Message

From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2629 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Thursday, July 18 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2629 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] HTRN Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink??? RE: [CANSLIM] DanF Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink??? Re: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:26:50 -0400 From: "Duke Miller" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTRN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C22EAA.391D6160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks, It has been so long, what with the M the way it is. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:07 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTRN Hi Duke, You're linking to an old version. The start page for the evaluator is http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim. The version you are accessing is the one that before I added the "fuzzy" scoring for stocks that didn't make the absolute WON criteria. Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:24 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTRN Mike, My CWH Evaluation tool is not working. I get this message when I click on it: Parse error: parse error in /home/cwhcharts/public_html/canslim/canslim.php on line 29 ???? Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:13 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HTRN Hi Charley, My understanding is that a cup as defined by WON can be up to 325 trading days long. A handle can be up to a third of the length of the cup. That's the definition we use. The complete WON spec for a cwh as I understand it is here: http://www.cwhcharts.com/WON_cwh.htm. Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:45 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] HTRN Folks: On the 17th I asked if a cup, which took two years to form, is a valid formation. This happens from time to time and I wondered if WON has addressed the question or if any of you have had personal experiences with such a sleeper. Using just the data available HTRN completed the right side of a two year cup on July 1, at a price of $17.75. For the last three weeks a "handle" has been drifting to the right. My gut feeling tells me this is not a legitimate c/h formation. What is your opinion? Charley - ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C22EAA.391D6160 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Thanks,

It has been so = long, what=20 with the M the way it is.

Duke

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons
Sent: Thursday, July 18, = 2002 10:07=20 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: = [CANSLIM]=20 HTRN

Hi=20 Duke,

You're linking to an old version. The start page for the = evaluator is=20 http://www.cwhcharts.com/cansli= m.

The=20 version you are accessing is the one that before I added the = "fuzzy"=20 scoring for stocks that didn't make the absolute WON=20 criteria.

Aloha,

Mike Gibbons
Proactive = Technologies,=20 LLC

http://www.proactech.com

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke=20 Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:24 PM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]=20 HTRN

Mike,

My CWH = Evaluation tool=20 is not working. I get this message when I click on=20 it:

Parse error: = parse=20 error in /home/cwhcharts/public_html/canslim/canslim.php on = line=20 29

????

Duke

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Mike Gibbons
Sent: Thursday, July = 18, 2002=20 2:13 PM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE:=20 [CANSLIM] HTRN

Hi Charley,

My understanding is that a cup as defined by WON can be = up to 325=20 trading days long. A handle can be up to a third of the length of = the cup.=20 That's the definition we use. The complete WON spec for a cwh as I = understand it is here: http://www.cwhcharts.com/WO= N_cwh.htm.

Aloha,

Mike Gibbons
Proactive = Technologies,=20 LLC

http://www.proactech.com

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 = 7:45=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: = [CANSLIM]=20 HTRN

Folks:=20
On the 17th I asked if a cup, which took two years to form, = is a=20 valid formation. This happens from time to time and I wondered = if WON=20 has addressed the question or if any of you have had personal=20 experiences with such a sleeper.
Using just the data = available HTRN=20 completed the right side of a two year cup on July 1, at a price = of=20 $17.75. For the last three weeks a "handle" has been drifting to = the=20 right.
My gut feeling tells me this is not a legitimate c/h=20 formation. What is your opinion? Charley=20 =

= - ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C22EAA.391D6160-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:32:48 -0700 From: "zillagirl" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink??? bill-I'm pretty bad at bases still, but do you think he referred to this as a base because it did not break the 200 day average? Thanks for bringing this up-it made me really stop and pay attention to this move and try to learn more instead of just read about it again and miss it. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Triffet" To: "canslim" Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:49 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink??? > Anyone catch the Investors.com weblink? http://www.investors.com/weblink/ > It's describing the action of ACMR. Now, look at what they define as a > "second stage base" > Yes, volume dried up for that period but look at the price swing - an over > 20% decline from the previous high to the intraday low. I wouldn't have > considered that a base at all. I guess the lack of volume is the key to > interpreting that base? Perhaps I need to also consider the previous 79% > gains based on the breakout from the first stage? > > Bill Triffet > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:35:46 -0400 From: "Duke Miller" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] DanF This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C22EAB.78B50610 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jeff.... I think most of us would agree it's time you introduce DanF to duke13139. Duke PS: I asked Katherine to add "duke13139" to the FAQ. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Gene Ricci Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:36 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] DanF Dan, not sure what you're trying to promote. I checked the archives and didn't find a posting looking for a jester. "THE" King and Queen post more content by accident than you do on purpose. Why not go with the flow and leave your rancor by the roadside? Gene - ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Forant To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:10 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] List FAQ "Birds of a Feather Flock Together" Now who could have said that? DanF - ----- Original Message ----- From: zillagirl To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] List FAQ Its no " BS" it's "IF" a poem by Rudyard Kipling. In any case my post was to thank Katherine. If it went over your head it may have been nice if you had ignored it instead of put in a pointless comment. - ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Forant To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:03 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] List FAQ Maybe one more could be added to the list for the occasional odd post.............BS DanF - ----- Original Message ----- From: zillagirl To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:21 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] List FAQ Katherine, I just have one thing to say to you(of course) "" If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you"""!!! Thank you for the list - I seem to have deleted mine that I got when I was new. Nancy - ----- Original Message ----- From: Katherine Malm To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:56 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] List FAQ For those new to the list, here's a FAQ to get you started--by no means comprehensive, but should get you on track. - -Katherine ============= Commonly used abbreviations: WON = William O'Neil, originator of CANSLIM HTMMIS = "How to Make Money in Stocks" by William J. O'Neil IBD = Investors Business Daily (www.investors.com) BO or B/O = Breakout MA = Moving Average dMA = days Moving Average VR = Virtual Reality fund M = Market ( the "M" in CANSLIM) N = New (the "N" in CANSLIM) LOL = Laughing Out Loud DD= Due Diligence IBD/CANSLIM Proprietary Rankings: GRS = Group Relative Strength RS = Relative Strength EPS = Earnings per Share Rank SMR = Sales/Margins/ROE A/D = Accumulation/Distribution Accounting/Finance Abbreviations: BS or B/S = Balance Sheet IS or I/S = Income Statement cflo = Cash Flow Pro Forma earnings = http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/proforma12-4.htm D/E = Debt to Equity PE or P/E = Price to Earnings ratio Commonly discussed technical patterns: (Would be great to have some straightforward definitions of each of these) LLUR = Lower Left Upper Right A Base = Ascending Base C&H or CwH = Cup and Handle HTF = High Tight Flag FB=Flat Base 2B=Double Bottoms Commonly discussed software/tools: DGO= DailyGraphs Online ( www.dailygraphs.com or beta.dailygraphs.com--beta will soon be ending) QP2 = Quotes Plus (www.qp2.com) HGSI = High Growth Stock Investing (www.highgrowthstock.com) TC2000 = Worden Brothers TC2000 technical analysis software (http://www.tc2000.com) VV= VectorVest (www.vectorvest.com) If you are new to CANSLIM investing (or just need a refresher): Take advantage of the excellent learning center at the IBD site-- www.investors.com/learn Free sites for stock scanning: http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/finder/predefstocks.asp http://www.marketguide.com/screen/SScreen.asp Free sites for charting: www.stockcharts.com www.bigcharts.com http://www.moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/charting.asp?Symbol=csco Free sites for due diligence: Company's web site http://biz.yahoo.com/p/c/csco.html www.cwhcharts.com/canslim www.investors.com (look for the stock checkup feature) Free resources for real time tracking: www.quotetracker.com - ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C22EAB.78B50610 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Jeff....

I think most of = us would=20 agree it's time you introduce DanF to = duke13139.

Duke

PS: I = asked Katherine=20 to add "duke13139" to the FAQ.

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Gene Ricci
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 = 11:36=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: = [CANSLIM]=20 DanF

Dan, not sure what you're = trying to=20 promote. I checked the archives and didn't find a posting looking for = a=20 jester. "THE" King and Queen post more content by accident than you do = on=20 purpose. Why not go with the flow and leave your rancor by the=20 roadside?

Gene

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Dan=20 Forant
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20

Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 = 10:10=20 AM

Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] List = FAQ

"Birds of a Feather = Flock Together" =20 Now who could have said that?

DanF

----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 zillagirl
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20

Sent: Thursday, July 18, = 2002 9:58=20 AM

Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] List = FAQ

Its no " BS" it's "IF" = a poem by=20 Rudyard Kipling. In any case my post was to thank = Katherine. =20 If it went over your head it may have been nice if you had ignored = it=20 instead of put in a pointless comment.

