From: KGRwheeler@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 01 Oct 1998 18:48:22 EDT I am getting ready to change the trailer pads on the Trailrite trailer for my M17. The old pads are 2x6 but they don't seem to fit the hull contours to well. Does anyone know, are they supposed to be 2x6 or were they originally 2x4. I appreciate any advice anyone can offer. Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: M_Boats: \web Page Date: 02 Oct 1998 06:09:30 -0700 Doug, Wow! Last night I checked out the archives page with the URL you sent. What a find! I down loaded all of it and sat up half the night reading. I've learned more about the M's here than I could find in months of searching, and every question I've already asked was answered. Thank you very much. Lee Puppy M326 At 08:47 PM 9/28/1998 -0400, you wrote: >Lee, > > The K.D web page I couldn't remember is >http://www.xmission.com:80/~kdiehl/. There is a list of monthly montgomery >list exchanges to read. Lots of good info. > >Happy sailing > >Doug > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Yamaha 4x4 vs Honda Date: 02 Oct 1998 11:39:58 EDT Bonze......... You lookin' to maybe sell that Honda 10 ??????? ( I assume it' a 9.9 ) Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 02 Oct 1998 12:06:39 EDT Ken I believe the bunks on my 17 trailer were 2x6 but I'm not sure it was a trailrite..... pull up Trailrite trailers on the net and get theit phone #....I had that at one time as well...but alas, moving does wonders for your paperwork....... Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Dan Diehlman" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Cruising Gulf Islands, etc. on M-Boats Date: 02 Oct 1998 11:51:22 -0700 Scott, I would enjoy a more detailed chronology of your trip. Have never cruised that area, but sounds inviting. Dan -----Original Message----- >Ed Hiestand wrote: ><the gulf islands and the lower part of Alaska. I am used to extensive >camping in a Volkswagen van , so close quarters are the standard. I am >wondering if anyone has undertaken extended trips on the m17 and would >appreciate any input you may have on their suitability for this type of >use.>> > >Ed, >We recently returned from cruising our M15 in British Columbia. This time, we >concentrated on the Sunshine Coast and Desolation Sound areas, but have >cruised the Gulf Islands a few years ago (different boat). I have cruised the >Pacific Northwest in a variety of much larger boats, but never had more fun >than we did on this trip on our tiny boat. I think that both the M15 and M17 >are perfectly suited for cruising these waters. The beauty of the Gulf >Islands--or most of BC cruising for that matter--is that there is ample >opportunity to go ashore, provision, and obtain fresh water. A small boat >does not feel so small when you spend some time ashore exploring, swimming in >the fresh water lakes, going to farmer's markets, etc. Also, if your time is >limited, you can trailer the boat (as we did) via ferry to different locals. >I would, however, strongly recommend a boom tent (one that drains overboard, >not into the cockpit), and maybe even a dodger for either M-boat--especially >the M15, due to the lack of sitting headroom below. I was not able to get >either together for our trip, but we were blessed with unusually dry/hot >weather. With a boom tent, one could still cook, read, and have a place to >dry wet gear during rainy periods (of which there are many in this region). >We have come to think of cruising on the M15 as a kind of boat-backpacking. >Actually, it is more comfortable than that, but you get the idea. Perhaps the >M17 would feel less this way. >We use an Origo single-burner alcohol stove (absorption, not pressurized--the >safest, easiest, and most efficient stove I have ever used--and yes, I have >tried butane) to cook in the cockpit. We carry a minimum of fresh foods >requiring a cooler (have a small soft cooler), and have a three gallon water >tank with a bulb-type hand pump on a hose led to the cockpit. We also use a >large solar shower, and showered almost every night--something that makes >living on a small boat more enjoyable. We placed the porta-potti aft in the >cockpit at night--a little more enjoyable for the crew not using the head. >Some on this list had expressed concerns about cruising North waters in >Montgomery boats because of the extreme currents, etc. Excepting the outside >(West) side of Vancouver Island, or the Queen Charlotte Strait, I think that >cruising BC waters is very safe. It is true that there are some outrageous >currents--in some places more than 15 knots, but if you pay attention to the >tide and current charts, this need not be a problem. The fact of the matter >is that a thirty foot boat is not going to fare much better in a tidal eddy or >whirlpool. The issue is not boat size, but seamanship (seapersonship?). You >can get some steep chop in the Strait of Georgia, but, as many on this list >will likely corroborate, the M-boats are tough, seaworthy little boats. My >own experience suggests that with a storm jib and two reefs in the main, The >M15 can stand up to a lot of weather (perhaps more than I can). I am sure the >same is true of the M17. >Anyway, I strongly endorse the M-boats for this kind of cruising. You may >wish to solicit the opinion of the list's resident Alaska expert. He lives up >there, and cruises with his family on an M15, so he can better speak of those >waters. >Have fun, >Scott Grometer, M15 #478, "bebe" >PS: if anyone is interested, I can post a more descriptive piece of our trip. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Harvey Wilson <102072.2315@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: M15 Date: 02 Oct 1998 22:48:12 -0400 Hi John.. Faxed the M-17 brochure to you today. Don't get carried away by 2 footitis..you have a great boat in the M-15...wish I had one many times, even tho I love my Stargazer. Harvey/Atl M-17 Stargazer #294 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Grove777@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: seagull Date: 04 Oct 1998 20:58:03 EDT ...am in need of owner's manual for a silver century seagull outboard...does any one have a manual that they would be willing to copy...hope so!!!...ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: MacT Subject: Re: M_Boats: seagull Date: 04 Oct 1998 22:17:02 -0400 810042213EDT Tr Paula Valentino, 60 Airline Rd., South Dennis, MA 02660-2513; Mr. Valentino repairs and sells SEAGULLS. They have an E-mail address but I can`t find it right now. 72 y Paz Mac/Doris WWP-19 HA`PENNY #965 @ Cole`s Pt. Plantation Marina Cole`s Pt., VA KQ4AL/KE4CYE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: MacT Subject: Re: M_Boats: seagull Date: 04 Oct 1998 22:17:02 -0400 810042213EDT Tr Paula Valentino, 60 Airline Rd., South Dennis, MA 02660-2513; Mr. Valentino repairs and sells SEAGULLS. They have an E-mail address but I can`t find it right now. 72 y Paz Mac/Doris WWP-19 HA`PENNY #965 @ Cole`s Pt. Plantation Marina Cole`s Pt., VA KQ4AL/KE4CYE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John Fell Subject: Re: M_Boats: M15 Date: 04 Oct 1998 19:11:19 -0700 Harvey Wilson wrote: > > Hi John.. > > Faxed the M-17 brochure to you today. > > Don't get carried away by 2 footitis..you have a great boat in the > M-15...wish I had one many times, even tho I love my Stargazer. > > Harvey/Atl > > M-17 Stargazer #294 Harvey, I did receive the fax you sent of the M17 with Stargazer's picture. I appreciate your efforts. You are right, I do have a great boat. It would be very hard to sell, after all I have it just the way that I want it now. Its just that sometimes heading out into the pacific ocean, can get a little overwhelming. Either a bad chop or large swells can make you wish for a little more!. The notes by Lyle and Jerry were very informing. I hope everyone that owns a 17 has those thoughts. thanks again. John fell M15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: sparsons@canby.com (Steve Parsons) Subject: M_Boats: M15 enhancements Date: 04 Oct 1998 19:57:36 -0700 After reading Scott's BC cruising, I am inclined to take my M15 up next season. We normally use our sea kayaks in that area, but a nice place to sleep sounds inviting. Especially at my age and weight. Now to the question. Has anyone put a dodger and/or cockpit tent on a M15? If so, what are your impressions? Can you still get forward easily with the dodger? Who did the work? What was the cost? Thanks in advance, Steve M15-159 Sojornen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mont15@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: M15 enhancements Date: 04 Oct 1998 23:06:33 EDT Steve, I made my own dodger and a boom tent with enclosers fore and aft. The boom tent is fairly easy to make, but the dodger took me in excess of 40 hours. I believe it would cost over $2,000. to have a dodger built, but you can do it yourself for under $300. (I'd have to look up for material costs.) If you want more info, let me know. The Complete Canvasmaker's Guide by Jim Grant was a big help. I can give you some helpful hints. Build them yourself. Bert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Ian L. Black" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Cruising Gulf Islands, etc. on M-Boats Date: 05 Oct 1998 07:21:38 +0000 Dear Scott, I think it would be great to hear more about your cruises in the Gulf Islands. Ian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Grove777@aol.com Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: seagull Date: 05 Oct 1998 11:02:28 EDT thanks for the info on the seagull ob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Ian L. Black" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 05 Oct 1998 09:27:30 +0000 Ken, I can't tell you what was there originally but they are currently 2x6 on my Trail-Rite, I'm reasonably sure they are original . Ian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: KGRwheeler@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 05 Oct 1998 14:40:37 EDT Thanks Ian, the consensus seems to to be 2x6 so that's what I will use. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bownez@juno.com (Michael L Bowden) Subject: Re: M_Boats: Yamaha 4x4 vs Honda Date: 04 Oct 1998 17:17:03 -0500 Lenny, Sorry buddy, I know the minute I sold that sweetheart of a motor I'd regret it. I'll keep it around for fishing boats or maybe the Cape Dory 26 that I don't own yet. Later, Bones ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Vagamundo@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Cruising Gulf Islands, etc. on M-Boats Date: 06 Oct 1998 00:41:11 EDT Please post it on the board. Dave Steed M17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Vagamundo@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 06 Oct 1998 00:43:51 EDT Ken, My Trailrite originals were 2x6s. Dave Steed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: KGRwheeler@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 06 Oct 1998 17:50:23 EDT Thanks Steve, I will use 2x6 and I think I will use a painted plywood beam to see if it will last any longer than the treated fir that was on the trailer. Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: SandmanAl@aol.com Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 06 Oct 1998 22:20:30 EDT Painted plywood will delaminate very quickly. If you want hi tech, use the recycled plastic "wood" that can be had at some lumber stores. How much could 2 boards cost? The green pressure treated lumber works quite well if you can't locate the recycled lumber. Sandy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: KGRwheeler@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 06 Oct 1998 22:35:20 EDT I looked at the recylcled plastic, way too much bend, and it looks too much like particle board. The treated fir on my trailer has split at all the supports. The plywood I'm going to use is fabricated for exterior trim. Should be stronger than fir and ought to last at least as long as the plywood motor mounts (I hope). I guess I'll give it a try and see how it does. Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: InternetHarvey Wilson <102072.2315@compuserve.com> Subject: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 06 Oct 1998 23:09:40 -0400 Hi Ken... Stargazer's trailer is 50 miles away, so I can't measure the bunk boards, but mine are more like 1x6 instead of 2x4 (like wall studs) They're covered with a brown, marine grade "astro turf ", and seem to be made of a hard wood, not pine. Harvey/ Cumming, Ga. M-17 Stargazer #294 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "richard q. lane" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 06 Oct 1998 21:54:13 -0700 InternetHarvey Wilson wrote: > > Hi Ken... > > Stargazer's trailer is 50 miles away, so I can't measure the bunk boards, > but mine are more like 1x6 instead of 2x4 (like wall studs) > > They're covered with a brown, marine grade "astro turf ", and seem to be > made of a hard wood, not pine. > > Harvey/ Cumming, Ga. > > M-17 Stargazer #294I spiral wrapped the disintegrating bunk boards on my M23 trailer using FG tape and West epoxy. Has lasted 10 yrs! Dick "Sadhana" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: sparsons@canby.com (Steve Parsons) Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 07 Oct 1998 19:19:28 -0700 Ken, Have you thought about a good epoxy seal on the plywood. If you can keep the water out, it should last quite a bit longer. Steve >I looked at the recylcled plastic, way too much bend, and it looks too much >like particle board. The treated fir on my trailer has split at all the >supports. The plywood I'm going to use is fabricated for exterior trim. >Should be stronger than fir and ought to last at least as long as the plywood >motor mounts (I hope). I guess I'll give it a try and see how it does. >Ken > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Don Haas Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 07 Oct 1998 19:35:27 -0700 If the Trailrite trailers for the M17 are similar to the M15 trailers as to how the bunk boards are installed; ie a three point mounting with the center point 2 or so inches lower than the end points, I have a suggestion based on my recent experience. I bought a really nice piece of fir for my replacement project, covered them with carpet, then when I tried to bolt them to the trailer, the center tang on the trailer bent up to meet the board instead of the board bending to meet the trailer. Only when I got the boat back on the trailer did the bunk board bend to the correct shape. So the suggestion is, pre-bend the board, maybe by placing a brick under each end and parking your car so the front tire presses the center down to the ground, and leave it rhat way for a couple of days. Dob Haas, M15-248, Dream Catcher. KGRwheeler@aol.com wrote: > Thanks Steve, I will use 2x6 and I think I will use a painted plywood beam to > see if it will last any longer than the treated fir that was on the trailer. > Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Fritz Stuneck Subject: M_Boats: M17 FOR SALE-MN Date: 08 Oct 1998 16:35:20 -0600 Minnesota White Bear Lake M-17 For Sale: Hull #MMP172330277 White Hull w/blue bottom paint Asking $5500 or BO Contact: Ginny Latham email: ginny_latham@ellerbe.com Boat is in the water at White Bear Lake, Tally's Marina. Looks nice, well kept. Black toe rail, lifelines, rear stern rail, spreader boots and sleeves. Gauges set in varnished wood. Depth, knot & Compass Varnished brightwork. Blue sail cover. White cushions inside. Newer style centerboard. 9.9 Sailmaster longshaft w/ lowering motor mount. Jib, genoa. Roller furling included, not installed. Trailer. Reason for sale: moving out of state. Reply to: fritzs@minn.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Stephen Jones Subject: M_Boats: The Sailing Index Date: 08 Oct 1998 15:01:34 -0600 (MDT) In a short while, I will be removing my old web page http://www.ualberta.ca/~sjones/ from the University of Alberta server. You may be familiar with its successor, The Sailing Index (http://www.sailingindex.com). The content migrated from one to the other over a year ago, and there has been a page since then redirecting you to the location of the most comprehensive collection of sailing links on the web. If you have not already done so, please change your links and bookmarks to The Sailing Index, since there will shortly no longer be a page on the U of A server to redirect you. New sites to be included should be sent to submit@sailingindex.com Sincerely, Stephen P.S. If you received this message more than once, I apologize. Stephen Jones | Dept. of Philosophy | The Sailing Index 4-108 Humanities Center | University of Alberta | http://www.sailingindex.com/ Edmonton, Alberta | CANADA T6G 2E5 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John Fell Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 08 Oct 1998 18:52:28 -0700 InternetHarvey Wilson wrote: > > Hi Ken... > > Stargazer's trailer is 50 miles away, so I can't measure the bunk boards, > but mine are more like 1x6 instead of 2x4 (like wall studs) > > They're covered with a brown, marine grade "astro turf ", and seem to be > made of a hard wood, not pine. > > Harvey/ Cumming, Ga. > > M-17 Stargazer #294 Harvey and all, I went down to my M15 today and noticed my trailer bunks are made of 2 by 4's. I sold lumber for a while, so I'm sure. John Fell M15 #126 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randolph I Palmer Subject: M_Boats: Montgomery for sale (fwd) Date: 08 Oct 1998 22:26:56 -0500 (CDT) Hi Doc, Thanks for reminding me. You are the third person who contacted me RE: the M17 at Ashland, WI. The boat has a yellow hull and I would guess it was built in the mid 1970's because the motor mount is cut into the transom and it has the aluminum toerails. The gel coat looks bright and shiney. (The northern sun doesn't eat the boats up so fast - one advantage to our short seasons I guess.) I've seen "Aggie" at the Ashland Marina before. So without further adieu: the phone number is 715-682-3961. Good luck on your boat search. Randy ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Randy..Saw your 9/28 post regarding the M-17 for sale on the Montgomery mailing list..While I was really after a M-15, ANY Montgomery in this part of the world is of interest..(I'm down in Oshkosh)...Do you have any details on her ??..Regards, Doc Musekamp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randolph I Palmer Subject: Re: M_Boats: Montgomery for sale (fwd) Date: 08 Oct 1998 22:46:02 -0500 (CDT) Just me again. I forgot to mention that the engine is a Johnson 8hp Sailtwin (looks like it is in good shape from the outside). Randy P. On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Randolph I Palmer wrote: > Hi Doc, > > Thanks for reminding me. You are the third person who contacted me RE: > the M17 at Ashland, WI. The boat has a yellow hull and I would guess it > was built in the mid 1970's because the motor mount is cut into the > transom and it has the aluminum toerails. The gel coat looks bright and > shiney. (The northern sun doesn't eat the boats up so fast - one advantage > to our short seasons I guess.) I've seen "Aggie" at the Ashland Marina > before. So without further adieu: the phone number is 715-682-3961. > > Good luck on your boat search. > > Randy > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sat, 3 Oct 98 21:20:12 -0500 > From: Doc Musekamp > To: palmrs@knight.cvfn.org > Subject: Montgomery for sale > > Randy..Saw your 9/28 post regarding the M-17 for sale on the Montgomery > mailing list..While I was really after a M-15, ANY Montgomery in this > part of the world is of interest..(I'm down in Oshkosh)...Do you have any > details on her ??..Regards, Doc Musekamp > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: KGRwheeler@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 09 Oct 1998 20:14:37 EDT Dick; I wish I had thought of that before I bought the wood for my new trailer bunks. Thanks, Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: KGRwheeler@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Trailer Pads M17 Date: 09 Oct 1998 20:17:08 EDT Dob; Thanks for the info. My bunks need to bend quite a bit too, but it looks like it is controlled by the spacing of the anchor bolts. I just about have the bunks done and will try to install next time I launch. Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: M_Boats: M15 Jib size? Date: 09 Oct 1998 18:06:00 -0700 Anyone have the measurements for an M15 working Jib (an 85%)? How about a good place to find one, new or used. Also, the spec sheets say the M15 has positive foam flotation. Mine was built in '85. If it's there, I don't see it. Can anyone explain this? Lee M15 Puppy 326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry montgomery Subject: Re: M_Boats: M15 Jib size? Date: 10 Oct 1998 13:50:16 +0000 Hi Lee The standard M-15 working jib is a 133%. I don't have the measurements at my fingertips but when I run across them I'll put them on the list. If your 15 doesn't have foam, someone took it out in favor of storage. Happens all the time. Jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mont15@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: M 15 floation? Date: 10 Oct 1998 17:42:04 EDT Lee, You need approximately 1 cubic foot of foam. Bert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry montgomery Subject: M_Boats: things of interest Date: 10 Oct 1998 14:17:52 +0000 Hi Group I just went thru a box of sails in the barn and have found two M-15 sails that someone might be interested in. They are both new sails made by Kern Ferguson (the best). The first is a 200% spinnaker, blue and white, in a turtle bag, and the other is a 180% genoa, without a bag. I don=92t really know what they are worth now, but my latest price list (1994) had them at 340. for the genoa and 300. for the spinnaker. I=92m sure that they are a good bit higher than that now so I guess 250. plus about 10. for shipping would be a good price for either. You know how to reach me; I=92m leaving next week for Colorado to go murder Bambi=92s = big brudder and hopefully won=92t be back for a couple of weeks so if the sails have buyers I=92ll send them out then. The other matter is the custom 23 owned by my friend Tom Van Atta in Tucson, which I mentioned a few weeks ago was for sale. Finally got him to put a price on it, which is an astounding 5K, including a good trailer and lots of sails. This is a boat that was put together for MORC racing by a good friend of mine. It has an M-23 hull, an M-15 deck, a Wavelength 24 rig with rod rigging, and a lead fin keel off of something. If I had something to tow it with I would be tempted to buy it myself, but I really don=92t want a boat that big, with my backpack mentality. If I did buy it, I would be tempted to put a 17 deck on it (which I have) and a hinged mast step and make a really neat cruising boat out of it. Tom has a back problem that will not allow him to sail anymore, and just bought a new truck and fifth-wheel trailer and needs the room. Someone should snap the boat up for that price. Email Tom regarding the boat at and tell him he owes me a beer; a good one- not the cheep stuff he usually buys. Jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John Fell Subject: Re: M_Boats: M15 Jib size? Date: 10 Oct 1998 21:55:45 -0700 L. Ingalls wrote: > > Anyone have the measurements for an M15 working Jib (an 85%)? > How about a good place to find one, new or used. > Also, the spec sheets say the M15 has positive foam flotation. Mine was > built in '85. If it's there, I don't see it. Can anyone explain this? > Lee > M15 Puppy 326 My floation is under the cockpit, in the form of foam blocks. very visible from the cabin. Foward, under the v-birth, I have foam in the foward compartment. My hatch is screwed down so that I don't remove it. See if you can locate foam blocks in either place on your boat. John Fell M15 #126 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Fritz Stuneck Subject: Fwd: M_Boats: M17 FOR SALE-MN Date: 12 Oct 1998 14:21:35 -0600 Here;s the proper email address for Ginny Latham in Minnesota Ginny_Latham@ellerbebecket.com 612-224-1024 . >Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 16:35:20 -0600 >To: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com >From: Fritz Stuneck >Subject: M_Boats: M17 FOR SALE-MN >Minnesota White Bear Lake M-17 For Sale: >Hull #MMP172330277 White Hull w/blue bottom paint >Asking $5500 or BO >Contact: Ginny Latham email: Ginny_Latham@ellerbebecket.com > >Boat is in the water at White Bear Lake, Tally's Marina. Looks nice, well >kept. >Black toe rail, lifelines, rear stern rail, spreader boots and sleeves. >Gauges set in varnished wood. Depth, knot & Compass >Varnished brightwork. >Blue sail cover. White cushions inside. Newer style centerboard. >9.9 Sailmaster longshaft w/ lowering motor mount. >Jib, genoa. Roller furling included, not installed. >Trailer. >Reason for sale: moving out of state. Thanks for your call this weekend, was out on the lake, great sailing!!! The hull # is 233, built 1977. Any other questions you can call or email. Thanks Reply to: fritzs@minn.