From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #3115 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Thursday, January 2 2003 Volume 02 : Number 3115 In this issue: [CANSLIM] Fred's Answer to My-- Re. Non CANSLIM Question Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD [CANSLIM] Question on IBD Industry Group Rankings ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:29:51 EST From: Spencer48@aol.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Fred's Answer to My-- Re. Non CANSLIM Question In a message dated 1/1/2003 2:35:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, ffradrich@attbi.com writes: << Jans There are those who think my 40 years of real-time experience is valid . . . and also a few who disagree. But it has been my experience that many CEO's and board members only look at the short-term effects (one or two quarters and a couple of years at the most) of many of their decisions. That is the driving force today in my humble opinion. Also, it is the time frame that most investors and financial analysts look at. They can't see beyond the end of this quarter. Look at the knee-jerk reactions of the lemmings who are today's portfolio managers for confirmation. But again that is the price we pay for stocks that are valued on the basis of high P/E's and hype, not the solid foundation base which Ben Graham and Armand Erpf espoused. Your suggestion that cutting costs enables companies to buy time has been used often to justify actions. But if the management was doing their jobs properly, why did the company get into the fix in the first place? It has been my observation that most companies that have wielded the cost-cutting stick carelessly have found it extremely difficult to restore morale, creativity and profitability in the long-run. Look at AT&T and most of its off-spring, the railroads, the airlines, etc. and maybe, you will see a little of the reasoning I'm trying to suggest is better. I remember well when a group took over a major public transportation company in 1994 and their first order of business was to hire telephone operators to answer the phones and scrap the automatic telephone answering system that kept customers wanting to make reservations going through menu's for five minutes before being able to make one (and that was if you had a touch-tone phone, if not, it was a real night-mare.) And that was a cost-saving measure . . . sure! The old board members were aghast! But revenues started up each quarter since then and the losses became less and shortly turned into profits. In 1981, we purchased a company from the bankruptcy court whose board had reduced the staffing by 75% over seven months and sales were down 85% in the same period. By hiring more sales personnel (sales were a direct function of the number of sales personnel), it took less than three months to turn the company around. When we sold it 18 months later, the company had 50% more employees than it had before the previous management had started wielding the cost cutting axe at the behest of its venture capital partner, and we made a 12 bag return on our investment. Fred -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Spencer48@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 12:57 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Non-CANSLIM question : Re: [CANSLIM] Is the market ready to rally? Fred: If you have real-time experience in this field (I'm not being snide, I just forget your resume), do you conclude that firms actually believe that the bottom-line, when they cut costs, will improve indefinitely? As I understand your E-mail, you think that most firms don't believe that cutting costs is just the necessary precursor strategem to buy them enough time in order to formulate a plan to increase revenues? jans In a message dated 1/1/2003 8:22:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, ffradrich@attbi.com writes: << ...I think that all the discussion about the cost side of the equation reminds me of the same mentality that all those CEO's and Board of Directors have adopted that cost-savings and employee layoffs are the route to improved bottom lines. Their strategy is nothing but a short-term fix and does nothing to solve the long-term problem. I guess that I belong to another school . . . innovate to create market and product demand, and provide the best service to your customer. >> >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:48:32 -0500 From: "Dave Rogers" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_009B_01C2B1AD.3C72A4C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ann, I am interested in eIBD but can't see a link in Investors.com. What is = the URL? Thanks. Dave ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ann=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Having received my 2-weeks of free eIBD, I downloaded the latest copy = of IBD onto my hard drive (because it wouldn't open) but still couldn't = open it. It may be because there is so little space on my drive. But it = took more than a few minutes to download, even with broadband. There's = no way that I would do this every day. Also, when I recently spoke to = someone at ibd on the phone, they informed me that it's 5 p.m Pacific = time that the e-paper is available, not 5 p.m. Eastern time, which I had = been incorrectly assuming. That's about the time that investors.com = posts.=20 Ann ----- Original Message -----=20 From: AJAskey@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Here are my thoughts on the cost of DGO as someone who did subscribe = but has since cancelled. (You mentioned DGO with eIBD and I hope that is = what you meant). =20 First, I think that the dollar cost is not that expensive to worry = someone who is investing at least $5000 in stocks in a bull market. = (For those playing with $2000 it may turn out to eat up all the gains.) = There is a question about whether it is useful to pay for DGO in a = mega-bear market when CANSLIM is the method of investing. It may be = better to subscribe on a monthly basis and only pay when the market = could be ready to pick up and cancel when it is obvious by the charts = that it will take a few months for a CANSLIM market to being. The IBD = paper is different and I like that in both bull and bear markets. OTOH -- Even though I don't think DGO is overly expensive in theory, = I do think the current content makes it worth about $100-$250 per year. = The charts are free several places. The majority data provided can be = found for free or around $250 per year from other sources. These data = source also provide the raw data behind the DGO data for download to a = local computer. DGO shows the EPS and sales that make up the Q/Q and = Y/Y growth, but does not provide a method of allowing that data to be = downloaded. I understand the concept of proprietary data but DGO does = not have data that isn't available elsewhere for much less. With the = data on the computer a user can screen for CANSLIM criteria to find = potential candidates. The rankings can be found in an IBD or a = subscriber can find then online. As for the eIBD, I looked at a sample online that was over 5MB. = This is too much to download everyday and several people I know who = subscribed to eIBD have cancelled because it is just too much trouble. Andy In a message dated 12/31/2002 1:51:17 PM Central Standard Time, = smaye1211@yahoo.com writes: Just a question to anybody out there what do you think a fair = price should be for DGO online (I'm not one of IBD lurkers)=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_009B_01C2B1AD.3C72A4C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ann,
 
