From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2317 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Tuesday, April 16 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2317 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] [CANSLIM] trend change for M [CANSLIM] Todays' rally [CANSLIM] Current Holdings RE: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings Re: [CANSLIM] Validity of Earnings Reports Re: [CANSLIM] trend change for M Re: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings EMBX (was Re: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:55:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Yang Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] As a private investor, I would not feel needed to have DGO for my stock screening. David Ryan still personally screen the printout Daily Graphs weekly. I have found much more market info during such screenings. Certainly, I have done screenings differently at Yahoo!Finance by pasting all stock symbols from my files. I think understanding the market trend is more important and profitable than screening with DGO. Such discusion certainly benifits all member. simoninvestments.net Simon - --- Tom Worley wrote: > Bill, I have been using DGO since its original beta > testing some years ago. > My biggest complaint was that there was no screening > capability (even if you > downloaded the index to the books into Excel, you > still only were getting > the 2200 or so stocks in the books, not the 8500 or > so publicly traded). > > I was very excited when they finally introduced the > Custom Screens, altho > frankly time limitations made it difficult for me to > work with them to the > extent I wanted. I did get several screens set up, > which I checked > religiously every day for the past five months or > so. But I found that my > style and application of CANSLIM gave me far more > candidates by using CBS > Marketwatch's free screen, than I ever got from DGO. > If I was offered the > Custom Screens, and the Industry Performance, for > $25 or so, then I would > take it. But for me, it's not worth what they are > charging. > > I simply found the screens too complicated, too > often resulting in no stocks > being found. Then I had to do analysis of stocks > that should have showed up, > to figure out which criteria kicked them out, and by > how much. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@bellsouth.net > AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William King" > To: > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 9:08 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] > > > As a new member of the list and relatively new to > CANSLIM, I'm interested in > anything that will make me a better stock picker. > I've already learned that > it isn't all in WON's books so I appreciate almost > all of the dialogue. > > I'm particularly interested in approaches, > software, web sites, etc. that > would make the search for CANSLIM stocks more > effective. For example, I > signed up for DGO too late to use the beta site and > note that DGO is > offering a discounted price to current subscribers > for the two new > elements "custom screening" and "industry groups". > Would like inputs from > those of you that used the beta site on whether they > worthwhile as compared > to VectorVest etc. > > Thanks, > Bill King > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Wahl" > To: > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 6:42 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] > > > > The simplest thing is to stick to CANSLIM stocks > when discussing stocks, > also fine > > is CANSLIM methodology, which probably comes up as > a topic more than > actual > > stocks. > > > > Things to avoid posting about are penny type > stocks, value plays, > cyclicals, precious > > metals, etc. > > > > Peripheral stuff that I don't think people mind > are suggestions on web > sites and links > > to the occasional article, discussions of software > (vector vest, quotes > plus and > > telechart 2000 come up from time to time), and > discussions of brokers. > > > > On 14 Apr 2002 at 13:14, Ira Post wrote: > > > > > Maybe we can agree on some guidelines here. Can > someone with more > > > experience in the group suggest something that > will be reasonable for > > > everyone? > > > > > > Ira > > > > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your > email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your > email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:47:44 -0500 From: "Hill, Ernie" Subject: [CANSLIM] trend change for M This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E5A1.1B0A9BE0 Content-Type: text/plain The strength of today's move in the market confirms that yesterday was the day in which the market made the low I was anticipating. While there is still a small chance that the market could take out the low of 1099.52 on the S&P either later this week or early next week it is very unlikely. This low came two days earlier than my model had predicted and at a price level some 30 S&P points higher than predicted. This is good news, because it indicates underlying strength in the market. This lends more evidence to the case for the new upswing in the market to take us to new highs for the year. The dominate trend for the next four to six weeks is up. Should be good times for CANSLIMers. E ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. ****************************************************************** - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E5A1.1B0A9BE0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The strength of today's move in the market confirms that yesterday was the day in which the market made the low I was anticipating. While there is still a small chance that the market could take out the low = of 1099.52 on the S&P either later this week or early next week it is very unlikely.