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: DoorAriel@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: M17 old style CB Date: 12 Oct 1998 18:10:56 EDT An M17 owner recently wrote that he thought his M17 had the "new style centerboard." Since not much gets by me, I leaped to the conclusion that there must be an old style centerboard, and that I probably have one. Would appreciate e-mail regarding the difference betwen the two boards, and whether or not boats with the old style boards can be fitted with the new style boards, whatever they are. Dick -- M17 253 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Natalie Bohnet Subject: M_Boats: Lightening Protection Date: 12 Oct 1998 15:19:41 -0700 Has anybody come up with a plan for protection from lightening strikes on an M17? Natalie M 17 #365 "Junior" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: stephen gray Subject: Re: M_Boats: Lightening Protection Date: 12 Oct 1998 23:44:26 +0000 At 03:19 PM 10/12/98 -0700, you wrote: >Has anybody come up with a plan for protection from lightening strikes on an >M17? > >Natalie >M 17 #365 "Junior" > > > Don't go sailing when it's lightening outside. Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doc Musekamp Subject: M_Boats: Count me among the enlightened !! Date: 12 Oct 1998 19:13:31 -0500 Hello everyone..I'm a brand new M-17 owner and list subscriber (although I've lurked through the archives on a fairly regular basis in the past !). I owe a debt of gratitude to Randy Palmer for his recent post, alerting me to "Aggie"'s availability in Ashland,WI. Randy emailed me the owner's phone number Friday night, I called, and Creighton Koski agreed to deliver the boat to Wausau, WI which is about 2 hrs from my home base of Oshkosh. Made the deal (and I mean deal!) and picked her up on Saturday.I keep wandering into the garage to convince myself she's really there...I'm completely infatuated..all kinds of plans/ideas for minor improvements or visions of long summer weekends on her, keep popping into my head...Possible name change ahead and yes, I have a copy of the correct ritual to Neptune to hopefully negate the associated untold bad luck ! I've owned several other boats as well as built a small skiff, but I think this one's for keeps. She's a 1978 model, Hull number 218 if I'm reading it right, with a beautiful sunflower yellow hull and white decks. Johnson Sailmaster 8 for power power and the standard set of main and jib for sail power. From what you all have said, looks like a 150 jenny is in my immediate future...Mostly, I'm just happy to have found her and feel certain that the best is yet to come... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mont15@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Lightening Protection Date: 12 Oct 1998 20:30:00 EDT Natalie, You can set up for lightening the same way I have done. Put a lightening dissipater on the mast. Forespar makes one for under $100. I can't remember the price. This will draw off static electricty. Put a tang on the port and starboard side of your mast tabernackle. To this attaches heavy cables (like jumper cables but heavier.) which you can have made up at a welding supply shop. The cables need to reach from the mast to the water when you are heeled over. Don't skimp here because otherwise they will not do you much good. At the end of each attach about 12 inches of copper pipe. Then you are set, A friend permanently attaches bolts to the tangs and simply brings up the cables from below and attaches them with wing nuts. Then just put the cables in the water. I gathered this information from my brother whose friends designs equipment for airport control towers. The equipment prevents problems from lightening strikes. Bert PS If you know anyone looking for a great M 15, mine is for sale. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry montgomery Subject: Re: M_Boats: M17 old style CB Date: 12 Oct 1998 16:51:29 +0000 Dick The older 17s (up to about #330 )had a cast iron cb; the newer ones had a glass board, filled with lead. They are not interchangable because of the different shape. The foundry that made the cast iron boards closed their doors (taking my pattern with them) in about 1990 and we made the change at that time. Jerry DoorAriel@aol.com wrote: > > An M17 owner recently wrote that he thought his M17 had the "new style > centerboard." Since not much gets by me, I leaped to the conclusion that > there must be an old style centerboard, and that I probably have one. Would > appreciate e-mail regarding the difference betwen the two boards, and whether > or not boats with the old style boards can be fitted with the new style > boards, whatever they are. > > Dick -- M17 253 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: chbenneck@juno.com (Conbert H Benneck) Subject: Re: M_Boats: M15 Jib size? Date: 12 Oct 1998 19:41:55 -0400 Hi Lee, The foam logs are installed in the storage area under the berth in the bow. Additional foam logs are in the aft end of the M-15, under the cockpit sole. If you open the front storage cover, under the berth, you'll find them easily. The cockpit sole floatation can be seen with a flashlight from the cabin. Connie ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Fritz Stuneck Subject: Re: M_Boats: M17 old style CB Date: 13 Oct 1998 05:20:46 -0600 According to Jerry M, only about the first 20 or so M17's had the "old style" centerboard which weighs around 500# and is cast steel or iron. This heavy centerboard cranks up and down with a trunnion mechanism which means that the board pivots on a fixed pin (which you can see at the bottom of the centerboard tunnel) . As you turn the crank screw (which is also fixed), the board moves up or down by means of a sort of clamp that attaches to the screw. This mechanism has great power and I can tell you that it WILL lift your boat out of the water when you are stuck in sand or or rocks iff you crank the wrong direction! However, the centerboard tunnel takes up substantial room in the cabin area. These boats also have no extra ballast cast or moulded into the bottom of the hull. I would imagine that the early 17's probably do better in heavier air, eh? There's my .02 worth which should be pretty close. There were a number of messages concerning this awhile ago and should be in the archives somewhere. Reply to: fritzs@minn.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doc Musekamp Subject: M_Boats: Count me among... Date: 13 Oct 1998 05:41:25 -0500 Sorry, folks...got so carried away, forgot to introduce myself....Doc Musekamp...Home port is Oshkosh,WI...Primary sailing waters..Lake Winnebago and Green Lake, both in east central Wisconsin...Lots of other places beckon however.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: theo Subject: M_Boats: New Date: 13 Oct 1998 08:51:22 -0600 Hello, my name is Theo I live in the Twin Cities of St.Paul(capital) and Minneapolis. I own a 1980 Montgomery(duh?) 17. Beige in color, she is named "Sails Call" I am considering selling it because I would like something larger, but it's such a great boat I'm torn. Thank God for winter storage. I'd like to find a Montgomery 23 in my general vicinity to look and and consider purchasing if available. So....if there is anyone out there that would like to show me their 23 this fall/winter, please contact me. I did notice (2) 23's in Hudson, WI earlier this season, are they still around? Looking forward to reading lots of good info to get me through this winter-hell. Cheers! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Robert Rubey Subject: M_Boats: Genoa rigging Date: 13 Oct 1998 12:48:56 -0400 We're thinking of adding a genoa to our M17 and would like advice on how others have gone about this. Do you add genoa track to the toe rail, as Bert has done on Kokopelli? Where along the toe rail do you place it? How do you run the genoa sheet? What solutions have others come up with. Thanks for any help, Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: New Date: 13 Oct 1998 14:41:51 EDT Theo If you get tired of the ice and snow this winter I have an M-23 in Phoenix, AZ. I just finished a MAJOR move ( I swear, never again ) so after I get her cleaned up a bit we'll be on the water......... Smooth Sailin' Lenny M-23 # 003 Sea Horse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bob Fisher Subject: Re: M_Boats: Genoa rigging Date: 13 Oct 1998 15:12:48 -0700 Robert: I have the perforated toe rail my 150 uses snap on blocks that can be moved and snapped into a new hole in the toe rail as needed. I have the sail mounted on a CDI furler. The blocks work fine. Why go to the expense or a track? Bob Fisher Robert Rubey wrote: > We're thinking of adding a genoa to our M17 and would like advice on how > others have gone about this. Do you add genoa track to the toe rail, as > Bert has done on Kokopelli? Where along the toe rail do you place it? > How do you run the genoa sheet? What solutions have others come up > with. Thanks for any help, Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randolph I Palmer Subject: M_Boats: Re: Montgomery for sale (fwd) Date: 13 Oct 1998 20:45:03 -0500 (CDT) Hi Doc, Well congratulations on buying a NICE boat! I was almost tempted to start adding to my fleet again but I saw she was gone last weekend. I figured someone couldn't resist. You bought her sight unseen? Takes some nerve (or an awfully large amount of trust on my words) but sounds like you got a good deal. I'm copying this note so the M_Boat crowd knows what's up. You are right. There are some smart and helpful people on the list (I try to put on the image that I'm one of them). ;^) Where are you going to sail her? You'll have to post the list with the tales of your first sails (we will accept it in poetic form). Enjoy! Fair winds, Randy On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Doc Musekamp wrote: > Randy...Well, third times the charm !!!..Just got back from Wausau..where > I picked up my new boat !!..Made the deal on the phone last night and > Creighton Koski agreed to deliver it to Wausau this afternoon..Can't > believe it, it hasn't really sunk in yet..the boat is a '76 model with an > '86 Johnson Sailmaster 8..and like you said, the hull is in gorgeous > condition..Bright yellow and not a craze or crack anywhere...Just > beautiful...Creighton made me an incredible deal on top of everything; I > ended up paying less than I expected to spend on an M-15 !!.. so I > couldn't be more pleased..Just wish we had a bit more of the season > left..In any event, I owe you one !!.thanks again for pointing me in the > right direction..I'll be subscribing to the list as well..Seem like some > knowledgeable, helpful folks participate...Take care..Doc Musekamp > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Dick Allgire Subject: Re: M_Boats: Genoa rigging Date: 13 Oct 1998 20:23:42 -0700 >Robert: >I have the perforated toe rail my 150 uses snap on blocks that can be moved >and snapped into a new hole in the toe rail as needed. I have the sail >mounted on a CDI furler. The blocks work fine. Why go to the expense or a >track? >Bob Fisher Same here....easy to move the block from one setting to another until y9ou get the best set for your genny....easier than a track, I think. > >Robert Rubey wrote: > >> We're thinking of adding a genoa to our M17 and would like advice on how >> others have gone about this. Do you add genoa track to the toe rail, as >> Bert has done on Kokopelli? Where along the toe rail do you place it? >> How do you run the genoa sheet? What solutions have others come up >> with. Thanks for any help, Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randolph I Palmer Subject: Re: M_Boats: New Date: 13 Oct 1998 21:18:41 -0500 (CDT) Hi Theo, Our M23 just moved to Navaho Lake on the Colorado/New Mexico border. There was one available in the LaCrosse, WI area (original owner - supposedly in great shape with many extras) earlier this year. It seemed to be at the top of the market ($17K) but maybe it is worth it. It has a red hull and is called Paprika. You might call 608-787-5810 and talk to them. There are atleast two more in the area - one in Isle, MN and another in the Twin Cities area someplace - maybe the one you saw in Hudson. Randy P. On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, theo wrote: > Hello, my name is Theo I live in the Twin Cities of St.Paul(capital) and > Minneapolis. I own a 1980 Montgomery(duh?) 17. Beige in color, she is > named "Sails Call" I am considering selling it because I would like > something larger, but it's such a great boat I'm torn. Thank God for > winter storage. > > I'd like to find a Montgomery 23 in my general vicinity to look and and > consider purchasing if available. So....if there is anyone out there > that would like to show me their 23 this fall/winter, please contact me. > I did notice (2) 23's in Hudson, WI earlier this season, are they still > around? > > Looking forward to reading lots of good info to get me through this > winter-hell. > > Cheers! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Saltm17@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Genoa rigging Date: 13 Oct 1998 22:30:15 EDT I have the teak toerail, and there is a track on it, two actually. The one goes all the way aft, for use with the spinnaker. The foreward one works best with the storm jib. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Ian L. Black" Subject: M_Boats: Having a ball! Date: 13 Oct 1998 23:07:35 +0000 Hello everyone, Congratulations to Doc on the newest member of his family. I'm having a ball with our M-17! We haven't had a chance to put it in the water since we bought it but that has not been a problem yet. I have it parked on the street in front of our house (we live on a cul de sac). I got a warning notice for having a recreational vehicle parked on the street for more than 24 hours stuck to it today by the local gendarme. I guess I'll have to move it to the storage lot for the time being. Too bad! It's been very pleasant to eat my corn flakes and be able to watch my boat from the kitchen window. I suppose moving it is for the best though -it will be safer and the neighbors are starting to talk because of the amount of time I spend just sitting in it. I guess they find this type of behavior unusual. Tsk, tsk not much imagination..My wife calls it my fort. She suggested that I might think about actually putting it in the water. I found this to be a novel thought so on Sunday we dragged it to the local resevoir. We successfully stepped the mast for the first time and did it without trying to kill each other off, a harbinger of good fortune for sure. In trying to get the mast up we managed to attract the attention of several folks( not bad for a previously empty parking lot) and I had several long drawn out discussions on the correct way to go about it while my wife held up the mast (we also own a business together.. Has this woman got a sense of humor or what). After having finally got it raised we discovered there was no water in the resevoir to speak of . One of our "advisors" mentioned that they started letting the water out at the end of September as was the norm this time of year in the mountains. Waterless resevoirs, hmmm. Maybe I could sell those heat- and-serve ice packs in our store.... Anyways to make a long story even longer I decided this would be a great time to practice unstepping the mast. I first told my wife to stand at the end of the cockpit and catch the mast when I released the forestay . She nixxed this idea . She said she had learned her lesson when we owned our 1st daysailer, a 16ft Sunbird called "I Think I Can". We were on our maiden voyage on a day in March one would term as on the warm side of freezing. We were approaching the dock after a brisk (and fraught filled) sail when we discovered our "sail away package" did not include auxillary power or even an oar. (I corrected this quickly on our second sail when I found a used wet suit at a garage sale- a tad small for me but it fit my wife perfectly- talk about luck) We came in under full sail and with an amazing turn of speed. As we approached the dock I yelled to my wife to stop us with her foot. She yelled back that her foot would break . I reminded her that her foot would heal but I didn't think the gel coat would. We did get her in safely in the end and my wife's limp is almost unnoticeable , but we're getting away from the real story... After much discussion and tears (mine) she handled the forestay and I handled the mast. During this event a new "advisor" came to offer his wise counsel . He turned out to be a very pleasant fellow who sails a McGregor 26 on the Sea of Cortez every winter. He extolled on the virtues of sailing in that area and even invited us down if we could make it. What a wonderful group the cruising sailors are. I would have been even more impressed if he would have helped but he continually pointed out how we needed to learn to operate as a team on our new boat. (He really did help us ...) Without much further ado we got packed up and headed for home so we could once more park it (illegally) at its corn flake perch. A great day of almost-sailing! I wonder if it's as much fun as when it is in the water? Good sailing to all, Ian in Oregon M-17 #343 "Seaweeble" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doc Musekamp Subject: M_Boats: Having a ball Date: 14 Oct 1998 07:24:34 -0500 Ian...What a hoot !!..Great story..almost choked on MY corn flakes..nice to start the day with a good laugh!!..Thanks !! Doc Musekamp M17,#218 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doc Musekamp Subject: M_Boats: Having a ball Date: 14 Oct 1998 07:28:42 -0500 Ian...What a hoot !!..Almost choked on MY cornflakes..Great story. Nice to start the day with a good laugh !!..Thanks ! Doc Musekamp M17, #218 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: Re: M_Boats: M15 Jib size? Date: 14 Oct 1998 05:48:40 -0700 Connie, Nope, no foam anywhere. I guesstamate about 12 cubic feet should hold float the boat, motor, and passengers. Any thought on that? Just saw a note from J.M. I thought he was in the boonies venting his murderous urges. Jerry scared me with that bit about the working jib being a 133%. Is he testing me? Does anyone use a smaller head sail? I still haven't put Puppy in the water. Trying to get her all pretty; previous owner wasn't into maintenance. But when I do, ya' all will be the first to hear about it. And I'm trying to bring back a really oxidized finish, found a lovely blue stripe, or about two square inches of it. Is there a fast way to dig through heavy oxidation? Help. M15 Puppy 326 Lee ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: M_Boats: Sails Date: 14 Oct 1998 06:03:50 -0700 Anyone know how to remove rust stains from a sail? M15 Puppy #326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Grove777@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: m 17 Date: 14 Oct 1998 09:22:23 EDT ...vanda shot out port lights w/pellet gun please would appreciate detailed advise on how to remove cabin ports to replace the now punctered glass...grove ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: TEHowe@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Having a ball! Date: 14 Oct 1998 09:45:12 EDT In a message dated 10/14/98 1:11:24 AM Central Daylight Time, suthdrug@rosenet.net writes: << It's been very pleasant to eat my corn flakes and be able to watch my boat from the kitchen window. >> I find a great deal of pleasure when my boat is in my drive in having my morning coffee in the cockpit while daydreaming of distant harbors. Don't just look at it, participate! You are going to have a lot of fun on your Montgomery, congratulations. TH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randy Palmer Subject: M_Boats: Cruising in a Falmouth Cutter 22' Date: 14 Oct 1998 17:09:16 -0700 http://www.48north.com/sep98/falmout.htm Hi Hess fans, I'll pass this address on to you folks with web access. The Falmouth Cutter is a fantasy boat for me - one I'll probably never own but it leaves lots of room open for dreaming: a small, go anywhere character boat that is pretty besides. The article has some good hints and arguements for small boat owners. Besides, I like the subtitle. Enjoy. Randy P. M15 #515 "Oui-1" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry montgomery Subject: Re: M_Boats: M17 old style CB Date: 14 Oct 1998 16:42:04 +0000 Hi Fritz You've got it right except for details; the original M-17 of which you right is a RETRACTABLE KEEL 17, and the "old style cb followed. We made around 300 of them, and switched to the "new" cb model about 1990. Jerry Fritz Stuneck wrote: > > According to Jerry M, only about the first 20 or so M17's had the "old > style" centerboard which weighs around 500# and is cast steel or iron. This > heavy centerboard cranks up and down with a trunnion mechanism which means > that the board pivots on a fixed pin (which you can see at the bottom of > the centerboard tunnel) . As you turn the crank screw (which is also > fixed), the board moves up or down by means of a sort of clamp that > attaches to the screw. This mechanism has great power and I can tell you > that it WILL lift your boat out of the water when you are stuck in sand or > or rocks iff you crank the wrong direction! However, the centerboard > tunnel takes up substantial room in the cabin area. These boats also have > no extra ballast cast or moulded into the bottom of the hull. I would > imagine that the early 17's probably do better in heavier air, eh? There's > my .02 worth which should be pretty close. > There were a number of messages concerning this awhile ago and should be in > the archives somewhere. > Reply to: fritzs@minn.