Message

From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2269 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Thursday, April 4 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2269 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI [CANSLIM] New DGO with Pricing (Ouch!) Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool DTMI - Stable Business Model in Today's Market 7854UWxE7-313wKru8297l20 Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI Re: [CANSLIM] New DGO with Pricing (Ouch!) [CANSLIM] water utilities-ot ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:29:38 -0500 From: "Duke Miller" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C1DB56.ABB6D140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All, Maybe it won't hurt to go back to early February on this one, when I was stopped out. Talk about history repeating itself. The only thing that comes to mind on DFXI is M. Just plain, hurting, sick M. I figure the 10.35% I'm earning on the sidelines (8% CANSLIM insurance cost + interest on my cash account...only 2.35% of it taxable, by the way) is worth it right now. Pardon the humor in this. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:25 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI Tom: Interesting comment and I will watch DFXI carefully for the rest of the week. I was not aware that a stock might take off again after retreating to the handle. Charley - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C1DB56.ABB6D140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

All,

Maybe it won't = hurt to go=20 back to early February on this one, when I was stopped out. Talk = about=20 history repeating itself.

The only thing = that comes=20 to mind on DFXI is M. Just plain, hurting, sick M. I figure = the=20 10.35% I'm earning on the sidelines (8% CANSLIM insurance cost + = interest on my=20 cash account...only 2.35% of it taxable, by the way) is worth it right=20 now.

Pardon the = humor in=20 this.

Duke

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April = 03,=20 2002 8:25 PM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re:=20 [CANSLIM] DFXI

Tom: Interesting comment and I will watch DFXI carefully for = the rest=20 of the week. I was not aware that a stock might take off again after=20 retreating to the handle.
Charley =

- ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C1DB56.ABB6D140-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:38:34 -0500 From: "William King" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Tom, I'm sure I speak for all the CANSLIM newbies/lurkers in thanking you and the other contributors for the information and analysis you folks make available to us. This response to Tim's challenge was excellent. I'm even beginning to understand the thought process. The specifics expand on what 's provided in WON's books although I guess it's all available in AskIBD. Re you comment on FCN's cash flow being below earnings - is that 4th qtr earnings of $0.23 x 4 = $0.92 compared to cash flow of $0.80? I took the trial subscription to DGO. I agree,it certainly makes due diligence easier. Thanks, Bill King - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > OK, Tim, I waded thru the emails, and so far no one was willing to take up > the challenge, so I'll put on my negatively biased trifocals and see if I > can find fault with these: > > KKD - as the longer terms members know, I love (read am addicted to) their > hot glazed donuts right off the rack. But could never be convinced that a > valuation multiple in the very high double digits was good investing. Still > am not with trailing PE of 88 and projected PE of 62. Short term trend > downward, breaking 50DMA today. > > SYPR - gotta be careful here, as I have this small cap in my VR Fund where I > have a small profit, 12 month trend clearly up, sequential earnings growth > support the big annual earnings forecasts for this year and next, I don't > like the much slower growth in sales, debt is high (114%), ROE is low (9%), > management ownership very high (87%) which means they can do anything they > want without shareholder recourse, including selling big blocks of their > stock or taking the company private at virtually any price. > > PER - single digit sales growth, weak earnings forecast (9 & 18% this year > and next) > > MOVI - erratic chart, wouldn't get excited about it till it breaks 20.16 on > volume, I don't trust the forecasts on this one, mostly gut sense of what > "people" are doing in real world vs right after 9/11 > > GPI - 6% earnings growth this year (above company forecasts) and 17% next > year doesn't excite me > > SAH - my economics flavor kicks in here, I don't see car sales doing well > this year, so can't believe the 21% earnings forecast even with the Don > Massey acquisitions, there's not that much juice after recent acquisitions > to bolster essentially flat earnings and sales that much, IMO > > TUES - I'll try to be gentle, since you own this one, and I rarely spend > money so am a poor judge of consumer habits, management has 72% of the > float, and funds got 43% of what's left, that's hefty, earnings way > unpredictable, from several pennies for three qtrs to 63 cents, I wouldn't > know what to expect?, debt a shocking 549% and cash flow essentially flat > with earnings > > FCN - had an easy year for comparisons in 2001, but 2002 will be far more > difficult, funds own 47% and management only owns 15%, cash flow below > earnings > > Nothing motivated me, I am continuing to build my cash reserves until "M" > cleans up its act, > > Tom Worley > stkguru@bellsouth.net > AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Fisher" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:43 AM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Forgive me if I totally disagree with you. There are still quite a few > practically perfect CANSLIM stocks out there to discuss, i.e. DFXI, without > bringing up these extremely sub-par candidates. I would not discourage > anyone from bringing them up for discussion, just that when their faults > are pointed out, that the advice offered be taken for what it is, namely > free. Take it or ignore it, but always remember, YGWYPF! IMNSHO. Want > something to do with your free time? Rip these apart: > > KKD SYPR PER MOVI GPI SAH TUES FCN > > Hint: The C&H isn't the only chart formation out there, nor is it the one > that necessarily is the best CANSLIM buy, particularly in this M... > > At 09:16 AM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >Easy, Tim: > > > >While the M's away the CANSLIMMERS must play! > > > >Duke > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > >[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Tim Fisher > >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:19 PM > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > >A stock 30% below its 52 wk high and with the 50dma under the 200 gets a > > > >10? Out of what, 100? Seriously, how is this a CANSLIM chart? > > > > Tim Fisher > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: 3 Apr 2002 20:20:34 -0800 From: "Tim Fisher" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Yeah, I like the charts, even MOVI, am so-so on the fundies, and that is the cream of my HGS crop. I never did pay any attn to the fundies beyond the fact that they meet my scan criteria, at least according to HGS data. At 08:09 PM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: >OK, Tim, I waded thru the emails, and so far no one was willing to take up >the challenge, so I'll put on my negatively biased trifocals and see if I >can find fault with these: > >KKD - as the longer terms members know, I love (read am addicted to) their >hot glazed donuts right off the rack. But could never be convinced that a >valuation multiple in the very high double digits was good investing. Still >am not with trailing PE of 88 and projected PE of 62. Short term trend >downward, breaking 50DMA today. > >SYPR - gotta be careful here, as I have this small cap in my VR Fund where I >have a small profit, 12 month trend clearly up, sequential earnings growth >support the big annual earnings forecasts for this year and next, I don't >like the much slower growth in sales, debt is high (114%), ROE is low (9%), >management ownership very high (87%) which means they can do anything they >want