From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2980 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, October 11 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2980 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies [CANSLIM] Picks and hopefully nothing too offensive RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Weblink Fw: JOSB (was:[CANSLIM] What's still strong?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:40:09 -0500 From: "Lin Wells" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies I like your list and the concept. I think "travel" stocks like ROOM, etc. work here. Also, I think the education stocks fit here, UOPX, etc. I was trying to set an appointment with an 86 year old man the other day and we had to schedule around his UNIX class. Lin - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:17 AM To: CANSLIM Subject: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Greetings one and all. I've been absent from the list for good reason, I think.... Earlier this year, I put forth a theory that it might be wise to keep an eye on stocks most likely to be positively impacted as baby boomers enter their retirement years. I didn't get much response, apparently not CANSLIM enough, but I forged ahead based on my personal experiences as a "leading edge" boomer. To wit, since becoming an economic being, I've kept an eye on my rear-view mirror. I observed (and profited from) the boomer impact over the years...as the bubble passed from one phase to another. A case in point: If it weren't for the boomers, I never could have sold my home of 25 years, probably worth about $50,000, for over $400,000! As I set out to build my list of "boomer babies," the challenge was to keep it within the CANSLIM envelope. So I confined my search to companies appearing in IBD's New America. Lacking 'M', AT LEAST we would have "N"! So I just finished scouring nine months of New America articles and the search yielded over 70 stocks, which I transferred them to a spreadsheet. It's basis is Katherine's "CANSLIM Hunting" spreadsheet (tied for the single greatest contribution to this list of all time with Mikes CANSLIM analyzer, thank you both). You can download the sheet at http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/BoomerBabies.zip A few caveats: Some companies on the list may evoke, "Is he nuts?" Trust me, each has a reason based on my rear-view-mirror observations. You'll also find industries where some companies appear while others in the same industry are excluded. For instance, the only home builders included are those with a major sunbelt focus. I've also excluded some obvious candidates, most notable is Pfizer (the inventors of the pill that has all the residents of Sun City putting signs on their doors that read, "Don't come a knockin' when my condo is a rockin'"). I'm reserving Pfizer and other non-New America stocks for a 'B' list of boomer babies. In conclusion, WON has said of late that what this market needs is a bunch of new IPO's to lead it into bull territory. I agree, but for the near term, he's gotta be dreamin'. So the boomer babies are an effort to ferret out stocks that have the potential to profit from the inevitable aging of the not-so-baby boomers. No chance they'll trigger an era of "irrational exuberance," but maybe they can generate some half-way decent returns. Finally, the list is just that: a list. In no way am I implying all the right fundamentals are there or that bases have formed or are forming...YET! But I think it's a good way to start tracking some potential winners. If this concept stirs you in any way, I invite you to share those companies you think might fit the mold. Have a great weekend... Duke - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:38:53 -0500 From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" Subject: [CANSLIM] Picks and hopefully nothing too offensive This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C27112.65218200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Okay - if this notice is offensive to anyone I won't post it again. I do a live show every Friday at 4:30 pm CST that is broadcast on local area Chicago cable and on the internet at www.webfn.com . It's a 30 minute show, roundtable discussion focused on what's ahead for the market, hence the name "The Look Ahead". The point of this is instead of typing my comments; you may be able to hear my comments, not that I am presuming anyone cares to know my point of view. Aside from that, in the past, the group has posted "watch lists." Our setup list has grown substantially and again, not to be presumptuous, but would like to share our ideas. Thoughts? Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com - ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C27112.65218200 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Okay – if this notice is = offensive to anyone I won’t post it again.  I do a live show every Friday = at 4:30 pm CST that = is broadcast on local area Chicago cable and on the internet at www.webfn.com.  It’s a 30 = minute show, roundtable discussion focused on what’s ahead for the = market, hence the name “The Look Ahead”.  The point of this is = instead of typing my comments; you may be able to hear my comments, not that I am = presuming anyone cares to know my point of view.

 

Aside from that, in the past, =  the group has posted “watch lists.”  Our setup list has = grown substantially and again, not to be presumptuous, but would like to share our ideas. =  Thoughts?