 

This low came two days earlier than my model had predicted and at a price level some 30 S&P points higher than predicted. This is good news, because it indicates underlying strength in the market. This lends more evi= dence to the case for the new upswing in the market to take us to new highs for t= he year.

 

The dominate trend for the next four to six weeks is up. Should be = good times for CANSLIMers.

 

E

 



******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
 - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E5A1.1B0A9BE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:42:23 -0400 From: "J. Lobatto" Subject: [CANSLIM] Todays' rally This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_03FD_01C1E587.3630D480 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just spent some time looking over lists of stocks that moved up today on = high volume relative to average trading volume, and there are very few = high RS/EPS stocks on the lists. In other words, today seems to be more = of a laggard rally than a leader's rally. Any significance to this? Jon - ------=_NextPart_000_03FD_01C1E587.3630D480 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just spent some time looking over lists = of stocks=20 that moved up today on high volume relative to average trading volume, = and there=20 are very few high RS/EPS stocks on the lists. In other words, today = seems=20 to be more of a laggard rally than a leader's rally. Any significance to = this?
 
Jon
- ------=_NextPart_000_03FD_01C1E587.3630D480-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 21:14:34 EDT From: Vanchee1@aol.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings - --part1_12d.fc509a2.29ee267a_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well, gang, periodically I like to post my current holdings for the group to see what stocks this one investor likes. I am NOT recommending anyone to buy any of these stocks as we all have our own criteria. I just like to share what I call my finds with the group in hopes others will share theirs. This allows us all to find the best of the best. I do realize that 95% of the readers will not share their own list, for some reason they feel its their list, they did the research and why should they share. But IM in this to make money and work as a team. GISX 98/95 ABB ATPX 84/99 AAA FDP 81/96 CBA MTEC 80/98 CAA NBSC 80/97 A DLI 80/94 AA PRX 80/22 EBD JJSF 94/96 BCB WAITING FOR A PULLBACK TO RE-ENTER Chris - --part1_12d.fc509a2.29ee267a_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well, gang, periodically I like to post my current holdings for the group to see what stocks this one investor likes. I am NOT recommending anyone to buy any of these stocks as we all have our own criteria. I just like to share what I call my finds with the group in hopes others will share theirs. This allows us all to find the best of the best. I do realize that 95% of the readers will not share their own list, for some reason they feel its their list, they did the research and why should they share. But IM in this to make money and work as a team.

GISX 98/95 ABB
ATPX 84/99 AAA
FDP 81/96 CBA
MTEC 80/98 CAA
NBSC 80/97 A
DLI 80/94 AA
PRX 80/22 EBD
JJSF 94/96 BCB WAITING FOR A PULLBACK TO RE-ENTER

Chris - --part1_12d.fc509a2.29ee267a_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:59:43 -0500 From: "jhs" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C1E4C0.7782D040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey...I don't mind sharing one of mine. Bought EMBX fairly recently and it is having a nice run. While perhaps not fitting all the CANSLIM criteria, I do like the unique product. Mass inoculation of chicken eggs which avoids the need to innoculate the live chicks. Hmmm....what's for dinner? Jack Spear jhs@chorus.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Vanchee1@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:15 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings Well, gang, periodically I like to post my current holdings for the group to see what stocks this one investor likes. I am NOT recommending anyone to buy any of these stocks as we all have our own criteria. I just like to share what I call my finds with the group in hopes others will share theirs. This allows us all to find the best of the best. I do realize that 95% of the readers will not share their own list, for some reason they feel its their list, they did the research and why should they share. But IM in this to make money and work as a team. GISX 98/95 ABB ATPX 84/99 AAA FDP 81/96 CBA MTEC 80/98 CAA NBSC 80/97 A DLI 80/94 AA PRX 80/22 EBD JJSF 94/96 BCB WAITING FOR A PULLBACK TO RE-ENTER Chris - ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C1E4C0.7782D040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey...I don't mind sharing one of mine.  Bought EMBX = fairly recently=20 and it is having a nice run.  While perhaps not fitting all the = CANSLIM=20 criteria, I do like the unique product.  Mass inoculation of = chicken eggs=20 which avoids the need to innoculate the live chicks.  =
Hmmm....what's for dinner?
 