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bownez@juno.com (Michael L Bowden) Subject: Re: M_Boats: Having a ball! Date: 13 Oct 1998 21:58:20 -0500 Ian, If you like your boat OUT of the water , just wait till you try it IN the water. Yee-hawwww. Michael "Bones" Bowden M17 #92 ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bownez@juno.com (Michael L Bowden) Subject: M_Boats: Re: Montgomery for sale (fwd) Date: 13 Oct 1998 21:42:51 -0500 Doc, Welcome to the list and congrats on the new (used) M17. You'll have countless hours of enjoyment sailing her wherever you wish. I think our boats may be very similar, I have a yellow hull also, yet rather faded, serial #92, 1976. This was my second season sailing her, and I am more than pleased. I bet you'll be anxious for spring to arrive to the mid-west. Keep us posted on your adventures. Michael "Bones" Bowden ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bownez@juno.com (Michael L Bowden) Subject: M_Boats: Re: Montgomery for sale (fwd) Date: 13 Oct 1998 21:42:51 -0500 Doc, Welcome to the list and congrats on the new (used) M17. You'll have countless hours of enjoyment sailing her wherever you wish. I think our boats may be very similar, I have a yellow hull also, yet rather faded, serial #92, 1976. This was my second season sailing her, and I am more than pleased. I bet you'll be anxious for spring to arrive to the mid-west. Keep us posted on your adventures. Michael "Bones" Bowden ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Grove777@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: deck failure on m-15 Date: 15 Oct 1998 09:29:56 EDT warning to all m-15 owners...yesterday while assisting w/lowering of mast[very carefully]...suddenly the mast dropped vertically about 2 feet...at first could not comprehend what had happened...upon examination...the deck below the mast tabernacle collapsed and the mast dropped straight down into the cabin...the area is soft and very spongy...it appears that the four boltsattaching the mast tabernacle allowed moisture to seep into the core and then the deck softened, glass on cabin side delaminated and the whole thing collapsed...note...the mast was under no downward strain as it was being lowered back towards the cockpit...infact it had probably not moved more than 6 feet in an arc as it was being lowered and was not in a strain...the owner of the boat died of luekemia after a 2 year battle and so it has not been looked after for 2 years..but why would the deck collapse...also front deck seems to be soft...2 questions...ideas on repairs and reinforcement???...and whats the trick to get the centerboard free???...no barnacles or little rocks wedged in the well...thanks for any response ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: TEHowe@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: M17 for sale repost Date: 15 Oct 1998 10:59:37 EDT Montgomery 17 sailboat in good shape with complete inventory for sale. 1978 keel/cb model, with Trailrite trailer. Three berth model, with galley sink to port. Main, Working Jib, Genoa. PFDs, anchor, whisker pole, electrical package, PortaPotti, bulkhead mounted compass and knotmeter. Transom mounted swim ladder, masthead windvane, Harken traveler gear. Johnson 4hp Sailmaster outboard with external gas tank Telescoping tiller extension Canoe paddle 4 fenders. $5000. Thomas Howe 785-841-6271 E-Mail TEHowe@aol.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Harvey Wilson <102072.2315@compuserve.com> Subject: M_Boats: Having a ball! Date: 15 Oct 1998 23:24:40 -0400 Hi Ian... Stargazer, my M-17, has a life similiar to yours. She sits in the side yard, and I'll enjoy a few reflective moments in her cockpit at night. On weekends, when the little grandkids visit, they insist on exploring her cockpit and cabin, snuggling on her cushions, and raising the jib. In your mast raising exercises, did you attach a line to the forestay to help raise and lower it ?? I use the sheets with a U shackle to connect them to the jib turnbuckle. I then stay in the cockpit while the admiral lowers the mast with the forestay/sheets. She can usually control the mast until it gets to a 45 deg. angle, at which time I can take hold and walk it back to the gallows fitted to the rudder pintles. Harvey/ Ga M-17 Stargazer #294 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Rod&Elsa Johnson" Subject: Re: M_Boats: m17 cruising Date: 15 Oct 1998 21:16:06 -0700 -----Original Message----- Ed Hiestand wrote >I am interested in a trailer boat that I can spend a month at a time in >the gulf islands and the lower part of alaska. I am used to extensive >camping in a volkswagon van , so close quarters are the standard. I am >wondering if anyone has undertaken extended trips on the m17 and would >appreciate any input you may have on their suitability for this type of >use. Would also like to read any stories that have been posted or >published regarding cruising on such boats. Thanks >Ed Hiestand > > Ed - I spent about 7 weeks early this summer singlehanding my M17 from my home in Port Angeles WA up into British Columbia, thru the Gulf Islands, Desolation Sound, Johnstone Strait, around Cape Caution, etc. Had originally thought to go all the way to Juneau then scaled it back when the reality of covering lots of miles sunk in - but I made it to Bella Bella and decided to explore around there. I wandered back to Ocean Falls and Bella Coola, then returned to Bella Bella by way of Namu and made a pass around the back (W) side of the island that Bella Bella is on, and from there headed back more or less the way I came. From all that I can tell you that the M17 is perfect for one person for that kind of trip. My wife met me in Alert Bay for 3 days and again in Ganges for 2 days and it was pretty crowded with two. I have made a number of minor changes to accomodate our weather and facilitate singlehanding - most of them have been extensively discussed here but I will list them anyway: - For safety I have a stern rail, a folding boarding ladder (always hanging on the transom) and eye bolts for safety harness attachment. - The main has slugs, lazy jacks and a topping lift to facilitate reefing. I always rigged the jib with a downhaul so I could douse it without going forward. - There is a double bow roller for the anchors - each anchor and its rode is kept in a basket in the cockpit with its line already lead around a roller so all I have to do to drop an anchor is to throw it overboard and pay out the line from the basket. To retrieve an anchor, I go forward, get hold of the line outboard from the roller, walk it back to the cockpit and pull it in from there. - I made a small dodger that just covers the companionway to keep the rain out (mostly) and there is a cockpit cover that fits over the boom. - I cooked on a 1 burner camp stove that sat on a board on a bucket in the cockpit and most of my meals were cooked in a pressure cooker. - I have a fishfinder type fathometer that the guess work out of finding the bottom fish that I ate almost every day. - There is a large solar panel mounted on the stern rail that kept the battery charged even though the sun didn't shine ever day. - I started out with a Honda 5hp and it worked great. On my way back I met another sailor who wanted to trade his Honda 8 (with alternator) for my 5 (he wanted to get rid of 20 lbs that he had to muscle every time he put the motor on his dingy). The 8 is also great, it is smoother than the 5 (being a twin) but I can't use more than a fraction of its power and it is heavy. Maybe the alterntor will let me get along without the solar panel, but otherwise I wish I had the 5 back. Thats an overview - if you have any questions I will do my best to answer them Rod Johnson M17 #408, "BuscaBrisas" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: suthdrug@rosenet.net Subject: Re: M_Boats: Having a ball! Date: 16 Oct 1998 04:42:51 GMT Harvey, I once again owe you thanks for the help. Your method of lowering the mast sounds a lot easier than our first attempt. I would imagine it is not near as exciting but life does have its trade-offs (lower medical bills, no divorce lawyers, etc.)... Anyways, thanks again, your advice will get good use. Ian from Oregon M-17 #343 "Seaweeble" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Gary M. Hyde" Subject: Re: M_Boats: m17 cruising Date: 16 Oct 1998 08:57:22 -0700 Rod&Elsa: I live in Pullman, WA., and am very interested in sailing Puget Sound and adjoining waters. I'm also interested in acquiring an easily trailered and single-handed boat, such as an M17, if you happen to know of one in the Pacific Northwest that is for sale (sail!). Regarding your sail up into the Gulf Islands and beyond, what do you do to keep warm on your boat? Thanks. gmhyde@wsu.edu >-----Original Message----- >From: ed hiestand >To: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com > >Date: Tuesday, September 29, 1998 6:14 PM >Subject: M_Boats: m17 > >Ed Hiestand wrote > >>I am interested in a trailer boat that I can spend a month at a time in >>the gulf islands and the lower part of alaska. I am used to extensive >>camping in a volkswagon van , so close quarters are the standard. I am >>wondering if anyone has undertaken extended trips on the m17 and would >>appreciate any input you may have on their suitability for this type of >>use. Would also like to read any stories that have been posted or >>published regarding cruising on such boats. Thanks >>Ed Hiestand >> >> >Ed - I spent about 7 weeks early this summer singlehanding my M17 from >my home in Port Angeles WA up into British Columbia, thru the Gulf Islands, >Desolation Sound, Johnstone Strait, around Cape Caution, etc. Had originally >thought to go all the way to Juneau then scaled it back when the reality of >covering lots of miles sunk in - but I made it to Bella Bella and decided to >explore around there. I wandered back to Ocean Falls and Bella Coola, then >returned to Bella Bella by way of Namu and made a pass around the back (W) >side of the island that Bella Bella is on, and from there headed back more >or less the way I came. From all that I can tell you that the M17 is perfect >for one person for that kind of trip. My wife met me in Alert Bay for 3 days >and again in Ganges for 2 days and it was pretty crowded with two. > >I have made a number of minor changes to accomodate our weather and >facilitate singlehanding - most of them have been extensively discussed here >but I will list them anyway: > - For safety I have a stern rail, a folding boarding ladder (always >hanging on the transom) and eye bolts for safety harness attachment. > - The main has slugs, lazy jacks and a topping lift to facilitate >reefing. I always rigged the jib with a downhaul so I could douse it without >going forward. > - There is a double bow roller for the anchors - each anchor and its >rode is kept in a basket in the cockpit with its line already lead around a >roller so all I have to do to drop an anchor is to throw it overboard and >pay out the line from the basket. To retrieve an anchor, I go forward, get >hold of the line outboard from the roller, walk it back to the cockpit and >pull it in from there. > - I made a small dodger that just covers the companionway to keep the >rain out (mostly) and there is a cockpit cover that fits over the boom. > - I cooked on a 1 burner camp stove that sat on a board on a bucket in >the cockpit and most of my meals were cooked in a pressure cooker. > - I have a fishfinder type fathometer that the guess work out of >finding the bottom fish that I ate almost every day. > - There is a large solar panel mounted on the stern rail that kept the >battery charged even though the sun didn't shine ever day. > - I started out with a Honda 5hp and it worked great. On my way back I >met another sailor who wanted to trade his Honda 8 (with alternator) for my >5 (he wanted to get rid of 20 lbs that he had to muscle every time he put >the motor on his dingy). The 8 is also great, it is smoother than the 5 >(being a twin) but I can't use more than a fraction of its power and it is >heavy. Maybe the alterntor will let me get along without the solar panel, >but otherwise I wish I had the 5 back. > >Thats an overview - if you have any questions I will do my best to answer >them > >Rod Johnson M17 #408, "BuscaBrisas" Gary M. Hyde Biological Systems Engineering Dept., WSU Pullman, WA. 99164-6120 USA Ph: 509-335-1636, FAX 509-335-2722 email: gmhyde@wsu.edu Web sites: http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~gmhyde/ImpactProperties.html http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~gmhyde/411BSysE-web-pages/411SrDIIOverview.html http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~gmhyde/433_web_pages/433AgProcOverview.html http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~gmhyde/CycloneOverview.html http://www.bsyse.wsu.edu/faculty/hyde.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Michael R Lallier" Subject: M_Boats: new member Date: 16 Oct 1998 22:33:09 -0400 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BDF954.F349A1A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello fellow sailers! =20 just returned home [ Cape Cod, Mass ] this past June from sailing south = for the past four years. willing to pass on any info to those of you = thinking of full time cruising.=20 send to: timelessvoyager@prodigy.net ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BDF954.F349A1A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello fellow = sailers!   =20
just returned home [ Cape Cod, Mass ] this past June = from=20 sailing south for the past four years. willing to pass on any info to = those of=20 you thinking of full time cruising.
send to:=20 timelessvoyager@prodigy.net
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BDF954.F349A1A0-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Rod&Elsa Johnson" Subject: Re: M_Boats: m17 cruising Date: 17 Oct 1998 08:58:18 -0700 -----Original Message----- ; Rod&Elsa Johnson >Rod&Elsa: >I live in Pullman, WA., and am very interested in sailing Puget Sound and >adjoining waters. I'm also interested in acquiring an easily trailered and >single-handed boat, such as an M17, if you happen to know of one in the >Pacific Northwest that is for sale (sail!). >Regarding your sail up into the Gulf Islands and beyond, what do you do to >keep warm on your boat? >Thanks. >gmhyde@wsu.edu > Gary - keeping warm wasn't much of a problem, thanks to long underware, a Mustang exposure suit and generally mild temperatures. The cabin could be warmed up a bit with a kerosene lantern (a Coleman lantern would have worked better I suppose but might have been more of a safety hazard). I also carried a little propane radiant heater but never used it. Getting wet things to dry was a bit of a problem at times and made me yearn for a real cabin heater and a place to hang stuff. That little problem and the general difficulty of cruising with 2, given the kind of weather we are blessed with, has made me think I want a bigger boat. So my M17 is sort of for sale - meaning I haven't advertised it but would sell it if the opportunity presented itself. If you are interested come on over and we will go for a sail - Rod Johnson, M17 #408 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Harvey Wilson <102072.2315@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Having a ball! Date: 17 Oct 1998 23:58:54 -0400 Hi Ian... ..Don't mention it !! I just passed on the method that the previous owner of Stargazer showed me when I went to Fla. to get her. 3 years ago, I could hardly find my backside with both hands when it came to a trailer sailer, but the good folks here took me under their collective wing and helped me out...glad to have helped. Harvey/ Ga M-17 Stargazer #294 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Don Haas Subject: Re: M_Boats: Having a ball! Date: 17 Oct 1998 20:43:16 -0700 Great story, that local resevoir wasn't Fernridge by any chance was it? Don, also in Oregon M15-248 Dream Catcher ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Shelley Daringer" Subject: M_Boats: Florida trip Date: 18 Oct 1998 07:23:58 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01BDFA68.45892300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all,=20 Kris and I are planning a short trip to Florida in the early part of = February and would love to do a few hours sailing while we are there. = Does anyone know of any good charters? Or maybe a Montgomery owner that = would like to take us out for a while? We haven't sailed on anything bigger than Lake Pepin, and are real = curious how the sailing is down there... We wtll be in south Florida staying with friends in Ft. Lauderdale, but = can go just about anywhere in the state. So far the trip will be at = least 5 days long. We just have to get out of Wisconsin for a while in = the dead of winter! Thanks in advance for any responses,=20 Shelley=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01BDFA68.45892300 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
Kris and I are planning a short trip = to Florida=20 in the early part of February and would love to do a few hours sailing = while we=20 are there.  Does anyone know of any good charters? Or maybe a = Montgomery=20 owner that would like to take us out for a while?
We haven't sailed on anything bigger = than Lake=20 Pepin, and are real curious how the sailing is down = there...
We wtll be in south Florida staying = with friends=20 in Ft. Lauderdale, but can go just about anywhere in the state.  So = far the=20 trip will be at least 5 days long.  We just have to get out of = Wisconsin=20 for a while in the dead of winter!
Thanks in advance for any=20 responses, 
Shelley 
------=_NextPart_000_0010_01BDFA68.45892300-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Ian L. Black" Subject: M_Boats: Oregon almost sailing Date: 18 Oct 1998 08:36:47 +0000 Don, It wasn't Fern Ridge. It was Cooper Creek outside of Sutherlin. I basically wanted to practice launching activities since Cooper Creek is a tad small to actually sail in. I hope to nail down a mooring in Fern Ridge in 1999. If I can't get one there I'll probably drag the Seaweeble up to the Columbia. If you have any suggestions on where to put in for the season let me know. Fern Ridge appears to offer the best opportunity for sailing because of its proximity to Sutherlin. The wife likes the idea of the Columbia. I think that may be because of its proximity to Nordstom's. Needless to say, the Columbia appears to be much more expensive and not quite as desirable even though you are that much closer to new dry clothing in the latest styles. Looking forward to hearing from you. Ian in Oregon M17 #343 "Seaweeble" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: William B Riker <75507.267@compuserve.com> Subject: M_Boats: Questions for Rod Date: 18 Oct 1998 21:39:22 -0400 Some questions for Rod Johnson: Rod, your adventures sound great. I hope to be able to get free for similar trips myself, in the east coast/Great Lakes area. I had my M15 on Lake Erie today, for the first time, and we got a taste of the weather the Great Lakes can dish out. A few comments and questions: " - For safety I have a stern rail, a folding boarding ladder (always hanging on the transom) and eye bolts for safety harness attachment." What location(s) would you recommend for eye bolt attachment points? " - The main has slugs, lazy jacks and a topping lift to facilitate reefing. I always rigged the jib with a downhaul so I could douse it without going forward." I agree that slugs and topping lift are the only way to go. Have you, or anyone, tried a storm trysail? I am definitely ordering a storm jib, and considering a trysail. Maybe a second reef would have helped us today, but I don't like what reefing does to sail shape. I've never had a problem hauling down the jib - just uncleat the halyard and down it comes. So I don't understand all the attention paid to jib downhauls. Could it be my nylon hanks just slide better on the forestay than most? " - There is a double bow roller for the anchors. . . " Your setup sounds great. Can you explain what the rollers are (blocks?), and where they are attached? Thanks, Bill Riker M15 #184 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: sparsons@canby.com (Steve Parsons) Subject: M_Boats: Words of Wisdom?? Date: 18 Oct 1998 20:52:12 -0700 I made the investment in some Cetol Marine today (rumor is that they will soon offer a 5 year loan per quart), plus some oxalic acid to clean up the bright work on Sojornen. Any words of wisdom about working with either? Regards, Steve M15 159 Sojornen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Wilsometer@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Words of Wisdom?? Date: 19 Oct 1998 01:43:10 EDT In a message dated 10/18/98 8:48:55 PM, you wrote: <> Steve, I put three coats of Cetol on my M15 about a year and a half ago, and it s= till looks great. I found that preparation was more important than anything el= se. I probably spent more time masking than brushing. I used the "blue" 3M masking tape (there are some really bad blue imitations out there--stick w= ith the 3M), and was careful to get a good tight bond right up next to the woo= d to be coated. The beauty of the blue 3M tape is that it will come up with a minimum of effort, even after a week or so. This is particularly importan= t with the Cetol because you must (should) wait at least 24 hours between co= ats. Make sure to clean up any accidents quickly, as the stuff is quite tenacio= us once dry. If you can do the job indoors, so much the better, as Cetol is = a real dirt magnet until dry. If you can't do it indoors, at least try to d= o it when there is little or no wind, and if possible, tarp the boat off while drying. As far as the Oxalic acid is concerned--be careful! I used Teak Wonder's = 2 part cleaner and brightener. The brightener is probably just oxalic or so= me other acid with a little dye thrown in. In spite of following the instructions and proceeding with extreme caution, I still managed to etch = the gel coat in a few spots. If I were to do it again, I would mask/plastic o= ff some areas, and would only bleach a very small section at a time. Anyway, I think you will be happy with the results. The coloring may be a little different than what you are used to, but the longevity of the produ= ct is nothing short of amazing. Happy brushing, Scott Grometer, M15 #478 "b=E9b=E9" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Robert Becker Subject: Re: M_Boats: Words of Wisdom?? Date: 19 Oct 1998 09:37:16 +0000 Steve, I put Cetol on my M15 last year with a final coat of Cetol gloss, and it still looks great. The gloss coat seemed to take forever to dry; it hardened in 24 hours but the surface was still brittle for what seemed like a month. Then it finally hardened into a very durable finish, which I really like. I sailed after the first week and worried about the brittle finish, but with no apparent harm. I took off most of my brightwork rather than mask, which seemed to work well. I think this is about the best stuff I have tried. Bob M15 #208 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Rod&Elsa Johnson" Subject: M_Boats: M17 cruising Date: 19 Oct 1998 09:42:05 -0700 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BDFB44.BB3FA420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable re: questions by Bill Riker re: safety harness attachments - I put eye bolts in the cockpit floor = on each end of the mainsheet traveler. I also put a long extension on my = safety harness tether so I could go clear forward without unclipping = because I figured on a small boat there is no way a tether will keep you = aboard anyway and what you want, if you go overboard, is to end up at = the transom where the boarding ladder is. re: jib downhaul - the downhaul not only gives assurance that the jib = will come all the way down even when full of wind, but it makes sure it = will stay down. It is an alternative to going forward in the worst = conditions to pull the sail down by hand and tie it down.With both the = downhaul snug and at least one jib sheet snug the jib is not going to go = anywhere - which sure beats going forward re: bow rollers - I made a plank about 5" x 34" x 1.5", took up the = forestay fitting and the mooring cleat, installed the plank and = re-installed the fitting and cleat (using longer bolts). The rollers are = mounted on the end of the plank, which sticks out far enough that an = anchor hanging on a roller will not bang the boat. I use a Bruce as the = main anchor and they are bad about doing that. Hope that answers your questions, Bill, and I hope you get to cruising = your M15. I have had more fun cruising my M17 than I ever had with any = big boat! Rod ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BDFB44.BB3FA420 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
re: questions by Bill = Riker
 
re: safety harness attachments  -  I put = eye bolts=20 in the cockpit floor on each end of the mainsheet traveler. I also put a = long=20 extension on my safety harness tether so I could go clear forward = without=20 unclipping because I figured on a small boat there is no way a tether = will keep=20 you aboard anyway and what you want, if you go overboard, is to end up = at the=20 transom where the boarding ladder is.
