From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2275 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, April 5 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2275 In this issue: [CANSLIM] Low handle Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Re: [CANSLIM] Low handle Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:55:28 EST From: Davellil5@aol.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Low handle A first for me. First time I've run into a good CANSLIM candidate with a handle 33% below the high point on the left side of the cup or W. And first time I'm asking for any comments from the group as a whole. The stock in question started a W-formation last August. This March, it began a handle. The high point of the left wall of the W was around 60. The pivot of the handle is about 40. The stock just broke out of the handle on a strong upgap on 80% above average volume. Obviously, the stock is not within WON's rule against buying 15% below the 52-week high. How far below the start of the cup or W can a handle form for a stock still to be regarded as a timely buy? Is 33% too far -- if a stock really shines on all other CANSLIM criteria? Incidentally, IBD ranks the stock at 79 99 52 C- A B. The 79 RS reflects that 33% gap still remaining between start of base formation and current price level. I discount the C- Industry ranking because the Company is in a niche business. In this market, I've observed that stocks that rise tend to be of Companies with niche-manship. They tend to march to their own drummer. They buck their industry groups. So -- any advice, based on what I've disclosed here? Regards, Dave - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:59:30 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C1DCBA.DF2A3E80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageFred, Discussions such as these you might call an "itch", others might = consider it "learning." If I'm right, you have been advising buys and = sells for your clients during the last 2 years, despite your musings = that one should do things other than invest.=20 While the market has not been conducive to CANSLIM stocks in the way = that it is in a secular Bull, I don't see how you can tell people that = going long with high quality candidates when the market is in an uptrend = is unwise. Sorry, but there's been lots of money to be made both long = and short over the last couple of years, and frankly, if we are moving = into a 10 or 15 year period of sideways market, then the investor has to = know how to move in and out of the market with the best of candidates as = it moves in a particular direction. I don't think anything in the = previous discussion was in any way trying to "disprove the CANSLIM = criteria." Katherine - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Fred Richards=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Katherine and all, I find all this talk about the lack of CANSLIM quality stocks rather = amusing. There are some markets (and I believe that since March 2000 we = are in one of those) where unless you want to take on the risks of = shorting the market, it is both wiser and better for one's pocketbook to = simply move to the sidelines, take up golf, knitting or seeing the = grandchildren, than attempt to disprove the CANSLIM criteria. Some of the readers on this forum will try to scratch their itch to = trade (so to speak) and then wonder why nothing seems to make sense. = Its the market that doesn't make sense! FFR -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:19 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Hi Duke, Didn't you receive the special = double-secret-forward-looking-X-Ray-sunglasses with your copy of HTMMIS? Thanks for pointing out the typo, I meant 9/28/01! Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Duke Miller=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:06 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Katherine, You are so good...however, since it's almost the weekend, = rhetorically speaking, how is it you know that September 28, 2002 is = going to be an FTD? Enjoy your weekend and, as you usually say, happy hunting! Duke=20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:07 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Hi John, I can't remember a specific reference source (jans seems to be = good at that), but I've always been taught that part of reading the = health of the market from a CANSLIM point of view is not only to read = the index averages, but also to follow the strength, follow through and = number of recent CANSLIM breakouts. I don't know that there's a specific = number quoted, but since the last follow-through day, we've had a paltry = few high quality stocks breaking out, many have failed and/or kissed = their pivots repeatedly, and most of the CANSLIM universe is still = building bases. I think the difference between what I've been seeing = lately and what we saw over the last couple of years is that, even when = these breakouts "fail" they seem to be falling back close to the pivot = and building a new (shorter) consolidation, rather than just completely = tanking and falling into oblivion. In my own watchlist, the number of possible candidates has = stayed steady since the previous FTD* 9/28/02, rather than consistently = diminishing in number as it had been doing for a couple of years. That = leaves me encouraged, though being patient and persistent in following = these stocks while they build a base is testing me in a *big* way!!! Katherine *FTD =3D O'Neil Follow Through Day, for the newbies ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:44 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M I haven't read HTMMIS in a long time (still waiting for the = next edition), but I seem to recall a guideline that says that if you stop = out on 3 good CANSLIM stocks, it's an indication that you should take a = break from the market for a few weeks. Does anyone else remember that, or am I thinking of a = different source other that HTMMIS? John C. - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C1DCBA.DF2A3E80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Fred,
 
Discussions such as these you might call an "itch", others might = consider=20 it "learning." If I'm right, you have been advising buys and sells for = your=20 clients during the last 2 years, despite your musings that one should do = things=20 other than invest.
 
