From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #3080 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, December 6 2002 Volume 02 : Number 3080 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies RE: Fundamental Philosophies (was: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT) RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies RE: Fundamental Philosophies (was: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT) RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:38:41 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C29D02.E13445F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable interesting point of view, Andy. In contrast to Katherine, I am a = fundies first type, only after I see what I like there do I start = examining the technicals. On the other hand, to get a list of stocks to = examine, I typically use a list of stocks hitting new highs (e.g. = someone else likes them well enough to actually buy them and drive the = price up), so maybe I am starting with technicals, switching to fundies, = then back to different technicals. But bottom line, I have bought a number of stocks where the technicals = were not right at the time, but the fundies were what I looked for. I = had confidence that, in time, the fundies would bring the technicals = into line where those looking first for technicals would become buyers, = and make me a nice profit. More times than not this worked out, but I = think you need to be a long term investor for this attitude to be = profitable. - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: AJAskey@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT Katherine, My thought is the fundies don't make a bit of difference of the first = 10-20% of the move. When "M" is bad very little works no matter what = the fundies are. When "M" is cooking everything works no matter what = the fundies are. CANSLIM attempts to separate those stocks capable of = making the 20-1500% move from those that can't. Many appear to get sucked in during a good "M" to buying only from a = good base. This works fine but it is tougher to make a reasonable long = term return making only 20% on each positive buy while losing 8% on each = negative buy and then staying in cash during the bad "M". If I were to = make 500% during a good bull run I would have less temptation to try to = make up for missing the big moves in a bad "M" when I only turned = several 20% gainers into 100% return during the bull. Andy In a message dated 12/5/2002 11:27:03 PM Central Standard Time, = kmalm@earthlink.net writes: To Curt's original point, each investor has to find a meaningful set = of rules to follow within a set of style guidelines (in this case, = CANSLIM), trade by them, and then adjust as necessary as they learn from = their post analysis. - ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C29D02.E13445F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

interesting point of view, Andy. In contrast to = Katherine,=20 I am a fundies first type, only after I see what I like there do I start = examining the technicals. On the other hand, to get a list of stocks to = examine,=20 I typically use a list of stocks hitting new highs (e.g. someone else = likes them=20 well enough to actually buy them and drive the price up), so maybe I am = starting=20 with technicals, switching to fundies, then back to different=20 technicals.

But bottom line, I have bought a number of = stocks where=20 the technicals were not right at the time, but the fundies were what I = looked=20 for. I had confidence that, in time, the fundies would bring the = technicals into=20 line where those looking first for technicals would become buyers, and = make me a=20 nice profit. More times than not this worked out, but I think you need = to be a=20 long term investor for this attitude to be profitable.

----- Original Message -----=20

From: AJAskey@aol.com

To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=

Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:21 AM

Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT

Katherine,

My=20 thought is the fundies don't make a bit of difference of the first = 10-20% of the=20 move. When "M" is bad very little works no matter what the fundies = are. When "M" is cooking everything works no matter what the = fundies=20 are. CANSLIM attempts to separate those stocks capable of making = the=20 20-1500% move from those that can't.

Many appear to get sucked in = during=20 a good "M" to buying only from a good base. This works fine but it = is=20 tougher to make a reasonable long term return making only 20% on each = positive=20 buy while losing 8% on each negative buy and then staying in cash during = the bad=20 "M". If I were to make 500% during a good bull run I would = have less=20 temptation to try to make up for missing the big moves in a bad "M" when = I only=20 turned several 20% gainers into 100% return during the=20 bull.

Andy

In a message dated 12/5/2002 11:27:03 PM = Central=20 Standard Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes:

To Curt's original point, each investor has to find a = meaningful=20 set of rules to follow within a set of style guidelines (in this case, = CANSLIM), trade by them, and then adjust as necessary as they learn = from their=20 post analysis.

- ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C29D02.E13445F0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:08:45 EST From: Davellil5@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies One of our members has said that a stock may be selected for purchase when there is a preponderance of evidence showing conformance with CANSLIM criteria. This makes sense because it is very rare for a stock to conform 100%. Nevertheless, there are some go-nogo conditions. PECS provides us with a good example of one of those conditions. PECS has displayed great growth. EPS growth this year is expected to be 51%. However, EPS growth for next year is projected to be only 22%, less than half as much. There's nothing shabby about 22% growth, but coming after 51%, it forces us to wonder whether the price of the stock already reflects all the prospects for the Company. Maybe that's why PECS broke out on high volume November 25th, only to collapse on high volume December 2nd, and is now flirting with its 50DMA. I've been burned by stocks that I bought because of great growth records in spite of much slower future growth projections. So, now, that is a go-nogo condition for me. Maybe I'll miss a few "comers", but I just don't want to take that risk again. It would be useful for us CANSLIM-ers to discuss strict go-nogo conditions in these e- mails. Does anyone else have them? Regards to all, Dave - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:18:49 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies Dave, the 51% earnings growth this year is essentially already history. We have less than a month left on that forecast. On the other hand, the 22% growth for next year comes on a higher level of profits, it's pretty tough for a company to keep making 51% year over year when the number to increase from continues to grow like that. I saw the 40% funds ownership, and gave me pause. But when I checked the Management ownership (68%) and the resulting size of the float, it diminished in importance. However, I would expect to see Management lightening up their ownership over the next year if the price keeps moving like it has been. - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: ; Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies One of our members has said that a stock may be selected for purchase when there is a preponderance of evidence showing conformance with CANSLIM criteria. This makes sense because it is very rare for a stock to conform 100%. Nevertheless, there are some go-nogo conditions. PECS provides us with a good example of one of those conditions. PECS has displayed great growth. EPS growth this year is expected to be 51%. However, EPS growth for next year is projected to be only 22%, less than half as much. There's nothing shabby about 22% growth, but coming after 51%, it forces us to wonder whether the price of the stock already reflects all the prospects for the Company. Maybe that's why PECS broke out on high volume November 25th, only to collapse on high volume December 2nd, and is now flirting with its 50DMA. I've been burned by stocks that I bought because of great growth records in spite of much slower future growth projections. So, now, that is a go-nogo condition for me. Maybe I'll miss a few "comers", but I just don't want to take that risk again. It would be useful for us CANSLIM-ers to discuss strict go-nogo conditions in these e- mails. Does anyone else have them? Regards to all, Dave - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:29:33 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: RE: Fundamental Philosophies (was: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_1DDE_01C29D01.9AA1FA70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Andy, Once again, I agree with you. No doubt that the greatest gains to be made during a Bear are on the short side, but careful selection of stocks with solid fundamentals and technicals for long positions while the Market is in rally mode during a Bear also offer up good returns. The *same* discipline in selection translates well in a solid Bull, because careful selection using the same methodology makes the difference between 30% and 300% returns. The challenge is to find what set of fundamental criteria (both forward and backward looking) constitutes "a good stock" and for each individual, that set of rules or guidelines is going to be a bit different. The key is "set of rules" to be followed without exception but that can be modified as the investor learns from their past mistakes. My argument was simply that a set of fundamental rules that is overly restrictive does not necessarily translate into "a good stock" or consistent returns. Dave L has posted a good email that addresses that very issue. That is, what is a go/no go within the CANSLIM style? Will we find consistencies across the board in some areas? If you were to pare down WON's work, what are the absolutes? Katherine -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of AJAskey@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:22 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT Katherine, My thought is the fundies don't make a bit of difference of the first 10-20% of the move. When "M" is bad very little works no matter what the fundies are. When "M" is cooking everything works no matter what the fundies are. CANSLIM attempts to separate those stocks capable of making the 20-1500% move from those that can't. Many appear to get sucked in during a good "M" to buying only from a good base. This works fine but it is tougher to make a reasonable long term return making only 20% on each positive buy while losing 8% on each negative buy and then staying in cash during the bad "M". If I were to make 500% during a good bull run I would have less temptation to try to make up for missing the big moves in a bad "M" when I only turned several 20% gainers into 100% return during the bull. Andy In a message dated 12/5/2002 11:27:03 PM Central Standard Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes: To Curt's original point, each investor has to find a meaningful set of rules to follow within a set of style guidelines (in this case, CANSLIM), trade by them, and then adjust as necessary as they learn from their post analysis. - ------=_NextPart_000_1DDE_01C29D01.9AA1FA70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Andy,

Once again, I agree with you. No = doubt that=20 the greatest gains to be made during a Bear are on the short side, but = careful=20 selection of stocks with solid fundamentals and technicals for long = positions=20 while the Market is in rally mode during a Bear also offer up good = returns. The=20 *same* discipline in selection translates well in a solid Bull, because = careful=20 selection using the same methodology makes the difference between 30% = and 300%=20 returns.