 

Ed Gjertsen II

ed@macktracks.com

- ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C27112.65218200-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:42:29 -0500 From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Duke - did you put macros in your sheet? Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:17 AM To: CANSLIM Subject: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Greetings one and all. I've been absent from the list for good reason, I think.... Earlier this year, I put forth a theory that it might be wise to keep an eye on stocks most likely to be positively impacted as baby boomers enter their retirement years. I didn't get much response, apparently not CANSLIM enough, but I forged ahead based on my personal experiences as a "leading edge" boomer. To wit, since becoming an economic being, I've kept an eye on my rear-view mirror. I observed (and profited from) the boomer impact over the years...as the bubble passed from one phase to another. A case in point: If it weren't for the boomers, I never could have sold my home of 25 years, probably worth about $50,000, for over $400,000! As I set out to build my list of "boomer babies," the challenge was to keep it within the CANSLIM envelope. So I confined my search to companies appearing in IBD's New America. Lacking 'M', AT LEAST we would have "N"! So I just finished scouring nine months of New America articles and the search yielded over 70 stocks, which I transferred them to a spreadsheet. It's basis is Katherine's "CANSLIM Hunting" spreadsheet (tied for the single greatest contribution to this list of all time with Mikes CANSLIM analyzer, thank you both). You can download the sheet at http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/BoomerBabies.zip A few caveats: Some companies on the list may evoke, "Is he nuts?" Trust me, each has a reason based on my rear-view-mirror observations. You'll also find industries where some companies appear while others in the same industry are excluded. For instance, the only home builders included are those with a major sunbelt focus. I've also excluded some obvious candidates, most notable is Pfizer (the inventors of the pill that has all the residents of Sun City putting signs on their doors that read, "Don't come a knockin' when my condo is a rockin'"). I'm reserving Pfizer and other non-New America stocks for a 'B' list of boomer babies. In conclusion, WON has said of late that what this market needs is a bunch of new IPO's to lead it into bull territory. I agree, but for the near term, he's gotta be dreamin'. So the boomer babies are an effort to ferret out stocks that have the potential to profit from the inevitable aging of the not-so-baby boomers. No chance they'll trigger an era of "irrational exuberance," but maybe they can generate some half-way decent returns. Finally, the list is just that: a list. In no way am I implying all the right fundamentals are there or that bases have formed or are forming...YET! But I think it's a good way to start tracking some potential winners. If this concept stirs you in any way, I invite you to share those companies you think might fit the mold. Have a great weekend... Duke - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:04:24 -0400 From: "Duke Miller" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Ed: All I did was put the symbols in, activated everything according to Katherine's instructions, and it worked when it left here. Duke - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Edward W. Gjertsen II Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:42 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Duke - did you put macros in your sheet? Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:17 AM To: CANSLIM Subject: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Greetings one and all. I've been absent from the list for good reason, I think.... Earlier this year, I put forth a theory that it might be wise to keep an eye on stocks most likely to be positively impacted as baby boomers enter their retirement years. I didn't get much response, apparently not CANSLIM enough, but I forged ahead based on my personal experiences as a "leading edge" boomer. To wit, since becoming an economic being, I've kept an eye on my rear-view mirror. I observed (and profited from) the boomer impact over the years...as the bubble passed from one phase to another. A case in point: If it weren't for the boomers, I never could have sold my home of 25 years, probably worth about $50,000, for over $400,000! As I set out to build my list of "boomer babies," the challenge was to keep it within the CANSLIM envelope. So I confined my search to companies appearing in IBD's New America. Lacking 'M', AT LEAST we would have "N"! So I just finished scouring nine months of New America articles and the search yielded over 70 stocks, which I transferred them to a spreadsheet. It's basis is Katherine's "CANSLIM Hunting" spreadsheet (tied for the single greatest contribution to this list of all time with Mikes CANSLIM analyzer, thank you both). You can download the sheet at http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/BoomerBabies.zip A few caveats: Some companies on the list may evoke, "Is he nuts?" Trust me, each has a reason based on my rear-view-mirror observations. You'll also find industries where some companies appear while others in the same industry are excluded. For instance, the only home builders included are those with a major sunbelt focus. I've also excluded some obvious candidates, most notable is Pfizer (the inventors of the pill that has all the residents of Sun City putting signs on their doors that read, "Don't come a knockin' when my condo is a rockin'"). I'm reserving Pfizer and other non-New America stocks for a 'B' list of boomer babies. In conclusion, WON has said of late that what this market needs is a bunch of new IPO's to lead it into bull territory. I agree, but for the near term, he's gotta be dreamin'. So the boomer babies are an effort to ferret out stocks that have the potential to profit from the inevitable aging of the not-so-baby boomers. No chance they'll trigger an era of "irrational exuberance," but maybe they can generate some half-way decent returns. Finally, the list is just that: a list. In no way am I implying all the right fundamentals are there or that bases have formed or are forming...YET! But I think it's a good way to start tracking some potential winners. If this concept stirs you in any way, I invite you to share those companies you think might fit the mold. Have a great weekend... Duke - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:22:55 -0700 From: Ian Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --Boundary_(ID_G+GSbSUM+z00JC0UZqL0kg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi Katherine: One thing that discourages me (again) is the ferocity of this rebound, and its apparent concentration in heavily shorted stocks. The big indices are up almost 10% in just 24 hours. I realize that they had dropped a lot, but it still doesn't leave much headroom for traditional follow-through days and a legitimate rally afterwards. We'll see. Chers, Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: Katherine Malm To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:24 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? Hi Ian, Glad to see you've popped up for a look see. Never can tell if a rally can turn into something sustainable.... certainly worth staying abreast just in case!! Either way, some very interesting stocks on the list.... Katherine ----- Original Message ----- From: Ian To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:22 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? Hi Katherine: Thank you very much for your efforts, I really appreciate it. I feel like I'm coming out of hibernation just by looking ... Cheers, Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: Katherine Malm To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:14 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? Hi Ian, Since "good CANSLIM characteristics" and "up siginificantly" are interpretive, I had to come up with some arbitrary guidelines for this list, so here's how I derived it: 1. Forward growth rate >=15% 2. Price >=$10 3. Not down in the latest 52 wks. If trading < 52wks, up since IPO. 4. Currently meet what I consider "minimum technicals" ... that is, >=200 day MA, no more than 15% below the 50 day MA, RS>=60. 5. I deleted any stocks meeting items 1-4 that were REITS, Mining or Food. I also deleted any stocks that are currently pending merger/acquisition targets. I arbitrarly left in cyclicals such as transportation and banking/S&L. Not all the charts are "pretty" as they may be up or even for the year, but face multiyear overhead resistence. All in all, 111 names. Out of 10000 stocks, that's about 1%. While that's not great odds for anybody long over the last year, it does make a very nice "short list" of strong stocks should the market get legs. See the list at: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/WorkingStocks101002.xls Katherine ----- Original Message ----- From: Ian To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:54 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? Hi all: I'm trying to make a list of stocks with good CANSLIM characteristics that are well up on the year and still above their 50 and 200 day ma's. Right now, the only $10+ stocks on my list are JCOM and BLUD. Does anyone have any others? Thanks, Ian - --Boundary_(ID_G+GSbSUM+z00JC0UZqL0kg) Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Hi Katherine:
 
