From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2414 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Thursday, May 9 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2414 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] Curious in Florida Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... Re: [CANSLIM] TASR Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... Re: [CANSLIM] DGOL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:55:41 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Curious in Florida This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_01D7_01C1F7A4.431129A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageMike, "N" refers to New, which includes both a new high, new = service or new product. Takes some evaluation of the company to rate it = on new service or product, one reason I concentrate my searching on = stocks with new highs. That also eliminates any overhead resistance. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mike Gibbons=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Curious in Florida Hi Duke, If a stock is in a handle, then it will stay on our WON watchlist until = it either breaks out, drops below the handle, or the handle length = exceeds 30 days (5 weeks). The N indicator means it is either in a = handle or was recently. Maybe I should limit it to only stocks that are = in a handle. What do you think? Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:32 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Curious in Florida Mike: You wrote: >Wouldn't the fact that it's in a handle be an additional indicator = that the stock is worth evaluating?=20 Absolutely. And when I see that it has been on the list, I scramble = to the chart. I'm not suggesting you change a thing in that regard.=20 It may help if I define exactly how I use the Evaluator. I, like many = herein, run screen after screen each day mining potential winners. = Before the Evaluator came along the majority of my time was spent = culling the losers--stocks that are "outside" my CANSLIM model. It = didn't take me long to decide that a rating of 7 or better keeps a stock = on my list. Under the new ratings, I'm considering moving that to 6.8. = That being the case, whether or not the stock has made the watch list = in the last 7 days is not significant. Might have been in the go-go = days preceding the market we're in now, I don't know. (And with stocks = building seemingly longer bases lately, maybe your criteria should be = longer, like 7 weeks. Doesn't WON say the handle should be 4 to 7 weeks = in duration? ) =20 The Evaluator provides me the "snapshot" I need...to cull or not. And = it saves me the most valuable commodity of all: time. Thanks again for making it available to us. Duke -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:00 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Curious in Florida Hi Duke, re: (FYI: Yes, there are 11 criteria on the Evaluator, but I throw = out N--the fact a stock appears within the past 7 days on a Watch List = is immaterial for ranking purposes, IMHO.)=20 Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:02 AM To: CANSLIM Subject: [CANSLIM] Curious in Florida Good morning all: Since most of you know how I feel about present market = environment, you'll be glad to know this isn't about that. It's about = AFTER "that!" I'll explain: Each day, I download the Excel version of the Daily Screen from = IBD. Then I "play" with it for awhile. I sort various aspects to my = personal preferences: Industry Group Rank (eliminating all above 40); = SMR (eliminating all at C or worse); and so forth. Then I may sort them = by other factors--combined RS & EPS Ratings or Index of Current PE vs. = Projected--to arrive at a another cutoff point. After all that, I put = the remnants into a portfolio with that day's price. Then I follow the = action. =20 What I'm seeing is an amalgam of stocks, the majority of which = keep re-appearing in my final cuts. Some, more than I care to mention, = I was shaken out of earlier this year before going to all cash; some, = more than I care to mention, I wish I'd jumped on. They're the ones = that when I should have jumped on them (I don't have 20-20 hindsight = like IBD does) the right criteria weren't present (usually the darn = charts). But the fact remains, many of the same symbols are there. And = they aren't going away!=20 Further, on May 6, a truly awful day on all three of the big = indexes, I reviewed my Daily Screens portfolios to see which stocks = suffered the least. The list read like a who's-who of my Daily Screens = Portfolios. =20 So, here's my question: If these same names are hanging around = like they are, day in and day out for several months now, both on my = sorted screens and in IBD editorial, does it stand to reason that when = the market turns, these stocks that have exhibited such strength in a = bad market should be the BIG winners when M starts to head North? I, like all of you, hear over and over again that we should be = watching for stocks forming good bases at this time, blah, blah, blah. = But it's my opinion 9/11 created one crazy environment for the markets = and a lot of stocks we're seeing making big gains these days are NOT = conforming to the teachings of WON. While composing this, I put these = stocks to one more test. The Canslim Evaluator. I found it interesting = that while all these stocks are floating on the top, the average score = is an unimpressive 6.2 out of 10. In fact, only one was 8 or better: = UOPX at 8. (FYI: Yes, there are 11 criteria on the Evaluator, but I = throw out N--the fact a stock appears within the past 7 days on a Watch = List is immaterial for ranking purposes, IMHO.) Your opinions will be highly valued. Thank you. Duke Everybody should believe in something - I believe I'll have = another glass of great wine! - ------=_NextPart_000_01D7_01C1F7A4.431129A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Mike, "N" refers to New, which includes both a = new high,=20 new service or new product. Takes some evaluation of the company to rate = it on=20 new service or product, one reason I concentrate my searching on stocks = with new=20 highs. That also eliminates any overhead resistance.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Mike=20 Gibbons
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:09 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Curious in Florida