I am interested in eIBD but can't see a = link in=20 Investors.com. What is the URL? Thanks.
 
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ann
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, = 2003 2:55=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Having received my 2-weeks of free eIBD, I = downloaded the=20 latest copy of IBD onto my hard drive (because it wouldn't open) but = still=20 couldn't open it. It may be because there is so little space on my = drive. But=20 it took more than a few minutes to download, even with broadband. = There's no=20 way that I would do this every day. Also, when I recently spoke to = someone at=20 ibd on the phone, they informed me that it's 5 p.m Pacific time that = the=20 e-paper is available, not 5 p.m. Eastern time, which I had been = incorrectly=20 assuming. That's about the time that investors.com posts. =
 
Ann

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 AJAskey@aol.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, = 2002 5:10=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Here are = my thoughts=20 on the cost of DGO as someone who did subscribe but has since = cancelled.=20 (You mentioned DGO with eIBD and I hope that is what you = meant). =20

First, I think that the dollar cost is not that expensive to = worry=20 someone who is investing at least $5000 in stocks in a bull = market. =20 (For those playing with $2000 it may turn out to eat up all the=20 gains.)  There is a question about whether it is useful to pay = for DGO=20 in a mega-bear market when CANSLIM is the method of investing.  = It may=20 be better to subscribe on a monthly basis and only pay when the = market could=20 be ready to pick up and cancel when it is obvious by the charts that = it will=20 take a few months for a CANSLIM market to being.  The IBD paper = is=20 different and I like that in both bull and bear markets.

OTOH = - -- Even=20 though I don't think DGO is overly expensive in theory, I do think = the=20 current content makes it worth about $100-$250 per year.  The = charts=20 are free several places.  The majority data provided can be = found for=20 free or around $250 per year from other sources.  These data = source=20 also provide the raw data behind the DGO data for download to a = local=20 computer.  DGO shows the EPS and sales that make up the Q/Q and = Y/Y=20 growth, but does not provide a method of allowing that data to be=20 downloaded.  I understand the concept of proprietary data but = DGO does=20 not have data that isn't available elsewhere for much less.  = With the=20 data on the computer a user can screen for CANSLIM criteria to find=20 potential candidates.  The rankings can be found in an IBD or a = subscriber can find then online.

As for the eIBD, I looked at = a=20 sample online that was over 5MB.  This is too much to download = everyday=20 and several people I know who subscribed to eIBD have cancelled = because it=20 is just too much trouble.