----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Dan=20 Forant
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20

Sent: Thursday, July 18, = 2002 4:03=20 AM

Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = List=20 FAQ

Maybe one more could be added = to the list=20 for the occasional odd post.............BS

DanF

----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 zillagirl
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20

Sent: Thursday, July = 18, 2002=20 12:21 AM

Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = List=20 FAQ

Katherine, I just have one = thing to say=20 to you(of course) "" If you can keep = your head=20 when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on=20 you"""!!! Thank you for the list = - - I=20 seem to have deleted mine that I got when I was = new. =20 Nancy

----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Katherine Malm =
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20

Sent: Wednesday, July = 17, 2002=20 8:56 PM

Subject: [CANSLIM] = List=20 FAQ

For those new to the list, here's a FAQ to get you = started--by=20 no means comprehensive, but should get you on track.

-Katherine

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Commonly used abbreviations:

WON =3D William O'Neil, originator of CANSLIM

HTMMIS =3D "How to Make Money in Stocks" by William J.=20 O'Neil

IBD =3D Investors Business Daily (www.investors.com)

BO or B/O =3D Breakout

MA =3D Moving Average

dMA =3D days Moving Average

VR =3D Virtual Reality fund

M =3D Market ( the "M" in CANSLIM)

N =3D New (the "N" in CANSLIM)

LOL =3D Laughing Out Loud

DD=3D Due Diligence

IBD/CANSLIM Proprietary Rankings:

GRS =3D Group Relative Strength

RS =3D Relative Strength

EPS =3D Earnings per Share Rank

SMR =3D Sales/Margins/ROE

A/D =3D Accumulation/Distribution

Accounting/Finance Abbreviations:

BS or B/S =3D Balance Sheet

IS or I/S =3D Income Statement

cflo =3D Cash Flow

Pro Forma earnings =3D http://www.sec= .gov/investor/pubs/proforma12-4.htm

D/E =3D Debt to Equity

PE or P/E =3D Price to Earnings ratio

Commonly discussed technical patterns: (Would be = great to=20 have some straightforward definitions of each of = these)

LLUR =3D Lower Left Upper Right

A Base =3D Ascending Base

C&H or CwH =3D Cup and Handle

HTF =3D High Tight Flag

FB=3DFlat Base

2B=3DDouble Bottoms

Commonly discussed software/tools:

DGO=3D DailyGraphs Online ( www.dailygraphs.com or=20 beta.dailygraphs.com--beta will soon be ending)

QP2 =3D Quotes Plus (www.qp2.com)

HGSI =3D High Growth Stock Investing (www.highgrowthstock.com)
TC2000 =3D Worden Brothers TC2000 technical = analysis=20 software (http://www.tc2000.com)

VV=3D VectorVest (www.vectorvest.com)

If you are new to CANSLIM investing (or just need a = refresher):

Take advantage of the excellent learning center at the = IBD=20 site-- www.investors.com/learn
=

Free sites for stock scanning:

htt= p://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/finder/predefstocks.asp

http://www.marketg= uide.com/screen/SScreen.asp

Free sites for charting:

www.stockcharts.com

www.bigcharts.com

http://www.moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/charting.asp?S= ymbol=3Dcsco

Free sites for due diligence:

Company's web site

http://biz.yahoo.com/p/c/csco= .html

www.cwhcharts.com/canslim
www.investors.com (look=20 for the stock checkup feature)

Free resources for real time tracking:

