From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #3133 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Wednesday, January 15 2003 Volume 02 : Number 3133 In this issue: RE: [CANSLIM] Rok Re: [CANSLIM] Rok RE: [CANSLIM] Rok [CANSLIM] Current Market [CANSLIM] SYMC RE: [CANSLIM] SYMC [CANSLIM] In this trader's market Re: [CANSLIM] In this trader's market ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:42:34 -0800 (PST) From: chris landolfi Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Rok - --0-214581249-1042598554=:5019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Everyone, Happy Belated New Year! I just wanted to say hello! I recently read How To Make Money In Stocks and I think it's great that there's this type of discussion group to participate in. I just joined this past weekend and I look forward to learning a lot and hopefully sharing some insightful comments. ROK looks promising! Happy Trading, Chris CANUSLIM03@YAHOO.COM Katherine Malm wrote:Hi Morris, ROK has a lot going for it, including it's breakout on Friday 1/10. See a chart at:http://www.cwhcharts.com/katherine/ROK011003.JPG It's been reorganizing itself after spinning off from its parent and is now a substantial leader in industrial automation. It's D/E has been decreasing and is lower than the industry average. It's ROE of 14.2% is a little low, but higher than the industry average. It's profit margins peaked in 2000, but have started rising again after a couple of years of declines. There is modestly increasing institutional ownership. See some financial details at: http://www.marketguide.com/MGI/mg.asp?target=%2Fstocks%2Fcompanyinformation%2Fhighlights&Ticker=ROK(and related links from the same spot), or at http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results/compare.asp?Page=TenYearSummary&Symbol=rok (and related links from the same spot) Technically it ranks 7th in RSRank in its industry; an industry that has 53% of its members with an RSRank >= 70 and 38% of stocks meeting minimum technicals (RS>=60, price within 85% of 50dMA, price>=200dMA). Here are the RSRank details on the industry for stocks with RS>=60 (these are ranks from our site, *not* from DGO, so may be slightly different):SymbolRSTCDN99SLR98PMTR98SANM97SMTX97NTAI95ROK95STIZ95SGMA95MVIS94ORBT93RSYS92MSV92EMA92SL92SBSE91TTMI91AFCO88ATSN88IRSN88BHE86JBL86CRDN86FEP86BMM85ASY84CRTK82NJ81HDTV80FLEX77CHP75ESIO74CLS73ARXX72TRCI70MERX67 Katherine -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of E2moskow@aol.com Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:23 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Re:Rok Hi : IBD Smart Money and CWHCharts have mentioned ROK, There seems to be a more than average amount of accumulation, does anyone have any ideas on this. Is this a case where the insiders are getting in early?------------------>Morris Moskowitz - --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now - --0-214581249-1042598554=:5019 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Hi Everyone,

Happy Belated New Year! I just wanted to say hello!  I recently read How To Make Money In Stocks and I think it's great that there's this type of discussion group to participate in. I just joined this past weekend and I look forward to learning a lot and hopefully sharing some insightful comments. ROK looks promising!

Happy Trading,

Chris

CANUSLIM03@YAHOO.COM

 Katherine Malm <kmalm@earthlink.net> wrote:

Hi Morris,
 
ROK has a lot going for it, including it's breakout on Friday 1/10. See a chart at:
http://www.cwhcharts.com/katherine/ROK011003.JPG
 
It's been reorganizing itself after spinning off from its parent and is now a substantial leader in industrial automation. It's D/E has been decreasing and is lower than the industry average. It's ROE of 14.2% is a little low, but higher than the industry average. It's profit margins peaked in 2000, but have started rising again after a couple of years of declines. There is modestly increasing institutional ownership.
 
