From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #955 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Wednesday, July 19 2000 Volume 02 : Number 955 In this issue: [CANSLIM] CMTN Re: [CANSLIM] Inflexion point for CMTN Re: [CANSLIM] Inflexion point for CMTN Re: [CANSLIM] Inflexion point for CMTN RE: [CANSLIM]Specific Industry Group Rankings Re: [CANSLIM] CMTN [CANSLIM] Test - ignore [CANSLIM] Comments on EMC ? [CANSLIM] DIAN b/o (1 day late) Re: [CANSLIM] Comments on EMC ? RE: [CANSLIM] Comments on EMC ? Re: [CANSLIM] brokers-again?help Re: [CANSLIM] HGS watch list Re: [CANSLIM]News Events Re: [CANSLIM] brokers-again?help [CANSLIM] brokers-again?help Re: [CANSLIM]News Events Re: [CANSLIM] HGS watch list [CANSLIM] DIAN non-b/o Re: [CANSLIM] DIAN non-b/o [CANSLIM] plxt Re: [CANSLIM] plxt RE: [CANSLIM]Specific Industry Group Rankings Re: [CANSLIM] plxt Re: [CANSLIM] plxt Re: [CANSLIM] CMTN Re: [CANSLIM] plxt Re: [CANSLIM] scsc b/o ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 21:10:32 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] CMTN By the way, the sharp drop on this one today took the RS all the way down to 89. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net chat with me at ICQ # 5568838 get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 22:10:00 -0400 From: asosis@ca.ibm.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Inflexion point for CMTN From TradingMarkets: In Copper Mountain's case, the stock rallied 40% in the week leading up to the report.... The outlook for companies like Copper Mountain and Efficient Networks remains bright, despite this short-term retracement in price. No question in our mind that many institutional investors around the country are cheering this opportunity to pick up both stocks at discounted levels. Their only problem is determining the appropriate entry point. Considerations include both a short- and long-term market view, as well as individual support levels for the stocks... Copper Mountain currently approaching near-term support at the $96 3/4 level. A break of this line could set up a decline to much firmer support at the $78 mark, a level that we would expect stock to use to stage a double-digit rally... EFNT faces important levels at $79 (200-day moving average) and $72... Another important note concerning Copper Mountain. We wouldn't expect to see another 40%, pre-earnings moves any time soon. After beating Wall Street views by just one penny this time, it is unlikely that next quarter stock will make the final list of names that momentum players look to rally into earnings. -- Damon Southward, Briefing.com Anna greg ruehler on 07/18/2000 03:58:08 PM Please respond to canslim@lists.xmission.com To: canslim@lists.xmission.com cc: Subject: [CANSLIM] Inflexion point for CMTN Can someone give me a good entry point level on CMTN based on current support levels over the last few months, etc. People who have been following this closely, could help me out here. Is this a buy here or is there more drop to a previous support level. Rgds, Greg __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail ? Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 20:17:14 -0600 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Inflexion point for CMTN I don't think there is a good entry until it stabilizes and it becomes more apparent where the price is going. Took a nearly 30 point hit today, that would certainly scare me away until things settle down, possibly forming another base. On 18 Jul 00, at 12:58, greg ruehler wrote: > Can someone give me a good entry point level on CMTN > based on current support levels over the last few > months, etc. People who have been following this > closely, could help me out here. Is this a buy here or > is there more drop to a previous support level. > > Rgds, > > Greg > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get Yahoo! Mail =96 Free email you can access from anywhere! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 21:47:40 -0500 From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Inflexion point for CMTN There is an old saying that it has to stop falling before it can go back up. Patrick Wahl wrote: >=20 > I don't think there is a good entry until it stabilizes and it becomes > more apparent where the price is going. Took a nearly 30 point hit > today, that would certainly scare me away until things settle down, > possibly forming another base. >=20 > On 18 Jul 00, at 12:58, greg ruehler wrote: >=20 > > Can someone give me a good entry point level on CMTN > > based on current support levels over the last few > > months, etc. People who have been following this > > closely, could help me out here. Is this a buy here or > > is there more drop to a previous support level. > > > > Rgds, > > > > Greg > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get Yahoo! Mail =96 Free email you can access from anywhere! > > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > - > > >=20 > - - - ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:26:27 -0400 From: Rocky Sanghvi Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]Specific Industry Group Rankings Can someone also publish the top 5 stocks to watch in the top 10 leading groups? Thanks! This group has been extremely educational and supportive. I would like to thank all for their contributions. Rakesh. - -----Original Message----- From: chris dempsey [mailto:chrisdempsey@mail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 8:25 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM]Specific Industry Group Rankings The following are the ranking of the specific industry groups from IBD on the first and 16th of each month this year. I hope this helps others as much as I believe this helps me! My account hit a year 2000 high yesterday and IRA closing in on one. ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:18:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Pritish Shah Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CMTN BTW, someone should tell motley crew that DSL stands for digital subscriber line and not dedicated subscriber line. Aren't these people supposed to favor tech/internet stocks over others? Regards, Shah 408-525-4263 On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Tom Worley wrote: > I agree with Tim, the CPI #s are not the problem, they were quite > decent actually. > > The Motley Fool did not help with CMTN today as the following was > posted before the market opened (my ISP had it at 8:49 AM) > > COPPER MOUNTAIN DULLING? > > The networking equipment maker beat estimates last night, > turning in strong margin numbers, but still missed the high-end > of expectations and may slide today following a weeklong run-up. > > By Dave Marino-Nachison > > Copper Mountain Networks (Nasdaq: CMTN) last night turned in > second-quarter pro forma net income of $0.24 per share > (excluding a stock-based compensation charge and the > amortization of purchased intangibles), ahead of Wall Street's > consensus by a penny but missing some analysts' estimates. > > Revenue rose more than 250% year-over-year to $80.2 million; > sales increased 32% on a sequential basis. Gross margins > improved to 54.6% from 52.8% a year ago, while operating margins > nearly doubled to 19.8% from 11.1%. > > The company, which develops dedicated subscriber line (DSL) > products that allow high-speed networking over copper wires, > released several new products during the quarter. CEO Rick > Gilbert said, "We expect that these products will continue to > position Copper Mountain solutions as best-of-breed for the > evolving business, MTU, and residential DSL markets." > > UBS Warburg LLC analyst Anton Wahlman told Bloomberg yesterday > that some analysts were looking for EPS of as much as $0.35 and > revenue of closer to $90 million. The shares moved back in > after-hours trading -- not always a useful indicator because of > the comparatively small volumes -- following a 40% run-up over > the previous week. > http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=55386 > > The shares hit a 52-week high during yesterday's trading, though > they closed a few points below it. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > chat with me at ICQ # 5568838 > get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tim Fisher > To: > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 11:08 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CMTNt > > > The market needed an excuse to sell off and all these techs not > smashing > earnings estimates is the excuse. NAZ has gone too far too fast > and needs > to rest for a while. Don't listen to the reports blaming it on > the CPI - > this is a technical selloff. Companies that had the misfortune to > report > last night are the ones taking it on the chin for the good of the > market > today. CMTN is probably a screaming buy at 99, but who knows? Per > WON if > you bought the b/o at 99 you'd still be in it this AM. If you > don't own it > then you wouldn't be buying it now. > > On 03:08 AM 7/18/00, Mike Lucero Said: > >I think IBD says that most stocks fall back to near the pivot > after a > >breakout and it's a second chance to buy them. I wouldn't count > the after > >hours trading. See what it does tomorrow. I own it, too. > > > >Mike > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: > >To: > >Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 9:23 PM > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CMTNt > > > > I have not lived through this scenario before and am not sure > how to > >handle it. When a company reports better than expected earnings > and matches > >earnings whispers but the stockn sells off back to the B/O > level, is this a > >buying opportunity? > > > >Anna > > Tim Fisher > Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites > > Tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW: http://OreRockOn.com > See naked fish and rocks! > > > - > > > > - > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:43:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Pritish Shah Subject: [CANSLIM] Test - ignore - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:39:48 -0400 From: Stuart_Clemons@lotus.