From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #385 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Tuesday, September 15 1998 Volume 02 : Number 385 In this issue: [CANSLIM] Scan Optics (SOCR) Re: [CANSLIM] Breakout in AVEI Re: [CANSLIM] Scan Optics (SOCR) Re: [CANSLIM] Part One - Group Strength; Part Two - NonCANSLIM Re: [CANSLIM] Breakout in AVEI Re: [CANSLIM] Part One - Group Strength; Part Two - NonCANSLIM [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites Re: [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites Re: [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites Re: [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites Re: [CANSLIM] Part One - Group Strength; Part Two - NonCANSLIM Re: [CANSLIM] Part One - Group Strength; Part Two - NonCANSLIM [CANSLIM] M Re: [CANSLIM] HGS Forum [CANSLIM] Cup and Handle Article [CANSLIM] PGEX: trouble [CANSLIM] INVESTMENT ADVICE - NonCANSLIM Re: [CANSLIM] Cup and Handle Article ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 21:48:51 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Scan Optics (SOCR) Members, Anyone who stills owns Scan Optics please contact me privately at stkguru@netside.net Tom W - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 21:00:59 -0500 From: Dave Cameron Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Breakout in AVEI Anindo Majumdar wrote: > > AVEI looks like it broke out today. What do you folks think ? Not really.... it hasn't based - looks more like a roller coaster. I believe a stock needs to base a little to constitute a 'break out'. But... I could be wrong. Dave Cameron - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 21:01:51 -0500 From: Dave Cameron Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Scan Optics (SOCR) Don't own SOCR - but OUCH! Were you still hanging on? Dave Cameron - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 22:59:03 -0500 From: Dave Cameron Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Part One - Group Strength; Part Two - NonCANSLIM Jeffry, old man, With all the comments this message generated, I can hardly WAIT to see Part Two. How many parts are there? Is this a mini-series? I think you have a great point on not buying on news. My success rate is close to zero in these instances; at least for individual stocks. Just my 1.7 cents (down from 2 cents - like most of my holdings) Dave Cameron - - ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 20:58:48 -0500 From: "Joe Scott" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Breakout in AVEI no volume,, only 1,961K average is 1.729K just up on a good day.. looks to me anyway, joe - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:10:15 GMT From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Part One - Group Strength; Part Two - NonCANSLIM On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:17:06 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: :Johan, : :>Interesting comments re:WON's follow-through day at Ian woodwards chat = site. : :Would you care to post. : :Thanks, : :Deepak I've been having difficulties finding these comments. Any hints? I am registered at the site, but the interface is baffling, what with the myriads of threads, and I cannot find the one alluded to above. Dan musicant@autobahn.org - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:55:44 -0800 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites If you guys don't already have enough sites to go to, here is a list of the top 50, according to someone. http://www.prars.com/web50/top50list.html - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 13:44:40 GMT From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites On Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:55:44 -0800, you wrote: :If you guys don't already have enough sites to go to, here is a list=20 :of the top 50, according to someone. : : : : :http://www.prars.com/web50/top50list.html Cool. Maybe I can find beta at one of these. Dan "Enough, or too much." -- Wm Blake musicant@autobahn.org - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 13:49:11 GMT From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites On Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:55:44 -0800, you wrote: :If you guys don't already have enough sites to go to, here is a list=20 :of the top 50, according to someone. : : : : :http://www.prars.com/web50/top50list.html : Well, here's the list! I'm posting this because the majority of these are not linked at the website. However, when I get my own submission to this list, they will all be hyperlinked! Enjoy! Dan As chosen by our Survey submissions.