See some financial details at: http://www.marketguide.com/MGI/mg.asp?target=%2Fstocks%2Fcompanyinformation%2Fhighlights&Ticker=ROK
(and related links from the same spot), or at http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results/compare.asp?Page=TenYearSummary&Symbol=rok (and related links from the same spot)
 
Technically it ranks 7th in RSRank in its industry; an industry that has 53% of its members with an RSRank >= 70 and 38% of stocks meeting minimum technicals (RS>=60, price within 85% of 50dMA, price>=200dMA). Here are the RSRank details on the industry for stocks with RS>=60 (these are ranks from our site, *not* from DGO, so may be slightly different):
Symbol RS
TCDN 99
SLR 98
PMTR 98
SANM 97
SMTX 97
NTAI 95
ROK 95
STIZ 95
SGMA 95
MVIS 94
ORBT 93
RSYS 92
MSV 92
EMA 92
SL 92
SBSE 91
TTMI 91
AFCO 88
ATSN 88
IRSN 88
BHE 86
JBL 86
CRDN 86
FEP 86
BMM 85
ASY 84
CRTK 82
NJ 81
HDTV 80
FLEX 77
CHP 75
ESIO 74
CLS 73
ARXX 72
TRCI 70
MERX 67
 
Katherine
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of E2moskow@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:23 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Re:Rok

Hi :
     IBD Smart Money and CWHCharts have mentioned ROK, There seems to be a more than average amount of accumulation, does anyone have any ideas on this.  Is
this a case where the insiders are getting in early?------------------>Morris Moskowitz


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now - --0-214581249-1042598554=:5019-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:56:38 EST From: E2moskow@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Rok - --part1_6b.723889d.2b5635f6_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Katherine: Thanks so much for the thorough analysis of ROK, sorry I couldn't thank you earlier. By the increase in volume every day, it indicates it is being accumulated. Is there any indication they have come in with new machinery.-------------------------------------------->Morris Moskowitz - --part1_6b.723889d.2b5635f6_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Katherine:
    Thanks so much for the thorough analysis of ROK, sorry I couldn't thank you earlier.  By the increase in volume every day, it indicates it is being accumulated.  Is there any indication they have come in with new machinery.-------------------------------------------->Morris Moskowitz - --part1_6b.723889d.2b5635f6_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:38:53 -0600 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Rok This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C2BC60.C56B96C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit HI Morris, Thanks for the feedback. I haven't performed an in-depth due diligence on ROK, so can't answer your question. Significant developments and news usually give the clues for discerning the "N"(ew) in CANSLIM characteristics. I've noticed that they seem to be on a reorganization/acquisition binge and have signed some significant contracts lately. Try these links as a good starting point for your investigation: http://yahoo.marketguide.com/MGI/signdevt.asp?target=stocks%2Fcompanyinformation %2Fsigndevt&Ticker=ROK http://yahoo.marketguide.com/MGI/news.asp?target=%2Fstocks%2Fcompanyinformation% 2Fnews&Ticker=ROK http://www.rockwellautomation.com/invrelations/index.html Katherine - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of E2moskow@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 9:57 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Rok Hi Katherine: Thanks so much for the thorough analysis of ROK, sorry I couldn't thank you earlier. By the increase in volume every day, it indicates it is being accumulated. Is there any indication they have come in with new machinery.-------------------------------------------->Morris Moskowitz - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C2BC60.C56B96C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
HI Morris,
 
Thanks for the feedback. I haven't = performed=20 an in-depth due diligence on ROK, so can't answer your question. = Significant=20 developments and news usually give the clues for discerning the "N"(ew) = in=20 CANSLIM characteristics. I've noticed that they seem to be on a=20 reorganization/acquisition binge and have signed some significant = contracts=20 lately. Try these links as a good starting point for your=20 investigation:
 
http://yahoo.marketguide.c= om/MGI/signdevt.asp?target=3Dstocks%2Fcompanyinformation%2Fsigndevt&T= icker=3DROK
 
http://yahoo.marketguide.com/MG= I/news.asp?target=3D%2Fstocks%2Fcompanyinformation%2Fnews&Ticker=3DRO= K
 
http:/= /www.rockwellautomation.com/invrelations/index.html
 
 
Katherine
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On=20 Behalf Of E2moskow@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 = 9:57=20 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 Rok