 
Jack Spear
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 Vanchee1@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:15 = PM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Current=20 Holdings

Well, gang, = periodically I=20 like to post my current holdings for the group to see what stocks this = one=20 investor likes. I am NOT recommending anyone to buy any of these = stocks as we=20 all have our own criteria. I just like to share what I call my finds = with the=20 group in hopes others will share theirs. This allows us all to find = the best=20 of the best. I do realize that 95% of the readers will not share their = own=20 list, for some reason they feel its their list, they did the research = and why=20 should they share. But IM in this to make money and work as a=20 team.

GISX 98/95 ABB
ATPX 84/99 AAA
FDP 81/96 = CBA
MTEC=20 80/98 CAA
NBSC 80/97 A
DLI 80/94 AA
PRX 80/22 EBD
JJSF = 94/96 BCB=20 WAITING FOR A PULLBACK TO RE-ENTER

Chris=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C1E4C0.7782D040-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:17:35 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Validity of Earnings Reports I am finally home, so will jump in. This is simply a personal quirk, even more a comfort factor, of mine. Since I only deal with small stocks, consistency is more important to me than a well established retailer, or clothing manufacturer, or other type company that traditionally has seasonal swings in earnings and sales. Since I don't like these industries anyway, I am not losing out on anything by excluding seasonal companies. But I do want to be able to establish my own mental expectations of upcoming revenues and earnings, and this is much easier to do with a company growing sequentially. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harvey Brion" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Validity of Earnings Reports Don't want to speak for Tom, Ian. I think the year-over-year comparison is still quite valid. However, sequential growth suggests a business that does not have much seasonality associated with it, or a company that is growing so fast that the seasonality is not yet a dominant factor. -Harvey Ian wrote: > "I preferred stocks showing consistent top and bottom line growth both > sequentially and year to year" Tom: Isn't the 'requirement' for > sequential growth a recent artifact of the tech bubble? It seems to me > that both CANSLIM and growth investing had always allowed for business > seasonality - as long as the y-o-y numbers were solidly up for each > season, it was still considered a growth stock that could command a > premium valuation. Do you think this has changed? Do you think that > the 'blessed' stocks now demand sequential growth too? Thanks, Ian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tom Worley > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 6:11 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Validity of Earnings Reports > Ira, I don't think you can protect yourself from a company > that is deliberately falsifying their financials, or using > creative accounting to cover up real issues. you would have > to not only have an accounting degree, but go in and do an > independent audit, which is not practical. Best you can do > is look for consistency (and inconsistencies) in the 10Q and > 10K reports. Read Management's discussion. Question or dig > deeper into anything that doesn't make logical sense. Look > for any changes in accounting procedures from prior > periods. Even before Enron, I preferred stocks showing > consistent top and bottom line growth both sequentially and > year to year. Now, that is even more important to me. If > they are fudging, at least they are doing it > consistently. Tom Worley > stkguru@bellsouth.net > AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ira Post > To: canslim@lists.xmission.comSent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 > 9:06 PMSubject: [CANSLIM] Validity of Earnings Reports > This has become a huge issue in the last year. I'm > bringing it up to this list because earnings growth is such > an important part of CANSLIM. What do you do to protect > yourselves from companies that fudge their real earnings? > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:54:06 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] trend change for M This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_01FB_01C1E5AA.6066DEC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ernie, Due to leaving work so late, I have not started looking at most charts = yet. But did check my personal investing, had 7 of 8 stocks up for the = day, two up nearly 20%, another up almost 10%, and a fourth up almost = 5%. Overall, my IRA gained 5.2% for the day, and my margin acct 4.4%. = Almost every stock I own was up on heavy volume. Saw similar patterns in = my VR Fund, which currently has 33 stocks and gained 3.47%, far = outdistancing the Russell 2000 and every other index than the Naz, which = narrowly beat me. With my fund now an Information Technology sector fund, with 75% = invested there, I was pleased to see some of the strength in technology = despite all the doom and gloom virtually everywhere I turn regarding = technology as an investment, including here in this group. While today's volume was not all I expected, most major indexes did both = beat yesterday's volume, as well as beat their daily average. So looks = to me like we should be counting the days for a follow thru day (FTD). I = was surprised to see so little posting on "M" and FTD. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Hill, Ernie=20 To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'=20 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:47 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] trend change for M The strength of today's move in the market confirms that yesterday was = the day in which the market made the low I was anticipating. While there = is still a small chance that the market could take out the low of = 1099.52 on the S&P either later this week or early next week it is very = unlikely. =20 This low came two days earlier than my model had predicted and at a = price level some 30 S&P points higher than predicted. This is good news, = because it indicates underlying strength in the market. This lends more = evidence to the case for the new upswing in the market to take us to new = highs for the year. =20 The dominate trend for the next four to six weeks is up. Should be good = times for CANSLIMers. =20 E =20 ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso=20 Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the=20 use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.=20 If you have received this email in error please notify the=20 sender. ****************************************************************** - ------=_NextPart_000_01FB_01C1E5AA.6066DEC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ernie,
 