without shareholder recourse, including selling big blocks of their >stock or taking the company private at virtually any price. > >PER - single digit sales growth, weak earnings forecast (9 & 18% this year >and next) > >MOVI - erratic chart, wouldn't get excited about it till it breaks 20.16 on >volume, I don't trust the forecasts on this one, mostly gut sense of what >"people" are doing in real world vs right after 9/11 > >GPI - 6% earnings growth this year (above company forecasts) and 17% next >year doesn't excite me > >SAH - my economics flavor kicks in here, I don't see car sales doing well >this year, so can't believe the 21% earnings forecast even with the Don >Massey acquisitions, there's not that much juice after recent acquisitions >to bolster essentially flat earnings and sales that much, IMO > >TUES - I'll try to be gentle, since you own this one, and I rarely spend >money so am a poor judge of consumer habits, management has 72% of the >float, and funds got 43% of what's left, that's hefty, earnings way >unpredictable, from several pennies for three qtrs to 63 cents, I wouldn't >know what to expect?, debt a shocking 549% and cash flow essentially flat >with earnings > >FCN - had an easy year for comparisons in 2001, but 2002 will be far more >difficult, funds own 47% and management only owns 15%, cash flow below >earnings > >Nothing motivated me, I am continuing to build my cash reserves until "M" >cleans up its act, > >Tom Worley >stkguru@bellsouth.net >AIM: TexWorley >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tim Fisher" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:43 AM >Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > >Forgive me if I totally disagree with you. There are still quite a few >practically perfect CANSLIM stocks out there to discuss, i.e. DFXI, without >bringing up these extremely sub-par candidates. I would not discourage >anyone from bringing them up for discussion, just that when their faults >are pointed out, that the advice offered be taken for what it is, namely >free. Take it or ignore it, but always remember, YGWYPF! IMNSHO. Want >something to do with your free time? Rip these apart: > >KKD SYPR PER MOVI GPI SAH TUES FCN > >Hint: The C&H isn't the only chart formation out there, nor is it the one >that necessarily is the best CANSLIM buy, particularly in this M... > >At 09:16 AM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >Easy, Tim: > > > >While the M's away the CANSLIMMERS must play! > > > >Duke > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > >[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Tim Fisher > >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:19 PM > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > >A stock 30% below its 52 wk high and with the 50dma under the 200 gets a > > > >10? Out of what, 100? Seriously, how is this a CANSLIM chart? > > > >Tim Fisher >Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site >Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. >mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com >WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: 3 Apr 2002 20:31:24 -0800 From: "Tim Fisher" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool I think he means 66 cents/share cash and 84 cents/share earnings (ttm). And my data has 44% insiders (6% below my cutoff) but hey, DGO excludes those 5% owners, which I consider to be insiders. DGO also uses funny money accounting (i.e. Enron-onomics) for EPS. Ahem. At 09:38 PM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Tom, >I'm sure I speak for all the CANSLIM newbies/lurkers in thanking you and the >other contributors for the information and analysis you folks make available >to us. This response to Tim's challenge was excellent. I'm even beginning to >understand the thought process. The specifics expand on what 's provided in >WON's books although I guess it's all available in AskIBD. > >Re you comment on FCN's cash flow being below earnings - is that 4th qtr >earnings of $0.23 x 4 = $0.92 compared to cash flow of $0.80? > >I took the trial subscription to DGO. I agree,it certainly makes due >diligence easier. > >Thanks, >Bill King > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tom Worley" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 PM >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > OK, Tim, I waded thru the emails, and so far no one was willing to take up > > the challenge, so I'll put on my negatively biased trifocals and see if I > > can find fault with these: > > > > KKD - as the longer terms members know, I love (read am addicted to) their > > hot glazed donuts right off the rack. But could never be convinced that a > > valuation multiple in the very high double digits was good investing. >Still > > am not with trailing PE of 88 and projected PE of 62. Short term trend > > downward, breaking 50DMA today. > > > > SYPR - gotta be careful here, as I have this small cap in my VR Fund where >I > > have a small profit, 12 month trend clearly up, sequential earnings growth > > support the big annual earnings forecasts for this year and next, I don't > > like the much slower growth in sales, debt is high (114%), ROE is low >(9%), > > management ownership very high (87%) which means they can do anything they > > want without shareholder recourse, including selling big blocks of their > > stock or taking the company private at virtually any price. > > > > PER - single digit sales growth, weak earnings forecast (9 & 18% this year > > and next) > > > > MOVI - erratic chart, wouldn't get excited about it till it breaks 20.16 >on > > volume, I don't trust the forecasts on this one, mostly gut sense of what > > "people" are doing in real world vs right after 9/11 > > > > GPI - 6% earnings growth this year (above company forecasts) and 17% next > > year doesn't excite me > > > > SAH - my economics flavor kicks in here, I don't see car sales doing well > > this year, so can't believe the 21% earnings forecast even with the Don > > Massey acquisitions, there's not that much juice after recent acquisitions > > to bolster essentially flat earnings and sales that much, IMO > > > > TUES - I'll try to be gentle, since you own this one, and I rarely spend > > money so am a poor judge of consumer habits, management has 72% of the > > float, and funds got 43% of what's left, that's hefty, earnings way > > unpredictable, from several pennies for three qtrs to 63 cents, I wouldn't > > know what to expect?, debt a shocking 549% and cash flow essentially flat > > with earnings > > > > FCN - had an easy year for comparisons in 2001, but 2002 will be far more > > difficult, funds own 47% and management only owns 15%, cash flow below > > earnings > > > > Nothing motivated me, I am continuing to build my cash reserves until "M" > > cleans up its act, > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@bellsouth.net > > AIM: TexWorley > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tim Fisher" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:43 AM > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > > Forgive me if I totally disagree with you. There are still quite a few > > practically perfect CANSLIM stocks out there to discuss, i.e. DFXI, >without > > bringing up these extremely sub-par candidates. I would not discourage > > anyone from bringing them up for discussion, just that when their faults > > are pointed out, that the advice offered be taken for what it is, namely > > free. Take it or ignore it, but always remember, YGWYPF! IMNSHO. Want > > something to do with your free time? Rip these apart: > > > > KKD SYPR PER MOVI GPI SAH TUES FCN > > > > Hint: The C&H isn't the only chart formation out there, nor is it the one > > that necessarily is the best CANSLIM buy, particularly in this M... > > > > At 09:16 AM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: > > >Easy, Tim: > > > > > >While the M's away the CANSLIMMERS must play! > > > > > >Duke > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > >[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Tim Fisher > > >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:19 PM > > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > >Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > > > > >A stock 30% below its 52 wk high and with the 50dma under the 200 gets a > > > > > >10? Out