 
re: jib downhaul  -  the downhaul not only = gives=20 assurance that the jib will come all the way down even when full of = wind, but it=20 makes sure it will stay down. It is an alternative to going forward in = the worst=20 conditions to pull the sail down by hand and tie it down.With both the = downhaul=20 snug and at least one jib sheet snug the jib is not going to go anywhere = - which=20 sure beats going forward
 
re: bow rollers  -  I made a plank = about =20 5" x 34" x 1.5", took up the forestay fitting and the = mooring=20 cleat, installed the plank and re-installed the fitting and cleat (using = longer=20 bolts). The rollers are mounted on the end of the plank, which sticks = out far=20 enough that an anchor hanging on a roller will not bang the boat. I use = a Bruce=20 as the main anchor and they are bad about doing that.
 
Hope that answers your questions, Bill, and I hope = you get to=20 cruising your M15. I have had more fun cruising my M17 than I ever had = with any=20 big boat!
 
Rod
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BDFB44.BB3FA420-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: DoorAriel@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Words of Wisdom?? Date: 19 Oct 1998 17:58:34 EDT Heat the oxalic acid a little, wear gloves and a respirator wouldn't hurt -- the stuff is very poisonous. Rinse thoroughly to remove remaining acid or the finish may not dry properly. Dick Straubel M17 #253 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "John Fleming" Subject: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 19 Oct 1998 15:20:53 -0700 Hi: I'm a new member of this Mailing List. My wife and I have a 1982 standard Montgomery 17, "Star Cross'd". We sail it here in Arizona, mostly at Roosevelt Lake. I'd like to start taking it to San Diego for the summer and the Sea of Cortez for the winter, but it's not quite ready yet. Star Cross'd is our first sailboat. We bought it because we liked it better than the other boats we saw. We looked at various makes and sizes 15-25 ft, and this seemed to fit just right. It helped that our friends introduced us to sailing on their Montgomery 15. At the time we didn't realize how distinctive it was compared to other makes. Since the production halt, Montgomery's have been hard to come by here in Arizona, and people seem to want them bad. Now we know why, because it seems to have just the right qualities in a pocket cruiser. As a local story, there was a relatively new and clean M15 here for sale at the local Sailboat Shop in Tempe, and it was only on the market for two weeks, being bought sight unseen by some guy from California. Every time I bring the boat in for maintenance, everyone comes rushing out to see if I want to sell it, and people who chat me up always ask indirectly if I'm interested in selling. The Shop says they have a waiting list for used Montgomery's. I like it the most. My wife likes it because it's small and easily handled, but she also doesn't like it because she's always bumping her head and elbows, and with the two kids on board, there's no place for her to retreat to (or keep the kids out of the way). She wants a 25-27 footer with standup headroom. But I'm not selling the M17. I tell her that to like this boat, you have to move slow and you'll be fine. Just slow down, stay calm, and take it easy. I should take my own advice. I came back from sailing this weekend with the usual collection of spot bruises, chipped fingernails, and cuts and scratches. Plus I broke the tiller. Seems like I'm always breaking something on that silly boat with big, clumsy movements. (That's why we call it "Star Cross'd".) We've got two jibs (working and 95%), two genoas (150% and 180%), and a tri-radial spinnaker. We have fun trying to out-guess the winds on the lake and swap the fore-sail. In the space of 15 minutes, we can go from the deck sweeper, to the 95% jib, to a single-reefed main. We do that more often and earlier now that we have kids (3 and 8) on board. Before, we kept up way too much sail way too long, and struggled to keep things under control, with water at the toe rails. Sigh, I miss those exciting days. When we bought the boat, it was a little tired and needed plenty of maintenance, too many little things had been neglected or been done slap-dash over the years. Four years later, I'm still figuring out what maintenance is needed and working through the list. But now I can say, it's in better shape than when we bought it, and some day it will be perfect (yeah, right). I saw two articles in the recent archives I'd like to comment on. We recently replaced the wooden bunks on the Trailrite trailer. It didn't quite work out, because the amount of pre-curve is EXTREMELY critical. We used 12 foot 2x6 redwood planks. Anyway, on both boards, we ended up with slightly too much curvature, putting undue pressure on the hull at the ends of the bunks, especially the forward end. (We could slip a piece of paper through the middle, without seeing daylight between boat and bunk, but not at the ends. $500 dollars later, after repairing the weakened hull, we added a middle support to the bunk, to keep the curve correct and maintain proper weight distribution.. This is the way the bunks are on the latest M15 Trailrite's (like that one I talked about above), and I'd highly recommend it for the M17's where the bunks are only supported on the ends. Thanks to whoever it was who said how to singlehand a foresail change: bear up until the foresail luffs, center the main, release the tiller, and go forward to pull down the sail, effectively heaving to by moving the center of effort and balance. I'll try it on my next outing. I've decided to take the plunge and replace the mast. It had a longitudinal twist and too many bad penetrations from the previous owner. Does any one have specs on the mast? Lbs/foot, length, moments, section (Sparcraft 104?) etc. Also, since I'm there, I'd like to increase the mast height 6 inches to a foot, keeping my same sails, in order to raise the boom and make more room for a dodger and mini-bimini. If you're sailing in Arizona, it's important to manage your sun exposure. Does anyone have relevant experience or tips or info on a mast changeout? Thanks very much. And on an administrative note, I'm probably going to change out my E-Mail address to my home address for this mailing list. I don't think my company supports this kind of E-Mail list activity at work. Regards, -- John Fleming John_Fleming@sat.mot.com fleming_maine@worldnet.att.net (Use this one!) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doc Musekamp Subject: M_Boats: Fwd: Sail Quote Date: 19 Oct 1998 18:09:38 -0500 Thought the list might be interested in this note I got from North Sails in response to an inquiry on new sails for my M17...I hadn't come across the concept of "minimum" pricing for sails before ??!!..In any event, I'm about halfway through the list archives (GREAT info, there by the way)..so a thread on sails has likely played out before, but anybody have exceptionally strong feelings on which sailmaker(s) know the boats well and build good sails ??..I'm thinking of a 150 for sure and possibly a new main to match..How popular are the CDI(or equivalent) jib furlers, out there in M-land ?? or is the simplicity of the hank on style with maybe a downhaul, still the way to go ??..Anybody ever try one of the Sailrite kits,by any chance ?? Might make a nice winter project..wonder what my wife has planned this winter ??!!..Thanks, Doc Sent: 10/19/98 2:21 PM Received: 10/19/98 5:12 PM Hello Doc, Thanks again for your interest in North Sails. I am with our "Midwest" loft, now located in Chicago after many years in Pewaukee, WI, and still service all of Wisconsin. Sailboats, Inc used to sell Montgomery's, and since they sent all of their business to us I wouldn't be surprised if your boat has sails we made in Pewaukee. Unfortunately, we have a minimum price of $500 for any North Sail, and I'm sure both your sails would be at minimum. However, we do have have another new division of the company called "Cruising Direct", conceived specifically for good quality sails for small boats at a better price. Their minimum is only $300. I suggest calling my friend Steve Gilbert at 888-424-7328. If I can help further please let me know; certainly I'd be happy to mail a package of info, including a Cruising Direct brochure. Sincerely, Perry Lewis North Sails Midwest 1665 N. Elston Ave Chicago, IL 60622 773-489-1308 Fax 489-9820 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 19 Oct 1998 19:30:41 EDT John I tried your new E-mail address..............it came back. I have an M-23 in Gilbert, Az.........drop me a line Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "John Fleming" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 19 Oct 1998 16:52:17 -0700 You wrote: > John > > I tried your new E-mail address..............it came back. I have an M-23 in > Gilbert, Az.........drop me a line > > Lenny Oops, sorry about that! fleming-maine@worldnet.att.net The only time I saw a M23 was from the outside out at the drydock storage at Roosevelt. I'd be interested in seeing the differences and hearing what you think. The only thing I know was what Jerry Montgomery wrote in his little history he wrote up several years ago and sent to me. If you haven't seen it, I could dig it up and E-Mail you the quotes. -- Regards, -- John Fleming Systems Engineering Advanced Systems Division ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: M_Boats: deck failure on m-15 Date: 19 Oct 1998 20:52:33 -0400 Whoa!!! This is not a nice story. Any repair that runs from the cabin to= p to the forward deck has got to approach the cost of the boat! Has this ever been reported on a Montgomery before this? I assume that to prevent this we should recaulk all through deck hardware= periodically. How often should this be done? Thanks, Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: deck failure on m-15 Date: 19 Oct 1998 21:19:10 EDT Doug DIY magazine has an article this month about sealing and bedding deck fittings......suggest you use 3M 4200.............seals like polyurethane, but allows later removal of fittings..............sorry to hear about your problem.......... Lenny M-23 # 003 Sea Horse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Don Haas Subject: Re: M_Boats: Oregon almost sailing Date: 19 Oct 1998 22:54:13 -0700 Fern Ridge was about the only place we sailed this year, even though its a long tow from Oregon City. We rented a slip at Richardson Point Marina and kept the boat there from August through Labor Day, making several overnight trips down. Sometimes we camped, sometimes slept on the boat. , There are locking gates to the docks and restrooms, showers and picnic facilities right there. Richard Campground is 100 yards away if you want to camp, both tents and RV are accomodated. The ramp is excellent and there has always been plenty of trailer parking. There even have the telephone pole gizzy to step masts on big boats. There are very few power boats zooming around, especially once you get away from the day use areas. There is usually wind. (see the following description I lifted for the Eugene Yacht Club web site). and swampy areas at one end with some great bird watching if your into that sort of thing. I think I posted some of those experiences earlier this summer. Drawbacks. Like Cooper Creek, Fern Ridge is drained starting in Oct and refilled sometime in spring. Another is the green stuff that adhears to anything under water. After just a month the bottom of Dream Catcher was solid green. I haven't sailed on the Columbia for many years, but if it is a nice day there will be lots of power boats clogging up the river. Maybe someone else has had a more recent Cloumbia experience. Call Rhonda at Richardson Point to get slip pricing and availibility - 541-935-3130. Have you checked the phonebook, maybe there is a Nordstroms in Eugene. Don Haas, M15-248 Dream Catcher **** From EYC ***** Fern Ridge Lake lies at the south end of the 100-mile long Willamette Valley. The local geography: North and East: flat flood plain South and West: hills There are three major wind patterns: 1. The clear weather pattern: This is the most predominant condition in the summer. The wind starts light in the morning and gets stronger in the afternoon as the sun's warmth fuels the thermals up the valleys in the hills to the south and west. It normally blows out of the north from 6-16 knots. One butte lies at the northwest corner of the lake next to the dam and generates moderate 5-15 degree wind shifts, which occasionally may reach 30 degrees. The puffs come from the right, mostly. Late afternoon the wind may back as it drops in velocity. If there is not dew on the ground in the early morning, the winds will be gusty. A couple of hours before sunset, the wind will temporarily pick up, moving to the west or southwest, and be quite frisky, until the sun touches the horizon, at which time it veers back north and usually shuts off. 2. The stormy weather pattern: This lasts for a day to a day and a half and comes from the west at 10-20 knots. Shifts do occur in this pattern as well, but seem to be more subtle and are most likely influenced by the thermal downdrafts and channeling caused by the various small valleys to the west. The shifts range about 5-10 degrees. 3. The light air pattern: This breeze is created by the passing of a high pressure cell with a front building off-shore on the Pacific. In this pattern, the weather system winds are trying to establish themselves from the south to southeast, but the thermal north winds fight them. This causes light and shifty winds that last until either the front comes in and pattern 2 arrives or until the front dissipates and the first pattern fills in. On rare occasions, an east wind will come out of this condition. This pattern usually lasts about 2-3 hours. Common knowledge dictates that under conditions #1, hang west. Under conditions #2, hang south. These basic rules seem to work, except when they don't. Just when you think you've got it all figured out, and you hold the left side of the course longer than anyone else, someone goes up the right side and makes out like a bandit. Under conditions #3, anything goes. Luck prevails. Overall, the winds are delightful and present an added element to the game of sailing that goes beyond go-fasts and boat speed. A quick and observant crew can read the wind and capitalize on it to gain boat lengths on competitors. The above analysis was first published by Charles Howard for the 1986 S-20 Class Championships in Eugene. They have since been reworked and revised by Ron Fish, Paul Stephens, and many observant and aspiring meteorologists. The basic premises, however, still prevail. ********************* > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Grove777@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: deck failure on m-15 Date: 20 Oct 1998 10:10:00 EDT ...i reported this sad event...the failure is the result i believe of water penetrating core, delamination on inside of cabin, compression from mast...but most of all inadequate strength in the cabin top to take the load...plan to beef up with cca treated plywood and treated 2 X 6 from the inside and all thru bolted...the front deck softness may just be the lightness of construction...but the reality is...there is a hole in the cabin top!!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: Re: M_Boats: deck failure on m-15 Date: 20 Oct 1998 07:22:39 -0700 Doug, Though I'm new to the M's, I do know a bit about this problem. (Rot in balsa) It was common to use balsa, due to its lightness and relative compression strength in end-grain, as a stiffener material . Some makers still use it, most have gone to construction foam cores, like Airex. The problem is that it's highly susceptible to rot is any moisture is allowed to get at it. However, once a deck fitting is properly bedded, you shouldn't have to worry about it unless replace the fitting. You can check for the rot problem by searching for soft spots, that is areas that seem a bit more flexible than the surrounding area, or-better, I think-it to tap with a round object like a screw driver handle and listen to the sound, which changes to a dull note when you encounter rot. This works in wood as well as glass. You need only be concerned if someone has added a fitting without bedding, or if a screw or bolt has loosened; it either is true, simply pull the offender and re-bed. Lee M15 Puppy 326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: M_Boats: Rot Date: 20 Oct 1998 07:34:30 -0700 The failure of the cabin top was due to rot, not a weak structure. The way the M's are cabin top is designed it is incredibly strong. You should consider getting a professional to look at the problem to at least asses the extent of the rot. This would save you from having to re-do the whole thing if you don't find and cut out All of the bad area. Also, unless you've worked with both materials, fiberglass and core materials, you could make a mess of things. I'm not laying a negative trip on you, only warning you to consider everything carefully before you start, and remember, there are a lot of M's out there without an internal mast support. Why take up cabin space if you don't have to? Best of luck, Lee M15 Puppy 326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Wilsometer@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 20 Oct 1998 13:20:08 EDT In a message dated 10/19/98 3:19:20 PM, you wrote: <> John, Welcome. I do not have specs for the M17 mast, but if I remember correctly= , Sparcraft is no longer. I recently helped a friend replace the mast on hi= s M15 (bent mast was *my* fault--too embarrassing to go into). He ordered a mast of the same physical dimensions from Dwyer Spars. Even though it wa= s very, very close in dimension, it still required a little modification to = fit. It also required purchasing their masthead unit, as the inside wall thickn= ess was different on the Dwyer. Dwyer has a website (that escapes me at the moment). Maybe someone else that has done this on an M17 can be of more h= elp. Happy sailing, Scott Grometer, M15 #478 "b=E9b=E9" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Wilsometer@aol.com Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 20 Oct 1998 13:23:34 EDT In a message dated 10/19/98 4:50:56 PM, you wrote: <> I would be interested in seeing thi history. Does it include boats other = than the M23? Thanks, Scott Grometer, M15 #478 "b=E9b=E9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Wilsometer@aol.com Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: deck failure on m-15 Date: 20 Oct 1998 13:52:32 EDT In a message dated 10/20/98 7:11:43 AM, you wrote: <<...i reported this sad event...the failure is the result i believe of wa= ter penetrating core, delamination on inside of cabin, compression from mast..= .but most of all inadequate strength in the cabin top to take the load...plan t= o beef up with cca treated plywood and treated 2 X 6 from the inside and all thru bolted...the front deck softness may just be the lightness of construction...but the reality is...there is a hole in the cabin top!!!!>> I have a 1991 M15 that was stored (unused) for the first six years of its life. The deck and house have no flex whatsoever. I suspect that Jerry t= ook the added strength provided by the crown of the cabin into consideration i= n his design. My cabin has a thicker core in the area under the mast, and o= ut to, and down, the cabin sides. I am sorry to hear of your dilemma, and I don't mean to diminish your situation in any way, but it would seem that the failure was not a functio= n of inadequate strength in construction, but rather inadequate bedding/sealing= of deck fittings. In addition to bedding/sealing the fittings, there is another precautionar= y measure that folks might want to consider. It involves removing the deck fittings, masking (covering) the through-deck holes on the inside of the cabin, and pouring (dripping) PENETRATING (not normal) Epoxy into the hole= s. This has the effect of creating a barrier in the balsa surrounding the fit= ting holes, and should not allow any absorption even if the deck sealant or bed= ding should fail. This sounds like a good winter project (in a heated garage!)= . Scott Grometer, M15 #478 "b=E9b=E9" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "John Fleming" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 20 Oct 1998 11:44:27 -0700 Wilsometer@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 10/19/98 3:19:20 PM, you wrote: > > < longitudinal twist and too many bad penetrations from the previous > owner. Does any one have specs on the mast? Lbs/foot, length, moments= , > section (Sparcraft 104?) etc. > Does anyone have relevant experience or tips or info on a mast > changeout? Thanks very much.>> > > John, > Welcome. I do not have specs for the M17 mast, but if I remember correc= tly, > Sparcraft is no longer. I recently helped a friend replace the mast on= his > M15 (bent mast was *my* fault--too embarrassing to go into). He ordere= d a > mast of the same physical dimensions from Dwyer Spars. Even though it= was > very, very close in dimension, it still required a little modification = to fit. > It also required purchasing their masthead unit, as the inside wall thi= ckness > was different on the Dwyer. Right. I already had to replace the original Montgomery masthead unit (i= t was bent and cracked and ready to fail, and I was trying to avoid a dismastin= g), with a 4-sheave Dwyer model D106. The mast that is very close is the DM-6 (fo= r the M17, I don't know the M15, but it might be the DM-4). I had to file down= the aft portions of the masthead insert to get it to fit into the original mast. = I must say, the Dwyer masthead is a brute compared to that lightweight original.= I won't ever have to worry about the mast head again. Except that now that= I'm getting a new mast, I'll need another new masthead (!) because my first D= wyer won't fit properly.Also, for the M17, the original masthead had integral = shroud attach points. The Dwyer D106 does not. I investigated getting a new ca= sting of the masthead locally, but it was too expensive, so we had to add some tan= gs to the top of the mast and get new upper shrouds. I think that was the prox= imate cause that got us to track down Jerry Montgomery, to ask him if he had an= y more mastheads, or at least had the mold, and he said he didn't. So I wonder = what Bob Eeg at Nor'Sea is doing? My question was more along the lines of is there a difference in wall thi= ckness and stiffness, leading to either more or less weight aloft, and changes in resultant boa= t stability; or changes in the strength/weakness of the mast from bending.= The masthead is now $92.10, and the DM-6 mast is $20/foot. > Dwyer has a website (that escapes me at the > moment). Maybe someone else that has done this on an M17 can be of mor= e help. http://www.csiworld.com/dwyer/ will get you there. > Happy sailing, > Scott Grometer, M15 #478 "b=E9b=E9" You too. And don't forget, the toe rails are thirsty and you have to giv= e them a drink of water once in a while. Yee hah! On our lake, it's controlled by= the gods, and they make sure that the rails get their ration. -- Regards, -- John Fleming M17: "Star Cross'd" fleming-maine@worldnet.att.