While the market has not been conducive to CANSLIM stocks in the = way that=20 it is in a secular Bull, I don't see how you can tell people that going = long=20 with high quality candidates when the market is in an uptrend is unwise. = Sorry,=20 but there's been lots of money to be made both long and short over the = last=20 couple of years, and frankly, if we are moving into a 10 or 15 year = period of=20 sideways market, then the investor has to know how to move in and out of = the=20 market with the best of candidates as it moves in a particular = direction. I=20 don't think anything in the previous discussion was in any way trying to = "disprove the CANSLIM criteria."
 
Katherine
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Fred = Richards
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 = 3:55=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS = and M

Katherine and all,
 
I=20 find all this talk about the lack of CANSLIM quality stocks rather=20 amusing.  There are some markets (and I believe that since March = 2000 we=20 are in one of those) where unless you want to take on the risks of = shorting=20 the market, it is both wiser and better for one's pocketbook to simply = move to=20 the sidelines, take up golf, knitting or seeing the grandchildren, = than=20 attempt to disprove the CANSLIM criteria.
 
Some=20 of the readers on this forum will try to scratch their itch to trade = (so to=20 speak) and then wonder why nothing seems to make sense.  Its the = market=20 that doesn't make sense!
 
FFR
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of = Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:19 PM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS = and=20 M

Hi Duke,
 
Didn't you receive the special=20 double-secret-forward-looking-X-Ray-sunglasses with your copy of=20 HTMMIS?
 
Thanks for pointing out the typo, I meant 9/28/01!
 
Katherine
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Duke Miller
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Friday, April 05, = 2002 2:06=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = HTMMIS and=20 M

Katherine,
 
You are = so=20 good...however, since it's almost the weekend, rhetorically = speaking,=20 how is it you know that September 28, 2002 is going to be an=20 FTD?
 
Enjoy = your weekend=20 and, as you usually say, happy hunting!
 
Duke 
-----Original = Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of = Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:07 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = HTMMIS and=20 M

Hi John,
 
I can't remember a specific reference source (jans seems to = be good=20 at that), but I've always been taught that part of reading the = health of=20 the market from a CANSLIM point of view is not only to read the = index=20 averages, but also to follow the strength, follow through and=20 number of recent CANSLIM breakouts. I don't know that = there's a=20 specific number quoted, but since the last follow-through day, = we've had=20 a paltry few high quality stocks breaking out, many have failed = and/or=20 kissed their pivots repeatedly, and most of the CANSLIM universe = is=20 still building bases. I think the difference between what I've = been=20 seeing lately and what we saw over the last couple of years is = that,=20 even when these breakouts "fail" they seem to be falling back = close to=20 the pivot and building a new (shorter) consolidation, rather = than just=20 completely tanking and falling into oblivion.
 
In my own watchlist, the number of possible candidates has = stayed=20 steady since the previous FTD* 9/28/02, rather than = consistently=20 diminishing in number as it had been doing for a couple of = years. That=20 leaves me encouraged, though being patient and persistent in = following=20 these stocks while they build a base is testing me in a *big*=20 way!!!
 
Katherine
 
*FTD =3D O'Neil Follow Through Day, for the newbies
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Cefaloni, John L Jr. = [AMSTA-AR-WEA]
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Friday, April 05, = 2002 6:44=20 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = HTMMIS and=20 M

I haven't read HTMMIS in a long time (still = waiting for=20 the next edition),
but I seem to recall a guideline that = says that=20 if you stop out on 3 good
CANSLIM stocks, it's an = indication that=20 you should take a break from the
market for a few=20 weeks.

Does anyone else remember that, or am I thinking = of a=20 different source other
that HTMMIS?

John=20 C.