Andy

In a message dated = 12/31/2002=20 1:51:17 PM Central Standard Time, smaye1211@yahoo.com = writes:


Just a question to anybody out there what do you think = a fair=20 price should be for DGO online (I'm not one of IBD lurkers)=20 =



- ------=_NextPart_000_009B_01C2B1AD.3C72A4C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:58:29 -0500 From: "Ann" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C2B1AE.A058DF80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave, When I called they told me to simply add /eibd to the regular link. You = have to sign on first. They gave me access because my paper is no longer being delivered in the = morning. I'm not sure whether I would have access otherwise. Ann ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Dave Rogers=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Ann, I am interested in eIBD but can't see a link in Investors.com. What is = the URL? Thanks. Dave ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ann=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Having received my 2-weeks of free eIBD, I downloaded the latest = copy of IBD onto my hard drive (because it wouldn't open) but still = couldn't open it. It may be because there is so little space on my = drive. But it took more than a few minutes to download, even with = broadband. There's no way that I would do this every day. Also, when I = recently spoke to someone at ibd on the phone, they informed me that = it's 5 p.m Pacific time that the e-paper is available, not 5 p.m. = Eastern time, which I had been incorrectly assuming. That's about the = time that investors.com posts.=20 Ann ----- Original Message -----=20 From: AJAskey@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Here are my thoughts on the cost of DGO as someone who did = subscribe but has since cancelled. (You mentioned DGO with eIBD and I = hope that is what you meant). =20 First, I think that the dollar cost is not that expensive to worry = someone who is investing at least $5000 in stocks in a bull market. = (For those playing with $2000 it may turn out to eat up all the gains.) = There is a question about whether it is useful to pay for DGO in a = mega-bear market when CANSLIM is the method of investing. It may be = better to subscribe on a monthly basis and only pay when the market = could be ready to pick up and cancel when it is obvious by the charts = that it will take a few months for a CANSLIM market to being. The IBD = paper is different and I like that in both bull and bear markets. OTOH -- Even though I don't think DGO is overly expensive in = theory, I do think the current content makes it worth about $100-$250 = per year. The charts are free several places. The majority data = provided can be found for free or around $250 per year from other = sources. These data source also provide the raw data behind the DGO = data for download to a local computer. DGO shows the EPS and sales that = make up the Q/Q and Y/Y growth, but does not provide a method of = allowing that data to be downloaded. I understand the concept of = proprietary data but DGO does not have data that isn't available = elsewhere for much less. With the data on the computer a user can = screen for CANSLIM criteria to find potential candidates. The rankings = can be found in an IBD or a subscriber can find then online. As for the eIBD, I looked at a sample online that was over 5MB. = This is too much to download everyday and several people I know who = subscribed to eIBD have cancelled because it is just too much trouble. Andy In a message dated 12/31/2002 1:51:17 PM Central Standard Time, = smaye1211@yahoo.com writes: Just a question to anybody out there what do you think a fair = price should be for DGO online (I'm not one of IBD lurkers)=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C2B1AE.A058DF80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dave,
 
When I called they told me to simply add /eibd to = the regular=20 link. You have to sign on first.
 
They gave me access because my paper is no longer = being=20 delivered in the morning. I'm not sure whether I would have access=20 otherwise.
 
Ann
 
 

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Dave = Rogers=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, = 2003 3:48=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Ann,
 
I am interested in eIBD but can't see = a link in=20 Investors.com. What is the URL? Thanks.
 
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ann
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, = 2003 2:55=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Having received my 2-weeks of free eIBD, I = downloaded the=20 latest copy of IBD onto my hard drive (because it wouldn't open) but = still=20 couldn't open it. It may be because there is so little space on my = drive.=20 But it took more than a few minutes to download, even with = broadband.=20 There's no way that I would do this every day. Also, when I recently = spoke=20 to someone at ibd on the phone, they informed me that it's 5 p.m = Pacific=20 time that the e-paper is available, not 5 p.m. Eastern time, which I = had=20 been incorrectly assuming. That's about the time that investors.com = posts.=20
 
Ann

----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 AJAskey@aol.com=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, = 2002 5:10=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Here = are my=20 thoughts on the cost of DGO as someone who did subscribe but has = since=20 cancelled. (You mentioned DGO with eIBD and I hope that is what = you=20 meant). 