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "John Fleming" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 20 Oct 1998 11:46:15 -0700 Wilsometer@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 10/19/98 4:50:56 PM, you wrote: > > < I know was what Jerry Montgomery wrote in his little history he wrote u= p > several > years ago and sent to me. > If you haven't seen it, I could dig it up and E-Mail you the quotes.>> > > I would be interested in seeing thi history. Does it include boats oth= er than > the M23? > Thanks, > Scott Grometer, M15 #478 "b=E9b=E9 It's mostly what Ken Diehl has in the archive, plus a little more. M15,= 17, and 23. -- Regards, -- John Fleming Systems Engineering Advanced Systems Division ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "John Fleming" Subject: M_Boats: More M17 Trailrite mods Date: 20 Oct 1998 11:59:13 -0700 I forgot to mention, I did another well deserved modification to the M17 Trailrite trailer for my 1982 M17. I put in keel guides, so that when retrieving the hull and keel are now always centered on the supports. The guys at the shop welded on some channel stock, and we have two boards going from the rear of the trailer, and meeting just past the keel roller, with just enough space for the keel to slip into. The keel just slips in perfect now. I can't tell you how many times I sat there cussing on the launch ramp, to-ing and fro-ing, back and forth, trying to get the keel centered. With the guides, it's a no-brainer, I don't even think about it. The hardest part is preparing (shaping and preserving) the wood. The next hardest part is trying to get the attach bolts to slide into the stainless tee-nuts without cross-threading. -- Regards, -- John Fleming M17: "Star Cross'd" fleming-maine@worldnet.att.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Keith Diehl" Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 20 Oct 1998 13:09:52 -0600 Take a look at http://www.xmission.com/pub/lists/montgomery_boats/archive/M17-Hi story.txt I think it's the same. ---------- In a message dated 10/19/98 4:50:56 PM, you wrote: <> I would be interested in seeing thi history. Does it include boats other than the M23? Thanks, Scott Grometer, M15 #478 "bébé ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 20 Oct 1998 20:21:49 -0400 The M17 mast question was answered by Jerry just last month. Here it is. "The 17 uses the old Sparcraft 104 section, which is used by W.D.Schock on the Santana 20, and by McGregor on the McGregor 26. Also, you might contact Bob Eeg of Nor'Sea Yachts (see CC above) to see if he has found a less-expensive source. Be nice to use the same section so that the old hardware will fit, and the 104 is a very good section that has not been improved upon." Jerry Thanks, Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: suthdrug@rosenet.net Subject: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 23 Oct 1998 06:24:02 GMT Hello... Is anybody out there? Since joining this list and buying an M17 I have been happily scurrying home at the end of the long days at work and bringing up the continuing saga of the joys, trials, and tribulations of the the Montgomry owners group. However, when I logged on tonight I went to the cupboard and the cupboard was bare!!!! I didn't think not having my daily dose of "list" would be this bad. I mean I'm hooked on this list worse than I was on Star Trek when I was in college. I've noticed that at certain times (usually late at night when any reasonable person would be in bed sleeping) it's all grabbing me like an off-base soap opera." Will Dick ever be happy with his centerboard or will he start looking for satisfaction elswhere?" " Is Doc going to meet the sailmaker of his dreams or is he going to have to keep buying lottery tickets?" " Will Bert really sell Kokopelli or will he have a last minute change of heart?( I hope so, I would hate to lose him from this list!)" " Am I ever going to get this boat in the water or is Judi going to turn it into the largest planter in West-central Oregon?" Anyways try not to let the Winter months slow down your chatter too much. It's nice to come home and be able to see that there are some people as wound up and dreamy about their boats as I am. Ian from Oregon M17 #343 "Seaweeble" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Fritz Stuneck Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 23 Oct 1998 05:09:02 -0600 Glad to see you asked cause I was just wondering the same thing? Must be just slowing down. In MN all the boats are being pulled right now. Fritz in MN Reply to: fritzs@minn.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: M_Boats: FLOTATION Date: 23 Oct 1998 03:05:37 -0700 Does anyone know what kind of flotation was used in the M15 to give positive buoyancy? How much was used? I've not been able to find anything but the foam closed cell here in San Diego. Lee M15 Puppy 326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 23 Oct 1998 11:31:29 EDT Ian Take heart.....there's always something going on................the list......LOL Lenny M-23 # 003 Sea Horse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Francene Lebowitz Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 23 Oct 1998 08:46:22 -0700 suthdrug@rosenet.net wrote: > > Hello... Is anybody out there? > Since joining this list and buying an M17 I have been happily scurrying > home at the end of the long days at work and bringing up the continuing saga of > the joys, trials, and tribulations of the the Montgomry owners group. However, > when I logged on tonight I went to the cupboard and the cupboard was bare!!!! I > didn't think not having my daily dose of "list" would be this bad. I mean I'm > hooked on this list worse than I was on Star Trek when I was in college. > I've noticed that at certain times (usually late at night when any reasonable > person would be in bed sleeping) it's all grabbing me like an off-base soap > opera." Will Dick ever be happy with his centerboard or will he start looking > for satisfaction elswhere?" " Is Doc going to meet the sailmaker of his dreams > or is he going to have to keep buying lottery tickets?" " Will Bert really sell > Kokopelli or will he have a last minute change of heart?( I hope so, I would > hate to lose him from this list!)" " Am I ever going to get this boat in the > water or is Judi going to turn it into the largest planter in West-central > Oregon?" > Anyways try not to let the Winter months slow down your chatter too much. > It's nice to come home and be able to see that there are some people as wound > up and dreamy about their boats as I am. > > Ian from Oregon > M17 #343 > "Seaweeble" Ditto, Ian. I even went so far as to email Keith Diehl who manages the list- thought something was wrong there or with my mailbox. Glad to find out it was just a lull. It is nice to read about all the trials and tribulations of those who love these boats. When I eventually buy one, I hope to contribute. You definitely have a way with words- and a sense of humor to boot. A belated welcome! Fran M15 wanna be owner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Harvey Wilson <102072.2315@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 23 Oct 1998 12:13:54 -0400 Hi John.. >>> It's mostly what Ken Diehl has in the archive, plus a little more. M15, 17, and 23.<<< Shux, John..post it..I'd love to read it... Harvey/ Ga. M-17 Stargazer #294 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Harvey Wilson <102072.2315@compuserve.com> Subject: M_Boats: Hi! I'm a new member of the list Date: 23 Oct 1998 12:13:55 -0400 Hi John.. Welcome to the group. Like you, the M-17 is my first sail boat. I took sailing lessons, then joined the schools sailing club for a year. Mostly 22 ft. Catalinas, Capris, Hunters, and assorted larger boats. I wanted a trailerable, smaller boat for my own, and looked at Compacs and 18ft. Capris, Precision 18 and a few others. To make a long story shorter, Larry Barkhuff, from this group, talked to me about a M-17 and sent me a copy of the brochure. As luck would have it, a cyber-friend from Florida sent me a copy of the Florida Sailboat Trader with Precisions in it...and a lone M-17!! I contacted the M-17 owner, had an agreement with him, drove 600 miles to Ft. Myers..it was all they said about it...and towed it home. Like your wife, the Admiral would like a larger boat. She likes the size of the cockpit, but the cabin is too small...remember, we learned on Capri/Catalina 22's. I'd like to go up to a M-23, but the only one that I found (in Fla. again) didn't have a trailer. Also found a 1980 Ericson 25+ on my lake very reasonably priced, and she says to get it...but doesn't understand why I want to keep the M-17 as well ! Harvey/ Ga. M-17 Stargazer #294 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Dan Diehlman" Subject: M_Boats: Rejoice Date: 23 Oct 1998 12:58:32 -0700 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01BDFE84.D6E65780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Montgomery owners, Last week I had cause to rejoice in having a small boat (M15). My = son enlisted me to help bring his boat home. I have had large boats in = the past and this incident gave me cause to rejoice in the fact that I = now have a small boat. His boat is a Santa Cruz 27, fast, with full kneeling headroom. First = requirement is a 3/4 ton truck to pull it, secondly to use a 50 ft line = to let the trailer disappear from sight into the lake, then the critical = positioning of the boat on the trailer, then inching it out, chocking = the wheels, reattaching it to the truck, then up to the "ready"area, = where very careful use of the gin pole allows dropping the very heavy = mast, then pulling it home with the truck working rather hard. All of = this to be followed by much sanding of the bottom, application of new = bottom paint, and the reverse procress. Yes, he is faster on the water than my small boat....but I wouldn't = trade even. Dan ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01BDFE84.D6E65780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Montgomery owners,
    Last week I had = cause to=20 rejoice in having a small boat (M15). My son enlisted me to help bring = his boat=20 home. I have had large boats in the past and this incident gave me cause = to=20 rejoice in the fact that I now have a small boat.
His boat is a Santa Cruz 27, fast, = with full=20 kneeling headroom. First requirement is a 3/4 ton truck to pull it, = secondly to=20 use a 50 ft line to let the trailer disappear from sight into the lake, = then the=20 critical positioning of the boat on the trailer, then inching it out, = chocking=20 the wheels, reattaching it to the truck, then up to the = "ready"area,=20 where very careful use of the gin pole allows dropping the very heavy = mast, then=20 pulling it home with the truck working rather hard. All of this to be = followed=20 by much sanding of the bottom, application of new bottom paint, and the = reverse=20 procress.
    Yes, he is faster = on the=20 water than my small boat....but I wouldn't trade even.
          &nbs= p;    =20 Dan
 
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01BDFE84.D6E65780-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: DoorAriel@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Rejoice Date: 23 Oct 1998 18:02:47 EDT Your "rejoice" note caught my attention because I have a twenty-six foot full keel boat named "Rejoice." It is a great boat, but I too have moved down to an M17. I still have "Rejoice," and will sail her again, but this last summer she stayed in storage (on a heavy trailer at the house), and I devoted full attention to M17 "Atta Baby!" What a great summer! Dick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: M_Boats: Rejoice Date: 23 Oct 1998 18:53:09 -0400 Your right on!! In this season so far I have crusied on Cape Cod for three days, = 10 days on the Pax river on the southern Chesapeak and 4 days on the Chester= river in the central Chesapeak and this doesn't include the daysails. = Minimu hassel, maximum use and the boats at home to see me off to work every day! = I think about moving up from time to time and if the M17 would go= in my garage as nicely as the 15 I might try it. = I would enjoy the pleasure of cruising an M23 but that may have t= o wait until I formally retire. Right now I'm only retired on weekends. :)= Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 23 Oct 1998 18:53:15 -0400 I don't know about the other members but I am contemplating some half bak= ed ideas for my M15 improvements for the winter (Christmas). I only have the original sails from 1984 and the last time I sailed with another M15 I was left in the dust. He had new sails. But I would like to try a trip to the Dry Tortugas and need downwind self= steering for the 60 nm run. If I bought a new jib could I use the old an= d new jib as twin staysails and rig sheet to tiller steering? The positives are it is cheaper than two staysails. The negatives are the visbility is cut down and the foot of the sails are= low to the water and might catch a wave and take the mast with it. Is this feasable? My motor is also an 1984 Johnson 2 hp and it's a noisy gas hog. I recent= ly went to the Annapolis sailboat show and saw Lin and Larry Pardee's world class cruising boat with no motor. This 30 ft heavy wooden boat only uses= a sculling oar. Could I live with this? Has anyone else used a sculling o= ar on an M15 or M15? Any other thoughts out there on these subjects? Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: M_Boats: FLOTATION Date: 23 Oct 1998 18:53:12 -0400 Lee, I don't know a part number or anything but the blocks under the cockpit are 6'X9"X26" blocks of styrafoam. The closed cell foam you are describing should be more durable and would do the job. If you put in th= e equivalent of this volume X2 ( my M15 came with two of these blocks) you would be ok. The blocks are this size so that they will not easily come out. I believe from your earlier description someone removed the floation in the bow as well.Check under the plywood panel forward of the porta potti location and check. If you fill in this space with closed ce= ll foam it will ensure a more even foatation. I do like the idea of shaping= this foam to protect a couple bottles of wine. Does wine float? Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "John Fleming" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Rejoice Date: 23 Oct 1998 16:52:52 -0700 Doug Kelch wrote: > In this season so far I have crusied on Cape Cod for three days, 10 > days on the Pax river on the southern Chesapeak and 4 days on the Chester > river in the central Chesapeak and this doesn't include the daysails. > Minimu hassel, maximum use and the boats at home to see me off to work > every day! Maybe an M-15 is better and easier to deal with than the M-17. Maybe I'm doing something wrong. When I'm sailing on the lake, I have to drop the sails at 3:30 and fire up the iron wind if I'm to make it out of the drydock boatyard by 6:30. And deeper into winter here (remember, in Arizona, the sailing season is reversed from everywhere else, and we sail fall, winter, and spring), the drydock yard closes at 5 PM, and we have to start working back by 2PM. And then it's a two-hour drive home. There's just so much to do: a) motor to the launch ramp, jump out, and wade ashore, b) get the car and wait in line at the launch ramp, c) put the trailer in the water, wait for the boat to arrive upon the trailer, d) pull the boat out of the water and to staging area, e) unpack kids, dogs, food, clothes and miscellanea from the boat, stow the motor, fold the sails, f) pack the car, close up the boat, put the cover on and tie it down, g) apologize to the wife for yelling sometime during all this activity, g) drive the boat to the yard and play the "back it into the zero-clearance slot" follies, h) wash up, clean up, feed the kids and the dog, and prepare for the drive home. And somewhere in there, there's usually one or two nit-noy repairs that have to be attended to. Sometimes I think we spend more time fooling with the boat and working for it, rather than it working for us. The time spent on the water must be really precious to go through all the folderol on shore. Then, when I go to the sailboat shop and crawl through the 26' footers, I'm always so much happier when I leave, knowing that I can do everything myself on my little dinky M17, and it's lightweight and small and easily wrestled into submission. I'm so happy I just skip out of there, knowing I'm not like all those other suckers who end up with ulcers from the stress of launching and retrieving their big 26 footers. -- Regards, -- John Fleming M-17: "Star Cross'd" fleming-maine@worldnet.att.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sandyal55@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 23 Oct 1998 20:07:37 EDT Doug; I have concerns about you going to the Tortuga's with any M15 or 17. When I went on a 36' ketch, we motored(no wind) for 24 hours from Boca Grande only to have 4-6' waves in the last 3 hours of the trip. The winds suddenly piped up to 25+ which made the approach to the anchorage fun. There are no provisions which means no fuel should you need any. No water either. We waited 3 days to leave only to get hit with a winter norther, 45-50 knot winds, and waves 12-15'. This would be verrrry dangerous in your boat. Good luck if you decide to try it. It has been done in small boats but pick your season and weather well. Sandy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: sparsons@canby.com (Steve Parsons) Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 23 Oct 1998 22:01:26 -0700 Doug, Are you sure you want a big sweep on your boat? Steve >I don't know about the other members but I am contemplating some half baked >ideas for my M15 improvements for the winter (Christmas). > >I only have the original sails from 1984 and the last time I sailed with >another M15 I was left in the dust. He had new sails. > >But I would like to try a trip to the Dry Tortugas and need downwind self >steering for the 60 nm run. If I bought a new jib could I use the old and >new jib as twin staysails and rig sheet to tiller steering? >The positives are it is cheaper than two staysails. >The negatives are the visbility is cut down and the foot of the sails are >low to the water and might catch a wave and take the mast with it. Is >this feasable? > >My motor is also an 1984 Johnson 2 hp and it's a noisy gas hog. I recently >went to the Annapolis sailboat show and saw Lin and Larry Pardee's world >class cruising boat with no motor. This 30 ft heavy wooden boat only uses a >sculling oar. Could I live with this? Has anyone else used a sculling oar >on an M15 or M15? > >Any other thoughts out there on these subjects? > >Doug >"Seas the Day" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: M_Boats: Floatation Date: 24 Oct 1998 07:22:19 -0700 Doug, Thanks for responding. My note was poorly worded; I meant that the only closed cell foam available here is the foam-in-place kind, and I don't want to put in anything permanent. I'll check out the material you suggested. Seems small thought, in cubic feet, that is. This is not really a big deal in San Diego. Winds and wave conditions are rarely frightening. I'm used to sailing in San Francisco bay, and that can get really hairy. But my mate would feel better with a bit of positive buoyancy. I may have Puppy ready to go into the water late next week. Really looking forward to that. Thanks again. Lee M15 Puppy #326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sailcrzy@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: Re: M-17 Sculling/sweep oar Date: 24 Oct 1998 10:25:24 EDT Out here on lake mead I sailed my "17" with an oar for a year and a half! It moved along quite nicely too! Mount an oar lock on the transom and another on one on your favorite side of the cockpit. Refer to Pardee's book "The capable Cruiser" for details. You'll probably have to make your oar to get the correct length. (About 14') My friend and I became very adept at sailing where most people were afraid to go! Another advantage to a smaller boat! The only problems were; completely windless days, having to row back a long way, and, sometimes, getting back on the trailer. These things were not a problem for the Pardee's because they don't trailer, don't daysail, and where ever they are becalmed, they're already home! I later got a motor but still had the oar as a backup. The added sailing ability's we developed from using an oar were worth it! Chuck Sailcrzy@aol.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sailcrzy@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Rejoice Date: 24 Oct 1998 10:29:15 EDT Amen to that brother!! Chuck Sailcrzy@aol.