Due to leaving work so late, I have not started = looking at=20 most charts yet. But did check my personal investing, had 7 of 8 stocks = up for=20 the day, two up nearly 20%, another up almost 10%, and a fourth up = almost 5%.=20 Overall, my IRA gained 5.2% for the day, and my margin acct 4.4%. Almost = every=20 stock I own was up on heavy volume. Saw similar patterns in my VR Fund, = which=20 currently has 33 stocks and gained 3.47%, far outdistancing the Russell = 2000 and=20 every other index than the Naz, which narrowly beat me.
 
With my fund now an Information Technology = sector fund,=20 with 75% invested there, I was pleased to see some of the strength in = technology=20 despite all the doom and gloom virtually everywhere I turn regarding = technology=20 as an investment, including here in this group.
 
While today's volume was not all I expected, = most major=20 indexes did both beat yesterday's volume, as well as beat their daily = average.=20 So looks to me like we should be counting the days for a follow thru day = (FTD).=20 I was surprised to see so little posting on "M" and FTD.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Hill, Ernie=20
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:47 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] trend change for M

The strength of today's move in the market = confirms that=20 yesterday was the day in which the market made the low I was = anticipating. While=20 there is still a small chance that the market could take out the low of = 1099.52=20 on the S&P either later this week or early next week it is very=20 unlikely.

 

This low came two days earlier than my model = had=20 predicted and at a price level some 30 S&P points higher than = predicted.=20 This is good news, because it indicates underlying strength in the = market. This=20 lends more evidence to the case for the new upswing in the market to = take us to=20 new highs for the year.

 

The dominate trend for the next four to six = weeks is up.=20 Should be good times for CANSLIMers.

 

E

 



********************************************************= **********
This=20 email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation = are=20 confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or = entity to=20 whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error = please=20 notify the=20
sender.
**********************************************************= ********
 - ------=_NextPart_000_01FB_01C1E5AA.6066DEC0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 01:11:56 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_026A_01C1E5AC.DDFC2730 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry, I remain part of that 95%, it's not a matter of proprietary info, = it's a matter of my style of CANSLIM simply not being correct for most = people here. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Vanchee1@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:14 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings Well, gang, periodically I like to post my current holdings for the = group to see what stocks this one investor likes. I am NOT recommending = anyone to buy any of these stocks as we all have our own criteria. I = just like to share what I call my finds with the group in hopes others = will share theirs. This allows us all to find the best of the best. I do = realize that 95% of the readers will not share their own list, for some = reason they feel its their list, they did the research and why should = they share. But IM in this to make money and work as a team. GISX 98/95 ABB ATPX 84/99 AAA FDP 81/96 CBA MTEC 80/98 CAA NBSC 80/97 A DLI 80/94 AA PRX 80/22 EBD JJSF 94/96 BCB WAITING FOR A PULLBACK TO RE-ENTER Chris=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_026A_01C1E5AC.DDFC2730 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry, I remain part of that 95%, it's not a = matter of=20 proprietary info, it's a matter of my style of CANSLIM simply not being = correct=20 for most people here.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Vanchee1@aol.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:14 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings

Well, gang, periodically I like to post my = current=20 holdings for the group to see what stocks this one investor likes. I am = NOT=20 recommending anyone to buy any of these stocks as we all have our own = criteria.=20 I just like to share what I call my finds with the group in hopes others = will=20 share theirs. This allows us all to find the best of the best. I do = realize that=20 95% of the readers will not share their own list, for some reason they = feel its=20 their list, they did the research and why should they share. But IM in = this to=20 make money and work as a team.