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Comments on EMC ? Hi all: Anyone have any comments or analysis of EMC's chart ? As I write this, EMC is up 4 1/4 at 82 7/8, right around it's 52 week high. Volume appears to be running at an above average rate at around 5mil after 1 hour & 20 minutes of trading. (the Microsoft MSN money site shows ave vol to be 9.3 mil) From today's IBD: 97 90 A A B Disc: I don't own EMC (yet). - - Stuart - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:58:34 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: [CANSLIM] DIAN b/o (1 day late) DIAN is confirming yesterday's breakout off a decent C&H (short, wide handle, Peter). Pretty impressive considering "M". I had cash but didn't have time to check it. About 12% extended now. Discl: I'm in as of early this AM. Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:12:07 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Comments on EMC ? I had to choose between it and DIAN this AM. Chose DIAN for the chart. EMC's cup is very shallow, even for a saucer, it hasn't formed even a rudimentary handle, and doesn't have that look of kicking out the weak holders to it. I.e. there could be considerable resistance around 83. A better buy-in point for EMC would have been the "stealth" b/o on 6/16. Plus they reported last nite, and this is a news-related b/o attempt (notice I said attempt - it still hasn't stayed above the pivot for more than a few seconds so far today). DIAN is breaking out for no apparent reason other than it is associated with genomics AFAIK. On 07:39 AM 7/19/00, Stuart_Clemons@lotus.com Said: >Hi all: > >Anyone have any comments or analysis of EMC's chart ? > >As I write this, EMC is up 4 1/4 at 82 7/8, right around it's 52 week high. >Volume appears to be running at an above average rate at around 5mil after >1 hour & 20 minutes of trading. (the Microsoft MSN money site shows ave >vol to be 9.3 mil) > > From today's IBD: 97 90 A A B > >Disc: I don't own EMC (yet). > >- Stuart > > >- Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 13:36:18 -0400 From: Rocky Sanghvi Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Comments on EMC ? Personally I am tempted to stay away from stocks with such high PE's and go after the smaller caps. The only "big" cap I own is SEBL. Yet, EMC is the leader in its field. - -----Original Message----- From: Stuart_Clemons@lotus.com [mailto:Stuart_Clemons@lotus.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 10:40 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Comments on EMC ? Hi all: Anyone have any comments or analysis of EMC's chart ? As I write this, EMC is up 4 1/4 at 82 7/8, right around it's 52 week high. Volume appears to be running at an above average rate at around 5mil after 1 hour & 20 minutes of trading. (the Microsoft MSN money site shows ave vol to be 9.3 mil) From today's IBD: 97 90 A A B Disc: I don't own EMC (yet). - - Stuart - - - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 08:05:22 EDT From: BIKEAR@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] brokers-again?help I think that schwab is good but I am not willing to pay the price...the preferred trade looks good and only 15...thanks any more suggestions - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 08:17:10 -0400 (EDT) From: chris dempsey Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HGS watch list Thanks for the web site. Your example is showing me a score of 100. Am I reading this correctly? Do the numbers move this much in one day? From: Kent Norman [gsnake@flash.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 10:32 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HGS watch list There are many players in the market, some use models based on various technical indicators. When I find the combination of nice CANSLIM and technical, I feel the stock has a better chance of broad based support. I use Barchart.com to rate the various technicals and focus on the 100% and 96% picks that have already passed the CANSLIM screen. Here is the URL: http://quotes.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=RHI&code=BSTK Select opinion I look at the overall average. In this example RHI rates an 88 Regards Kent chris dempsey wrote: > > How do you figure? > > From: Kent Norman [gsnake@flash.net] > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 10:49 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HGS watch list > > As a second opinion, I use technical analysis. These are the ones that > score 100 > > IVIS ATMS ACLNF ALTR BEIQ CMTN DRAM ELNT PLXS PLXT PWER QGENF SDLI SMTC > TA TECD TNL > > Kent > > Tim Fisher wrote: > > > > HGS list for this week. Wow, it got huge. Many more stocks than any time > > this year that I can recall. > > > > ACDO ACLNF ADI ALTR AMCC APH ASML AUDC > > BEIQ BJS BRCM CDT CDWC CHP CMTN CPN > > DIAN DLTR DRAM ELNT EMC ERICY EXTR FII > > FLEX ICUI IMPH JBL LEH LFUS LTRE MCRL > > MSS MWD NEWP NSIT NUHC NVLS ORBK PCCC > > PENG PHCC PLT PLXS PLXT PMCS PRLX PWER > > QGENF SAMN SCH SCOR SDLI SFA SHFL SMTC > > TA TECD TLGD TNL UNH WAT XLTC ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 08:03:25 -0400 (EDT) From: chris dempsey Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]News Events I don't remember reading this. Please tell me where I can find this in WON's books. I believe I've had decent results. Although I can't say that I kept good records of which stocks were purchased at news events. The ones that haven't worked out are history. From: Tim Fisher [tim@OreRockOn.