The challenge is to find what set = of=20 fundamental criteria (both forward and backward looking) constitutes "a = good=20 stock" and for each individual, that set of rules or guidelines is going = to be a=20 bit different. The key is "set of rules" to be followed without = exception but=20 that can be modified as the investor learns from their past mistakes. My = argument was simply that a set of fundamental rules that is overly = restrictive=20 does not necessarily translate into "a good stock" or consistent = returns. Dave L=20 has posted a good email that addresses that very issue. That is, what is = a go/no=20 go within the CANSLIM style? Will we find consistencies across the board = in some=20 areas? If you were to pare down WON's work, what are the = absolutes?

Katherine

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 AJAskey@aol.com
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:22=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 NXTL, SXT

Katherine,

My thought is the fundies don't make a bit = of=20 difference of the first 10-20% of the move. When "M" is bad very = little=20 works no matter what the fundies are. When "M" is cooking = everything=20 works no matter what the fundies are. CANSLIM attempts to = separate those=20 stocks capable of making the 20-1500% move from those that = can't.

Many=20 appear to get sucked in during a good "M" to buying only from a good=20 base. This works fine but it is tougher to make a reasonable = long term=20 return making only 20% on each positive buy while losing 8% on each = negative=20 buy and then staying in cash during the bad "M". If I were = to make=20 500% during a good bull run I would have less temptation to try to = make up for=20 missing the big moves in a bad "M" when I only turned several 20% = gainers into=20 100% return during the bull.

Andy

In a message dated = 12/5/2002=20 11:27:03 PM Central Standard Time, kmalm@earthlink.net = writes:

To Curt's original point, each investor has to find a = meaningful=20 set of rules to follow within a set of style guidelines (in this = case,=20 CANSLIM), trade by them, and then adjust as necessary as they learn = from=20 their post=20 analysis.

- ------=_NextPart_000_1DDE_01C29D01.9AA1FA70-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:41:47 -0600 From: "Fred Richards" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies The key is to balance risk with reward. In the case of PECS, it has made money for some investors on several occasions. But it did require one to use either a good alert system or hard trailing stops to protect those gains. The question is simply this: Did you set your stop-loss or Action Point to keep those losses as minimal as possible. O'Neil suggests 6% below cost in most cases as the initial Action Point. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Davellil5@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:09 AM To: cjcorley@hiwaay.net; canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies One of our members has said that a stock may be selected for purchase when there is a preponderance of evidence showing conformance with CANSLIM criteria. This makes sense because it is very rare for a stock to conform 100%. Nevertheless, there are some go-nogo conditions. PECS provides us with a good example of one of those conditions. PECS has displayed great growth. EPS growth this year is expected to be 51%. However, EPS growth for next year is projected to be only 22%, less than half as much. There's nothing shabby about 22% growth, but coming after 51%, it forces us to wonder whether the price of the stock already reflects all the prospects for the Company. Maybe that's why PECS broke out on high volume November 25th, only to collapse on high volume December 2nd, and is now flirting with its 50DMA. I've been burned by stocks that I bought because of great growth records in spite of much slower future growth projections. So, now, that is a go-nogo condition for me. Maybe I'll miss a few "comers", but I just don't want to take that risk again. It would be useful for us CANSLIM-ers to discuss strict go-nogo conditions in these e- mails. Does anyone else have them? Regards to all, Dave - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:44:39 -0600 From: "Fred Richards" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C29D03.B6818740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Smile . . . The cost of Value Line compared to similar information sources became out of line and their track record was slumping. Well, at least, you got me to laugh after being up all night. So now it is off to bed. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of AJAskey@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:24 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies So you are now saying you don't always get what you pay for....? Sorry, just had to as the setup was perfect... LOL Andy In a message dated 12/6/2002 1:59:31 AM Central Standard Time, ffradrich@attbi.com writes: Actually, Curt, we used Value Line for many years but dropped it over a decade ago. It just was not a good source for us. - ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C29D03.B6818740 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Smile=20 . . .

The=20 cost of Value Line compared to similar information sources became out of = line=20 and their track record was slumping.

Well,=20 at least, you got me to laugh after being up all night. So now it is off = to=20 bed.