Hi=20 Duke,
 
If a=20 stock is in a handle, then it will stay on our WON watchlist until it = either=20 breaks out, drops below the handle, or the handle length exceeds 30 days = (5=20 weeks). The N indicator means it is either in a handle or was recently. = Maybe I=20 should limit it to only stocks that are in a handle. What do you=20 think?
 
Aloha,
 
Mike Gibbons
Proactive Technologies, = LLC
http://www.proactech.com
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke=20 Miller
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:32 AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Curious in = Florida

Mike:
 
You=20 wrote:
 
>Wouldn't the fact that it's in a handle be an = additional=20 indicator that the stock is worth evaluating?=20
 
Absolutely.   And when I see that = it has=20 been on the list, I scramble to the chart.  I'm not suggesting = you change=20 a thing in that regard. 
 
It may = help if I=20 define exactly how I use the Evaluator.  I, like many herein, run = screen=20 after screen each day mining potential winners.  Before the = Evaluator=20 came along the majority of my time was spent culling the = losers--stocks that=20 are "outside" my CANSLIM model.  It didn't take me long to = decide=20 that a rating of 7 or better keeps a stock on my list.  = Under the=20 new ratings, I'm considering moving that to=20 6.8.  
 
That being = the case,=20 whether or not the stock has made the watch list in the last 7 days is = not=20 significant.  Might have been in the go-go days preceding the = market=20 we're in now, I don't know.  (And with stocks building = seemingly=20 longer bases lately, maybe your criteria should be longer, like 7 = weeks.  Doesn't WON say the handle should be 4 to 7 weeks in=20 duration? ) 
 
The = Evaluator provides=20 me the "snapshot" I need...to cull or not.  And it saves me the = most=20 valuable commodity of all:  = time.
 
Thanks = again for=20 making it available to us.
 
Duke
 
 
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons
Sent: Thursday, May 09, = 2002 5:00=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: = [CANSLIM]=20 Curious in Florida

Hi=20 Duke,
 
re: (FYI:  Yes, = there are 11=20 criteria on the Evaluator, but I throw out N--the fact a stock = appears=20 within the past 7 days on a Watch List is immaterial for ranking = purposes,=20 IMHO.)=20
 
 
 
Aloha,
 
Mike Gibbons
Proactive = Technologies,=20 LLC
http://www.proactech.com
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke=20 Miller
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:02 = AM
To:=20 CANSLIM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Curious in=20 Florida

Good = morning=20 all:
 
Since = most of=20 you know how I feel about present market environment, you'll = be glad=20 to know this isn't about that.  It's about AFTER = "that!" =20 I'll explain:
 
Each day, = I download=20 the Excel version of the Daily Screen from IBD.  Then = I "play"=20 with it for awhile.  I sort various aspects to my = personal=20 preferences: Industry Group Rank (eliminating all above 40); = SMR=20 (eliminating all at C or worse); and so forth.  Then I may = sort them=20 by other factors--combined RS & EPS Ratings or Index of = Current PE vs.=20 Projected--to arrive at a  another cutoff = point. =20 After all=20 that, I put the remnants into a portfolio with that day's = price. =20 Then I follow the action. 
 
What I'm = seeing is an=20 amalgam of stocks, the majority of which keep re-appearing in = my=20 final cuts.  Some, more than I care to mention, I was shaken = out of=20 earlier this year before going to all cash; some, more than I care = to=20 mention, I wish I'd jumped on.  They're the ones that = when I=20 should have jumped on them (I don't have 20-20 hindsight like IBD = does)=20 the right criteria weren't present (usually the darn = charts).  But=20 the fact remains, many of the same symbols are there.  And = they=20 aren't going away!
 