Hi = Katherine:=20
    Thanks so much for the thorough analysis of = ROK,=20 sorry I couldn't thank you earlier.  By the increase in volume = every day,=20 it indicates it is being accumulated.  Is there any indication they = have=20 come in with new=20 machinery.-------------------------------------------->Morris=20 Moskowitz - ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C2BC60.C56B96C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:25:47 -0700 From: "Rahul Parikh" Subject: [CANSLIM] Current Market What do you all think of the current market? It does not seem that bad. Some breakouts are starting to work, but I don't think what we are in qualifies as a bull market. Does this look like a safe market to start putting some money to work, or should one wait longer?

- --

_______________________________________________
Get your free email from http://www.india.com

Powered by Outblaze - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:35:56 -0600 From: michael_niemotka@baxter.com Subject: [CANSLIM] SYMC Does it look to anyone else that SYMC has formed and broken out of a cwh with a high handle? Thanks Mike Niemotka , PE Sr. Principal Engineer Baxter Healthcare Corporation Route 120 & Wilson Road Round Lake, IL 60073 Tel (847) 270-4075 Fax (847) 270-4525 michael_niemotka@baxter.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:18:47 -0600 From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] SYMC We got in the stock in November around 40.3 off a cup with no handle and have added every so slightly since. Looks like a high handle on the weekly chart - we added some of the recent "w". Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of michael_niemotka@baxter.com Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:36 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] SYMC Does it look to anyone else that SYMC has formed and broken out of a cwh with a high handle? Thanks Mike Niemotka , PE Sr. Principal Engineer Baxter Healthcare Corporation Route 120 & Wilson Road Round Lake, IL 60073 Tel (847) 270-4075 Fax (847) 270-4525 michael_niemotka@baxter.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:10:38 -0800 From: "rchodes" Subject: [CANSLIM] In this trader's market This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C2BCD2.2C03DD40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've only followed this thread for less than a year now so I don't have = a good historical perspective on the fate of CANSLIM stocks in a = "trading market" (if that is what we are in). A couple of stocks BLUD = and SFNT got slammed by downgrades today on valuation. No bad news as = far as I could tell or even a chart pattern that I'd call a climax run. = Just some analyst who felt that the stock got ahead of itself. Is this a common fate for CANSLIM stocks or a relatively new trend by = analysts to show that they are not afraid to downgrade a stock to a HOLD = or even a SELL. SNFT looks like it found some buying support when it approached the = former base but BLUD (LLUR) got killed. - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C2BCD2.2C03DD40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've only followed this thread for less = than a year=20 now so I don't have a good historical perspective on the fate of CANSLIM = stocks=20 in a "trading market" (if that is what we are in).  A couple of = stocks BLUD=20 and SFNT got slammed by downgrades today on valuation.  No bad news = as far=20 as I could tell or even a chart pattern that I'd call a climax = run.  Just=20 some analyst who felt that the stock got ahead of itself.
 
Is this a common fate for CANSLIM = stocks or a=20 relatively new trend by analysts to show that they are not afraid to = downgrade a=20 stock to a HOLD or even a SELL.
 
SNFT looks like it found some buying = support when=20 it approached the former base but BLUD (LLUR) got=20 killed.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C2BCD2.2C03DD40-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:10:04 -0700 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] In this trader's market Yes, It think its fairly common in these canslim-momentum type stocks for there to be some rapid sell offs, even in a strong market. I would also say that analysts upgrades and downgrades are best ignored. Some conspiracy types even think upgrades and downgrades are issued for the purpose of allowing clients to unload a stock (an upgrade) or buy a stock. On 15 Jan 2003 at 20:10, rchodes wrote: > Is this a common fate for CANSLIM stocks or a relatively new trend by analysts > to show that they are not afraid to downgrade a stock to a HOLD or even a SELL. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #3133 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.