One thing that discourages me (again) is the ferocity of this rebound, and its apparent concentration in heavily shorted stocks. The big indices are up almost 10% in just 24 hours. I realize that they had dropped a lot, but it still doesn't leave much headroom for traditional follow-through days and a legitimate rally afterwards. We'll see.
 
Chers,
 
Ian
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong?

Hi Ian,
 
Glad to see you've popped up for a look see. Never can tell if a rally can turn into something sustainable.... certainly worth staying abreast just in case!! Either way, some very interesting stocks on the list....
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From: Ian
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong?

Hi Katherine:
 
Thank you very much for your efforts, I really appreciate it.
 
I feel like I'm coming out of hibernation just by looking ...
 
Cheers,
 
Ian
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong?

Hi Ian,
 
Since "good CANSLIM characteristics" and "up siginificantly" are interpretive, I had to come up with some arbitrary guidelines for this list, so here's how I derived it:
 
1. Forward growth rate >=15%
2. Price >=$10
3. Not down in the latest 52 wks. If trading < 52wks, up since IPO.
4. Currently meet what I consider "minimum technicals" ... that is, >=200 day MA, no more than 15% below the 50 day MA, RS>=60.
5. I deleted any stocks meeting items 1-4 that were REITS, Mining or Food. I also deleted any stocks that are currently pending merger/acquisition targets. I arbitrarly left in cyclicals such as transportation and banking/S&L.
 
Not all the charts are "pretty" as they may be up or even for the year, but face multiyear overhead resistence. All in all, 111 names. Out of 10000 stocks, that's about 1%. While that's not great odds for anybody long over the last year, it does make a very nice "short list" of strong stocks should the market get legs.
 
 
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From: Ian
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] What's still strong?