Further, = on May 6, a=20 truly awful day on all three of the big indexes, I reviewed my = Daily=20 Screens portfolios to see which stocks suffered the = least.  The=20 list read like a who's-who of my Daily Screens Portfolios. =20
 
So, = here's my = question:  If=20 these same names are hanging around like they are, day in and day = out for=20 several months now, both on my sorted screens and in IBD = editorial, does=20 it stand to reason that when the market turns, these stocks that = have=20 exhibited such strength in a bad market should be the BIG winners = when M=20 starts to head North?
 
I, like = all of you,=20 hear over and over again that we should be watching for stocks = forming=20 good bases at this time, blah, blah, blah.  But it's my = opinion 9/11=20 created one crazy environment for the markets and a lot of stocks = we're=20 seeing making big gains these days are NOT conforming to the = teachings of=20 WON.  While composing this, I put these stocks = to one more=20 test.  The Canslim Evaluator.  I found it interesting = that while=20 all these stocks are floating on the top, the average score is an=20 unimpressive 6.2 out of 10.  In fact, only one was 8 or = better: =20 UOPX at 8.  (FYI:  Yes, there are 11 criteria on the = Evaluator,=20 but I throw out N--the fact a stock appears within the past 7 days = on a=20 Watch List is immaterial for ranking purposes, = IMHO.)
 
Your = opinions will be=20 highly valued.  Thank you.
 
Duke
 
Everybody should=20 believe in something - I believe I'll have another glass of great=20 wine!
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_01D7_01C1F7A4.431129A0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:57:15 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_01E9_01C1F7A4.7B4F5B20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was informed that new subscribers to DGO no longer can get the = discount by buying one book a month of DG books. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Parnelli=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... Sounds like the way to go...Thanks Tom!!!=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 10:04 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... I think you would have to subscribe to DGO as well as their new = Industry Groups service. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Parnelli=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 9:53 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... Hi group, Hope all enjoyed this day. I like most, had quality stocks that = didn't participate too well in the rally today. Our day will come! Question, Is there a way to get a list of top CANSLIM stocks from a = particular industry group? For example, if gaming stocks are rated = high, can I click on a magical screen that can show me 90 90 A A A = stocks in that sector. I don't see anything on investors.com that will = do this. Many thanks, Parnelli - ------=_NextPart_000_01E9_01C1F7A4.7B4F5B20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I was informed that new subscribers to DGO no = longer can=20 get the discount by buying one book a month of DG books.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Parnelli =
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and = learning...

Sounds like the way to go...Thanks = Tom!!! 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 = 10:04=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still = reading and=20 learning...

I think you would have to subscribe to DGO as = well as=20 their new Industry Groups service.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Parnelli =
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 9:53 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Still reading and = learning...

Hi group,
 
Hope all enjoyed this day.  I like most, had = quality=20 stocks that didn't participate too well in the rally today.  Our = day will=20 come!
 
Question, Is there a way to get a list of top = CANSLIM stocks=20 from a particular industry group?  For example, if gaming stocks = are=20 rated high, can I click on a magical screen that can show me 90 90 A A = A=20 stocks in that sector.  I don't see anything on investors.com = that will=20 do this.
 