-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= =20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe=20 canslim".  Do not use quotes in your=20 = email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C1DCBA.DF2A3E80-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 17:11:10 EST From: Vanchee1@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Low handle - --part1_195.4db5e5d.29df7afe_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Why IM even replying, I don't know. No stock mentioned, then no comments. - --part1_195.4db5e5d.29df7afe_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Why IM even replying, I don't know. No stock mentioned, then no comments. - --part1_195.4db5e5d.29df7afe_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 17:15:05 EST From: Chazmoore@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M - --part1_55.2534179f.29df7be9_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't know about the rest of you folks, but when Katherine speaks, I listen. Charley - --part1_55.2534179f.29df7be9_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't know about the rest of you folks, but when Katherine speaks, I listen. Charley - --part1_55.2534179f.29df7be9_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:14:55 -0600 From: "Hill, Ernie" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1DCEF.50CF9380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Katherine, You hit on an excellent point when you said "when the market is in an uptrend". I believe that for the time being this is how to make money with high quality candidates. You need to take advantage of the uptrends when they present themselves and settle for 10-30% gains. Until we see the "secular Bull" return, finding stocks that double after breaking out of bases will be exceptionally rare. This places even more importance in reading the market because uptrends will likely be brief, lasting only weeks to a couple of months at best until the economy really gets going. E - -----Original Message----- From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:00 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Fred, Discussions such as these you might call an "itch", others might consider it "learning." If I'm right, you have been advising buys and sells for your clients during the last 2 years, despite your musings that one should do things other than invest. While the market has not been conducive to CANSLIM stocks in the way that it is in a secular Bull, I don't see how you can tell people that going long with high quality candidates when the market is in an uptrend is unwise. Sorry, but there's been lots of money to be made both long and short over the last couple of years, and frankly, if we are moving into a 10 or 15 year period of sideways market, then the investor has to know how to move in and out of the market with the best of candidates as it moves in a particular direction. I don't think anything in the previous discussion was in any way trying to "disprove the CANSLIM criteria." Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: Fred Richards To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Katherine and all, I find all this talk about the lack of CANSLIM quality stocks rather amusing. There are some markets (and I believe that since March 2000 we are in one of those) where unless you want to take on the risks of shorting the market, it is both wiser and better for one's pocketbook to simply move to the sidelines, take up golf, knitting or seeing the grandchildren, than attempt to disprove the CANSLIM criteria. Some of the readers on this forum will try to scratch their itch to trade (so to speak) and then wonder why nothing seems to make sense. Its the market that doesn't make sense! FFR - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:19 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Hi Duke, Didn't you receive the special double-secret-forward-looking-X-Ray-sunglasses with your copy of HTMMIS? Thanks for pointing out the typo, I meant 9/28/01! Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: Duke Miller To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:06 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Katherine, You are so good...however, since it's almost the weekend, rhetorically speaking, how is it you know that September 28, 2002 is going to be an FTD? Enjoy your weekend and, as you usually say, happy hunting! Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:07 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M Hi John, I can't remember a specific reference source (jans seems to be good at that), but I've always been taught that part of reading the health of the market from a CANSLIM point of view is not only to read the index averages, but also to follow the strength, follow through and number of recent CANSLIM breakouts. I don't know that there's a specific number quoted, but since the last follow-through day, we've had a paltry few high quality stocks breaking out, many have failed and/or kissed their pivots repeatedly, and most of the CANSLIM universe is still building bases. I think the difference between what I've been seeing lately and what we saw over the last couple of years is that, even when these breakouts "fail" they seem to be falling back close to the pivot and building a new (shorter) consolidation, rather than just completely tanking and falling into oblivion. In my own watchlist, the number of possible candidates has stayed steady since the previous FTD* 9/28/02, rather than consistently diminishing in number as it had been doing for a couple of years. That leaves me encouraged, though being patient and persistent in following these stocks while they build a base is testing me in a *big* way!!! Katherine *FTD = O'Neil Follow Through Day, for the newbies - ----- Original Message ----- From: Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA] To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:44 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M I haven't read HTMMIS in a long time (still waiting for the next edition), but I seem to recall a guideline that says that if you stop out on 3 good CANSLIM stocks, it's an indication that you should take a break from the market for a few weeks. Does anyone else remember that, or am I thinking of a different source other that HTMMIS? John C. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email " majordomo@xmission.com " - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. ****************************************************************** - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1DCEF.50CF9380 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Kath= erine,

 

You = hit on an excellent point when you said “when the market is in an uptrend”. I believe tha= t for the time being this is how to make money with high quality candidates. You need= to take advantage of the uptrends when they present themselves and settle for 10-30% gains. Until we see the “secular Bull” return, finding s= tocks that double after breaking out of bases will be exceptionally rare.