GISX 98/95 ABB
ATPX 84/99 = AAA
FDP=20 81/96 CBA
MTEC 80/98 CAA
NBSC 80/97 A
DLI 80/94 AA
PRX 80/22 = EBD
JJSF 94/96 BCB WAITING FOR A PULLBACK TO = RE-ENTER

Chris=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_026A_01C1E5AC.DDFC2730-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 01:17:04 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: EMBX (was Re: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0276_01C1E5AD.95B2A3E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable too far extended for interest now, funds have 26% while management only = has 11%, repurchasing shares which may be part of why the price is going = higher, but my biggest criticism is the 5% earnings growth forecast both = this year and next. This latter alone takes it off any CANSLIM list. Sorry Jack, may be a good momentum stock to continue riding if you are = in cheap enough, but it's not CANSLIM. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: jhs=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 9:59 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings Hey...I don't mind sharing one of mine. Bought EMBX fairly recently and = it is having a nice run. While perhaps not fitting all the CANSLIM = criteria, I do like the unique product. Mass inoculation of chicken = eggs which avoids the need to innoculate the live chicks. =20 Hmmm....what's for dinner? Jack Spear jhs@chorus.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Vanchee1@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:15 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings Well, gang, periodically I like to post my current holdings for the = group to see what stocks this one investor likes. I am NOT recommending = anyone to buy any of these stocks as we all have our own criteria. I = just like to share what I call my finds with the group in hopes others = will share theirs. This allows us all to find the best of the best. I do = realize that 95% of the readers will not share their own list, for some = reason they feel its their list, they did the research and why should = they share. But IM in this to make money and work as a team. GISX 98/95 ABB ATPX 84/99 AAA FDP 81/96 CBA MTEC 80/98 CAA NBSC 80/97 A DLI 80/94 AA PRX 80/22 EBD JJSF 94/96 BCB WAITING FOR A PULLBACK TO RE-ENTER Chris=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0276_01C1E5AD.95B2A3E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
too far extended for interest now, funds have = 26% while=20 management only has 11%, repurchasing shares which may be part of why = the price=20 is going higher, but my biggest criticism is the 5% earnings growth = forecast=20 both this year and next. This latter alone takes it off any CANSLIM=20 list.
 
Sorry Jack, may be a good momentum stock to = continue=20 riding if you are in cheap enough, but it's not CANSLIM.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----=20
From: jhs
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 9:59 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Current Holdings

Hey...I don't mind sharing one of mine.  Bought EMBX = fairly recently=20 and it is having a nice run.  While perhaps not fitting all the = CANSLIM=20 criteria, I do like the unique product.  Mass inoculation of = chicken eggs=20 which avoids the need to innoculate the live chicks.  =
Hmmm....what's for dinner?
 
 
Jack Spear
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 Vanchee1@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:15 = PM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Current=20 Holdings

Well, gang, = periodically I=20 like to post my current holdings for the group to see what stocks this = one=20 investor likes. I am NOT recommending anyone to buy any of these = stocks as we=20 all have our own criteria. I just like to share what I call my finds = with the=20 group in hopes others will share theirs. This allows us all to find = the best=20 of the best. I do realize that 95% of the readers will not share their = own=20 list, for some reason they feel its their list, they did the research = and why=20 should they share. But IM in this to make money and work as a=20 team.

GISX 98/95 ABB
ATPX 84/99 AAA
FDP 81/96 = CBA
MTEC=20 80/98 CAA
NBSC 80/97 A
DLI 80/94 AA
PRX 80/22 EBD
JJSF = 94/96 BCB=20 WAITING FOR A PULLBACK TO RE-ENTER

Chris=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0276_01C1E5AD.95B2A3E0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2317 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.