Sorry. I'm having problems with this whole public access FTP thing. If you'd like a copy, just e-mail me directly and I'll send it back to you (at least to the first few people!) John C. - -----Original Message----- From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:28 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool John All I got was an empty briefcase. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:45 AM To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool The whole discussion about buying before breakouts reminds me of a "guide" to trading cups that I acquired some time ago. Some of you may have seen it, I have no idea how widely distributed it is, but I've never seen it anywhere since then. The guide talks about buying before the cup is even completed - the "cup completion cheat" buy point. AHMH's chart looks like it may be a candidate. Obviously, this is a step or two off of the CANSLIM path, but I thought it might be of interest anyway. If I've uploaded it properly, it should be here: http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/rockaway_johnnie/lst?.dir=3D/Public&.view=3Dl John C. - -----Original Message----- From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:09 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Holy CANSLIM, Batman! How interesting. And it's only rated A in Stock Checkup! I looked at the charts pursuant to some earlier discussions about buying before the breakout. On March 22, the AHMH RS line broke into new ground, and has risen since. We often read in IBD about the RS line breaking into new ground, usually, when the stock hasn't hit its pivot yet. And look at the three days around this event...all on huge volume. I'd be interested in others' feedback on this. On the same subject, Mike, do you have a way of running a screen to spit out other AHMH's...i.e., List all stocks with 8/11 or higher? (I'd pay dearly for that.) Robin (aka Duke) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:11 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Duke, (and others) here's one for you... AHMH ... a "10" - lacking only industry ranking Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:09 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Bill, Great input here. How about a show of hands of those who've been stopped out of A+ Stock Checkup stocks! And as always, thanks, Mike. I'm one of the heavy users, and if it doesn't hit 6/11 or better, I'm onto the next one. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Bill Triffet Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:56 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Mike, First, I'd like to say thanks for the tool. I have yet to see anyone else - WON's products included - attempt to do something so basic as rate a stock directly to the c-a-n-s-l-i-m acronym attributes. Maybe because it's such a subjective thing that it's easier to dance around the numbers than really grade a stock based on canslim. The Stock Evaluator on the IBD site is pretty weak with in that regard. I guess if they actually graded a stock on ACTUAL IBD canslim data that would be construed as touting a stock. This is why most of us go to at least 3-5 different places to review a stock or use Daily Graphs where the data is all there but not exactly spelled out so as to not tout the issue. I think it's a great tool in addition to several others. Given it's price (g) I have no complaints and it comes close in some of the canslim criteria for me. Things like (M)arket direction and (N)ew can be very subjective and must be reviewed several ways. Come to think of it, lately when I see a high (L) rating it's usually extended as that is how it got there. I'm of the consensus of several others here that with data being so immediate, it's better to look for the gems in rising groups - not at the top. - -Bill - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gibbons" To: Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:24 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) > have been > overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least > once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are > using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by > one list subscriber in a single day! > > Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are making > of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the > validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail > ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of > CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions. > > For those of you who may have missed it, the link is > http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > Proactive Technologies, LLC > http://www.proactech.com > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe > canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2267 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.