<= span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'> 

<= span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'>This places even more importance in r= eading the market because uptrends will likely be brief, lasting only weeks to a couple of months at best until the economy really gets going.=

<= span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'> 

<= span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'>E

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002= 4:00 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.c= om
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMI= S and M

 <= /o:p>

Fred,=

 = ;

Discu= ssions such as these you might call an "itch", others might consider it "learning." If I'm right, you have been advising buys and sells f= or your clients during the last 2 years, despite your musings that one should = do things other than invest.

 = ;

While= the market has not been conducive to CANSLIM stocks in the way that it is in a secular Bull, I don't see how you can tell people that going long with high quality candidates when the market is in an uptrend is unwise. Sorry, but there's been lots of money to be made both long and short over the last cou= ple of years, and frankly, if we are moving into a 10 or 15 year period of side= ways market, then the investor has to know how to move in and out of the market = with the best of candidates as it moves in a particular direction. I don't think anything in the previous discussion was in any way trying to "disprove= the CANSLIM criteria."

 = ;

Kathe= rine

 = ;

 = ;

----- Original Message -----

From: Fred Richards <= /span>

To: canslim@lists.xmission.com <= /font>

Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:55 PM

Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M

 

Katherine and all,

 

I find all this talk about the lack of CANSLIM quality stocks rather amusing.  There are some markets (and I believe that since March 2000 we are in one of those) where unless you want to take on the risks of shorting the market, it is both wiser and better for one's pocketbook to si= mply move to the sidelines, take up golf, knitting or seeing the grandchildren, = than attempt to disprove the CANSLIM criteria.=

 

Some of the readers on this forum will try to scratch their itc= h to trade (so to speak) and then wonder why nothing seems to make sense.  = Its the market that doesn't make sense!

 

FFR

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]<= b>On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002= 2:19 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.c= om
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMI= S and M

Hi Du= ke,

 = ;

Didn'= t you receive the special double-secret-forward-looking-X-Ray-sunglasses with your copy of HTMMIS?

 = ;

Thank= s for pointing out the typo, I meant 9/28/01!

 = ;

Kathe= rine

----- Original Message -----

To: canslim@lists.xmission.com <= /font>

Sent: Friday, April 05,= 2002 2:06 PM

Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M

 

Katherine,

 = ;

You are so good...however, since it's almost the weekend, rhetorically speakin= g, how is it you know that September 28, 2002 is going to be an FTD?

 = ;

Enjoy your weekend and, as you usually say, happy hunting!

 = ;

Duke 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmissi= on.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002= 8:07 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.c= om
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HTMMI= S and M

Hi Jo= hn,

 = ;

I can= 't remember a specific reference source (jans seems to be good at that), but I= 've always been taught that part of reading the health of the market from a CAN= SLIM point of view is not only to read the index averages, but also to follow the strength, follow through and number of recent CANSLIM breakouts. I don= 't know that there's a specific number quoted, but since the last follow-throu= gh day, we've had a paltry few high quality stocks breaking out, many have fai= led and/or kissed their pivots repeatedly, and most of the CANSLIM universe is still building bases. I think the difference between what I've been seeing lately and what we saw over the last couple of years is that, even when the= se breakouts "fail" they seem to be falling back close to the pivot = and building a new (shorter) consolidation, rather than just completely tanking= and falling into oblivion.

 = ;

In my= own watchlist, the number of possible candidates has stayed steady since the previous FTD* 9/28/02, rather than consistently diminishing in number = as it had been doing for a couple of years. That leaves me encouraged, though being patient and persistent in following these stocks while they build a b= ase is testing me in a *big* way!!!

 = ;

Kathe= rine

 = ;

*FTD = =3D O'Neil Follow Through Day, for the newbies

----- Original Message -----

To: canslim@lists.xmission.com <= /font>

Sent: Friday, April 05,= 2002 6:44 AM

Subject: [CANSLIM] HTMMIS and M

 

I hav= en't read HTMMIS in a long time (still waiting for the next edition),
but I seem to recall a guideline that says that if you stop out on 3 good CANSLIM stocks, it's an indication that you should take a break from the
market for a few weeks.

Does anyone else remember that, or am I thinking of a different source othe= r
that HTMMIS?

John C.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.



******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
 - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1DCEF.50CF9380-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2275 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.