Hi all:
 
I'm trying to make a list of stocks with good CANSLIM characteristics that are well up on the year and still above their 50 and 200 day ma's. Right now, the only $10+ stocks on my list are JCOM and BLUD. Does anyone have any others?
 
Thanks,
 
Ian
 
 
- --Boundary_(ID_G+GSbSUM+z00JC0UZqL0kg)-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:19:55 -0500 From: Gene Ricci Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01C27120.81E64840 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ed, yes... there are macros and they are clean. Gene ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Edward W. Gjertsen II=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:42 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Duke - did you put macros in your sheet? Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:17 AM To: CANSLIM Subject: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies Greetings one and all. I've been absent from the list for good = reason, I think.... Earlier this year, I put forth a theory that it might be wise to keep = an eye on stocks most likely to be positively impacted as baby boomers enter their retirement years. I didn't get much response, apparently not CANSLIM enough, but I forged ahead based on my personal = experiences as a "leading edge" boomer. To wit, since becoming an economic being, I've kept an eye on my rear-view mirror. I observed (and profited = from) the boomer impact over the years...as the bubble passed from one phase to another. A case in point: If it weren't for the boomers, I never could have sold my home of 25 years, probably worth about $50,000, for over $400,000!=20 As I set out to build my list of "boomer babies," the challenge was to keep it within the CANSLIM envelope. So I confined my search to companies appearing in IBD's New America. Lacking 'M', AT LEAST we = would have "N"! =20 So I just finished scouring nine months of New America articles and = the search yielded over 70 stocks, which I transferred them to a spreadsheet. It's basis is Katherine's "CANSLIM Hunting" spreadsheet (tied for the single greatest contribution to this list of all time = with Mikes CANSLIM analyzer, thank you both). You can download the sheet at http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/BoomerBabies.zip A few caveats: Some companies on the list may evoke, "Is he nuts?" Trust me, each has a reason based on my rear-view-mirror observations. You'll also find industries where some companies appear while others = in the same industry are excluded. For instance, the only home builders included are those with a major sunbelt focus. I've also excluded some obvious candidates, most notable is Pfizer (the inventors of the pill that has all the residents of Sun City putting signs on their doors = that read, "Don't come a knockin' when my condo is a rockin'"). I'm = reserving Pfizer and other non-New America stocks for a 'B' list of boomer = babies. In conclusion, WON has said of late that what this market needs is a bunch of new IPO's to lead it into bull territory. I agree, but for = the near term, he's gotta be dreamin'. So the boomer babies are an effort = to ferret out stocks that have the potential to profit from the = inevitable aging of the not-so-baby boomers. No chance they'll trigger an era of "irrational exuberance," but maybe they can generate some half-way decent returns.=20 Finally, the list is just that: a list. In no way am I implying all = the right fundamentals are there or that bases have formed or are forming...YET! But I think it's a good way to start tracking some potential winners. If this concept stirs you in any way, I invite you to share those companies you think might fit the mold.=20 Have a great weekend... Duke - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01C27120.81E64840 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ed, yes... there are macros and they = are=20 clean.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Edward = W. Gjertsen=20 II
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 = 10:42=20 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Boomer=20 Babies

Duke - did you put macros in your sheet?

Ed = Gjertsen=20 II
ed@macktracks.com

-----Origi= nal=20 Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20 On Behalf Of Duke Miller
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:17 = AM
To:=20 CANSLIM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies

Greetings one and=20 all.  I've been absent from the list for good reason,
I=20 think....

Earlier this year, I put forth a theory that it might = be wise=20 to keep an
eye on stocks most likely to be positively impacted as = baby=20 boomers
enter their retirement years.  I didn't get much = response,=20 apparently
not CANSLIM enough, but I forged ahead based on my = personal=20 experiences
as a "leading edge" boomer.  To wit, since = becoming an=20 economic being,
I've kept an eye on my rear-view mirror.  I = observed=20 (and profited from)
the boomer impact over the years...as the = bubble passed=20 from one phase
to another. A case in point: If it weren't for the = boomers,=20 I never
could have sold my home of 25 years, probably worth about = $50,000,=20 for
over $400,000!

As I set out to build my list of "boomer = babies," the challenge was to
keep it within the CANSLIM envelope. = So I=20 confined my search to
companies appearing in IBD's New America. = Lacking=20 'M', AT LEAST we would
have "N"! 