of what, 100? Seriously, how is this a CANSLIM chart? > > > > > > > Tim Fisher > > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > > Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. > > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:38:32 -0700 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI So many breakouts have failed in the last 6 or 9 months that I avoided this one, although it looked pretty good. When is the last time any breakouts actually followed through? Until a see a few work, I'm staying out, buying on dips if anything, and that I do very sparingly. > Another c/h bites the dust. Feel like I was lured in then had the trap > shut. Since I got in early I had a small profit when I bailed out. > Proof it usually doesn't pay to chase a stock after the price exceeds > the buy point. Charley > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:26:06 -0800 From: Harvey Brion Subject: [CANSLIM] New DGO with Pricing (Ouch!) New version of DGO is now available at www.dailygraphs.com Annual Pricing: DGO $720 Custom Screens (with DGO) $249 Industry Groups (with DGO) $199 All the above $1000 No mention of discounts with the Daily Graphs print version. For details on pricing go to http://www.dailygraphs.com/pricing.asp?sp=1 - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 05:09:17 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Hi Bill, cash flow is measured on an annual basis. DGO shows earnings of 84 cents for 2001 and cash flow of only 80 cents. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: "William King" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:38 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool Tom, I'm sure I speak for all the CANSLIM newbies/lurkers in thanking you and the other contributors for the information and analysis you folks make available to us. This response to Tim's challenge was excellent. I'm even beginning to understand the thought process. The specifics expand on what 's provided in WON's books although I guess it's all available in AskIBD. Re you comment on FCN's cash flow being below earnings - is that 4th qtr earnings of $0.23 x 4 = $0.92 compared to cash flow of $0.80? I took the trial subscription to DGO. I agree,it certainly makes due diligence easier. Thanks, Bill King - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > OK, Tim, I waded thru the emails, and so far no one was willing to take up > the challenge, so I'll put on my negatively biased trifocals and see if I > can find fault with these: > > KKD - as the longer terms members know, I love (read am addicted to) their > hot glazed donuts right off the rack. But could never be convinced that a > valuation multiple in the very high double digits was good investing. Still > am not with trailing PE of 88 and projected PE of 62. Short term trend > downward, breaking 50DMA today. > > SYPR - gotta be careful here, as I have this small cap in my VR Fund where I > have a small profit, 12 month trend clearly up, sequential earnings growth > support the big annual earnings forecasts for this year and next, I don't > like the much slower growth in sales, debt is high (114%), ROE is low (9%), > management ownership very high (87%) which means they can do anything they > want without shareholder recourse, including selling big blocks of their > stock or taking the company private at virtually any price. > > PER - single digit sales growth, weak earnings forecast (9 & 18% this year > and next) > > MOVI - erratic chart, wouldn't get excited about it till it breaks 20.16 on > volume, I don't trust the forecasts on this one, mostly gut sense of what > "people" are doing in real world vs right after 9/11 > > GPI - 6% earnings growth this year (above company forecasts) and 17% next > year doesn't excite me > > SAH - my economics flavor kicks in here, I don't see car sales doing well > this year, so can't believe the 21% earnings forecast even with the Don > Massey acquisitions, there's not that much juice after recent acquisitions > to bolster essentially flat earnings and sales that much, IMO > > TUES - I'll try to be gentle, since you own this one, and I rarely spend > money so am a poor judge