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 10:10 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]Brokerages (News Events) Read HTMMIS closely, the breakouts on no news are due to institutional or hedge fund buying and are often stronger, run longer and farther, and are less prone to failure than those driven by earnings, news, or brokerages. Given a choice I'll buy the no-apparent-reason b/o every time. On 05:40 AM 7/18/00, chris dempsey Said: >I think that news + a breakout (or even a near break out) is a GREAT time to >buy a stock! > >News + a breakout + a brokerage upgrade is also a GREAT time to buy a stock! > >A brokerage upgrade (by itself) causing a breakout is NOT a good time to buy >a stock. > >The problem is at lunch time when I buy most of my stocks many times I >cannot find a reason why a stock is up on high volume. I will still buy the >stock and try to find out later, and adjust accordingly. > >From: Eric Shen [eshen@level1.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 4:55 PM >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]Brokerages > > >Hmm.. this is an interesting thought. >If we shouldn't buy on the news, then shouldn't the best time to buy >during the lull between the spate of earning reports? > >I was under the impression that if a company announces good earnings >and the stock breaks out on good volume, then that's good. > >Comments? >Eric > > >Rocky Sanghvi wrote: > > > > Anna: > > > > Actually this represents a important point. IMHO, The M seems to be > > indicating a rally ahead if brokerages are doing well. I always keep in > > mind what WON said "Pay attention to what the M have already done..." > > > > Rakesh. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: asosis@ca.ibm.com [mailto:asosis@ca.ibm.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:21 PM > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]Brokerages > > > > I agree that the best way to buy a b/o when it happens without news. > > Brokerages rallied on the announcement today. However, some had valid > > setups prior to today: MER, AGE, LEH, LM...... One point of view: avoid > > the breakouts we are seeing today because they are news driven. Second > > point of view: MER and AGE broke out last week (or somewhere there... > > definitely not today).. Therefore we have valid leadership in the group so > > it is ok to buy. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Anna ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 07:19:41 EDT From: BIKEAR@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] brokers-again?help thanks - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:31:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Anthony DiLella Subject: [CANSLIM] brokers-again?help Dreyfus allows stops on Nas & NYSE stocks. Tony D.an From: BIKEAR@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] brokers-again?help I don't think that suretrade has stops on the nas....hey guys could you please tell me who I can look at that have stops on the nas plus a page that keeps up with your losses and gains when you sell.....which oneline broker would have these? jan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:30:32 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]News Events From IBD: More specifically, price moves often presage positive corporate news. Mutual funds, pension funds and other institutions often spot and act on promising developments before such knowledge becomes widely known. But their massive buying is hard to conceal. If a stock hits a new high on a surge in volume, there's a good chance someone clever and with deep pockets knows something. Legendary stock trader Nicolas Darvas likened buying stocks on such breakouts to making himself a ''silent partner'' of these invisible but powerful operators. On 05:03 AM 7/19/00, chris dempsey Said: >I don't remember reading this. Please tell me where I can find this in WON's >books. > >I believe I've had decent results. Although I can't say that I kept good >records of which stocks were purchased at news events. The ones that haven't >worked out are history. > >From: Tim Fisher [tim@OreRockOn.com] >Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 10:10 AM >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]Brokerages (News Events) > >Read HTMMIS closely, the