So I just finished = scouring=20 nine months of New America articles and the
search yielded over 70 = stocks,=20 which I transferred them to a
spreadsheet.  It's basis is = Katherine's=20 "CANSLIM Hunting" spreadsheet
(tied for the single greatest = contribution to=20 this list of all time with
Mikes CANSLIM analyzer, thank you both). = You can=20 download the sheet at
http://WallSt= reet-LLC.com/canslim/BoomerBabies.zip

A=20 few caveats: Some companies on the list may evoke, "Is he = nuts?"
Trust me,=20 each has a reason based on my rear-view-mirror observations.
You'll = also=20 find industries where some companies appear while others in
the = same=20 industry are excluded.  For instance, the only home = builders
included=20 are those with a major sunbelt focus. I've also excluded = some
obvious=20 candidates, most notable is Pfizer (the inventors of the pill
that = has all=20 the residents of Sun City putting signs on their doors that
read, = "Don't=20 come a knockin' when my condo is a rockin'"). I'm reserving
Pfizer = and=20 other non-New America stocks for a 'B' list of boomer = babies.


In=20 conclusion, WON has said of late that what this market needs is = a
bunch of=20 new IPO's to lead it into bull territory.  I agree, but for = the
near=20 term, he's gotta be dreamin'. So the boomer babies are an effort = to
ferret=20 out stocks that have the potential to profit from the = inevitable
aging of=20 the not-so-baby boomers. No chance they'll trigger an era = of
"irrational=20 exuberance," but maybe they can generate some half-way
decent = returns.=20

Finally, the list is just that: a list.  In no way am I = implying=20 all the
right fundamentals are there or that bases have formed or=20 are
forming...YET!  But I think it's a good way to start = tracking=20 some
potential winners.  If this concept stirs you in any way, = I=20 invite you
to share those companies you think might fit the mold.=20

Have a great weekend...

Duke



-
-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim".  Do=20 not use quotes in your email.


-
-To = subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20 "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In= =20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe = canslim". =20 Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01C27120.81E64840-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:38:07 -0500 From: "Norman" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Weblink So much for their analysis. APPX is still climbing on volume, 16% off it's 52wk high. Only time will tell. Norm - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Dempsey" To: Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:44 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] IBD Weblink > Norm, > > At least for once they are calling one early, usually they call them after > the fact. I don't have a good example handy but I believe IBD has mentioned > this type of pattern before as being good. It seems to me that this has a > better chance of working since it is a recent IPO. > > I'm sure the check is in the mail. But don't get to excited as they will > spend more on postage then the value of the check. > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Norman > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:02 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: [CANSLIM] IBD Weblink > > Today's weblink features APPX. They describe the "false handle and > breakout" that is currently happening with that issue. It's a good look at > how the IBD folks interpret "low" handles. > > Now, the real question, can I expect to receive a little royality check in > the mail for this free advertising? Are you (lurker) listening out there?? > > Norm > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:00:33 -0500 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Fw: JOSB (was:[CANSLIM] What's still strong?) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C27126.2F4F5760 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kelly, JOSB is certainly in good company with the likes of MWRK, COH, CHS, CLE, = GYMB..... but others like TLB, JILL and ANN are showing signs of = outright breakdown. Can't help but think that recent comps are going to = look good after the dismal sales last year after 9/11. At this point, = I'd be more inclined to wait and see if stocks like JOSB can build a = head of steam with strong accumulation, as it's just as likely they = could roll over for good (last man standing so to speak). I've marked a = chart at: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/JOSB101002.JPG Since moving into our new house last year, my mailbox has been crowded = with catalogs and fliers from companies I've never even heard of...maybe = something to do with the new zip code....appalling how much money these = guys spend on print advertising that goes directly to the recycle bin = unopened...but so far, nothing from JOSB!! Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Kelly Short=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:56 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? Katherine, I like the looks of JOSB with the MACD about to make a bullish = crossover and RSI turning positive. All though, getting conflicting = statements from the A/D and money flow side of things. But these are = just technicals- the aspect of JOSB that really got my attention is the = weekly (sometimes daily) email I get from them advertising their sales. Kelly -----Original Message----- From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:15 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? Hi Ian, Since "good CANSLIM characteristics" and "up siginificantly" are = interpretive, I had to come up with some arbitrary guidelines for this = list, so here's how I derived it: 1. Forward growth rate >=3D15% 2. Price >=3D$10 3. Not down in the latest 52 wks. If trading < 52wks, up since IPO. 4. Currently meet what I consider "minimum technicals" ... that is, = >=3D200 day MA, no more than 15% below the 50 day MA, RS>=3D60. 5. I deleted any stocks meeting items 1-4 that were REITS, Mining or = Food. I also deleted any stocks that are currently pending = merger/acquisition targets. I arbitrarly left in cyclicals such as = transportation and banking/S&L. Not all the charts are "pretty" as they may be up or even for the = year, but face multiyear overhead resistence. All in all, 111 names. Out = of 10000 stocks, that's about 1%. While that's not great odds for = anybody long over the last year, it does make a very nice "short list" = of strong stocks should the market get legs. See the list at: = http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/WorkingStocks101002.xls Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ian=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:54 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] What's still strong? Hi all: I'm trying to make a list of stocks with good CANSLIM = characteristics that are well up on the year and still above their 50 = and 200 day ma's. Right now, the only $10+ stocks on my list are JCOM = and BLUD. Does anyone have any others? Thanks, Ian - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - --- For your protection, this e-mail message has been scanned for = viruses.=20 Visit us at http://www.neoris.com/=20 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - --- - ------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C27126.2F4F5760 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Kelly,
 