* * all linkable web addresses have reciprocal link. Listed Alphabetically. =20 =20 http://www.agedwards.com/=20 http://www.bigcharts.com/=20 http://www.bloomberg.com/=20 http://www.briefing.com/=20 http://cbs.marketwatch.com/=20 http://www.cnbc.com/=20 http://www.cnnfn.com/=20 http://www.dailystocks.com/=20 http://www.datek.com/=20 http://www.daytraders.com/=20 http://www.dbc.com/=20 http://www.discoverbrokerage.com/=20 http://www.dljdirect.com/=20 http://www.doh.com/=20 http://www.etrade.com/=20 http://www.fidelity.com/=20 http://www.flash.net/~hesler=20 http://www.fool.com/=20 http://www.hoovers.com/=20 http://www.iionline.com/=20 http://www.investools.com/=20 http://investor.msn.com/=20 http://www.investorama.com/=20 http://www.investorguide.com/=20 http://www.lowrisk.com/=20 http://www.marketguide.com/=20 http://www.merrill-lynch.com/=20 http://www.moneynet.com/=20 http://www.morningstar.net/=20 http://www.nasdaq.com/=20 http://www.prars.com/=20 http://www.qfn.com/=20 http://www.quote.com/=20 http://www.researchmag.com/=20 http://www.schwab.com/=20 http://www.smartmoney.com/=20 http://www.stockmaster.com/=20 http://www.stockresearch.com/=20 http://www.stocksite.com/=20 http://www.stocksmart.com/=20 http://www.stockwiz.com/=20 http://www.taylortrader.com/=20 http://www.techstocks.com/=20 http://www.thestreet.com/=20 http://www.vectorvest.com/=20 http://www.wadecook.com/=20 http://www.wallstreetcity.com/=20 http://www.waterhouse.com/=20 http://www.wsrn.com/=20 http://www.zacks.com=20 Other Nominated Sites... =20 http://www.aaii.com/=20 http://www.ameritrade.com/=20 http://www.amex.com/=20 http://www.better-investing.org/=20 http://www.bulltrade.com/=20 http://www.businessweek.com/=20 http://www.cboe.com/=20 http://www.cbs.com/=20 http://www.chicagostockex.com/=20 http://www.dailyrocket.com/=20 http://www.edgar-online.com/=20 http://www.equis.com/=20 http://www.financialweb.com/=20 http://www1.firstcall.com/=20 http://www.forbes.com/=20 http://www.fortune.com/=20 http://www.freeedgar.com/=20 http://www.futuresuperstock.com/=20 http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/=20 http://www.hh-club.com/=20 http://www.investorlinks.com/=20 http://www.ipocentral.com/=20 http://www.iqc.com/=20 http://www.jackm.com/=20 http://www.marketplayer.com/=20 http://members.aol.com/baccom=20 http://www.money.com/=20 http://www.msnbc.com/=20 http://www.napeague.com/=20 http://www.natcorp.com/ir/finance.html=20 http://www.netpicks.com/=20 http://www.netquo.com/=20 http://www.netstockdirect.com/=20 http://www.nyse.com/=20 http://www.pcquote.com/=20 http://www.pitbull.com/=20 http://www.pointcast.com/=20 http://www.pristine.com/=20 http://www.prodigy.com/=20 http://www.puls.net/=20 http://www.ragingbull.com/=20 http://www.russreports.com/=20 http://www.stockfever.com/=20 http://www.stockpicks.com/=20 http://www.stockscreener.com/=20 http://www.stockselector.com/=20 http://www.stocktools.com/=20 http://www.street.com/=20 http://www.suretrade.com/=20 http://www.thewebinvestor.com/=20 http://www.tradepbs.com/=20 http://www.trendtrader.com/=20 http://www.valueline.com/=20 http://www.worth.com/=20 musicant@autobahn.org - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 10:31:20 -0400 From: Jungbluth.Joe@oscsystems.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites Dan- You should be able to find beta under Fundamentals at the WSRN.COM site and probably at other sites that list fundamentals such as Yahoo!. Joe jungbluth.joe@oscsystems.com musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant) on 09/15/98 09:44:40 AM Please respond to canslim@lists.xmission.com To: canslim@lists.xmission.com cc: (bcc: Joe Jungbluth/OrbMD) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] (Fwd) Top 50 Financial Sites On Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:55:44 -0800, you wrote: :If you guys don't already have enough sites to go to, here is a list :of the top 50, according to someone. : : : : :http://www.prars.com/web50/top50list.html Cool. Maybe I can find beta at one of these. Dan "Enough, or too much." -- Wm Blake musicant@autobahn.org - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 09:08:28 +0200 From: Johan Van Houtven Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Part One - Group Strength; Part Two - NonCANSLIM At 05:10 AM 15-09-98 GMT, you wrote: >On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:17:06 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: > >:Johan, >: >:>Interesting comments re:WON's follow-through day at Ian woodwards chat site. >: >:Would you care to post. >: >:Thanks, >: >:Deepak > >I've been having difficulties finding these comments. Any hints? I am >registered at the site, but the interface is baffling, what with the >myriads of threads, and I cannot find the one alluded to above. > >Dan >musicant@autobahn.org Dan, The are among the most recent posts. The subject title is WON's follow-through method (or something like that). Johan Van Houtven / CLICK! N.V. - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 15:09:02 GMT From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Part One - Group Strength; Part Two - NonCANSLIM On Tue, 15 Sep 1998 09:08:28 +0200, you wrote: :At 05:10 AM 15-09-98 GMT, you wrote: :>On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:17:06 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: :> :>:Johan, :>: :>:>Interesting comments re:WON's follow-through day at Ian woodwards = chat :site. :>: :>:Would you care to post. :>: :>:Thanks, :>: :>:Deepak :> :>I've been having difficulties finding these comments. Any hints? I am :>registered at the site, but the interface is baffling, what with the :>myriads of threads, and I cannot find the one alluded to above. :> :>Dan :>musicant@autobahn.org : : :Dan, : :The are among the most recent posts. The subject title is WON's :follow-through method (or something like that). : : : :Johan Van Houtven / CLICK! N.V. : : I went to the site and it said I had 280 unread messages, and they started 7/30/98 and couldn't seem to get the recent ones. Therefore, I marked all messages as read, so when I next go I'll get new stuff (as of last night). Dan musicant@autobahn.org - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:29:24 +1200 From: "Dean Edwards" Subject: [CANSLIM] M There is an excellent report on the US equity market located at http://www.cme.com/market/equity/outlook3/stk998cme.html Highligted below are my thoughts on some of the selected passages: There = is a lot of money currently sitting on the sidelines, that is waiting to go back into equities once the market consolidates. It is still evident tha= t that sector rotation is with the defensive stocks. If the wild market gyrations over the last couple of weeks slowly dissipated, then we could start to see some of this money flow back into the market. If Latin Ameri= ca could go "under" soon, then I imagine all the world "bad news" is out! Money that was being invested regularly by US investor's on a yearly or monthly basis in emerging markets, could possibly be switched back into t= he USA market. Perception that the USA is a safer place to invest. I woul= d not be investing in Latin America at the present time. When those countri= es are being forced to devalue their currencies and the "double whammy" affect of their stock markets sliding even further downward. The hedge fu= nds that are supposely resistant to "world fluctuations" have not stood up to some of these tests. I aware of at least a dozen hedge funds, not just losing money "big time" but ultimately going broke. The complexity or the chaos of the market has not been formulated into some of their computer programs. Market Breadth The market's advance earlier this year was characterized by a relatively narrow surge in the largest of the large-cap stocks (i.e., Microsoft, Del= l Computer, Lucent Technologies, Schering-Plough) while the rest of the mar= ket lagged or even fell. For example, while the S&P 500 peaked in July, the broader Russell 2000 crested in late April and was down 31.4% from that h= igh at the end of August at a 1-1/3 year low. The more recent correction in t= he S&P 500 and the Dow has only driven home what most investors already knew= =97 the broader market and thus many investors=92 portfolios, have been perfo= rming worse than the returns in the headline Dow and S&P 500 indexes would indicate. Breadth started faltering at the beginning of the correction in July and = has since worsened. The main measure of breadth, the advance/decline line, peaked in the beginning of April and has since trended lower, indicating that more issues on the NYSE are falling than are rising. The advance/decline volume line made a high in July that coincided with the market's peak and has since fallen, indicating that on balance, more volu= me is flowing into declining shares. The percentage of individual tocks abov= e their 200-day averages fell to a 7-year low of 19% in August where it was down from 85% in October 1997. The S&P 500 also closed below its 200-day moving average in August and stayed there for the first time in two years. Mutual Fund Flows Monthly stock mutual fund inflows got off to a slow start in 1998 and the= n accelerated to a 13-month peak of $26.5 billion in the month of April. Si= nce then, however, the pace of mutual fund inflows has been slowing. May saw = a total of $19.3 billion arrive in mutual fund coffers according to data fr= om the Investment Company Institute while June and July saw inflows of $19.2 and $16.5 billion, respectively. In August, capital inflows then collapse= d and generous estimates indicate that somewhere just above $1 billion flow= ed into mutual fund accounts, the lowest amount seen since January of 1991. Individual investors apparently are sensitive to the ups and downs of the stock market and the August data suggests that they can=92t be counted on= to support a sagging market. Instead, money market mutual funds assets have swollen to a record $1.26 trillion as investors seek safety. Sentiment The correction that is taking place in the stock market has taken a toll = on investor sentiment which has fallen sharply to fairly oversold levels. Investment advisor sentiment, as measured by the Investors Intelligence newsletter, recently fell to a 1-year low of 40.4% which was the fifth consecutive weekly decline following six straight weekly increases. The decline in investor sentiment could be a positive sign for bulls as it ha= s fallen fairly far below the 1-3/4 year high of 54.6% which was posted dur= ing the week of April 17. In fact, the previous three times that bullish sentiment has fallen below 45% have been propitious times to own stocks. Another measurement of sentiment, the 10-day average of the call/put volu= me ratio on the OEX options contract, has fallen over the past 1-1/2 months after posting a 10-month high of 1.8 (i.e. there were 1.8 calls traded fo= r every put) on July 15. Most