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry smith Subject: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 24 Oct 1998 10:44:58 -0400 I stumbled onto Keith Diehl's Homepage last night and decided to check out the Montgomery boats some more after reading his page. I did severl searched but didn't come up with much. Are there sites that have more information and pictures, and maybe some for sale listings? Thanks Jerry Smith ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Bryan Harstad" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Floatation Date: 24 Oct 1998 09:46:44 -0000 I was told that a cubic yard is suppose to displace 2000 pounds. I never confirmed that. All you have to do is find out how much a cubic yard of water weighs. Bryan -----Original Message----- >Doug, >Thanks for responding. >My note was poorly worded; I meant that the only closed cell foam available >here is the foam-in-place kind, and I don't want to put in anything >permanent. I'll check out the material you suggested. Seems small >thought, in cubic feet, that is. This is not really a big deal in San >Diego. Winds and wave conditions are rarely frightening. I'm used to >sailing in San Francisco bay, and that can get really hairy. But my mate >would feel better with a bit of positive buoyancy. >I may have Puppy ready to go into the water late next week. Really >looking forward to that. >Thanks again. >Lee >M15 Puppy #326 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mont15@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 24 Oct 1998 10:55:19 EDT Jerry, I have a beautiful 1984, extremely well equiped M 15. I live in the San Francisco Bay Area. If you want any information, let me know. Bert 510-339-7050 or e mail me ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry smith Subject: Re: M_Boats: Floatation Date: 24 Oct 1998 11:10:05 -0400 1687lbs/cu. yd. fresh water Bryan Harstad wrote: > I was told that a cubic yard is suppose to displace 2000 pounds. > I never confirmed that. All you have to do is find out how much a > cubic yard of water weighs. > > Bryan > > -----Original Message----- > From: L. Ingalls > To: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com > > Date: Saturday, October 24, 1998 2:23 PM > Subject: M_Boats: Floatation > > >Doug, > >Thanks for responding. > >My note was poorly worded; I meant that the only closed cell foam available > >here is the foam-in-place kind, and I don't want to put in anything > >permanent. I'll check out the material you suggested. Seems small > >thought, in cubic feet, that is. This is not really a big deal in San > >Diego. Winds and wave conditions are rarely frightening. I'm used to > >sailing in San Francisco bay, and that can get really hairy. But my mate > >would feel better with a bit of positive buoyancy. > >I may have Puppy ready to go into the water late next week. Really > >looking forward to that. > >Thanks again. > >Lee > >M15 Puppy #326 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: M_Boats: Water Wts. Date: 24 Oct 1998 17:26:58 -0700 Sea water weights 64 lbs. per cubic foot. That works out close, about 1800 pounds. Thanks Bryan, now I have to find the foam. Lee M15 Puppy #326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Rejoice Date: 24 Oct 1998 22:37:37 EDT Hey gang.........if anybody is interested, I have a used mainsail from my ol' 17. It has a few small tears that can be easily repaired, or just keep it as is for a backup. I was going to send it to that place in Pa. and have it reconditioned.......I've seen their work and it is exquisite.......and reasonable. Make offer + s/h and I will send ups or us mail. Lenny M-23 # 003 Sea Horse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Water Wts. Date: 24 Oct 1998 22:40:09 EDT Lee As an alternative I have heard of using inflatable bladders in lieu of foam. Put 'em in, blow 'em up, and sail away.... Lenny M-23 # 003 Sea Horse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: sparsons@canby.com (Steve Parsons) Subject: M_Boats: Brightwork Date: 24 Oct 1998 20:19:24 -0700 Now that the rain is back in Oregon, it's a fine time to putter on boat projects. I had a nice fire in the shop woodstove, a nip of bourbon and branch water, the tappet brothers on NPR, and my Labrador Retrievers under foot. Every day's a holiday and every meal is a banquet. It could only be better if I was sailing. My thanks to all who responded to my question about refinishing the brightwork on a M15. The oxalic acid works nicely to bleach the teak back to more original colors, and the Cetol Marine looks great. I did pull the toe rails off, and experienced no problems other than fighting with the rock hard bedding compound. I am not sure what was there before, but it's ugly when you try to get it smooth. My boat does not yet have a battery or lights. Any suggestions on this topic? I am also interested in installing a bow pulpit to hang the lights. Does anyone have a source? Regards, Steve M15 - 159 Sojornen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sandyal55@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Brightwork Date: 25 Oct 1998 01:17:37 EDT The old bedding compound(rock hard) was probably 3M 5200. If you use Life Caulk, It doesn't harden and is removeable years later. It also stays flexable and cures without moisture. I've used it in AZ for our trailerable boats and highly recommend it. Sandy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 25 Oct 1998 08:37:49 -0500 Sandy, Thanks for the advice, I really appreciate it. The trip was planned last year but I had to cancell due to family schedules. As you pointed out part of the scheduling problem is to leave enough time in the= schedule so that you can wait out a three day norther rather than risk getting caught out. It's probably a good thing I didn't go last year because I reall= y didn't understand what I was getting into. A person who has made the tri= p in an M17 described beating back to Key West against 6 - 7 ft seas for 35= hrs and having hallucenations! He did not have self steering but even so= thats not a pleasure trip. By the way, a park ranger at Dry Tortugas keep= s an M17 on the Island! This past season I have intentionally gone out in increasingly stronger winds and have learned to enjoy the larger waves up to a point. = The most extreme I have been in so far is 29 kts, measure at a nearby NOA= A bouy, in Nantucket sound with 5 - 7 ft. waves. It was great fun and the M15 did very well but I was free to return to port after a couple of hour= s. = Thanks Doug "Seas the Day" T ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: M_Boats: Re: M-17 Sculling/sweep oar Date: 25 Oct 1998 08:51:33 -0500 Chuck, I certainly agree that sailing without a motor does teach you a l= ot about sailing. I sailed a Tanzer 16 and a Sunfish well of the coast of N= ew England and accross the Chesapeak Bay. These areas have much a more reliable sea breeze than lake Mead. I only had a short canoe paddle as back up and never had to use it. I have always been suprised at how quick sailors with motors are = to turn them on. I have a pair of 7 1/2 ft aluminum oars and I was thinking of cutting them up into two 7 ft sections and joining them with a 4 ft woode= n dowl snuggly fit into both tubes for strength and stiffness. This would also let me break it down and store it inside the boat. Do you think thi= s would work? Thanks, Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: Re: M_Boats: Water Wts. Date: 25 Oct 1998 09:04:33 -0500 Lee, A possible source of closed cell foam and possibly large blocks o= f styrafoam are the Radio Control airplane hobby shops or catalogs. This material is used in the modern models to get precise airfoils using hot wire jigs. I have used the blow up bladders and they work well in areas wher= e abrasion is not a problem. The rough finished fiberglass under the cocpi= t would puncture these pretty fast. Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 25 Oct 1998 09:09:24 -0500 Jerry, I see you received an invite to view an M15 in San Francisco. If= you have a chance do it, you have to see to believe. = I do not know of any other sites but would be willing to email so= me photo's (gif, jpeg or .bmp) if you like. Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Bryan Harstad" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Water Wts. Date: 25 Oct 1998 10:02:00 -0000 When placing the flotation, its best to place it low and toward the outsides, and at both ends of the boat. If you place it in the center, the boat would have a tendency to roll when swamped (this is not a problem with a keel boat, but something to keep in mind if you do something like this for a different type of boat). The flotation only works if its under water when the boat is swamped, if its placed too high, it wont be submerged, and it wont displace water. Ideally you want the flotation placed so that if the boat is swamped, the boat is upright, and the cockpit is no longer taking on water. This way you can start bailing with no new water will going into the boat. -----Original Message----- >Lee, > > A possible source of closed cell foam and possibly large blocks of >styrafoam are the Radio Control airplane hobby shops or catalogs. This >material is used in the modern models to get precise airfoils using hot >wire jigs. > > I have used the blow up bladders and they work well in areas where >abrasion is not a problem. The rough finished fiberglass under the cocpit >would puncture these pretty fast. > >Doug >"Seas the Day" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: SAlm111@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 25 Oct 1998 13:00:01 EST Doug I'd be interested in your photos. Would you mind e-mailing a few my way? Thanks Steve M-15 #402 MOONDANCE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 25 Oct 1998 20:31:09 -0500 Steve, I'm not sure what kind of pictures you like ( I like them all) so= I will send you 3 pictures from a September raft up with an M15 "Seas the Day", an M17 "Bellerin", an M23 "Walkabout" and a 1961 32' Pearson Vangar= d with an Celtic name I could never quite catch. One picture each from the= port side, bow on and stern on. I think they are a very good series of compartive photos. Anyone else interested? Doug "Seas the Day ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: William B Riker <75507.267@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 25 Oct 1998 22:31:30 -0500 Doug, Regarding your rather exciting sailing in Nantucket Sound, I'm interested in your thoughts on sail selection for those conditions. I will be sailing on Lake Erie next season, and it has a reputation for being tricky and quick to anger. I like sailing with plenty of wind, but want to be able to get home when it becomes too much. I would think a storm jib is necessary, and wonder if anyone has tried a storm trysail. My original main, with only one set of reef points, is droopy and ugly when reefed. Maybe a new sail would be okay, even using a second reef. What were you using in 29kts? Bill Riker M-15 #184 Storm Petrel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: suthdrug@rosenet.net Subject: Re: M_Boats: FLOTATION Date: 25 Oct 1998 19:44:58 GMT Dear Doug, I got caught up in the repartee of flotation, densities of sea water, displacement issues, etc. After careful evalution I decided I didn't know anything about any of these things. However, when I came to the last part of your note "Does wine float?", I thought that this was something I could sink my teeth into! I ran to the kitchen sink and immediately filled it with water. I then took a bottle of cabernet savignon out of the wine rack and placed it in the sink and it sank to the bottom immediately. I was surprised and concerned by this result. I mean you have to think of the real consequences of this. Take , for example, that your boat is sinking in a remote position in the Pacific Ocean or maybe Mud Lake. You crawl into your liferaft but not before you release the case of wine you've thoughtfully stored on deck just in case of such an emergency. You sorrowfully watch as your boat sinks away but to add to the horror your wine sinks away even faster! You are looking forward to being stuck in a "dry" boat for weeks maybe even hours on end. To make matters worse it won't even sail! It would be enough to cause even a strong man to snap! I determined at this point to experiment with trying to make the wine float. I first emptied about 4 ounces from the bottle and resealed it with a rubber vacuum cork so the wine wouldn't "go over" from exposure to air. I placed the bottle back in the sink and behold... it sank again. While I was contemplating this phenomena I drank the 4 ounces held out. It was a nice wine and I didn't want it to go to waste. I repeated the experiment by emptying 4 ounces at a time, recorking with the vacuum seal, and placing it in the sink always with the same result! Well at least the wine wasn't going to waste. I was still concerned about the problem ( but not nearly so as when I began for some odd reason...) so I switched to a chardonnay. My reasoning being that a nice light white might float a little better. I continued to experiment on into the evening, or so my wife tells me. I think she was astounded at my dedication to finding a solution. Well somewhere during the evening I must have collapsed from exhaustion from too much thinking for when I woke up in the morning I had a splitting headache. This was undoubtedly from using areas of the brain which hadn't been tapped since my college days. It was unfortunate to find that I must have been so tired I failed to record the data I'm sure I must have obtained. All I could find were some doodlings of islands with palm trees, boats, and some remarkable sketches of what appears to be members of the fairer sex. Don't give up on me though, I intend to get back to business at my earliest opportunity. I want to get this figured out for the greater good of the sailing community. Wish me luck! Ian from Oregon M17 #343 "Seaweeble" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sailcrzy@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Re: M-17 Sculling/sweep oar Date: 25 Oct 1998 22:50:31 EST Doug, Your aluminum oar idea sounds good! Try it out and see what happens. Stowing the oar was always a problem. Try clamping the oar lock to different places until you know which spot works best. Happy rowing! Chuck ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: sparsons@canby.com (Steve Parsons) Subject: M_Boats: Rudder Inspection Time Date: 25 Oct 1998 20:09:07 -0800 As I was puttering with Sojornen this morning, I noticed that the flange that connects the tiller to the rudder connecting rod had lost one of the nuts that holds the flange to the tiller, plus the other was loose. I don't know if anything catastrophic would have happened if the second nut came loose, but I suspect that the rudder would have flipped up a bit. Regardless, it's something to check. If you're missing any, they were 10x32s on Sojornen. Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: ed hiestand Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 25 Oct 1998 21:47:27 -0800 Doug Kelch wrote: > > Steve, > > I'm not sure what kind of pictures you like ( I like them all) so I > will send you 3 pictures from a September raft up with an M15 "Seas the > Day", an M17 "Bellerin", an M23 "Walkabout" and a 1961 32' Pearson Vangard > with an Celtic name I could never quite catch. One picture each from the > port side, bow on and stern on. I think they are a very good series of > compartive photos. > > Anyone else interested? > > Doug > "Seas the Day yes please , I would love to see and compare the three boats side by side. Ed Hiestand hiestec@libby.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: M_Boats: Photos Date: 26 Oct 1998 05:14:03 -0800 Yeah! I'd love to see photos of all the boats. Lee M15 Puppy #326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "L. Ingalls" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Water Wts. Date: 26 Oct 1998 05:23:12 -0800 Doug, Bladders would be ideal, but I think you're right about their being easily punctured. I may have found a source for foam. I'll let you know. Lee M15 Puppy #326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randy_Watkins@odp.tamu.edu Subject: M_Boats: test message Date: 26 Oct 1998 08:10:02 CST hello, wanted to check my connection, thanks R.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randy_Watkins@odp.tamu.edu Subject: M_Boats: hello from R.G. Date: 26 Oct 1998 08:23:13 CST Hello, I wanted to introduce myself to the list, Randy ( R.G. ) Watkins. I recently purchased a M15 ( Lil Bit ) from Dick Ortmeyer here in Texas. I've decided to rename her Crystal Sea. I sail in the central Texas area as well as the Galveston Bay area. I'd enjoy hearing from other Montgomery owners in Texas. Sailing invitation-I'm getting together with some friends for a day sail this Sun. at Lake Conroe, come on out if you're in the area. Randy ( R.G. ) Watkins-College Station, Tx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Dick Allgire Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 26 Oct 1998 09:19:55 -0700 Sure would like to see them. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Keith Diehl" Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 26 Oct 1998 08:25:51 -0700 Doug was kind enough to send these photos to me, and I will post them in the Montgomery gallery on my home page as soon as I can find the time. Please check there towards the end of the week if you're interested. Keith Diehl -- Salt Lake City http://www.xmission.com/~kdiehl ---------- Steve, I'm not sure what kind of pictures you like ( I like them all) so I will send you 3 pictures from a September raft up with an M15 "Seas the Day", an M17 "Bellerin", an M23 "Walkabout" and a 1961 32' Pearson Vangard with an Celtic name I could never quite catch. One picture each from the port side, bow on and stern on. I think they are a very good series of compartive photos. Anyone else interested? Doug "Seas the Day ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Keith Diehl" Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 26 Oct 1998 08:25:51 -0700 Doug was kind enough to send these photos to me, and I will post them in the Montgomery gallery on my home page as soon as I can find the time. Please check there towards the end of the week if you're interested. Keith Diehl -- Salt Lake City http://www.xmission.com/~kdiehl ---------- Steve, I'm not sure what kind of pictures you like ( I like them all) so I will send you 3 pictures from a September raft up with an M15 "Seas the Day", an M17 "Bellerin", an M23 "Walkabout" and a 1961 32' Pearson Vangard with an Celtic name I could never quite catch. One picture each from the port side, bow on and stern on. I think they are a very good series of compartive photos. Anyone else interested? Doug "Seas the Day ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Morris, Giles" Subject: RE: M_Boats: Water Wts. Date: 26 Oct 1998 10:24:40 -0500 >As an alternative I have heard of using inflatable bladders in lieu of foam. >Put 'em in, blow 'em up, and sail away.... The product name "Boat Saver" comes to mind, but I can't find a reference to it on The Net. I saw it at the Annapolis show. Imagine a life raft designed to inflate inside the cabin. Not cheap, but looked well made. Giles Morris Arlington VA M-15 #264 "Umiaq" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Keith Diehl" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Water Wts. Date: 26 Oct 1998 08:57:21 -0700 I think they're called Yacht Saver. They make a family of products. Probably most appropriate for the M17 is a duffel bag that contained a high strength (not easily puncturable -think Zodiac) air bladder and a bottle of compressed air. Pull the string and your boat is unsinkable. Other types have permanently installed deflated bladders and water activated switches. Price, as I recall, started in the $1K range. I think I've got a brochure somewhere that I can dig for if anyone wants an address. Keith Diehl -- Salt Lake City http://www.xmission.com/~kdiehl ---------- > From: Morris, Giles > To: 'montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com' > Subject: RE: M_Boats: Water Wts. > Date: Monday, October 26, 1998 8:24 AM > > >As an alternative I have heard of using inflatable bladders in lieu of > foam. > >Put 'em in, blow 'em up, and sail away.... > > The product name "Boat Saver" comes to mind, but I can't find a > reference to it on The Net. I saw it at the Annapolis show. Imagine a > life raft designed to inflate inside the cabin. Not cheap, but looked > well made. > > Giles Morris > Arlington VA > M-15 #264 "Umiaq" > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Motomike@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: FLOTATION Date: 26 Oct 1998 11:48:41 EST Dear Ian, Your hilarious report about your efforts to discover whether or not wine floats sent me overboard with laughter. I feel compelled to investigate for myself. Thanks, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: rc2222@pacbell.net Subject: M_Boats: Montgomery List Date: 26 Oct 1998 10:04:46 -0800 Keith: How many are on the list? Does anyone know why Captain Kidd hasn't been posting. Rich "Really" M-15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Keith Diehl" Subject: M_Boats: Photos of Raft-up Date: 26 Oct 1998 12:49:07 -0700 Well, my corporate email server is down so I spent my "do email" time updating my home page. (don't tell my boss ) The photos of the M23, M17, and M15 raft-up are there now, as well as a nice picture of an M15 under sail. Thanks to Doug Kelch for the photos. Keith Diehl -- Salt Lake City http://www.xmission.com/~kdiehl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Keith Diehl" Subject: M_Boats: Photos of Raft-up Date: 26 Oct 1998 12:49:07 -0700 Well, my corporate email server is down so I spent my "do email" time updating my home page. (don't tell my boss ) The photos of the M23, M17, and M15 raft-up are there now, as well as a nice picture of an M15 under sail. Thanks to Doug Kelch for the photos. Keith Diehl -- Salt Lake City http://www.xmission.com/~kdiehl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry montgomery Subject: Re: M_Boats: Floatation Date: 26 Oct 1998 14:34:37 +0000 Hi Bryan A cubic foot of fresh water weighs 62.4 lbs, but I have no idea what a cubic yard weighs- possibly more. Jerry Bryan Harstad wrote: > > I was told that a cubic yard is suppose to displace 2000 pounds. > I never confirmed that. All you have to do is find out how much a > cubic yard of water weighs. > > Bryan > > -----Original Message----- > From: L. Ingalls > To: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com > > Date: Saturday, October 24, 1998 2:23 PM > Subject: M_Boats: Floatation > > >Doug, > >Thanks for responding. > >My note was poorly worded; I meant that the only closed cell foam available > >here is the foam-in-place kind, and I don't want to put in anything > >permanent. I'll check out the material you suggested. Seems small > >thought, in cubic feet, that is. This is not really a big deal in San > >Diego. Winds and wave conditions are rarely frightening. I'm used to > >sailing in San Francisco bay, and that can get really hairy. But my mate > >would feel better with a bit of positive buoyancy. > >I may have Puppy ready to go into the water late next week. Really > >looking forward to that. > >Thanks again. > >Lee > >M15 Puppy #326 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry montgomery Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 26 Oct 1998 14:43:35 +0000 Doug- I don't know what you are talking about, but I've been gone for 1 1/2 weeks and haven't gone thru all my messages yet and am taking them in order. Jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry montgomery Subject: Re: M_Boats: FLOTATION Date: 26 Oct 1998 14:50:48 +0000 Ian I tried something similar except that I used whisky, rum, tequilla, etc, and a bathtub. I know what you mean about college days; all I can remember about college are the Sunday morning "voids". Jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Dick Allgire Subject: M_Boats: Monday Date: 26 Oct 1998 17:19:07 -0700 I finished the season at GSL Saturday helping Don Gorder take out his C22 and managed to fall in the lake .... and I tell you, going in with a Michigan sweat shirt, full length trousers including billfold, and running shoes(brand new) is not the best way the celebrate the end of a sailing season....which I guess you missed because I've not seen your flat top there....did note the white one at the south end and a dyllow one facing it. About the dunking....Don and I took a brief turn around the marina before going to the ramp for the pull-out. As we approached the dock at the ramp I stood on the deck forward to hop off and take a line......I don't know how I did it but I stepped right into the water and it isn't easy getting out.....Don gave me a hand but could only get my head and shoulds on the dock and then grabbed my belt and hauled my the rest of the way out....the alternative would have been to paddle over to the ramp and walk out. The water wasn't cold but I banged my knee on something going in and sliced my hand open trying to stop my fall by holding the shroud....not too bad, tho, although I am limping from the banged up knee. Doc Jackson, who has my boat ,happened to have an extra pair of sweat pants and a pair shorts and a dry shirt which I changed into and then went for a brief, windless sail in the Mary L....darned if was going to let a dunking keep from a sail with the season so near the end. So ends the '98 season, for me .....sorry you weren't there for the fun (?) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: KQ4AL Subject: Re: M_Boats: Floatation Date: 26 Oct 1998 18:45:19 -0500 810261845

27 x whatever constant for water (fresh-salt-Salt Lake-Sea of G) Density/weight.