of consumer habits, management has 72% of the > float, and funds got 43% of what's left, that's hefty, earnings way > unpredictable, from several pennies for three qtrs to 63 cents, I wouldn't > know what to expect?, debt a shocking 549% and cash flow essentially flat > with earnings > > FCN - had an easy year for comparisons in 2001, but 2002 will be far more > difficult, funds own 47% and management only owns 15%, cash flow below > earnings > > Nothing motivated me, I am continuing to build my cash reserves until "M" > cleans up its act, > > Tom Worley > stkguru@bellsouth.net > AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Fisher" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:43 AM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > Forgive me if I totally disagree with you. There are still quite a few > practically perfect CANSLIM stocks out there to discuss, i.e. DFXI, without > bringing up these extremely sub-par candidates. I would not discourage > anyone from bringing them up for discussion, just that when their faults > are pointed out, that the advice offered be taken for what it is, namely > free. Take it or ignore it, but always remember, YGWYPF! IMNSHO. Want > something to do with your free time? Rip these apart: > > KKD SYPR PER MOVI GPI SAH TUES FCN > > Hint: The C&H isn't the only chart formation out there, nor is it the one > that necessarily is the best CANSLIM buy, particularly in this M... > > At 09:16 AM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >Easy, Tim: > > > >While the M's away the CANSLIMMERS must play! > > > >Duke > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > >[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Tim Fisher > >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:19 PM > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > >A stock 30% below its 52 wk high and with the 50dma under the 200 gets a > > > >10? Out of what, 100? Seriously, how is this a CANSLIM chart? > > > > Tim Fisher > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. > mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 22:59:20 +1200 From: Subject: DTMI - Stable Business Model in Today's Market 7854UWxE7-313wKru8297l20 - ------=_NextPart_000_00A1_70C84A7C.A3324C61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RFRNSSBSZWNpZXZlcyBTdHJvbmcgQnV5IGZyb20gQW5hbHN5dHMNCg0KSWYg eW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBpbiBlcnJvciBvciB3aXNoIHRvIHVu c3Vic2NyaWJlIGZyb20NCkludmVzdG9yLVJlc291cmNlLCBwbGVhc2UgZmlu ZCByZW1vdmUgaW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb25zIGF0IGJvdHRvbSBvZiBwYWdlLg0KDQoq KioqKioqKioqKioqDQpSRVNFQVJDSCBSRVBPUlQ6IERUT01JLCBJbmMuDQpS ZXNlYXJjaCBSZXBvcnQgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGZvciBEVE9NSSwgSW5jLg0KUGxl YXNlIHNlbmQgYW4gZW1haWwgdG8gRFRNSV9SZXNlYXJjaC1SZXBvcnRAZXhj aXRlLmNvbQ0Kd2l0aCBEVE1JIFJFUE9SVCBpbiB0aGUgc3ViamVjdCBsaW5l IHRvIHJlY2VpdmUgdGhlIGNvbXBsZXRlIHJlcG9ydC4NCm1haWx0bzpEVE1J X1Jlc2VhcmNoLVJlcG9ydEBleGNpdGUuY29tP3N1YmplY3Q9RFRNSVJFUE9S VA0KKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KDQpTeW1ib2wgT1RDQkI6IERUTUkNClJlY2Vu dCBQcmljZSAoMy8yNS8wMikgJDEuMDANCk1hcmtldCBDYXBpdGFsaXphdGlv biAkMTZNDQpTaGFyZXMgT3V0c3RhbmRpbmcgMTZNDQpGbG9hdCAyLjFNDQpE YWlseSBWb2x1bWUgIDI4Sw0KRGVsYXllZCBRdW90ZTogaHR0cDovL3F1b3Rl LnlhaG9vLmNvbS9xP3M9ZHRtaS5vYiZkPXYxDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19f Xw0KDQpISUdITElHSFRTDQoNCkRUT01JLCBJbmMuIChPVENCQjogRFRNSSkg IHNwZWNpYWxpemVzIGluIGlkZW50aWZ5aW5nLA0KcXVhbGlmeWluZyBhbmQg c2VsbGluZyAibWFya2V0IGludGVsbGlnZW5jZSIgdG8gYnVzaW5lc3MtdG8t YnVzaW5lc3MNCnByb3NwZWN0cyB1c2luZyBpdHMgYWR2YW5jZWQgcHJvcHJp ZXRhcnkgc29mdHdhcmUuIFRoZSBzb2Z0d2FyZQ0KY2FwdHVyZXMgYSBtdWx0 aXR1ZGUgb2YgYnVzaW5lc3MtdG8tYnVzaW5lc3MgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gb24N CnByb2R1Y3RzLCBjYXBhY2l0eSBhbmQgc3VwcGxpZXJzLiBUaGlzIHR1cm4t a2V5LCBwZXJtaXNzaW9uLWJhc2VkDQpwcm9ncmFtIHV0aWxpemVzIGEgZGF0 YWJhc2Ugb2Ygb3ZlciA2MDAsMDAwIGJ1c2luZXNzZXMgYW5kIDIyLDAwMA0K cHJvZHVjdHMgdG8gcHJvdmlkZSBjbGllbnRzIHdpdGggdGltZS1zZW5zaXRp dmUgZXNzZW50aWFsIG1hcmtldA0KaW50ZWxsaWdlbmNlLg0KDQpEVE1JJ3Mg cGF0ZW50LXBlbmRpbmcgc3lzdGVtIHF1aWNrbHkgaWRlbnRpZmllcyBuZXcg bWFya2V0cyBhbmQNCnByb3NwZWN0cyBmb3IgY2xpZW50cyBhbmQgY2FuIHBy