First, I think that the dollar cost is not = that=20 expensive to worry someone who is investing at least $5000 in = stocks in a=20 bull market.  (For those playing with $2000 it may turn out = to eat up=20 all the gains.)  There is a question about whether it is = useful to=20 pay for DGO in a mega-bear market when CANSLIM is the method of=20 investing.  It may be better to subscribe on a monthly basis = and only=20 pay when the market could be ready to pick up and cancel when it = is=20 obvious by the charts that it will take a few months for a CANSLIM = market=20 to being.  The IBD paper is different and I like that in both = bull=20 and bear markets.

OTOH -- Even though I don't think DGO is = overly=20 expensive in theory, I do think the current content makes it worth = about=20 $100-$250 per year.  The charts are free several = places.  The=20 majority data provided can be found for free or around $250 per = year from=20 other sources.  These data source also provide the raw data = behind=20 the DGO data for download to a local computer.  DGO shows the = EPS and=20 sales that make up the Q/Q and Y/Y growth, but does not provide a = method=20 of allowing that data to be downloaded.  I understand the = concept of=20 proprietary data but DGO does not have data that isn't available = elsewhere=20 for much less.  With the data on the computer a user can = screen for=20 CANSLIM criteria to find potential candidates.  The rankings = can be=20 found in an IBD or a subscriber can find then online.

As = for the=20 eIBD, I looked at a sample online that was over 5MB.  This is = too=20 much to download everyday and several people I know who subscribed = to eIBD=20 have cancelled because it is just too much = trouble.

Andy

In=20 a message dated 12/31/2002 1:51:17 PM Central Standard Time,=20 smaye1211@yahoo.com writes:


Just a question to anybody out there what do you = think a=20 fair price should be for DGO online (I'm not one of IBD lurkers) = =



- ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C2B1AE.A058DF80-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:20:58 -0500 From: "Dave Rogers" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00AD_01C2B1B1.C4C0E9A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Ann, I got the following message: eIBD is only available in select markets and is not currently available = to the general public. Guess I'll have to wait to become a select market :-( Dave ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ann=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 3:58 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Dave, When I called they told me to simply add /eibd to the regular link. = You have to sign on first. They gave me access because my paper is no longer being delivered in = the morning. I'm not sure whether I would have access otherwise. Ann ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Dave Rogers=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Ann, I am interested in eIBD but can't see a link in Investors.com. What = is the URL? Thanks. Dave ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ann=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Having received my 2-weeks of free eIBD, I downloaded the latest = copy of IBD onto my hard drive (because it wouldn't open) but still = couldn't open it. It may be because there is so little space on my = drive. But it took more than a few minutes to download, even with = broadband. There's no way that I would do this every day. Also, when I = recently spoke to someone at ibd on the phone, they informed me that = it's 5 p.m Pacific time that the e-paper is available, not 5 p.m. = Eastern time, which I had been incorrectly assuming. That's about the = time that investors.com posts.=20 Ann ----- Original Message -----=20 From: AJAskey@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Here are my thoughts on the cost of DGO as someone who did = subscribe but has since cancelled. (You mentioned DGO with eIBD and I = hope that is what you meant). =20 First, I think that the dollar cost is not that expensive to = worry someone who is investing at least $5000 in stocks in a bull = market. (For those playing with $2000 it may turn out to eat up all the = gains.) There is a question about whether it is useful to pay for DGO = in a mega-bear market when CANSLIM is the method of investing. It may = be better to subscribe on a monthly basis and only pay when the market = could be ready to pick up and cancel when it is obvious by the charts = that it will take a few months for a CANSLIM market to being. The IBD = paper is different and I like that in both bull and bear markets. OTOH -- Even though I don't think DGO is overly expensive in = theory, I do think the current content makes it worth about $100-$250 = per year. The charts are free several places. The majority data = provided can be found for free or around $250 per year from other = sources. These data source also provide the raw data behind the DGO = data for download to a local computer. DGO shows the EPS and sales that = make up the Q/Q and Y/Y growth, but does not provide a method of = allowing that data to be downloaded. I understand the concept of = proprietary data but DGO does not have data that isn't available = elsewhere for much less. With the data on the computer a user can = screen for CANSLIM criteria to find potential candidates. The rankings = can be found in an IBD or a subscriber can find then online. As for the eIBD, I looked at a sample online that was over 5MB. = This is too much to download everyday and several people I know who = subscribed to eIBD have cancelled because it is just too much trouble. Andy In a message dated 12/31/2002 1:51:17 PM Central Standard Time, = smaye1211@yahoo.com writes: Just a question to anybody out there what do you think a fair = price should be for DGO online (I'm not one of IBD lurkers)=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_00AD_01C2B1B1.C4C0E9A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Ann,
 
I got the following = message:
 

eIBD is only available in select markets and is not currently = available to=20 the general public.