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 AJAskey@aol.com
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:24=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 Fundamental Philosophies

So you are now saying you don't always get what you pay = for....? =20 Sorry, just had to as the setup was perfect... = LOL

Andy

In a=20 message dated 12/6/2002 1:59:31 AM Central Standard Time, = ffradrich@attbi.com=20 writes:

Actually, Curt, we used Value Line for many years but = dropped it=20 over a decade ago. It just was not a good source for us. =

- ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C29D03.B6818740-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:38:53 -0700 From: "David Taggart" Subject: RE: Fundamental Philosophies (was: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C29CFA.86788E80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My absolutes are Earnings growth, RS, the sector, and Overall chart. Of course the most important part is a stop order. David Taggart -----Original Message-----est bu From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:30 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: Fundamental Philosophies (was: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT) Hi Andy, Once again, I agree with you. No doubt that the greatest gains to be made during a Bear are on the short side, but careful selection of stocks with solid fundamentals and technicals for long positions while the Market is in rally mode during a Bear also offer up good returns. The *same* discipline in selection translates well in a solid Bull, because careful selection using the same methodology makes the difference between 30% and 300% returns. The challenge is to find what set of fundamental criteria (both forward and backward looking) constitutes "a good stock" and for each individual, that set of rules or guidelines is going to be a bit different. The key is "set of rules" to be followed without exception but that can be modified as the investor learns from their past mistakes. My argument was simply that a set of fundamental rules that is overly restrictive does not necessarily translate into "a good stock" or consistent returns. Dave L has posted a good email that addresses that very issue. That is, what is a go/no go within the CANSLIM style? Will we find consistencies across the board in some areas? If you were to pare down WON's work, what are the absolutes? Katherine -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of AJAskey@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:22 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT Katherine, My thought is the fundies don't make a bit of difference of the first 10-20% of the move. When "M" is bad very little works no matter what the fundies are. When "M" is cooking everything works no matter what the fundies are. CANSLIM attempts to separate those stocks capable of making the 20-1500% move from those that can't. Many appear to get sucked in during a good "M" to buying only from a good base. This works fine but it is tougher to make a reasonable long term return making only 20% on each positive buy while losing 8% on each negative buy and then staying in cash during the bad "M". If I were to make 500% during a good bull run I would have less temptation to try to make up for missing the big moves in a bad "M" when I only turned several 20% gainers into 100% return during the bull. Andy In a message dated 12/5/2002 11:27:03 PM Central Standard Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes: To Curt's original point, each investor has to find a meaningful set of rules to follow within a set of style guidelines (in this case, CANSLIM), trade by them, and then adjust as necessary as they learn from their post analysis. - ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C29CFA.86788E80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My=20 absolutes are Earnings growth, RS, the sector, and Overall chart. = Of=20 course the most important part is a stop order. =

David=20 Taggart

-----Original Message-----est bu
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Katherine = Malm
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:30 AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: Fundamental = Philosophies=20 (was: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT)

Hi Andy,

Once again, I agree with you. No = doubt=20 that the greatest gains to be made during a Bear are on the short = side, but=20 careful selection of stocks with solid fundamentals and technicals for = long=20 positions while the Market is in rally mode during a Bear also offer = up good=20 returns. The *same* discipline in selection translates well in a solid = Bull,=20 because careful selection using the same methodology makes the = difference=20 between 30% and 300% returns.

The challenge is to find what = set of=20 fundamental criteria (both forward and backward looking) constitutes = "a good=20 stock" and for each individual, that set of rules or guidelines is = going to be=20 a bit different. The key is "set of rules" to be followed without = exception=20 but that can be modified as the investor learns from their past = mistakes. My=20 argument was simply that a set of fundamental rules that is overly = restrictive=20 does not necessarily translate into "a good stock" or consistent = returns. Dave=20 L has posted a good email that addresses that very issue. That is, = what is a=20 go/no go within the CANSLIM style? Will we find consistencies across = the board=20 in some areas? If you were to pare down WON's work, what are the=20 absolutes?

Katherine

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 AJAskey@aol.com
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:22=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 NXTL, SXT

Katherine,

My thought is the fundies don't make a = bit of=20 difference of the first 10-20% of the move. When "M" is bad = very=20 little works no matter what the fundies are. When "M" is = cooking=20 everything works no matter what the fundies are. CANSLIM = attempts to=20 separate those stocks capable of making the 20-1500% move from those = that=20 can't.