www.quotetracker.com

=

- ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C22EAB.78B50610-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 20:26:10 -0700 From: "Bill Triffet" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink??? Zilla, Now I have my trusty HTMMIS in hand I see a couple things: "Nearly all proper bases will show a dramatic volume dry up in the very low of the base patttern and in the low area of the handle". But it goes on to say," The combination of tightness in prices (daily or weekly price closes being very close to each other) and dried up volume is generally quite constructive". Hmmm. I'd say the tightness in prices maybe pertains to the 1st stage base. I see volume the dry up but that 20% dip is a bit scary. As far as not crossing the 200dma goes, I'd have bailed as it crossed the 50...but that's just me. Heck, a 60% gain in 3months would be just fine with me! (g) - -Bill - ----- Original Message ----- From: "zillagirl" To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink??? > bill-I'm pretty bad at bases still, but do you think he referred to this as > a base because it did not break the 200 day average? Thanks for bringing > this up-it made me really stop and pay attention to this move and try to > learn more instead of just read about it again and miss it. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Triffet" > To: "canslim" > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:49 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] ACMR - Investors.com weblink??? > > > > Anyone catch the Investors.com weblink? http://www.investors.com/weblink/ > > It's describing the action of ACMR. Now, look at what they define as a > > "second stage base" > > Yes, volume dried up for that period but look at the price swing - an over > > 20% decline from the previous high to the intraday low. I wouldn't have > > considered that a base at all. I guess the lack of volume is the key to > > interpreting that base? Perhaps I need to also consider the previous 79% > > gains based on the breakout from the first stage? > > > > Bill Triffet > > > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 23:09:17 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C22EB0.23F58550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable could be correct, but from memory seems like the housing stocks have had = a longer, and higher, run than the HMOs. - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: J. Lobatto=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:45 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks Tom, You may be right, but I'd contrast the action of the housing stocks to = the HMOs. Both have been very strong groups this year. However, in the = recent correction, the housing stocks have been battered down far more = than the HMOs. The latter were up strongly yesterday, while the former = dropped a bit more. Of course there is tremendous rotation in this = market and the opposite might happen today, but to my eyes, it would = appear that the housing stocks are in more serious trouble. Jon ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:00 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks I disagree, Jon, and for opposite reasons. The housing stocks have = done very well in a market that has continued to trend ever lower. For = just that reason, those investors that chose to stay invested on the = long side (me and two others, I think), would be more likely to take = profits on the housing stocks to jump into some "momentum" big or mid = caps when the rallies start and look like they could take off. I see this especially on a lot of my small / micro caps that have done = well, when the market rallies on heavy volume from the very liquid big = cap names, the little guys tend to either sell off or at least not get = any new money running into them, all the action is concentrated on the = bigger names where less risk is perceived against the perceived "value" = (everyone loved them at $45, so they must be a real bargain at $18). ----- Original Message -----=20 From: J. Lobatto=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:29 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks Another negative sign are the once mighty housing stocks. This group = has been a leader all year reflecting the hosuing boom we've discussed = here before. In the past couple of weeks these stocks have been = hammered. If these stocks were going to bounce back (as they've done = before), today's rally should have been the perfect opportunity, but it = appears they are now leading the retreat down. Jon=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C22EB0.23F58550 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

could be correct, but from memory seems like the = housing=20 stocks have had a longer, and higher, run than the HMOs.

----- Original Message -----=20

From: J. = Lobatto=20

To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=

Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:45 AM

Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks

Tom,

You may be right, but I'd = contrast the=20 action of the housing stocks to the HMOs. Both have been very strong = groups this=20 year. However, in the recent correction, the housing stocks have been = battered=20 down far more than the HMOs. The latter were up strongly yesterday, = while the=20 former dropped a bit more. Of course there is tremendous rotation in = this market=20 and the opposite might happen today, but to my eyes, it would appear = that the=20 housing stocks are in more serious trouble.

Jon

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 = 11:00=20 PM

Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Housing=20 stocks

I disagree, Jon, and for opposite reasons. The = housing=20 stocks have done very well in a market that has continued to trend = ever lower.=20 For just that reason, those investors that chose to stay invested on = the long=20 side (me and two others, I think), would be more likely to take = profits on the=20 housing stocks to jump into some "momentum" big or mid caps when the = rallies=20 start and look like they could take off.

I see this especially on a lot of my small / = micro caps=20 that have done well, when the market rallies on heavy volume from the = very=20 liquid big cap names, the little guys tend to either sell off or at = least not=20 get any new money running into them, all the action is concentrated on = the=20 bigger names where less risk is perceived against the perceived = "value"=20 (everyone loved them at $45, so they must be a real bargain at=20 $18).

----- Original Message -----=20
From: J. = Lobatto=20

To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:29 AM

Subject: [CANSLIM] Housing stocks

Another negative sign are = the once=20 mighty housing stocks. This group has been a leader all year = reflecting the=20 hosuing boom we've discussed here before. In the past couple of weeks = these=20 stocks have been hammered. If these stocks were going to bounce back = (as=20 they've done before), today's rally should have been the perfect = opportunity,=20 but it appears they are now leading the retreat down.

Jon

- ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C22EB0.23F58550-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2629 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.