breakouts on no news are due to institutional or >hedge fund buying and are often stronger, run longer and farther, and are >less prone to failure than those driven by earnings, news, or brokerages. >Given a choice I'll buy the no-apparent-reason b/o every time. > >On 05:40 AM 7/18/00, chris dempsey Said: > >I think that news + a breakout (or even a near break out) is a GREAT time >to > >buy a stock! > > > >News + a breakout + a brokerage upgrade is also a GREAT time to buy a >stock! > > > >A brokerage upgrade (by itself) causing a breakout is NOT a good time to >buy > >a stock. > > > >The problem is at lunch time when I buy most of my stocks many times I > >cannot find a reason why a stock is up on high volume. I will still buy the > >stock and try to find out later, and adjust accordingly. > > > >From: Eric Shen [eshen@level1.com] > >Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 4:55 PM > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]Brokerages > > > > > >Hmm.. this is an interesting thought. > >If we shouldn't buy on the news, then shouldn't the best time to buy > >during the lull between the spate of earning reports? > > > >I was under the impression that if a company announces good earnings > >and the stock breaks out on good volume, then that's good. > > > >Comments? > >Eric > > > > > >Rocky Sanghvi wrote: > > > > > > Anna: > > > > > > Actually this represents a important point. IMHO, The M seems to be > > > indicating a rally ahead if brokerages are doing well. I always keep in > > > mind what WON said "Pay attention to what the M have already done..." > > > > > > Rakesh. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: asosis@ca.ibm.com [mailto:asosis@ca.ibm.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:21 PM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]Brokerages > > > > > > I agree that the best way to buy a b/o when it happens without news. > > > Brokerages rallied on the announcement today. However, some had valid > > > setups prior to today: MER, AGE, LEH, LM...... One point of view: avoid > > > the breakouts we are seeing today because they are news driven. Second > > > point of view: MER and AGE broke out last week (or somewhere there... > > > definitely not today).. Therefore we have valid leadership in the group >so > > > it is ok to buy. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Anna > > >______________________________________________ >FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com >Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > > >- Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:23:32 -0500 From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HGS watch list Yes Chris you are correct. Today it is 100% (before market close - so effectively yesterday's numbers). It calculates on end of day data, so yes technicals can change rapidly. Really it is the same principle as a breakout. If stock XYZ breaks out on high volume, it would suddenly become more desirable that day than if it had not. Happy hunting Kent chris dempsey wrote: > > Thanks for the web site. Your example is showing me a score of 100. Am I > reading this correctly? Do the numbers move this much in one day? > > From: Kent Norman [gsnake@flash.net] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 10:32 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HGS watch list > > There are many players in the market, some use models based on various > technical indicators. When I find the combination of nice CANSLIM and > technical, I feel the stock has a better chance of broad based support. > I use Barchart.com to rate the various technicals and focus on the 100% > and 96% picks that have already passed the CANSLIM screen. Here is the > URL: > http://quotes.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=RHI&code=BSTK > > Select opinion > I look at the overall average. In this example RHI rates an 88 > > Regards > Kent > > chris dempsey wrote: > > > > How do you figure? > > > > From: Kent Norman [gsnake@flash.net] > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 10:49 PM > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HGS watch list > > > > As a second opinion, I use technical analysis. These are the ones that > > score 100 > > > > IVIS ATMS ACLNF ALTR BEIQ CMTN DRAM ELNT PLXS PLXT PWER QGENF SDLI SMTC > > TA TECD TNL > > > > Kent > > > > Tim Fisher wrote: > > > > > > HGS list for this week. Wow, it got huge. Many more stocks than any time > > > this year that I can recall. > > > > > > ACDO ACLNF ADI ALTR AMCC APH ASML AUDC > > > BEIQ BJS BRCM CDT CDWC CHP CMTN CPN > > > DIAN DLTR DRAM ELNT EMC ERICY EXTR FII > > > FLEX ICUI IMPH JBL LEH LFUS LTRE MCRL > > > MSS MWD NEWP NSIT NUHC NVLS ORBK PCCC > > > PENG PHCC PLT PLXS PLXT PMCS PRLX PWER > > > QGENF SAMN SCH SCOR SDLI SFA SHFL SMTC > > > TA TECD TLGD TNL UNH WAT XLTC > > ______________________________________________ > FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com > Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > > - - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:20:14 