From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2803 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Thursday, August 15 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2803 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:14:48 -0400 From: "Edward McDonough" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C2445D.BB7CC9C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Institutional sponsorship is one of the CANSLIM criteria for investment. You simply want to ride along with the institutions. You'll know when they begin selling UCBH when it breaks trend. I know trend is not a big element of Canslim so simply use O'neil's 8% stop loss rule. The TREND is your friend. Go with it till it tells you otherwise. Play the game to win! Call me crazy. Ed - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Ann Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:49 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH But is it up over 50% this year because of the institutions buying up 91% of it! - ----- Original Message ----- From: Edward McDonough To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:05 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH UCBH With all due respect, a stock that is up over 50% YTD is exactly a growth stock. Don't make this more complicated than it is. Stay with the trends. Play the game to win Call me crazy Ed - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Ann Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:33 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH Thank you, Charley. That is very helpful. Ann You didn't state your investment goals, but in my opinion this is not a growth stock. For one thing if institutions own 91% now, there simply isn't enough stock available to new buyers to move the price significantly. That does not mean they cannot enjoy good steady slow growth. The funds own 31%; WON recommends staying below 25%. Charley - ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C2445D.BB7CC9C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Institutional sponsorship is one = of the CANSLIM criteria for investment. You simply want to ride along with the institutions.

You’ll know when they = begin selling UCBH when it breaks trend. = I know trend is not a big element of Canslim so = simply use

O’neil’s 8% stop loss = rule.

The TREND is your = friend.

Go with it till it tells you = otherwise.

Play the game to = win!

Call me = crazy.

Ed

-----Original = Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Ann
Sent: = Thursday, August 15, = 2002 12:49 PM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = UCBH

But is it up over 50% this year because of = the institutions buying up 91% of it!

----- Original Message = - -----

From: Edward McDonough

To:= canslim@lists.xmission.com

Sent: Thursday, August 15, = 2002 11:05 AM

Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH

UCBH

=

With all due respect, a stock that is up over 50% YTD is exactly a growth = stock.

Don’t make this more complicated than it is.

Stay with the trends.

Play the game to win

Call me crazy

Ed

-----Original = Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmi= ssion.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Ann
Sent: = Thursday, August 15, = 2002 10:33 AM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = UCBH

Thank you, Charley. That is very = helpful.

Ann

You didn't state your = investment goals, but in my opinion this is not a growth stock. For one thing if institutions own 91% now, there simply isn't enough stock available to = new buyers to move the price significantly. That does not mean they cannot = enjoy good steady slow growth. The funds own 31%; WON recommends staying = below 25%.

Charley =

- ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C2445D.BB7CC9C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:19:47 EDT From: Chazmoore@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH - --part1_63.101ced34.2a8d3cb3_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ed and Ann: Perhaps you are right Ed. You certainly are as we look back. In June 2000 the stock was at $14.; in June 2001 it was at $28.; in June 2002 it was at $37. I would say that qualifies as a growth stock. It is hard to say what the future holds but they are forecasting 17% growth in 2003, and if they meet that goal (assuming a P/E of 25) the price should rise to $56. Note that their current P/E of 25 represents a five year high. The point I was making is that the company seems to be nearing the end of this truly remarkable growth (for a bank). Thanks for bringing up the subject. Charley - --part1_63.101ced34.2a8d3cb3_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ed and Ann:
Perhaps you are right Ed. You certainly are as we look back. In June 2000 the stock was at $14.; in June 2001 it was at $28.; in June 2002 it was at $37. I would say that qualifies as a growth stock.

It is hard to say what the future holds but they are forecasting 17% growth in 2003, and if they meet that goal (assuming a P/E of 25) the price should rise to $56. Note that their current P/E of 25 represents a five year high.

The point I was making is that the company seems to be nearing the end of this truly remarkable growth (for a bank).

Thanks for bringing up the subject.