At 14:34 98/10/26 +0000, you wrote:
>Hi Bryan
>
>A cubic foot of fresh water weighs 62.4 lbs, but I have no idea what a
>cubic yard weighs- possibly more.
>
>Jerry
>
>
>Bryan Harstad wrote:
>>
>> I was told that a cubic yard is suppose to displace 2000 pounds.
>> I=A0 never confirmed that.=A0=A0 All you have to do is find out how much a
>> cubic yard of water weighs.
>>
>> Bryan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: L. Ingalls <ingalls@gemini.adnc.com>
>> To: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com
>> <montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com>
>> Date: Saturday, October 24, 1998 2:23 PM
>> Subject: M_Boats: Floatation
>>
>> >Doug,
>> >Thanks for responding.
>> >My note was poorly worded; I meant that the only closed cell foam available
>> >here is the foam-in-place kind, and I don't want to put in anything
>> >permanent.=A0=A0 I'll check out the material you suggested.=A0= =A0 Seems small
>> >thought, in cubic feet, that is.=A0=A0 This is not really a big deal in San
>> >Diego.=A0=A0 Winds and wave conditions are rarely frightening.= =A0=A0 I'm used to
>> >sailing in San Francisco bay, and that can get really hairy.=A0=A0 But my mate
>> >would feel better with a bit of positive buoyancy.
>> >I may have Puppy ready to go into the water late next week.=A0=A0 Really
>> >looking forward to that.
>> >Thanks again.
>> >Lee
>> >M15=A0 Puppy=A0 #326
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>

72 y Paz  Doris and Grover  HA`PENNY WWP-19 #965
          KQ4AL/KE4CYE  Occoquan, VA   38 41' 18" N  77  17' 30"W 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 26 Oct 1998 19:48:33 -0500 Message text written by INTERNET:montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com >Doug, Regarding your rather exciting sailing in Nantucket Sound, I'm interested= in your thoughts on sail selection for those conditions. I will be saili= ng on Lake Erie next season, and it has a reputation for being tricky and quick to anger. I like sailing with plenty of wind, but want to be able = to get home when it becomes too much. = I would think a storm jib is necessary, and wonder if anyone has tried a storm trysail. My original main, with only one set of reef points, is droopy and ugly when reefed. Maybe a new sail would be okay, even using = a second reef. What were you using in 29kts? Bill Riker< Bill, I was using a new (this season)storm jib and a double reefed main= =2E = I had the second reef points put in my 12 yr old main last fall. When th= e work on the jib and main was performed I asked for the storm jib and the second reef to be put in I asked the sailmaker to make the storm jib a little on the large size and to not make the second reef so deep that the= little boat had no power climb the larger seas. The storm jib is very fl= at and the jiffy reefing with both reef points flatens the main quite well. = = I do like the way these sails balance the helm in the high winds.= = The boat was a little over powered cresting the waves when a gust was coming through at about 35 kts but easily handled. Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Gary M. Hyde" Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 26 Oct 1998 16:33:08 -0800 Doug: Yes, I'd be interested in you pictures too! --Gary >Steve, > > I'm not sure what kind of pictures you like ( I like them all) so I >will send you 3 pictures from a September raft up with an M15 "Seas the >Day", an M17 "Bellerin", an M23 "Walkabout" and a 1961 32' Pearson Vangard >with an Celtic name I could never quite catch. One picture each from the >port side, bow on and stern on. I think they are a very good series of >compartive photos. > >Anyone else interested? > >Doug >"Seas the Day ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mont15@aol.com Subject: M_Boats: Re: Re: M_floatation Date: 26 Oct 1998 20:32:25 EST According to Larry Brown in his book "Frugal Yachting" ' Figure roughly one cubic yard of floatation will support a thousand pounds of boat and equipment. If you live in the S.F. Bay area, I can get you the name of a good source. Bert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: chbenneck@juno.com (Conbert H Benneck) Subject: Re: M_Boats: Floatation Date: 25 Oct 1998 17:37:23 -0500 Lee, Go to Home Depot and buy some 4 x 8 foot sheets of styrofoam. This you can cut with a carpenters saw into the sizes needed to fit in the M-15. Then glue the individual planks together to reach the desired thickness, width, and length. Yes, styrofoam is a bit messy - it crumbles into itty bitty balls that fly around the place and attach themselves everywhere, but, it's cheap, and does the job. Don't use the foam-in-place material: you can never remove it short of blasting, or becoming a foam miner - diging it out inch by inch. Connie M-15 LEPPO ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: chbenneck@juno.com (Conbert H Benneck) Subject: Re: M_Boats: FLOTATION Date: 26 Oct 1998 20:53:23 -0500 Hi Ian, Your experiment with the cabernet sauvignon and the chardonnay were the right direction,only you made a fundamental error in your thinking. Everyone who's wife has made him help vacuum the carpets knows that a vacuum is heavier - a lot heavier - than air. By pulling a vacuum in the bottle and recorking it, you kept adding weight. Ian, forget the heavy vacuum and let the light air into the bottle, and you'll find that your half empy bottles of Cabernet will float just fine. But in case of impending shipwreck, remember to put a fishing line on the neck of each bottle and fasten them to your life vest (and don't forget the corkscrew). Then your boat can sink, and you will be afloat with good bottles, and the means for accessing their contents. And from an engineering standpoint, each bottle you drain and recork adds positive bouyancy to you so that you stick further out of the water and therefore can be more readily located by the rescue teams. Salut Connie M-15 #400 LEPPO Glastonbury, CT ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sandyal55@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Re: Re: M_floatation Date: 26 Oct 1998 21:47:18 EST To those interested; water weighs 8.34lb/gal X 7.48 gal/cu.ft. X 27cu.ft/cu.yd = 1684.3464 lbs. I think somebody reported that last week. Sandy PS; I've run water plants for 30 years. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Saltm17@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 26 Oct 1998 23:50:33 EST Doug, Despite the problems I had this year in my Dry Sail to the Dry Tortugas, I'm planning to try again next year. Probably in May again since the water is warmer and the chance of winter storms is much reduced. As the weather gets colder, my planning will get warmer. Hope you can make the trip. John M17 #372 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Saltm17@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 27 Oct 1998 00:03:29 EST Bill, I had a second set of reef points put on the main, and I have a storm jib which is also reefable. I sat at the dock one day when the wind was a true 30 Knots, debating whether I really wanted to go out in that mess. I decided it was the best chance I would ever get, since I was at the dock and put in both reefs in the main under stable conditions. I didn't reef the storm sail. I sailed out from the protection in the harbor, and started screaming along. It was a wild ride, but I found out three things for sure about sailing in winds like that. 1) a boom-vang is almost a neccessity when going down wind 2) the sailboat can go to weather, even hard on the wind under those conditions, and 3) I hope I don't have to go hard on the wind in those conditions. Really, the boat did amazingly well, but the margin for error was just about nil. It would have been much better if there was another, knowledgeable, person on board, if for nothing more than weight on the high side. John M-17 #372 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Dan Diehlman" Subject: M_Boats: Flotation Date: 26 Oct 1998 21:34:11 -0800 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01BE0128.5EE2E400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Connie et All, I'm afraid the experiments with wine bottles will only lead you up a = blind alley. On my boat, I carry no life preservers. Each crew member is assigned two = of the 5 liter wine box containers. If in danger (for which the = parameters vary wildly), you extract the aluminum container from the = box, place the spigot in your mouth and drain the contents....then = without removing the spigot from your mouth, you quickly inflate the = aluminum container orally. Having done this successfully with one, you = place it under one armpit and then proceed to do likewise for the other. = On occasion, especially when there is a lack of wind, we practice = "man overboard"drill. We keep doing it until we "get it right".=20 Dan M15 Etude ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01BE0128.5EE2E400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Connie et All,
    I'm afraid the = experiments=20 with wine bottles will only lead you up a blind alley.
On my boat, I carry no life = preservers. Each=20 crew member is assigned two of the 5 liter wine box containers. If in = danger=20 (for which the parameters vary wildly), you extract the aluminum = container from=20 the box, place the spigot in your mouth and drain the contents....then = without=20 removing the spigot from your mouth, you quickly inflate the aluminum = container=20 orally. Having done this successfully with one, you place it under one = armpit=20 and then proceed to do likewise for the other.
    On occasion, = especially when=20 there is a lack of wind, we practice "man overboard"drill. We = keep=20 doing it until we "get it right".
 
          &nbs= p; Dan=20 M15 Etude
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01BE0128.5EE2E400-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Larry Barkhuff Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 27 Oct 1998 11:34:26 -0500 Doug, I was just catching up on my e mail and saw your post about the raf= t up pix. Do you happen to know who owns the M23 named " Walkabout"? I do= not recall that name boat from my list....I am also trying to get the entire list of 23 owners as I have compiled it, posted for Randy....Larry= Barkhuff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: M-15, M-17 Date: 27 Oct 1998 14:04:41 EST Lzrry I would like a copy of that list too.........I saw another 23 at the sailboat shop the other day..I'll try and find out who the owner of that one is...........al I know for sure is he is from Tucson.............. Lenny M-23 # 003 Sea Horse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randy_Watkins@odp.tamu.edu Subject: M_Boats: spares Date: 27 Oct 1998 13:14:02 CST hello As a new M15 owner I am trying to put together a M15 specific spare part complement. Is there a source for obtain spares as needed. thanks R.G. Watkins ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares Date: 27 Oct 1998 14:49:19 EST Randy A good source for spare parts is West Marine.. Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randy_Watkins@odp.tamu.edu Subject: Re[2]: M_Boats: spares Date: 27 Oct 1998 14:13:49 CST Lenny thanks I'll check them out for some of the general spares. One item I read about in some of the earlier postings were centerboard problems. I don't have this problem ( and hope I don't in the future) but how would you for instance obtain a replacement c/b for a M15? would you have to have one made or is there a source for these critical type parts. thanks, R.G. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Author: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com at #Internet Randy A good source for spare parts is West Marine.. Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Morris, Giles" Subject: RE: Re[2]: M_Boats: spares Date: 27 Oct 1998 15:19:50 -0500 >but how would you for instance >obtain a replacement c/b for a M15? Funny that you should mention that... I had to get a replacement c/b after mine broke. If you haven't already done so, I suggest that you look at the information about M-15 c/bs and c/b pennants, specifically about how the board must NOT be lowered too far. I was lucky enough to need a new board just as Bob Eeg was beginning M-17 production, and the two boards are identical. FWIW: I did briefly consider just getting a steel plate the right shape and width, but was worried about corrosion (how do boats with metal drop keels avoid it?) and excess weight (extra ballast would be nice, but a metal board would be a real joy to raise and lower by hand. Giles Morris Arlington VA M-15 #264 "Umiaq" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randy_Watkins@odp.tamu.edu Subject: Re[4]: M_Boats: spares Date: 27 Oct 1998 14:33:53 CST Giles thanks for the info, I'll be careful lowering & raising, did I understand the M17 ( new models ) & M15 use the same c/b or do you have two boats. Mine is a 1981 model so I don't know exactly what the construction is. thanks R.G. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Author: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com at #Internet >but how would you for instance >obtain a replacement c/b for a M15? Funny that you should mention that... I had to get a replacement c/b after mine broke. If you haven't already done so, I suggest that you look at the information about M-15 c/bs and c/b pennants, specifically about how the board must NOT be lowered too far. I was lucky enough to need a new board just as Bob Eeg was beginning M-17 production, and the two boards are identical. FWIW: I did briefly consider just getting a steel plate the right shape and width, but was worried about corrosion (how do boats with metal drop keels avoid it?) and excess weight (extra ballast would be nice, but a metal board would be a real joy to raise and lower by hand. Giles Morris Arlington VA M-15 #264 "Umiaq" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: William B Riker <75507.267@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 27 Oct 1998 21:14:44 -0500 John, Thanks for the heavy weather info and advice. Sounds like over 30 kts I would need another mainsail option - smaller that a double reefed main. And it would probably add to the comfort factor with wind less than 30. I haven't heard of reef points on a storm jib. Interesting. . . Thanks, Bill Riker M15 #184 Storm Petrel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: sparsons@canby.com (Steve Parsons) Subject: M_Boats: Overtime? Date: 27 Oct 1998 19:02:48 -0800 Hey Gang, I hope I haven't asked this before (geezerdom is here), but does anyone know who owns the M23 named Overtime. I saw it at Waldo Lake this year, and assumed that it was hull #1, but since have been in contact with Gary and Beth Summer, and learned differently. Regardless, if you know the owner, or if you know of a 23 in the Pacific Northwest, please let me know. Regards, Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Doug Kelch Subject: Re: M_Boats: Where is everybody? Date: 28 Oct 1998 17:09:53 -0500 Message text written by INTERNET:montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com >John, Thanks for the heavy weather info and advice. Sounds like over 30 kts I= would need another mainsail option - smaller that a double reefed main. = And it would probably add to the comfort factor with wind less than 30. = I haven't heard of reef points on a storm jib. Interesting. . . Thanks, Bill Riker M15 #184 Storm Petrel< Bill, My M15 does well up to about 35 kts with a storm jib and double reefed main. You always have to pay attention at wind speeds and waves this strong. I would drop the storm jib between 35 and 40 kts and above that I would be looking to heave to (which works well on an M15) or look for something smaller. Doug "Seas the Day" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: Re[2]: M_Boats: spares Date: 28 Oct 1998 18:24:33 EST Randy It's times like that when you find out who your friends really are...........hopefully someone with another M-15..............seriously though, I have heard of " spares " being found.............JM usually has a line on parts and pieces.........although it may not hurt to drop the board one of these days and make a template... Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "John Fleming" Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 28 Oct 1998 17:29:41 -0700 Randy_Watkins@odp.tamu.edu wrote: > Lenny thanks I'll check them out for some of the general spares. One > item I read about in some of the earlier postings were centerboard > problems. I don't have this problem > ( and hope I don't in the future) but how would you for instance > obtain a replacement c/b for a M15? would you have to have one made > or is there a source for these critical type parts. I haven't gotten through all the archives (perhaps some poor soul could distill them into a FAQ), but I did have several experiences with my M-17 centerboard. First, the pivot pin for the centerboard mounted through the keel trunk kept walking out. Just the little back and forth movement of the board while sailing was enough to start it walking out. I could not have done a multi-day sail without risking the centerboard completely falling out of trunk, or something worse. What a disaster that would have been! The shop filled the holes on both sides, glassed them over, and gelcoated. I don't know if that is the preferred response or not (it wasn't necessarily mine), but it's done. Perhaps a better response would have been to have some sort of C-ring insert into a slot at both ends of the pin. With their response, any time the centerboard hoist rigging needs replacing or repairing, we are going to have to find and break into the filled/glassed over holes and push the pin out to drop the board entirely out of the trunk. Second. Before they fixed the first problem, I had the boat hoisted, and the centerboard removed from the keel trunk. I had them inspect the centerboard hoist rigging. The rigging seemed fine, but they noticed that the little metal tab at the back of the centerboard had broken off. This tab, part of the original casting, if it's there, it supposed to rest against a through-pin at the rear and bottom of the centerboard keel trunk, and keep the centerboard from swinging too far forward and damaging the front of the trunk. Apparently, or so the shop said, the tab breaking off is is a common failure, as well as when it does, subsequent damage to the trunk (which mine also had had). To mitigate this, there is a big knot in the centerboard haul up/down line (I forget the exact name!) just inside the companionway, inside the cabin, and at the front top of the centerboard trunk. When the centerboard is fully deployed, the knot rests on the entrance hole to the trunk, and prevents any more forward movement of the centerboard. All you other M-17'ers: is this problem common? Have you had similar experiences? How have you solved the centerboard pivot pin walkout problem? -- Regards, -- John Fleming Systems Engineering Advanced Systems Division ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Randy_Watkins@odp.tamu.edu Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: M_Boats: spares Date: 28 Oct 1998 18:23:23 CST Lenny thanks for the info. R.G. _______________________ Reply Separator _______________________ Author: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com at #Internet Randy It's times like that when you find out who your friends really are...........hopefully someone with another M-15..............seriously though, I have heard of " spares " being found.............JM usually has a line on parts and pieces.........although it may not hurt to drop the board one of these days and make a template... Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: chbenneck@juno.com (Conbert H Benneck) Subject: Re: M_Boats: Flotation Date: 27 Oct 1998 20:56:39 -0500 Dan, Your flotation method with the wine boxes is another example of the truely inspired thinking that sailors do to solve problems. It is an elegant solution to the problem. I will not have anything on board our boat, where I can't find two uses for the item, (three is even better, but I have rarely been able to achieve that goal) and your wine box meets that criteria: it provides drink and sustenance while sailing; and at the same time supplying the means for remaining afloat if the vessel should encounter some form of negative bouyancy disaster, where the Captain desires to keep his head above water. Et voila: drink the wine: inflate the bladder; and happily await your rescue. But Dan, in this situation one should also have a small tray with hors d'oeuvres attached to one's life jacket, so that you have some nibblies to eat while awaiting rescue. Having drunk the wine, you now need a bit of nurishment. I'll supply the idea: you work out the details. Connie ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Natalie Bohnet Subject: M_Boats: Rust in keel sump? Date: 28 Oct 1998 19:38:18 -0700 Hi Everyone, JUst finished reading the heavy weather accounts; are there any additional stories out there, particularly use of storm and/or trysails on M17's? Also, we have noticed what appears to be rust accumulating in the keel sump. We have a 1983 model with a metal centerboard, but are not quite sure what is rusting. Also, we seem to accumulate a small amount of water in the sump regularly. Not sure origin of water. As far as we can tell there are no leaks in the hull or we have not taken water into the cockpit. We have observed some water entering the boat through the centerboard pendant hole, although not a lot. Water always is always contained in the sump. Not a rising leak. Any ideas? Thanks, Nat & Mike "Junior" M17 #365 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John&Kris Subject: Re: M_Boats: Rust in keel sump? Date: 28 Oct 1998 20:51:05 +0000 Natalie Bohnet wrote: > Hi Everyone, > JUst finished reading the heavy weather accounts; are there any additional > stories out there, particularly use of storm and/or trysails on M17's? > Also, we have noticed what appears to be rust accumulating in the keel sump. > We have a 1983 model with a metal centerboard, but are not quite sure what > is rusting. Also, we seem to accumulate a small amount of water in the sump > regularly. Not sure origin of water. As far as we can tell there are no > leaks in the hull or we have not taken water into the cockpit. We have > observed some water entering the boat through the centerboard pendant hole, > although not a lot. Water always is always contained in the sump. Not a > rising leak. > Any ideas? Have you checked the two cockpit drains? Either the hoses, or the glassed-in hose attach pipes? If the hose clamps are too tight, it could have cracked the fiberglass pipe. Or the hoses are leaking. Or you don't have hose clamps. Or there are cracks in the locker exit, or the hull exit. When my '82 M-17 is in the water and sailing, the aft locker is wet with sloshing water, which tells me that the cockpit drain hoses and hull exit holes are continuously below the waterline. It could come from there. If there is a lot of rust, it has to be coming from the centerboard, through a crack in the trunk. You'll have to get in there with a flashlight and carefully inspect the trunk next to the bilge sump. Alternatively, hoist the boat, drop the centerboard completely out, and inspect the entire interior of the trunk, trying to shine bright lights through the hull, one person inside, one outside. Or how about the transom through-hulls for the motor mount? When you are motoring, all that water surging about the mount could leak in. Somewhere along the way, I went out and got two of those big corks for the cockpit drains, that they sell at the boat stores. I have them stored below the quarterberths, but they really need to be tied directly to the drain hoses, so that if there ever were to be a problem, the hull exits or the hoses could be plugged. It's good that you check for leaks. I never really do, I keep forgetting to when I have the boat in the water. And I've never looked directly into the sump. The bilge pump strainer is down there, below the anchor, and once in a while I lift the strainer out to look at it.. I guess I'm afraid that if I squirmed into that space below the cockpit to look directly into the sump, I might never be able to squirm out. And I'm not a big guy. And thanks for helping me out on the nautical name for the centerboard up/downhaul rigging, the "pendant". When I first learned to sail on our M-17, it was always so confusing: "Uh, honey, could you pull on that um, string, there? Which one? Umm, that one. NO! NOT that one! The other one!". It's like learning a foreign language. First you learn it yourself, and then you have to teach the rest of the family. And no yelling or it's going to be an icy day of sailing regardless of the outdoor temperature. Regards, -- John Fleming M-17: "Star Cross'd" fleming-maine@worldnet.att.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John&Kris Subject: M_Boats: Heavy weather sails Date: 28 Oct 1998 21:00:51 +0000 Doug Kelch wrote: > Message text written by INTERNET:montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com > >John, > > Thanks for the heavy weather info and advice. Sounds like over 30 kts I > would need another mainsail option - smaller that a double reefed main. > And it would probably add to the comfort factor with wind less than 30. > > I haven't heard of reef points on a storm jib. Interesting. . . > > Thanks, > Bill Riker > M15 #184 > Storm Petrel< > > Bill, > > My M15 does well up to about 35 kts with a storm jib and double > reefed main. You always have to pay attention at wind speeds and waves > this strong. I would drop the storm jib between 35 and 40 kts and above > that I would be looking to heave to (which works well on an M15) or look > for something smaller. One day I priced out a storm trysail to replace the main. Here in Arizona, it's either light airs, or a front is moving through and it's very squally and gusty. I thought that would be cool, to be out on the lake, and see if I could take 30 gusty knots. Alternately, I dream of Mexico and the sea of Cortez, and I'd hate to be caught in a chubasco. Anyway, a new trysail was $600, so I decided I'd wait until I really do need it. Regards, -- John Fleming M-17: "Star Cross'd" fleming-maine@worldnet.att.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Grove777@aol.com Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 29 Oct 1998 09:44:25 EST have you had any experience in freeing a stuck centerboard...cannot find any obstruction around sides of centerboard...but still it will not drop...any advice would be appreciated ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bob Fisher Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 29 Oct 1998 08:13:59 -0700 I assume it is stuck in the up position. I have had the same problem. The cause on my boat is the roller that the keel rest on when the board is up and the boat on the trailer. It seems that most of the weight is resting on this roller. The bunks support the boat but do not keep sufficient weight off the centerboard in the raised position. Trailering the boat with the stress on the board jams it too far up in the trunk and it will not fall. My solution (albiet not the best) is to carry an 18" piece of rebar and a rubber mallet. When you are ready to drop the centerboard position the rebar against the aft portion of the centerboard in the access hole just below the winch and give it a few hard blows and it will fall. CAUTION! Be sure that your penant has enough slack to let the board come lose but you don't want it to fall on the tang and snap it off. A better solution would be to fabricate rollers on each side of the hull to get the weight off the centerboard. This may not be your problem, but it could be. Jerry M. will have a better answer. Bob Fisher Grove777@aol.com wrote: > have you had any experience in freeing a stuck centerboard...cannot find any > obstruction around sides of centerboard...but still it will not drop...any > advice would be appreciated ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Saltm17@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 29 Oct 1998 16:44:26 EST I had the same problem for a number of years. The weight of the board on the roller was cutting into the roller. I changed the pennant from rope to cable, and marked where the cable at the spot where the tang on the centerboard met the pin. Since then I haven't had a problem with it sticking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bob Fisher Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 29 Oct 1998 15:36:46 -0700 I may be a little dense but how could this reduce the weight of the boat resting on the roller and prevent the center board from being jammed up into the trunk? Bob Fisher Saltm17@aol.com wrote: > I had the same problem for a number of years. The weight of the board on the > roller was cutting into the roller. I changed the pennant from rope to > cable, and marked where the cable at the spot where the tang on the > centerboard met the pin. Since then I haven't had a problem with it sticking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Bryan Harstad" Subject: M_Boats: Diagram of centerboard/trunk mechanism Date: 29 Oct 1998 17:59:49 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01BE0365.EBDD9460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does someone have a diagram of the centerboard/trunk mechanism? I am specifically looking to find out how the rope is routed, and where = it is connected. The rope to my centerboard is old and worn, I might = have to replace it next spring. How do you replace the rope? Has anyone replaced the rope while the = boat is in the water? I have a early 74 (if i remember right) version = of an M17, what else should I check for while down there? ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01BE0365.EBDD9460 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Does someone have a diagram of the=20 centerboard/trunk mechanism?