recently, the ratio fell to a 2-year low belo= w 1.2 where it was in oversold territory. While these two indicators can=92= t be used individually to make buy/sell decisions, they are showing signs that sentiment has reached oversold levels, a bullish indicator for stock pric= es. Small Cap Stocks The small-capitalization stocks (companies with a market caps of $1 billi= on or less) have been underperforming their large-cap brethren for all of 19= 98 and on average are down sharply from their all-time highs. The Russell 20= 00, an index of small-cap stocks with an average market cap of $400 million, = is down 22.7% for the year-to-date compared to the S&P 500's 1.3% loss over = the same period. The small-cap stocks are in the midst of a 31.4% correction that followed the posting of an all-time high in the Russell 2000 of 492.= 28 (April 22). Not only have the small-caps been leading the rest of the stock market lo= wer over the past four months but they were also underperforming before the correction got underway. While small-cap stocks outperformed the large-ca= ps through most of the 1980s and early 1990s, since 1993 the large-cap stock= s have taken over the leadership role. Since the start of 1995, the Russell 2000 has delivered an annualized gain of 10.6% (12.1% with dividends reinvested in the index) compared to the S&P 500's annualized gain of 24.= 6% (27% with dividends reinvested). The small-capitalization stocks (companies with a market caps of $1 billi= on or less) have been underperforming their large-cap brethren for all of 19= 98 and on average are down sharply from their all-time highs. The Russell 20= 00, an index of small-cap stocks with an average market cap of $400 million, = is down 22.7% for the year-to-date compared to the S&P 500's 1.3% loss over = the same period. The small-cap stocks are in the midst of a 31.4% correction that followed the posting of an all-time high in the Russell 2000 of 492.= 28 (April 22). Not only have the small-caps been leading the rest of the stock market lo= wer over the past four months but they were also underperforming before the correction got underway. While small-cap stocks outperformed the large-ca= ps through most of the 1980s and early 1990s, since 1993 the large-cap stock= s have taken over the leadership role. Since the start of 1995, the Russell 2000 has delivered an annualized gain of 10.6% (12.1% with dividends reinvested in the index) compared to the S&P 500's annualized gain of 24.= 6% (27% with dividends reinvested). The sharp sell-off in the Russell 2000 would appear to go against conventional wisdom. The Asian economic crisis should theoretically have less of an impact on the earnings of small companies who make most of the= ir sales domestically. Along those same lines, the sustained strength in the dollar should also have less impact on smaller companies compared to larg= e multi-national firms who derive a higher portion of their earnings in depreciating foreign currencies. Despite those factors, the Russell 2000 = has continued to fall. The main reason that the small-caps are lagging may be that the sector has simply fallen out of favor with individual investors. Participation by small investors has been focussed on the largest of the = big stocks with S&P 500 index and other large-cap mutual funds seeing the majority of fund inflows. Investors are also seeking the perceived safety= of companies with proven earnings histories. Global Performance Morgan Stanley=92s index of emerging stock markets has fallen 41% in the = last six months and is now back to where it stood at the start of 1991. Almost eight years of gains have been totally erased. Investors are reevaluating the risk of investing in emerging markets given the possibility of contin= ued financial sector instability and the increased reluctance by the industrialized nations to provide bailouts. - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT) From: dbphoenix Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HGS Forum <> I had to take the opportunity to replace that subject title. It was driving me crazy :) If you've marked the messages as read, you can still go through them manually. Just select the HGS forum then click "Bottom". Then select "Follow Through Day Concept" from 9/8. There will be around eight posts. - --Db _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 13:09:03 -0400 From: Peter Newell Subject: [CANSLIM] Cup and Handle Article Stocks and Commodities did an in depth article on the cup and handle that I found interesting and very similar to WON's article in Monday's IBD(just in case you missed it). One point was that buying a c&h pattern before it breaks out or with to little volume is very perilous and probably a good shorting situation. The other points I found interesting which are probably buried in WON's book is that the top of the right side of the cup is lower than the left side and that the pivot point is 1/8 a point above this with a breakout of 50% increase in volume. Not a new high but up to 10% lower. Peter - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 10:48:06 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: [CANSLIM] PGEX: trouble