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: [CANSLIM] DIAN non-b/o Well, it did not break out. Did make a new high but did not advance 5%. The trading was wild this AM. I could have had it for 32 when I got my first real-time quote; by the time I had my order entered it was up to 34-5/8. Got all the way up to 39-3/4 during the frenzy. Made 20x ADV, probably an all-time vol hi. Anyway it closed at 34-1/2 so I'm not very far in the red yet. When the M settles down I think it will take off. Should report Friday, maybe someone knows something. Anyway watch PLT tomorrow - it reported, broke out on 5x ADV (but didn't match the intraday spike that is the high) and was kinda lost in the noise today. Tim Fisher Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites Tim@OreRockOn.com WWW: http://OreRockOn.com See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 17:57:47 -0500 From: "Frank" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DIAN non-b/o Tim, I didn't understnad what you meant about it making a new high but not advancing 5%. Was 5% the point where the stock advanced too far to buy from the new high or pivot point? Thanks and good luck Frank - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Fisher" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 4:20 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] DIAN non-b/o > Well, it did not break out. Did make a new high but did not advance 5%. The > trading was wild this AM. I could have had it for 32 when I got my first > real-time quote; by the time I had my order entered it was up to 34-5/8. > Got all the way up to 39-3/4 during the frenzy. Made 20x ADV, probably an > all-time vol hi. Anyway it closed at 34-1/2 so I'm not very far in the red > yet. When the M settles down I think it will take off. Should report > Friday, maybe someone knows something. > > Anyway watch PLT tomorrow - it reported, broke out on 5x ADV (but didn't > match the intraday spike that is the high) and was kinda lost in the noise > today. > > Tim Fisher > Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites > > Tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW: http://OreRockOn.com > See naked fish and rocks! > > > - > > _______________________________________________ Why pay for something you could get for free? NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:16:23 -0600 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: [CANSLIM] plxt PLXT announced earnings after the close today, looked like pretty good numbers. They broke out of some sort of pattern a couple of days ago, are still around the buy point, but given the last two days market action, this may not be the time to buy anything, but this would be one for a watch list at least. - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 17:20:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Pritish Shah Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] plxt I have started thinking about what Tim has said before (i.e. do not buy on the news breakout as they are more prone to failures) I think that makes sense. Regards, Shah 408-525-4263 On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Patrick Wahl wrote: > PLXT announced earnings after the close today, looked like pretty > good numbers. They broke out of some sort of pattern a couple of > days ago, are still around the buy point, but given the last two days > market action, this may not be the time to buy anything, but this > would be one for a watch list at least. > > - > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 07:39:30 -0400 From: Dan Forant Subject: RE: [CANSLIM]Specific Industry Group Rankings I'll second the thank you. I subscribe to the IBD. Where do we find the stocks in the groups when they list for example 32 stocks in a particular group? Dan At 09:26 AM 7/18/00 -0400, you wrote: >Can someone also publish the top 5 stocks to watch in the top 10 leading >groups? > >Thanks! This group has been extremely educational and supportive. I would >like to thank all for their contributions. > >Rakesh. > >-----Original Message----- >From: chris dempsey [mailto:chrisdempsey@mail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 8:25 AM >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Subject: [CANSLIM]Specific Industry Group Rankings > >The following are the ranking of the specific industry groups from IBD on >the first and 16th of each month this year. I hope this helps others as much >as I believe this helps me! My account hit a year 2000 high yesterday and >IRA closing in on one. > > > >______________________________________________ >FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com >Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > >- > >- > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 19:51:03 -0500 From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] plxt I had it. Got stopped out today. Made a little. I was thinking about getting back in till I started