 
I am specifically looking to find = out how the=20 rope is routed, and where it is connected.   The rope to my=20 centerboard is old and worn,  I might have to replace it next=20 spring.
 
How do you replace the = rope?   Has=20 anyone replaced the rope while the boat is in the water?  I have a = early 74=20 (if i remember right) version of an M17,  what else should I check = for=20 while down there?
------=_NextPart_000_001A_01BE0365.EBDD9460-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sandyal55@aol.com Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 29 Oct 1998 19:16:09 EST I don't own a Montgomery but if the centerboard is sticking out below the fixed keel, when it is retracted, it should not have weight on it. A support should be about an inch under it so that the pennant is lowered after putting the boat on the trailer. The centerboard would then be resting on it's own support separate from the boat's weight. Also, the pennant isn't taking a pounding when going down the highway cause it won't have any weight on it. I've trailered this way for 11 years without trouble. Sandy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Saltm17@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 29 Oct 1998 20:15:07 EST I'm not sure it did, but it did stop the board from hanging up in the trunk. I think the rope was being jamed in ther trunk, but the wire, taking up less space, allowed the board to move higher up into the trunk. In any case, I no longer had a problem with the roller being cut by the board. John M17 #372 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: KGRwheeler@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Diagram of centerboard/trunk mechanism Date: 29 Oct 1998 20:59:57 EST Byran; I replaced my pennant earlier this year. It is a straight shot thru the hull to the cabin. I removed the pin that catches the tang on the board from the keel, had the boat raised by hoist until I could see the connection point then I tied on the new pennant, had the boat lowered onto the trailer and replaced the pin. My pennant was tied to a D shackle that was pinned to the board. I wished I had had a new shackle to install but the old one is working. The only problem I have is I had to raise it to the maximum to clear the trailer roller, this puts the knot in the pennant up against the hull. I think thats why my pennant broke. Incidentally we had no problem gettting the boat back on the trailer with the board down. I think I probably could have launched that way too. Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: sparsons@canby.com (Steve Parsons) Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 29 Oct 1998 18:44:08 -0800 Is this a 15? If so, I have careened the boat on a mudflat, and pulled the board down with a pair of needle nose pliers, plus in nice clean water I've played frog man. Probably the best thing would be to have a small dowel do pass through the hole in the bridge deck, and push it down. Steve >have you had any experience in freeing a stuck centerboard...cannot find any >obstruction around sides of centerboard...but still it will not drop...any >advice would be appreciated > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Robert Becker Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 29 Oct 1998 19:21:44 +0000 I assume you have a M15. When I loaded my M15 on the trailer with the centerboard inadvertently down, the board is pushed up by the trailer frame and the pendant knot drops between the centerboard and keel and wedges the board in the up position. To free it, jack up the bow of the boat on the trailer using a hydraylic jack under the foreward part of the keel, with boards between the jack and boat. When the boat is 3-4" off the trailer, the board should drop free. If not, reach in and tug the pendant or pry down on the board from outside the boat until it drops free, then secure the pendant so the board is in the full raised position. Next time, make sure the centerboard is up when you load it on the trailer. The other thing to remember is to have the centerboard secured in the raised position when you launch. If the board is free, it will drop off the first roller and catch on the aft roller (trailrite trailer) and the boat will not float free. You end up pushing and pulling and cussing and giving a great show for the folks on the dock, until you pull it back on the trailer, climb in and sucure the board in up position, and launch again. Good luck, Bob M15 #208 ---------- > From: Grove777@aol.com > To: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 09:44:25 EST > >have you had any experience in freeing a stuck centerboard...cannot find any >obstruction around sides of centerboard...but still it will not drop...any >advice would be appreciated > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jerry montgomery Subject: M_Boats: Re: Boat in socal Date: 29 Oct 1998 20:13:45 +0000 Hi Tom The original interior on the 17 was the 3-berth, which had a quarterberth on starboard, and a galley across from it on port. The galley seemed to be a good idea at the time (what the market wanted), but most everyone cooks in the cockpit in a boat this size and probably few used it actually for a galley. The value of the galley was the storage under, and also the sink was a great place to keep halyard tails and also to pee in in a lite-air race altho that did require some contortions and it was easy to slip and make a real mess. But the best thing about the three-berth was the cockpit storage aft of the galley. Open the portside cockpit hatch and there was a large compartment that extended to the bottom of the hull, almost to the centerline. A great place for bulky things like the outboard, and the primary anchor and lots of rode (I always anchored the 17 from the cockpit, then walked forward to cleat it off). The four-berth has, on port, a mirror-image quarterberth, which naturally extends aft so that there is no room for cockpit storage. The good side was that there is sitting headroom below, on both side, which the three-berth does not have. In answer to your implied question, you could convert a four berth to a three berth by cutting out the port cockpit storage box, making a access hole for the storage locker. In production, we used a router with a diamond bit, which cuts fiberglass like a hot knife thru butter, but you could make do by using a mandrel with a 3" diameter cutting wheel. Cutting out the aft part of the quarterberth and bonding in the divider that is needed to compartmentalize the locker would be the hard part; there is nothing nastier to work with than old fiberglass. But it could be done. The most recent (3 1/2 berth?) interior is probably the best; instead of the galley there is a short berth (settee) on port, and behind it the cockpit locker, which to me is the important part. It didn't have the storage of the original (under the galley cabinet), and didn't have a sink to pee in, but it did have good sitting headroom on both sides, and the short berth was long enough to sleep a half-grown kid, if you were crazy enough to want one of them along. Better, a good dog, which could sleep on the sole anyway and doesn't require obnoxious music. If I were ambitious enough to try to convert a 4-berth, I would change it to the 3 1/2. If I remember right, we changed to this interior exclusively in the late 80's. The first one of this type was a special order, and the idea of the customer (not me) but as soon as we started on the boat and I realized what a good idea it was, I tried to steal the idea and claim it as my own, but the guy wouldn't let me get away with it. Some people are just naturally uptight. I think I'll put this on the M list because there might be a few who will find it useful, and some might want to comment. Hope you and Jane can join us on the Boundary Waters. Jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Saltm17@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 09:29:22 EST I just read my E-mail to the group. I think I must be drinking - testing that survival floation technique. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Keith Diehl" Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 09:00:57 -0700 My outboard vibrates enough that a drive around the harbor with a small amount of slack in the pennant will free the board when it gets stuck. ---------- > From: Steve Parsons > To: montgomery_boats@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues > Date: Thursday, October 29, 1998 7:44 PM > > Is this a 15? If so, I have careened the boat on a mudflat, and pulled the > board down with a pair of needle nose pliers, plus in nice clean water I've > played frog man. Probably the best thing would be to have a small dowel do > pass through the hole in the bridge deck, and push it down. > > Steve > > >have you had any experience in freeing a stuck centerboard...cannot find any > >obstruction around sides of centerboard...but still it will not drop...any > >advice would be appreciated > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 11:07:42 EST Grove If your board is one of the glass ones it may have a crack and taken on some water...........the board freefalls when the pendant is released...........so.........let out some slack and get under the boat and pull it down to find out what is going on... Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 11:10:40 EST Bob I think I'd be whacking on that roller or changing it out before banging on the board .... Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bob Fisher Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 09:12:19 -0700 Lenny: did that. same result. the boat rests on that roller as it is trailed. AirEvacLen@aol.com wrote: > Bob > > I think I'd be whacking on that roller or changing it out before banging on > the board .... > Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 14:46:49 EST Bob Hmmm............are you sure the keel is retracted all the way into the trunk ? Read something on a previous post about the pendant getting jammed up in the trunk................sounded logical, in a way. You have a 15, or a 17 ? Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bob Fisher Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 13:24:42 -0700 i thought of that as well. the board does not retract all the way up in the trunk, about 1" remains when the boat is loaded on the trailer. I can see the pennant attached to the centerboard when I look down into the trunk from the top just below the winch. I cannot winch it all the way up. Thus, when the boat is trailed it is forced up and jams. I have had a yard lift it and there does not seem to be any obstruction. I have M-17 #373. AirEvacLen@aol.com wrote: > Bob > > Hmmm............are you sure the keel is retracted all the way into the trunk > ? > > Read something on a previous post about the pendant getting jammed up in the > trunk................sounded logical, in a way. You have a 15, or a 17 ? > > Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 17:47:20 EST Bob When you had your boat lifted, did you try raising and lowering the board? Seems like there is something, maybe a burr on the board or a blem in the trunk preventing it from retracting all the way................ Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bob Fisher Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 30 Oct 1998 16:32:11 -0700 Lenny: you may be on to something. The first time this happened, ( I had just purchased the boat) I could not get the board to drop. So we sailed with it up. Had a blast! I took the boat to Driscoll Marine in San Diego. They lifted the boat and the board dropped. Again last year and this when i launched the board would not drop and this necessitated my solution which does work but is not the best solution. It does not harm the board. I keep the pennant whinched and just enough slack so that it will loosen. AirEvacLen@aol.com wrote: > Bob > When you had your boat lifted, did you try raising and lowering the board? > Seems like there is something, maybe a burr on the board or a blem in the > trunk preventing it from retracting all the way................ > > Lenny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Grove777@aol.com Subject: Re: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 31 Oct 1998 12:30:00 EST ...found a 97 cent solution to stuck centerboard...purchased a 3/16 steel rod from true value hardware...slip the rod down the pennant tube to top of centerboard and tap lightly with hammer...free at last as they say ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bob Fisher Subject: Re: M_Boats: spares - centerboard issues Date: 31 Oct 1998 13:28:54 -0700 That is precisely what I do. Grove777@aol.com wrote: > ...found a 97 cent solution to stuck centerboard...purchased a 3/16 steel rod > from true value hardware...slip the rod down the pennant tube to top of > centerboard and tap lightly with hammer...free at last as they say ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Larry Barkhuff Subject: M_Boats: Diagram of centerboard/trunk mechanism Date: 31 Oct 1998 16:36:57 -0500 Is it my machine, or do the messages from some of the subscribers not wr= ap around when they are posted? Specifically the lnote from Bryan about the= centerboatd and hooisting pendant????? Anthing we can do??? Larry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Larry Barkhuff Subject: M_Boats: Overtime? Date: 31 Oct 1998 16:36:59 -0500 Steve, (alias geezer) I do not know about the 23 Overtime, but Gary and= Beth Sumner have a 23 in Pertland Ore. Their Ph num is 541=3D484=3D2768.= =2E.This is Hull #1 and I understand from Bob E that Gary has done some serious improvements to the boat, new oval portlights, rework on interior ( Gary = is 6'2" or so) and other things.. Bob saw the boat I think In Newport.......BTW, this time I typed the phone number correctly.....Larry= B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Larry Barkhuff Subject: M_Boats: 23 Owners List Date: 31 Oct 1998 17:15:26 -0500 To Randy, and any others interested: This is the 23 owners list as I ha= ve acquired names and locations over the past couple years: 1. Gary Sumner and Beth Wilner 1658 E. 24th Ave. Eugene, Oregon, 974= 03 541-484-2768 This is the #1 hull, and is the photo boat on the brochure, with I think, Jerry and Lyle, and an as yet unidentified lady. 2. Nick Honodel 1012 Cosimany Place, West River Md. 20778 = 410-867-1896 3. Michael Leonard 3819 E. Bellvue Ave. Tucson, Az 85716 4. Harvey Zeligman, M.D. 6860 E Roch Canyon Ridge Rd. Tucson, Az 8575= 0 5. Babe Logan This is an owner finished boat. Boat was moved to a reservioir in Calif and address is not known at this time 6. Randy Palmer 420 Lake Road, Altoona, Wi. 54720 715-836-9077 = This boat has been sold to a new owner... 7. Tony Kozlik 2936 W. Morrow Drive, Phoeniz, Az 85027 8. Richard Lane 2137 Washington St #12 Port Townsend, Wa 98368 = 360-385-6686 560 Palo Allto Ave, Mountain View, C= a = 94941 415-967-0417 9. Dave Davanzati The Ships Store, 5043 E. Speedway Tucson, Az 85712 = 1-800-699-1290 Boat is reportedy for sale This may be the black and white Skunk boat 10. Cliff Halverson HC 69 Box 149R Isle, Mn. 56342 11. Robert Mann 9700 Portland Ave,. #334 Bloomington Mn. 55420 = MMP230740179 612-885-0909 formerly Big Bird (yellow boat) 12. Michael Rafferty Chula Vista, Calif 714-636-4018 Summer Solstice,,,,this may be the boat sold to new owner in Arizona 13. Bill Wehrs 2202 Barnabee Rd. LaCrosse Wis 54601 608-785-8103 = = 608-787-5810 Red Hull, "Paprika" boat reportedly for sale In addition, the second issue of the newsletter reported news about two boats in Sausalito, in a marina there and John went to see one. No news about the ownrs was uncovered. There was a blud hull boat on Lake Pleasant, in Phoenix, and seen by Tony Kozlik when he has his boat there.= = Richard Lane reported knowledge about a boat in Puget sound with steering= gear attached. I found an ad in a boat trader in Florida last year listi= ng a 23 for sale in the Fort Myers area. It has been sold and is re[ortedly= still in the area, and had no trailer. As I understand it, there were 20 of the boats made by Jerry and one made= by an employee who worked on the sly and sort of stole a boat.....any comments Jerry????? I just sold the power boat I spent last year rebuilding and repowering, a= nd now have started new project on another.. When this one goes away, I thi= nk I may have to look for another 23 to play with...... Larry Barkhuff = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Bryan Harstad" Subject: Re: M_Boats: Diagram of centerboard/trunk mechanism Date: 31 Oct 1998 18:01:55 -0000 Some where in your mail program, there is an option to turn word wrap on. Happy hunting ******************** Bryan Harstad Eden Prairie, MN ******************** -----Original Message----- >Is it my machine, or do the messages from some of the subscribers not wrap >around when they are posted? Specifically the lnote from Bryan about the >centerboatd and hooisting pendant????? Anthing we can do??? Larry > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: AirEvacLen@aol.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Diagram of centerboard/trunk mechanism Date: 31 Oct 1998 20:30:44 EST Larry Thanks for the list of 23's..............for an update, I now own #003 .......purchased from Michael Leonard in Tucson, formerly owned by Tom Vanatta in Tucson.............. Leonard W. Smith 421 S. Lake Mirage Dr. Gilbert, Az. 85233 I can be reached at: AirEvacLen@aol.com Lenny