Charley - --part1_63.101ced34.2a8d3cb3_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:34:51 -0400 From: Ed McDonough Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C24460.88C13DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Charley, 56 sounds good to me. That would be another 30%. Not to shabby. By the way, it doesn't matter what industry the stock is in if it goes up. As long as it goes up, I win. Play the game to win. Ed - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH Ed and Ann: Perhaps you are right Ed. You certainly are as we look back. In June 2000 the stock was at $14.; in June 2001 it was at $28.; in June 2002 it was at $37. I would say that qualifies as a growth stock. It is hard to say what the future holds but they are forecasting 17% growth in 2003, and if they meet that goal (assuming a P/E of 25) the price should rise to $56. Note that their current P/E of 25 represents a five year high. The point I was making is that the company seems to be nearing the end of this truly remarkable growth (for a bank). Thanks for bringing up the subject. Charley - ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C24460.88C13DB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Charley,=

56 sounds good to me.

That would be another 30%. Not to = shabby.

By the way, it doesn’t = matter what industry the stock is in if it goes up.

As long as it goes up, I = win.

Play the game to = win.

Ed

-----Original = Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of = Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent: = Thursday, August 15, = 2002 1:20 PM
To: = canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = UCBH

Ed and Ann:
Perhaps you are right Ed. You certainly are as we look back. In June = 2000 the stock was at $14.; in June 2001 it was at $28.; in June 2002 it was at = $37. I would say that qualifies as a growth stock.

It is hard to say what the future holds but they are forecasting 17% = growth in 2003, and if they meet that goal (assuming a P/E of 25) the price = should rise to $56. Note that their current P/E of 25 represents a five year high. =

The point I was making is that the company seems to be nearing the end = of this truly remarkable growth (for a bank).

Thanks for bringing up the subject.

Charley

- ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C24460.88C13DB0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:35:20 -0400 From: "Ann" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0091_01C24460.99A0DA00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Ed and Charley. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ed McDonough=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 1:34 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] UCBH Charley, =20 56 sounds good to me. =20 That would be another 30%. Not to shabby. =20 By the way, it doesn't matter what industry the stock is in if it goes = up. =20 =20 As long as it goes up, I win. =20 Play the game to win. =20 Ed =20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Chazmoore@aol.com Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UCBH =20 Ed and Ann:=20 Perhaps you are right Ed. You certainly are as we look back. In June = 2000 the stock was at $14.; in June 2001 it was at $28.; in June 2002 it = was at $37. I would say that qualifies as a growth stock.=20 It is hard to say what the future holds but they are forecasting 17% = growth in 2003, and if they meet that goal (assuming a P/E of 25) the = price should rise to $56. Note that their current P/E of 25 represents a = five year high.=20 The point I was making is that the company seems to be nearing the end = of this truly remarkable growth (for a bank).=20 Thanks for bringing up the subject.=20 Charley - ------=_NextPart_000_0091_01C24460.99A0DA00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks, Ed and Charley.

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ed=20 McDonough
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=

Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 = 1:34=20 PM

Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = UCBH

Charley,

56 sounds good=20 to me.

That would be another = 30%. Not to=20 shabby.

By the way, it doesn=92t = matter what=20 industry the stock is in if it goes up. =20

As long as it goes up, I=20 win.

Play the game to=20 win.

Ed

-----Original=20 Message-----
From: = owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of=20 Chazmoore@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15,=20 2002 = 1:20=20 PM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]=20 UCBH

Ed and Ann:
Perhaps = you are=20 right Ed. You certainly are as we look back. In June 2000 the stock = was at=20 $14.; in June 2001 it was at $28.; in June 2002 it was at $37. I would = say=20 that qualifies as a growth stock.

It is hard to say what the = future=20 holds but they are forecasting 17% growth in 2003, and if they meet = that goal=20 (assuming a P/E of 25) the price should rise to $56. Note that their = current=20 P/E of 25 represents a five year high.

The point I was making = is that=20 the company seems to be nearing the end of this truly remarkable = growth (for a=20 bank).

Thanks for bringing up the subject.=20 =

Charley

- ------=_NextPart_000_0091_01C24460.99A0DA00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2803 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.