This one is on my watch list - have seen it bantered about here before. Watch out below! Off almost 5 right now. Herb on TheStreet: Is Pacific Gateway Playing a Shell Game with Investors? The company in question: Pacific Gateway (PGEX:Nasdaq), whose main business is selling time on foreign long-distance networks to telephone companies. The analyst: PaineWebber's Eric Strumingher, who recently boosted his rating on Pacific Gateway to a buy from hold, while at the same time cutting his estimates. Usually analysts lower their rating when they cut estimates. But not Strumingher, who justified the change by writing in a report that he believes investors will "recognize the value in this investment and will move to EBITDA-based valuations from earnings-based valuations." For the entire story: http://micro.sitespecific.com/Street/redirect.2q.cgi?banner=herbib.60.123 Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites mailto:Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: 16 Sep 98 8:42:13 From: Dean Edwards Subject: [CANSLIM] INVESTMENT ADVICE - NonCANSLIM "Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognises genius." - - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle William O'Neil has been quoted as saying, that he has read hundreds of books on investing. From his own personal library collection, he believes not many of them are very good. However, he ranks Bernard Baruch's autobiography as one of his top ten for investment books. Here is an article below that highlights some of his thoughts. IMMORTAL INVESTMENT ADVICE FROM BERNARD BARUCH Of all those who made their marks on Wall Street, few commanded more respect and admiration than Bernard Baruch did. In his time, he made millions, advised U.S. presidents, and was a primary source for quotes about the great events of his day. Baruch died in 1965 at the age of 94; but his thinking which enabled him to amass a fortune still has relevance today. The following excerpts are taken from a Bottom Line Personal (August 1, 1997) article outlining Baruch's thoughts on investing. We believe this advice is particularly relevant to today's existing conditions in the stock market. "Hold firm opinions, but be open to changing them when another outcome is inevitable. Stubbornness as to opinions must be entirely eliminated. But when you decide, act promptly. Don't wait to see what the market will do." It was precisely this flexibility that saved Baruch in the Crash of 1929. It was always thought that Baruch sold his stocks when the market was at its high in 1929, thus avoiding the big crash in October. We know now that this story was nothing but a myth. In fact, Baruch was a committed bull in 1929, believing that a new economic age had arrived (sound familiar?). The financier was actually still heavily invested when the market collapsed. Despite his commitment to stocks, Baruch sold most of his holdings while other investors, believing that a recovery was around the bend, held on. Once he realized he was wrong, Baruch turned defensive and cut his losses. Result: While Baruch didn't escape unscathed his fortune fell from about $25 million to about $16 million he experienced a decline of only 36% while the overall market plummeted by more than 80% by 1932. "Take risks, but put prudence ahead of profits." Baruch was every inch a speculator, with an enormous tolerance for risk. After he made his first million on Wall Street, by the age of 30, he had more than enough on which to live comfortably. Yet he chose to put that million at risk to make a second million and a third million until his fortune amounted to roughly $25 million. For all his willingness to take risks, Baruch was always wise enough to know when it was time to settle for a reasonable profit instead of holding out for the last dollar. Example: Baruch's greatest investment success was in a mining company called Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. He invested when it was a small company and watched its fortunes rise. When he sold his stake in 1926, he walked off with a profit of between $6 million and $8 million. That was a substantial profit, yet it was only a fraction of what he would have earned if he had waited a few years longer. But Baruch expressed no regrets about selling too soon. His advice, as spelled out in a memo written in 1930, was, "Become more humble as the market goes your way. It is not prudent to wait for the top of the market too sell, it is better to sell "too soon." - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 20:41:06 -0700 (PDT) From: dbphoenix Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Cup and Handle Article <> Unfortunately, a breakout on a 50% increase in volume is likely to blow through that 1/8 point in seconds. In fact, the stock may already be extended before you even know the breakout has occurred (assuming it didn't take place before the market even opened). If you don't want to buy the handle before the breakout, it might be prudent to wait till the handle is tested rather than buy too far into the breakout. - --Db _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #385 ***************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.