b3ZpZGUgYSBzdGVhZHkgc3RyZWFtIG9mIGxlYWRzIHRvDQpjbGllbnQgc2Fs ZXMgZGVwYXJ0bWVudHMgd2l0aCBib3RoIGltbWVkaWF0ZSBhbmQgbG9uZy10 ZXJtIHNlbGxpbmcNCm9wcG9ydHVuaXRpZXMuIERUTUkncyBjbGllbnRzIGJl bmVmaXQgZnJvbSBhIGxvd2VyIGNvc3Qtb2Ytc2FsZXMgYW5kDQphIHN0ZWFk eSBzdHJlYW0gb2YgcHJvc3BlY3RzIHdoaWNoIGJlY29tZXMgdmVyeSB2YWx1 YWJsZSBpbiBhbiBlcmENCndoZXJlIGNvbXBhbmllcyBhcmUgd29ya2luZyBk aWxpZ2VudGx5IHRvIHJlZHVjZSBvcGVyYXRpbmcNCmV4cGVuZGl0dXJlcyB3 aGlsZSBncm93aW5nIHRoZWlyIGNvcmUgYnVzaW5lc3MuDQoNCkRUTUkncyBi dXNpbmVzcyBtb2RlbCBwcm92aWRlcyBmb3Igc2lnbmlmaWNhbnQgcmVjdXJy aW5nIG1vbnRobHkNCnJldmVudWVzIGJ5IGtlZXBpbmcgdGhlaXIgY2xpZW50 J3MgZGF0YWJhc2VzIHVwZGF0ZWQuIFR5cGljYWxseSwNCkRUTUkgZW50ZXJz IGEgY29udHJhY3QgdG8gcHJvdmlkZSB0aHJlZSBwcmUtZGV0ZXJtaW5lZCBj YXRlZ29yaWVzDQpvZiBxdWFsaWZpZWQgbGVhZHMgd2l0aCB3aGljaCBpdHMg Y2xpZW50cyBhcmUgaW50ZXJlc3RlZC4gVGhlIGNvbXBhbnkNCmdlbmVyYXRl cyBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIHJldmVudWUgdGhyb3VnaCBzZXJ2aWNlcyBzdWNoIGFz IHRyZW5kIGFuYWx5c2lzLA0KbWFya2V0IHN0dWRpZXMsIHJlcG9ydCBnZW5l cmF0aW9uLCBhbmQgaW50ZXJuZXQgc2l0ZSBwb3NpdGlvbmluZy4NCg0KU29t ZSBrZXkgcG9pbnRzIHRvIGNvbnNpZGVyOg0KDQoqIERUTUkgd2lsbCBiZSBh IGxlYWRpbmcgYWdncmVnYXRvciBhbmQgZGlzdHJpYnV0b3INCiAgb2YgbWFu dWZhY3R1cmluZyBkYXRhDQoNCiogRFRNSSBwcm9kdWN0cyBhcmUgdW5pcXVl IGluIHRoZSBpbmR1c3RyeSBhbmQNCiAgdW5wYXJhbGxlbGVkIGZvciBxdWFs aXR5DQoNCiogUmVjZW50bHkgY29tcGxldGVkIGEgbWFqb3IgcHVyY2hhc2Ug dGhhdCBoYXMgYXR0cmFjdGVkDQogIHRvcCBuZXcgbWFuYWdlbWVudCwgbmV3 IHN0cmF0ZWdpYyBwYXJ0bmVyc2hpcHMgYW5kIGENCiAgbW9yZSBhZ2dyZXNz aXZlIGJ1c2luZXNzIHBsYW4NCg0KKiBOZXcgYnVzaW5lc3MgbW9kZWwgZml0 cyBwZXJmZWN0bHkgaW4gdG9kYXkncw0KICBlY29ub21pYyBlbnZpcm9ubWVu dA0KDQoqIFRoZSBDb21wYW55J3MgdW5pcXVlIHByb2R1Y3RzIHBvc2l0aW9u IGl0IHRvIGdhaW4NCiAgc2lnbmlmaWNhbnQgbWFya2V0IHNoYXJlIGluIHRo aXMgcmFwaWRseSBncm93aW5nIHNlY3Rvcg0KDQoqIEJ1c2luZXNzIG1vZGVs IHByb3ZpZGVzIGZvciBzaWduaWZpY2FudCByZWN1cnJpbmcNCiAgbW9udGhs eSByZXZlbnVlcw0KDQoqIERUTUkncyBtYXJrZXQgc2hhcmUgaXMgdmFsdWVk IGF0IG92ZXIgJDQgQmlsbGlvbiBEb2xsYXJzDQoNCiogUGxhbnMgdG8gZXhw YW5kIGludG8gQXNpYS9QYWNpZmljIGFuZCBFdXJvcGVhbiBNYXJrZXRzDQoN CldlIGFyZSBpc3N1aW5nIGEgc3Ryb25nIGJ1eSByZWNvbW1lbmRhdGlvbiBv biBEVE1JIGFuZCBmZWVsIHRoZQ0Kc3RvY2sgY291bGQgYXBwcmVjaWF0ZSBj b25zaWRlcmFibHkgaW4gdGhlIG5lYXIgZnV0dXJlLCBkcml2aW5nIGZvcmNl cw0KYmVoaW5kIHRoaXMgbW92ZSB3aWxsIGJlIHNpZ25pZmljYW50bHkgaW5j cmVhc2luZyByZXZlbnVlcyB0aHJvdWdoDQpuZXcgY2xpZW50IGNvbnRyYWN0 cy4gQXMgRFRNSSBlbnRlcnMgaXRzIHJvbGwtb3V0IHBoYXNlLCB3ZSBleHBl Y3QNCm1hbnkgZXhjaXRpbmcgcHJlc3MgcmVsZWFzZXMgYW5kIG5ldyBidXNp bmVzcyBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnRzLg0KDQoqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQpSRVNFQVJD SCBSRVBPUlQ6IERUT01JLCBJbmMuDQpSZXNlYXJjaCBSZXBvcnQgYXZhaWxh YmxlIGZvciBEVE9NSSwgSW5jLg0KUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgYW4gZW1haWwgdG8g RFRNSV9SZXNlYXJjaC1SZXBvcnRAZXhjaXRlLmNvbQ0Kd2l0aCBEVE1JIFJF UE9SVCBpbiB0aGUgc3ViamVjdCBsaW5lIHRvIHJlY2VpdmUgdGhlIGNvbXBs ZXRlIHJlcG9ydC4NCm1haWx0bzpEVE1JX1Jlc2VhcmNoLVJlcG9ydEBleGNp dGUuY29tP3N1YmplY3Q9RFRNSVJFUE9SVA0KKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KDQoq IENvbnRhY3QgSW5mb3JtYXRpb246IEludmVzdG9yLVJlc291cmNlICA4NDMt MjE2LTc1MTgNCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCklNUE9SVEFOVCBESVNDTEFJTUVSLSBJbnZl c3Rvci1SZXNvdXJjZSBpcyBhbg0KaW5kZXBlbmRlbnQgZWxlY3Ryb25pYyBw dWJsaWNhdGlvbiBwcm92aWRpbmcgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gb24gc2VsZWN0ZWQN CnB1YmxpYyBjb21wYW5pZXMuSW52ZXN0b3ItUmVzb3VyY2UgaXMgbm90IGEg cmVnaXN0ZXJlZCBpbnZlc3RtZW50DQphZHZpc29yIG9yIGEgcmVnaXN0ZXJl ZCBzZWN1cml0aWVzIGJyb2tlciBkZWFsZXIuIFRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbg0K Y29udGFpbmVkIGluIG91ciBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbnMgYXJlIGNhcmVmdWxseSBj b21waWxlZCBieQ0KSW52ZXN0b3ItUmVzb3VyY2UgYmFzZWQgdXBvbiBzb3Vy Y2VzIHRoYXQgd2UgYmVsaWV2ZSB0byBiZSByZWxpYWJsZS4NCkludmVzdG9y LVJlc291cmNlLCBob3dldmVyLCBkb2VzIG5vdCBndWFyYW50ZWUgdGhlIGFj Y3VyYWN5IG9mIGFueQ0KaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gY29udGFpbmVkIGluIG91ciBw dWJsaWNhdGlvbnMuIFRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbg0KY29udGFpbmVkIHNob3Vs ZCBub3QgYmUgY29uc3RydWVkIGFzIGFuIG9mZmVyIHRvIHNlbGwsIG9yIGEN CnNvbGljaXRhdGlvbiB0byBidXksIGFueSBzZWN1cml0aWVzIHJlZmVycmVk