JOSB is certainly in good company with the likes of MWRK, COH, CHS, = CLE,=20 GYMB..... but others like TLB, JILL and ANN are showing signs of = outright=20 breakdown. Can't help but think that recent comps are going to look good = after=20 the dismal sales last year after 9/11. At this point, I'd be more = inclined to=20 wait and see if stocks like JOSB can build a head of steam with strong=20 accumulation, as it's just as likely they could roll over for good (last = man=20 standing so to speak). I've marked a chart at:
 
http://WallStre= et-LLC.com/canslim/JOSB101002.JPG
 
Since moving into our new house last year, my mailbox has been = crowded with=20 catalogs and fliers from companies I've never even heard of...maybe = something to=20 do with the new zip code....appalling how much money these guys spend on = print=20 advertising that goes directly to the recycle bin unopened...but so far, = nothing=20 from JOSB!!
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Kelly Short
Sent: Thursday, October 10, = 2002 1:56=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] What's = still=20 strong?

Katherine,
 
I=20 like the looks of JOSB with the MACD about to make a bullish crossover = and RSI=20 turning positive. All though, getting conflicting statements from the = A/D and=20 money flow side of things. But these are just technicals- the aspect = of JOSB=20 that really got my attention is the weekly (sometimes daily) email I = get from=20 them advertising their sales.
 
Kelly
-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Malm=20 [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, = 2002=20 12:15 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: = Re:=20 [CANSLIM] What's still strong?

Hi Ian,
 
Since "good CANSLIM characteristics" and "up siginificantly" = are=20 interpretive, I had to come up with some arbitrary guidelines for = this list,=20 so here's how I derived it:
 
1. Forward growth rate >=3D15%
2. Price >=3D$10
3. Not down in the latest 52 wks. If trading < 52wks, up = since=20 IPO.
4. Currently meet what I consider "minimum technicals" ... that = is,=20 >=3D200 day MA, no more than 15% below the 50 day MA, = RS>=3D60.
5. I deleted any stocks meeting items 1-4 that were REITS, = Mining or=20 Food. I also deleted any stocks that are currently pending=20 merger/acquisition targets. I arbitrarly left in cyclicals such as=20 transportation and banking/S&L.
 
Not all the charts are "pretty" as they may be up or even for = the year,=20 but face multiyear overhead resistence. All in all, 111 names. Out = of 10000=20 stocks, that's about 1%. While that's not great odds for anybody = long over=20 the last year, it does make a very nice "short list" of strong = stocks should=20 the market get legs.
 
See the list at: http:/= /WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/WorkingStocks101002.xls
 
 
Katherine
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Ian =
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Thursday, October 10, = 2002=20 11:54 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] What's = still=20 strong?

Hi all:
 
I'm trying to make a list of stocks with good = CANSLIM=20 characteristics that are well up on the year and still above their = 50 and=20 200 day ma's. Right now, the only $10+ stocks on my list are JCOM = and=20 BLUD. Does anyone have any others?
 
Thanks,
 
Ian
 
 
For your protection, this e-mail message has been scanned for = viruses.=20

Visit us at http://www.neoris.com/=20

- ------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C27126.2F4F5760-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2980 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.