Many thanks,
 
Parnelli
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_01E9_01C1F7A4.7B4F5B20-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 22:05:34 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TASR primary reason that I can figure is that there was an article on Reuters on Sunday, 12 days ago, indicating FAA approval was expected during last week. That has not happened. Contact with the company indicated they were expecting an FAA decision within 10 days, and that time period has now passed as well. I confirmed they are still expecting FAA decision, but have no assurance of what the decision will be, or when. With so many pilots pressuring for their right to take a firearm into the cockpit, and Boeing saying most planes could survive a few bullet holes, I see little option for FAA to approve non-lethal weapons (NLW) for all cockpits. I think many investors may have bot on spec that FAA approval was imminent, based on the Reuters article, and are now bailing out since it didn't happen. The company had previously disclosed that it was in conversation with a number of airlines that would take no action until after FAA approval, so a number of contracts could follow if, or when, FAA approves NLW in the cockpit. Whether tasers would be specifically approved remains to be seen. As I previously mentioned, I am in it for the long haul (2 years or more), would buy more if I had cash in my IRA. but that's because it is for me a long term core holding. Chart and performance wise, it's looking weak right now. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" To: Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:54 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] TASR Anyone know why TASR is getting pounded today? Tom, you seem to follow this one - what's going on? Any opinions on whether it is technically "broken"? John C. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 22:09:44 -0400 From: "Parnelli" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0103_01C1F7A6.39552E00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Darn Tom...sometimes a guy just can't catch a break. At any rate, still = sounds like DGO is worth the price of admission. Have a great Friday = eve! -Parnelli p.s. I still like USLB by the way...been rolling it = quite nicely. The company is landing decent accounts and just announced = a sweet acquisition today. I know you mentioned once before that you = liked safe, thinly traded stocks in a reasonable price range. Something = to think about anyway! =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:57 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... I was informed that new subscribers to DGO no longer can get the = discount by buying one book a month of DG books. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Parnelli=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... Sounds like the way to go...Thanks Tom!!!=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 10:04 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... I think you would have to subscribe to DGO as well as their new = Industry Groups service. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Parnelli=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 9:53 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Still reading and learning... Hi group, Hope all enjoyed this day. I like most, had quality stocks that = didn't participate too well in the rally today. Our day will come! Question, Is there a way to get a list of top CANSLIM stocks from a = particular industry group? For example, if gaming stocks are rated = high, can I click on a magical screen that can show me 90 90 A A A = stocks in that sector. I don't see anything on investors.com that will = do this. Many thanks, Parnelli - ------=_NextPart_000_0103_01C1F7A6.39552E00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Darn Tom...sometimes a guy just can't catch a = break.  At=20 any rate, still sounds like DGO is worth the price = of admission.  Have=20 a great Friday eve!  -Parnelli   p.s. I still like = USLB by=20 the way...been rolling it quite nicely.  The company is landing = decent=20 accounts and just announced a sweet acquisition today.  I know you=20 mentioned once before that you liked safe, thinly traded stocks in a = reasonable=20 price range.  Something to think about=20 anyway!   
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 = 9:57=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still = reading and=20 learning...

I was informed that new subscribers to DGO no = longer can=20 get the discount by buying one book a month of DG books.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Parnelli =
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still reading and = learning...

Sounds like the way to go...Thanks = Tom!!! 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 = 10:04=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Still = reading=20 and learning...

I think you would have to subscribe to DGO = as well as=20 their new Industry Groups service.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----=20
From: = Parnelli =
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 9:53 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Still reading and = learning...

Hi group,
 
Hope all enjoyed this day.  I like most, = had quality=20 stocks that didn't participate too well in the rally today.  = Our day=20 will come!
 
Question, Is there a way to get a list of top = CANSLIM=20 stocks from a particular industry group?  For example, if = gaming stocks=20 are rated high, can I click on a magical screen that can show me 90 = 90 A A A=20 stocks in that sector.  I don't see anything on investors.com = that will=20 do this.
 
Many thanks,
 
Parnelli
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0103_01C1F7A6.39552E00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 23:16:04 EDT From: Mhboatman@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DGOL - --part1_7d.270a3ad1.2a0c9574_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mike, Had the same problem Tuesday. Contacted them by e-mail. Said they are switching everyone over to the "new system." My access to Daily Graphs Version 4.0 "had been terminated" as they are in the process of phasing it out. I was directed to use my (old) Bata access username and password at www.dailygraphs.com. The "new screen" looks like what we had in the Bata version with daily, weekly and interday screens. Additional downloading required. Process was upsetting. No advance warning. Very poor (non existent) customer service! But they did respond to my e-mails with in minutes, during the evening. They did agree to extend my subscription for another year at $299, as I am, and have been, a monthly NASDAQ book subscriber at $270 per year. Didn't feel I needed the $1000 deluxe model -- besides no discount available on that version. Howard - --part1_7d.270a3ad1.2a0c9574_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mike,

Had the same problem Tuesday.  Contacted them by e-mail.  Said they are switching everyone over to the "new system."  My access to Daily Graphs Version 4.0 "had been terminated" as they are in the process of phasing it out.  I was directed to use my (old) Bata access username and password at www.dailygraphs.com.  The "new screen" looks like what we had in the Bata version with daily, weekly and interday screens.  Additional downloading required.

Process was upsetting.  No advance warning.  Very poor (non existent) customer service!  But they did respond to my e-mails with in minutes, during the evening.  They did agree to extend my subscription for another year at $299, as I am, and have been, a monthly NASDAQ book subscriber at $270 per year.  Didn't feel I needed the $1000 deluxe model -- besides no discount available on that version.

Howard - --part1_7d.270a3ad1.2a0c9574_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2414 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.