Guess I'll have to wait to become a = select=20 market  :-(

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ann
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, = 2003 3:58=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Dave,
 
When I called they told me to simply add /eibd to = the=20 regular link. You have to sign on first.
 
They gave me access because my paper is no longer = being=20 delivered in the morning. I'm not sure whether I would have access=20 otherwise.
 
Ann
 
 

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Dave Rogers=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, = 2003 3:48=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Ann,
 
I am interested in eIBD but can't = see a link in=20 Investors.com. What is the URL? Thanks.
 
Dave
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Ann=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Wednesday, January = 01, 2003=20 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Having received my 2-weeks of free eIBD, I = downloaded=20 the latest copy of IBD onto my hard drive (because it wouldn't = open) but=20 still couldn't open it. It may be because there is so little space = on my=20 drive. But it took more than a few minutes to download, even with=20 broadband. There's no way that I would do this every day. Also, = when I=20 recently spoke to someone at ibd on the phone, they informed me = that it's=20 5 p.m Pacific time that the e-paper is available, not 5 p.m. = Eastern time,=20 which I had been incorrectly assuming. That's about the time that=20 investors.com posts.
 
Ann

----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 AJAskey@aol.com
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Tuesday, December = 31, 2002=20 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = eIBD

Here = are my=20 thoughts on the cost of DGO as someone who did subscribe but has = since=20 cancelled. (You mentioned DGO with eIBD and I hope that is what = you=20 meant). 

First, I think that the dollar cost is not = that=20 expensive to worry someone who is investing at least $5000 in = stocks in=20 a bull market.  (For those playing with $2000 it may turn = out to=20 eat up all the gains.)  There is a question about whether = it is=20 useful to pay for DGO in a mega-bear market when CANSLIM is the = method=20 of investing.  It may be better to subscribe on a monthly = basis and=20 only pay when the market could be ready to pick up and cancel = when it is=20 obvious by the charts that it will take a few months for a = CANSLIM=20 market to being.  The IBD paper is different and I like = that in=20 both bull and bear markets.

OTOH -- Even though I don't = think DGO=20 is overly expensive in theory, I do think the current content = makes it=20 worth about $100-$250 per year.  The charts are free = several=20 places.  The majority data provided can be found for free = or around=20 $250 per year from other sources.  These data source also = provide=20 the raw data behind the DGO data for download to a local = computer. =20 DGO shows the EPS and sales that make up the Q/Q and Y/Y growth, = but=20 does not provide a method of allowing that data to be = downloaded. =20 I understand the concept of proprietary data but DGO does not = have data=20 that isn't available elsewhere for much less.  With the = data on the=20 computer a user can screen for CANSLIM criteria to find = potential=20 candidates.  The rankings can be found in an IBD or a = subscriber=20 can find then online.

As for the eIBD, I looked at a = sample=20 online that was over 5MB.  This is too much to download = everyday=20 and several people I know who subscribed to eIBD have cancelled = because=20 it is just too much trouble.

Andy

In a message = dated=20 12/31/2002 1:51:17 PM Central Standard Time, smaye1211@yahoo.com = writes:


Just a question to anybody out there what do you = think a=20 fair price should be for DGO online (I'm not one of IBD = lurkers)=20 =



- ------=_NextPart_000_00AD_01C2B1B1.C4C0E9A0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 08:06:59 -0800 From: "David Gerber" Subject: [CANSLIM] Question on IBD Industry Group Rankings Happy New Year Everyone! How do I find the identity of the stocks in the IBD Industry Groups, specifically the newly risen "Fiber Optics Networks" group? I subscribe to IBD only. Thanks, Dave - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #3115 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.