Many appear to get sucked in during a good "M" to = buying only=20 from a good base. This works fine but it is tougher to make a=20 reasonable long term return making only 20% on each positive buy = while=20 losing 8% on each negative buy and then staying in cash during the = bad=20 "M". If I were to make 500% during a good bull run I = would have=20 less temptation to try to make up for missing the big moves in a bad = "M"=20 when I only turned several 20% gainers into 100% return during the=20 bull.

Andy

In a message dated 12/5/2002 11:27:03 PM = Central=20 Standard Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes:

To Curt's original point, each investor has to find a=20 meaningful set of rules to follow within a set of style guidelines = (in=20 this case, CANSLIM), trade by them, and then adjust as necessary = as they=20 learn from their post=20 analysis.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C29CFA.86788E80-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:39:34 -0700 From: "David Taggart" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_005D_01C29CFA.9EDF5A30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey, Valueline is great. If you have a free username and password from the library :-) -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Fred Richards Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:45 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies Smile . . . The cost of Value Line compared to similar information sources became out of line and their track record was slumping. Well, at least, you got me to laugh after being up all night. So now it is off to bed. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of AJAskey@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:24 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies So you are now saying you don't always get what you pay for....? Sorry, just had to as the setup was perfect... LOL Andy In a message dated 12/6/2002 1:59:31 AM Central Standard Time, ffradrich@attbi.com writes: Actually, Curt, we used Value Line for many years but dropped it over a decade ago. It just was not a good source for us. - ------=_NextPart_000_005D_01C29CFA.9EDF5A30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey,

Valueline is great. If you have a free username and = password from=20 the library :-)

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Fred=20 Richards
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:45 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Fundamental=20 Philosophies

Smile . . .

The=20 cost of Value Line compared to similar information sources became out = of line=20 and their track record was slumping.

Well, at least, you got me to laugh after being up all night. = So now it=20 is off to bed.

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 AJAskey@aol.com
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:24=20 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 Fundamental Philosophies

So you are now saying you = don't always get=20 what you pay for....? Sorry, just had to as the setup was = perfect...=20 LOL

Andy

In a message dated 12/6/2002 1:59:31 AM = Central=20 Standard Time, ffradrich@attbi.com writes:

Actually, Curt, we used Value Line for many years but = dropped=20 it over a decade ago. It just was not a good source for = us. =20

<= /HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_005D_01C29CFA.9EDF5A30-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:00:06 -0600 From: "Fred Richards" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C29D05.DEFFD260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Perhaps, it has improved but we found that it was not as timely in getting information as other sources. And in our business, timing is about as important as luck. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of David Taggart Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:40 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies Hey, Valueline is great. If you have a free username and password from the library :-) -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Fred Richards Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:45 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies Smile . . . The cost of Value Line compared to similar information sources became out of line and their track record was slumping. Well, at least, you got me to laugh after being up all night. So now it is off to bed. -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of AJAskey@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:24 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies So you are now saying you don't always get what you pay for....? Sorry, just had to as the setup was perfect... LOL Andy In a message dated 12/6/2002 1:59:31 AM Central Standard Time, ffradrich@attbi.com writes: Actually, Curt, we used Value Line for many years but dropped it over a decade ago. It just was not a good source for us. - ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C29D05.DEFFD260 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Perhaps, it has improved but we found that it was not as timely = in=20 getting information as other sources. And in our business, timing = is about=20 as important as luck.

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of David=20 Taggart
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:40 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Fundamental=20 Philosophies

Hey,

Valueline is great. If you have a free username and = password from=20 the library :-)

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Fred=20 Richards
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:45 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Fundamental=20 Philosophies

Smile . . .

The cost of Value Line compared to similar information = sources became=20 out of line and their track record was slumping. =

Well, at least, you got me to laugh after being up all = night. So now=20 it is off to bed.

-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of=20 AJAskey@aol.com
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:24 = AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies

So you are now saying you = don't always=20 get what you pay for....? Sorry, just had to as the setup = was=20 perfect... LOL

Andy

In a message dated 12/6/2002 = 1:59:31 AM=20 Central Standard Time, ffradrich@attbi.com = writes:

Actually, Curt, we used Value Line for many years = but=20 dropped it over a decade ago. It just was not a good = source for=20 us.

- ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C29D05.DEFFD260-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #3080 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.