IHRvIGhlcmVpbi4gRFRPTUksIEluYy4sDQpoYXMgYWdyZWVkIHRvIHBheSAx MjAsMDAwIHNoYXJlcyBvZiBmcmVlLXRyYWRpbmcgY29tcGFueSBzdG9jayBm b3INCkludmVzdG9yIFJlbGF0aW9ucyBhbmQgcmVzZWFyY2ggc2VydmljZXMg Zm9yIGEgcGVyaW9kIG9mIHNpeCBtb250aHMuDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX18N Cg0KT1BULU9VVCBJbnN0cnVjdGlvbnM6DQpUaGlzIG1haWxpbmcgaXMgYSB0 YXJnZXRlZCBtYWlsaW5nIGZvciBpbnZlc3RvcnMuDQpZb3UgaGF2ZSByZWNl aXZlZCB0aGlzIGFzIGEgcmVzdWx0IG9mIHlvdXIgZGVtb25zdHJhdGVkDQpp bnRlcmVzdCBpbiBpbnZlc3RtZW50cy4gSWYgeW91IHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8g YmUgcmVtb3ZlZCANCmZyb20gcmVjZWl2aW5nIGFueSAgYWRkaXRpb25hbCBp bnZlc3RtZW50IG9wcG9ydHVuaXRpZXMvb2ZmZXJzLA0Kc2ltcGx5IHNlbmQg YW4gZW1haWwgdG8gdGhlIGFkZHJlc3MgYmVsb3cgd2l0aCBPUFQtT1VUDQpp biB0aGUgc3ViamVjdCBsaW5lLiBZb3VyIGVtYWlsIGFkZHJlc3Mgd2lsbCBi ZSByZW1vdmVkIGltbWVkaWF0ZWx5Lg0KbWFpbHRvOnNwcmluZ2JvYXJkZXI4 NzVAeWFob28uY29tP3N1YmplY3Q9T1BULU9VVCpEVE1JDQoNCjI0ODRsY2RX MS0xNjRhaXZ2NDk1MWtiQVQ5LTI3MktWVGs4MTQ4aE50cDEtMTkzendEeTY4 NDRDQUNDNi01MTloY2lBOTYwbDY3DQo1NDU1UVhMSDktNjgxZllyRDQ3NTlO allZNC01NDRTd0lEODA5NkxzWWI0LTI5bDQzDQo= ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 06:40:45 -0500 From: "Dan Forant" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI Really, the facts speak for themselves. CANSLIM has not worked well in this type of market. Yet day after day I read of posters jumping into stocks fueled by other posts. If your smart you'll wait a few more months. The atmosphere of earnings, world events and Wall Street problems are all holding the big money back. I read where there is 3 trillion of investments missing in the market. Why do you think they are on the sidelines??? DanF - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Wahl" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:38 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI > So many breakouts have failed in the last 6 or 9 months that I avoided this one, > although it looked pretty good. When is the last time any breakouts actually > followed through? Until a see a few work, I'm staying out, buying on dips if > anything, and that I do very sparingly. > > > Another c/h bites the dust. Feel like I was lured in then had the trap > > shut. Since I got in early I had a small profit when I bailed out. > > Proof it usually doesn't pay to chase a stock after the price exceeds > > the buy point. Charley > > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 07:44:15 -0500 From: "Rob Miller" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] New DGO with Pricing (Ouch!) They can keep custom screen and industry groups. Although I find them occassionally useful, they aren't worth that much. Did anyone figure out how to register. I signed up for the beta during the period indicated, so I don't qualify. They want me to resubscribe. I just paid an annual subscription a couple months ago. I'm not giving them more money. Rob - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harvey Brion" To: Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:26 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] New DGO with Pricing (Ouch!) > New version of DGO is now available at www.dailygraphs.com > > Annual Pricing: > DGO $720 > Custom Screens (with DGO) $249 > Industry Groups (with DGO) $199 > All the above $1000 > > No mention of discounts with the Daily Graphs print version. > > For details on pricing go to http://www.dailygraphs.com/pricing.asp?sp=1 > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 07:44:55 -0500 From: "Robert McGill" Subject: [CANSLIM] water utilities-ot This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DBAC.9D080190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable any thoughts on this sector? Anyone know any names so I can look at = some charts? Bob - ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DBAC.9D080190 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

any thoughts on this sector? = Anyone know any=20 names so I can look at some charts? Bob

- ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DBAC.9D080190-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2269 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.