watching Bloomberg and MSNBC. The mood does not seem good for the next few days. I think I will sit back and see what unfolds. How do the rest of you feel about the M ? Kent Patrick Wahl wrote: > > PLXT announced earnings after the close today, looked like pretty > good numbers. They broke out of some sort of pattern a couple of > days ago, are still around the buy point, but given the last two days > market action, this may not be the time to buy anything, but this > would be one for a watch list at least. > > - - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 19:54:45 -0500 From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] plxt Has any one studied the historical patterns to news spikes? Seems there should be some research out there somewhere? I don't remember IBD or WON making much of a case for it. Seems if there were something substantial, we would be hearing about it as often as "cut losses at 8% - 10%" Kent Pritish Shah wrote: > > I have started thinking about what Tim has said before (i.e. do not buy on > the news breakout as they are more prone to failures) > > I think that makes sense. > > Regards, > Shah > 408-525-4263 > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Patrick Wahl wrote: > > > PLXT announced earnings after the close today, looked like pretty > > good numbers. They broke out of some sort of pattern a couple of > > days ago, are still around the buy point, but given the last two days > > market action, this may not be the time to buy anything, but this > > would be one for a watch list at least. > > > > - > > > > > > - - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 20:50:20 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CMTN Actually, I get the impression they are essentially long term, fundamentals based. Coke is one of their major holdings, for example. They do tech stocks, but only well established ones, not net stocks by and large. They would like a Yahoo, but not a Dr Koop. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net chat with me at ICQ # 5568838 get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html - ----- Original Message ----- From: Pritish Shah To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 12:18 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CMTN BTW, someone should tell motley crew that DSL stands for digital subscriber line and not dedicated subscriber line. Aren't these people supposed to favor tech/internet stocks over others? Regards, Shah 408-525-4263 On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Tom Worley wrote: > I agree with Tim, the CPI #s are not the problem, they were quite > decent actually. > > The Motley Fool did not help with CMTN today as the following was > posted before the market opened (my ISP had it at 8:49 AM) > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:57:11 -0600 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] plxt PLXT broke out before the earnings were released, which is why I avoided it, did not want to buy two days ahead of an earnings announcement (look at CMTN). If it did breakout because of an earnings report, I think it would be ok to buy it. On 19 Jul 00, at 17:20, Pritish Shah wrote: > I have started thinking about what Tim has said before (i.e. do not buy on > the news breakout as they are more prone to failures) > > I think that makes sense. > > > Regards, > Shah > 408-525-4263 > > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Patrick Wahl wrote: > > > PLXT announced earnings after the close today, looked like pretty > > good numbers. They broke out of some sort of pattern a couple of > > days ago, are still around the buy point, but given the last two days > > market action, this may not be the time to buy anything, but this > > would be one for a watch list at least. > > > > - > > > > > > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:24:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Anna Sosis Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] scsc b/o Is this good time to exchange TECD for SCSC... - --- Tim Fisher wrote: > Well, it did not break out. Did make a new high but > did not advance 5%. The > trading was wild this AM. I could have had it for 32 > when I got my first > real-time quote; by the time I had my order entered > it was up to 34-5/8. > Got all the way up to 39-3/4 during the frenzy. Made > 20x ADV, probably an > all-time vol hi. Anyway it closed at 34-1/2 so I'm > not very far in the red > yet. When the M settles down I think it will take > off. Should report > Friday, maybe someone knows something. > > Anyway watch PLT tomorrow - it reported, broke out > on 5x ADV (but didn't > match the intraday spike that is the high) and was > kinda lost in the noise > today. > > Tim Fisher > Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites > > Tim@OreRockOn.com > WWW: http://OreRockOn.com > See naked fish and rocks! > > > - > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #955 ***************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.